URI:
  TEXT View source
       
       # 2025-06-30 - True Biz by Sara Nović
       
           True biz (adj./exclamation; American Sign Language):
           really, seriously, definitely, real-talk
       
       I almost quit reading this book because it felt so harsh in the
       beginning. I am glad i stuck with it, because it tells an interesting
       story. I think that harshness was an unrelenting realism, true to the
       title.  This book is a coming of age story about a Deaf girl who is
       growing up in a blighted community.  In many ways she is profoundly
       unprivileged.  She has a bad cochlear implant and suffers language
       deprivation and behavioral problems.
       
       This book is educational in multiple ways.  There is some overlap
       between True Biz and Deaf Utopia, but they are very different kinds
       of books.  Both books are personal and have lessons about Deaf
       culture and history.  Deaf Utopia is more autobiographical and has a
       decided focus on the author's life.  True Biz is fiction and felt to
       me like it had a more expansive scope, giving a stronger, starker
       vision of Deaf community.
       
   DIR Deaf Utopia
       
       What follows are interesting excerpts from the book.
       
       > Those who are born deaf all become senseless and incapable of
       > reason. --Aristotle, 384-322 BCE
       
       > Those who believe as I do, that the production of a defective race
       > of human beings would be a great calamity to the world, will
       > examine carefully the causes that lead to the intermarriages of the
       > deaf with the object of applying a remedy.
       > --Alexander Graham Bell, 1883
       
       > A manufacturer of amazing medical devices known as cochlear
       > implants, which restore hearing to the deaf, sold defective
       > implants to young children and adults for years--even after
       > learning that a significant number of the devices had failed.
       > --NBC News, March 14, 2014
       
       * * *
       
       There was a theory among linguists that the brain's capacity for
       language learning--language as a concept, a modality for thought--is
       finite.  Scientists called the period from ages zero to five the
       "critical window," within which a child had to gain fluency in at
       least one language, any language, or risk permanent cognitive damage.
       Once the window shut, learning anything became difficult, even
       impossible--without a language, how does one think, or even feel?
       
       The critical window remained "theoretical," mostly because
       intentionally depriving children of language was deemed by ethicists
       too cruel an experiment to conduct.  And yet, February saw the
       results of such trials every day--children whose parents had feared
       sign language would mark them, but who ended up marked by its
       absence.  These children had never seen language as it really was,
       outside the speech therapist's office, alive and rollicking, had
       never been privy to the chatter of the playground or around the
       dinner table.
       
       There was no reason assistive technology and sign language should be
       an either-or-affair; time and time again some of her strongest
       students proved that, when it came to language, more is more.  Often
       when she found herself in pedagogical arguments with fellow
       administrators across the district, she put it this way: imagine
       telling someone that learning French would ruin their kid's English,
       hurt their brain.  Usually people scoffed at her and February would
       nod.  It /did/ sound ridiculous.  And yet, though fear of
       bilingualism in two spoken languages has been dismissed as xenophobic
       nonsense, though it was now desirable for hearing children to speak
       two languages, medicine held fast to its condemnation of ASL.
       
       * * *
       
       February had been born on the edge of East Colson in her family's
       blue clapboard house, in the back bedroom that would later become her
       own. ...
       
       February's mother was slight and asthmatic and would certainly have
       benefited from some medical oversight during labor, but she had long
       made up her mind to have her baby at home.  It would be much scarier,
       even dangerous, to give birth in a place where no one knew sign
       language.  The Deaf community was replete with hospital horror
       stories, particularly of the labor and delivery variety.  Her
       mother's friend Lu had been wheeled into the OR without anyone
       telling her that she was about to have a cesarean; a woman down in
       Lexington had died of a blood clot after nursing staff ignored her
       complaints of pain she'd scrawled on a napkin.  The Americans with
       Disabilities Act, which would mandate that hospitals provide
       accommodations to deaf patients, was still more than a decade away.
       So February's mother wasn't taking any chances--if she couldn't have
       an epidural, at least she would know what the hell was going
       on.
       
       * * *
       
       # Ear Vs Eye: Deaf Mythology
       
       Eyeth--get it?
       
       In the Deaf storytelling tradition, utopia is called Eyeth because
       it's a society that centers the eye, not the ear, like here on
       Earth.
       
       In the Deaf world, there's a famous story about a utopian planet
       where everyone signs and everything is designed for easy visual
       access.  In some tellings, hearing people are the minority and learn
       to conform to the majority sign language, in others the planet is
       completely Deaf.  Have any of you seen an Eyeth story?
       
       Eyeth may be a pun, but it's not a joke--it's a myth.
       
       ## Myth (N):
       
       1. a traditional story that reveals part of the worldview of a
          people, or embodies the ideals and institutions of a society
       
       2. parable; short ficticious story that illustrates a moral attitude
          or principle
       
       The importance of Eyeth in Deaf culture is twofold.  First, it
       highlights the things we value: sign language, communication,
       accessibility, community.  It expresses our dreams: equality, a
       special place to call our own free from the demands of hearing
       society, recognition of our culture.
       
       Eyeth is also important because it reinforces Deaf culture as a
       culture.  Storytelling and myths are an important part of what makes
       us human and a common thread across all kinds of ethnic groups.
       
       ## Did You Know?
       
       * Deaf scholars have proven that Deafness meets the requirements to
         be considered an ethnicity.
       
       * Historically this was the common view before oral education nearly
         eradicated sign languages.
       
       * Even Alexander Graham Bell, who wanted to rid society of deafness,
         spoke of "a race of Deaf people."
       
  HTML Eyeth by Kelsey Young
       
       * * *
       
       In education, like everything in America, money ruled the day, and
       Deaf education had been hyperstratified by the rise of the cochlear
       implant.  Wealthier kids whose parents could pay out-of-pocket for
       surgery and rehabilitative therapies often found success in the
       mainstream; kids whose families couldn't pay stayed deaf.  But even
       as a shift in Medicaid coverage meant access to the device itself
       increased, access to the therapies and educational resources didn't.
       The hearing world was shocked to find that the working-class kid of a
       single mom who couldn't stay home and funnel practice sounds into his
       head, or drive him to countless therapy appointments all day, was not
       "cured" as the implant sales reps had promised.  Those kids often
       wound up back at Deaf schools only now with vast cognitive deficits.
       The more vulnerable her student body was, the less politicians cared,
       or even pretended to care, about their fate.  She wrote to the new
       legislators anyway, but seldom heard [ha ha] back.
       
       * * *
       
       In the late 19th century, manual language versus oral communication
       for deaf children was a hot topic of debate among educators, embodied
       by Thomas H. Gallaudet, the cofounder of the American School for the
       Deaf, and your friendly neighborhood eugenecist, Alexander Graham
       Bell.
       
       Gallaudet, who'd learned sign language from French teacher of the
       deaf Laurent Clerc, had seen the success of signing Deaf schools
       firsthand in France, making him a strong proponent of signed
       languages.  But Bell believed deaf people should be taught to speak,
       and sign language should be removed from Deaf schools.
       
       Q: Why would a man with a deaf wife and mother want to eradicate sign
          language?
       
       A: Eugenics
       
       In his words:
       
       > Those who believe as I do, that the production of a defective race
       > of human beings would be a great calamity to the world, will
       > examine carefully the causes that lead to the intermarriages of the
       > deaf with the object of applying a remedy.
       > --Alexander Graham Bell, 1883
       
       Eugenics was a popular pseudoscience at this time in the U.S., and
       Bell was a big advocate.  The belief was used to justify the forcible
       sterilization of disabled people, a program that Hitler admired and
       is said to have learned from.
       
       Bell was against forced sterilization himself, but instead believed
       getting rid of sign language was the key to eradicating deafness.
       Without sign, deaf people would integrate into the general population
       rather than marry one another, thereby producing fewer deaf babies.
       
       Besides his ethics, Bell's actual science was wrong--most deafness
       isn't directly hereditary--but his ideas remain prevalent in deaf
       education circles today.
       
           Delegates At The Milan Conference In 1880
           -----------------------------------------
           
           Hearing: 163
           Deaf:      1
       
       In 1880, educators gathered in Milan, Italy, to discuss the state of
       deaf education.  The delegates had been handpicked by the oralist
       society sponsoring the conference with the express goal of
       eliminating manual language from schools.
       
       The conference passed eight resolutions, effectively banning signed
       language from schools for the deaf around the world for about 80
       years.  Some schools, including the school that would become
       Gallaudet University, pushed back against the resolutions, but most
       adopted them.
       
       ## Milan's First Resolution:
       
       The Convention, considering the incontestable superiority of
       articulation over signs in restoring the deaf-mute to society and
       giving him a fuller knowledge of language, declares that the oral
       method should be preferred to that of signs in education and the
       instruction of deaf-mutes  (Passed 160-4)
       
       ## Milan's Second Resolution:
       
       The Convention, considering that the simultaneous use of articulation
       and signs has the disadvantage of injuring articulation and
       lip-reading and the precision of ideas, declares that the pure oral
       method should be preferred  (Passed 150-16)
       
       Where Milan's resolutions were implemented, deaf children were
       forbidden from using sign language in the classroom or outside of it.
       As punishment, hands were tied down, rapped with rulers, or slammed
       in drawers.  The period between 1880 and 1960 is considered the dark
       age of deaf education.
       
       In the U.S., the National Association of the Deaf, founded in 1880 in
       response to the conference, became the first disability rights
       organization, and was and is run by Deaf people.
       
       Worried that ASL would become extinct, they also used brand-new film
       technology to document the language, making some of the earliest
       recordings of their kind.
       
           Milan's Legacy
           --------------
           
           1. Deaf teachers removed from schools because they cannot teach
           orally
           
           2. Deaf students language deprived, no deaf role models
           
           3. Fewer successful deaf professionals
           
           4. Deafness further stigmatized
              Point 4 creates a feedback loop returning to point 2.
       
       In the U.S., eugenics became unpopular after it was associated with
       Nazism.  Subsequent deaf education conferences have apologized for
       the harm done by the Milan resolutions.  Science has proven ASL is a
       fully realized language, and that its use does not inhibit the
       learning of speech.  Nevertheless, the shadow of eugenics persists in
       medicine and education today.  The Alexander Graham Bell Association
       continues to advocate for the pure oral method of educating deaf
       children.
       
       author: Nović, Sara, 1987-
  TEXT detail: gopher://gopherpedia.com/0/Sara_Novic
       LOC:    PS3614.O929 T78
       tags:   book,deaf,fiction,queer
       title:  True Biz
       
       # Tags
       
   DIR book
   DIR deaf
   DIR fiction
   DIR queer