commented:
So that's a DSL as in "a s-expression wrapper around an existing
language", adding a layer of indirection. There's also "DSL" as in "my
program's functions and control structures morph into my application's
own little language", in theory bringing expressiveness and
conciseness. I think that in practice the lisp syntax (or lack
therefore) allows to quickly have the feeling you're using your own
DSL, even if you're only using functions and maybe one simple macro. I
don't think I was illuminated by "the power of DSLs" so far. Maybe
that'll come. The one good freeing feature is code-is-data-is-code
(and the CL environment 8-) ).
.