URI:
       MONO, POLY, WHATEVER
       
       Overview
       ------------------------------------------------------------
       A rambled musing on relationships. Mildly coherent.
       
       
       The core
       ------------------------------------------------------------
   IMG iillustration-1.png
       
       In my core I believe people are good and well
       intended. Maybe I don't always see that goodness in people,
       but it's what I believe. I like this belief because it lets
       me approach the world in an open and positive manner. I also
       believe that people want to make connections in the world,
       and that these connections happen in many different ways. We
       make connections that are friendly, romantic, sexual,
       platonic, and/or intellectual. Often, these connections are
       turned into a framework: best friend, lover, partner,
       mentor, and so on.
       
       
       Getting hurt
       ------------------------------------------------------------
   IMG iillustration-5.png
       
       Hurt is inevitable in any connection. Anyone can hurt me. A
       friend can do it just as well as a partner. I don't like
       getting hurt. Being dumped hurts, and it hurts to try to
       understand why I was dumped, and why someone wants to be
       with someone else, and why someone doesn't have the same
       love for me as I do for them. Fundamentally, I want people
       to be with the people they want to be with. So fundamentally
       I'm actually OK if a (ex)partner wants to be with someone
       else in a different capacity. If either I can't understand
       or can't accept their reasons, all I can do is accept this
       fact. And all I can do is be happy for them for their new
       path and, if agreeable, and find a new way to carry down our
       own path together (how long does it take for ex-lovers to
       become best friends?)
       
       
       Collision
       ------------------------------------------------------------
   IMG iillustration-2.png
       
       All of these thoughts and feelings and beliefs for me
       collide into a single concept: commitment. For me, what the
       relationship is called is secondary to how it breathes; for
       me, it should breathe with commitment. A commitment to be
       open, to be emotionally present, to work through conflict,
       to love and show kindness, and to create, agree upon, and
       respect each other's boundaries. The qualities of commitment
       are important in any and every relationship, and they're
       truly always present in the relationships that survive. For
       me, really and finally, this is all that matters. And it's
       from here that I find strength to create many types of new
       relationships.
       
       
       Common carry
       ------------------------------------------------------------
   IMG iillustration-6.png
       
       Unfortunately, starting new relationships is difficult. I
       come into a relationship along my unique trajectory with my
       particular satchel of experience. As I lay the particulate
       before me and in front of a new boo, there may be particles
       that appear to them unfamiliar, threatening, or
       frightening. Hopefully, too, some particles appear exciting,
       enticing, and loving. Commitment figures its way into a
       budding romance just as it defines a long lasting
       union. From the start there is a commitment to be together
       openly on new ground, examining new behaviours, reactions,
       reflections and challenges. What particle from my satchel
       will I add to our common carry? What will they add? If two
       particles are incompatible can we get along with our journey
       all the same?
       
       
       Frameworks
       ------------------------------------------------------------
   IMG iillustration-4.png
       
       Relationships end. They always do. It could be death, or
       something more exacting but diffuse like a growing distance,
       a new interest, or a breach of trust. The constant is that
       one way or another they'll be over. But that's not a bad
       outcome, it's not something to avoid. For me, finding a
       framework that allows me to move through the changing
       features of a relationship in a positive way is most
       important. It's corny, but I do believe that /all endings
       are also new beginnings/. It's difficult to stomach the hurt
       that results from a framework disruption. For a while, the
       feelings may be inverse to how the relationship began. Not
       happy, but sad. Not elated, but defeated. Not hopeful, but
       despondent. Is this inevitable? Maybe.
       
       
       What I want
       ------------------------------------------------------------
   IMG iillustration-7.png
       
       I want to love the people in my life. I want to be
       emotionally and physically available to these people--my
       loved ones--in ways that are appropriate, honest, and
       reciprocle. I want to feel my feelings freely and act on
       them responsibly. I want to be surrounded by people who are
       not threatened by what they don't understand. I may not be
       able to explain what brings me joy and pleasure, fulfilment
       and connection. And I want that to be OK. All the same, I
       want to participate as active player eager hearer of what
       brings my loved ones their own sense of love. I imagine
       these wants like a dinner with many people gathered
       around. Each person at the table representing a different
       part of myself: the part that grows and learns, the part
       that laughs and cries, the part that desires and endeavors,
       the part that touches and is touched. My loved ones bring
       these parts out of me. /They are these parts of me/. And I'd
       never want to find myself seated at a table without one more
       seat, one more meal, for that part of myself who has yet to
       arrive and has yet to be loved.
       
       
       Love
       ------------------------------------------------------------
   IMG iillustration-8.png
       
       I've been through frameworks of monogamy and polyamory. I've
       become frustred by not being understood by monogamists who
       can't grasp polyamory, and polyamorists who can't grasp
       monogamy (I've also been that stubborn monogamist, and I've
       been that stubbord polyamorist.) Returning to fundamentals,
       I believe the /existence of love/ is what's important, not
       /what that love is called/. The framework--monogamy,
       polyamory--is simply the protective shell that's used to
       insulate its inhabitants from getting hurt, which is ironic
       because that hurt usually happens from the inside-out, not
       the outside-in. All of this leaves me feeling that whatever
       I call the relationship doesn't really matter. I've called
       it a friendship, partnership, cohabitation,
       whatever. Mostly, though, I've always found myself just
       wanting to call it love.