URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sinclair Spectrum Vega Plus Console
  HTML https://zxvegaplus.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Vega Plus Development
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 278--------------------------------------------------
       (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: milinks Date: November 29, 2016, 9:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is the post of the interview with RCL published by the
       Inquirer 28th November 2016, put here for ease of reading, and
       opinions etc...
       The original page article can be found HERE.....
  HTML https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2478567/zx-spectrum-vega-production-is-delayed-as-rcl-hopes-for-christmas-release
  HTML http://www.theinquirer.net/IMG/617/357617/spectrum-vega-atic-atac-370x229.jpeg
  HTML https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2478567/zx-spectrum-vega-production-is-delayed-as-rcl-hopes-for-christmas-release
       [RETRO COMPUTERS LIMITED (RCL)
  HTML http://retrocomputerslimited.com
       has confirmed that there is to
       be a further delay to the ZX Spectrum Vega+, the handheld
       version of last year’s ZX Spectrum Vega, a recreation of the
       iconic 8-bit computer.
       The problem was revealed on Friday night on the project’s
       Indiegogo
  HTML https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-sinclair-zx-spectrum-vega-plus-console-games#/<br
       />page. The team explained that playtesters had identified a
       problem with one of the buttons in the small production run that
       had already taken place, which led to the decision to pause the
       full-scale production, pending a change to the component. RCL
       will also retroactively fit the new button to consoles already
       manufactured.
       The statement said: "Assembling and playing with these first
       units we identified an improvement we believed was essential to
       the Vega+ gaming experience. An improvement that would make the
       feel of the product far better, including a correction in the
       design of one of the buttons making it more robust and able to
       withstand the rigours of extended game-play.
       "This change has caused a brief delay while we improved the
       product and we have now completed the necessary revisions. We
       have also produced the first batch of custom made modified
       buttons and will be spending the next few days manufacturing
       units, using the already completed electronics and the newly
       modified buttons. As soon as we have completed the necessary
       tests to ensure that the revised Vega+ is now perfect, we will
       be able to announce our delivery schedule."
       This latest delay has caused understandable disquiet amongst
       backers, fuelled by an ongoing campaign of "extremist" social
       media activity including Twitter and Facebook attacks making
       claims that the project is in trouble, including personal
       attacks on members of staff and allegations of bad business
       practice strenuously denied by RCL and its staff.
       Whilst the INQUIRER is keen not to give this sort of thing
       oxygen, we are keen to make sure that the facts as we understand
       them are crystal clear. Some commenters have implicated us,
       suggesting that we "lied" because we quoted RCL as being able to
       offer a delivery date of "days not weeks", which was true at the
       time that we attributed the quote, but for various reasons has
       now slipped.
       We were also accused of Reviewing
  HTML http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/review/2476479/zx-spectrum-vega-hands-on-review<br
       />a prototype, not a production model. Both these claims have be
       en
       fanned by a small group of Twitter users whose accounts seem in
       most cases only to be used for anti-RCL Tweets.
       We'd also point out that we described it as a "hands-on", which
       is a term that the INQ has used for the past fifteen years to
       differentiate between an initial review in situ (such as the
       launch) as opposed to a full review.
       We spoke to Suzanne Martin, Managing Director of RCL and asked
       her to clarify some of the burning questions from backers.
       Firstly, that version of the console we reviewed. Do you still
       say that was a production model?
       "It was a short, initial production run. Some of the units were
       given to testers, and a group of young gamers, it was them who
       pointed out the problem with the component."
       Why didn’t the INQUIRER spot this problem?
       "You only had the console for an hour to review. The problem is
       to do with extended use and long-term durability and so it was
       those playing for hours at a time that picked it up".
       What happened to the rest of the production models in that first
       batch?
       "They are being adapted with the new buttons too."
       And is the full production run in progress?
       "No, we have paused for further testing. It won’t restart until
       we are happy with the product. It’s frustrating, for us too, but
       we’d rather it went out to backers as the best product it can
       be."
       So does that mean Christmas delivery is off the table?
       "We still hope to get some units out before Christmas, but being
       completely honest, we can’t promise that until we get the test
       results back this week.
       "This was a completely unforeseen incident at the last possible
       moment. This is the nature of a start-up business in the
       consumer electronics arena, and given some of the things that
       have happened between the Vega and the Vega+, it’s a credit to
       the team that it’s nearly ready at all, though we’re very sorry
       to the backers that we’ve slipped from our original projected
       delivery date.
       "Even big companies like Apple and Nintendo have delays – the
       difference with crowd-funding the delays are public”
       What sort of "things?"
       "We can’t talk about a lot of it as there are legal proceedings
       in progress. But much of the story is documented already
  HTML http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2467530/specwars-accusations-fly-as-the-world-of-retro-zx-spectrum-gaming-gets-ugly<br
       />and more will come to light later. Our advice is that
       'post-truth' applies to the Vega+ story. Don’t assume everything
       you hear about us is true.
       "We’re still determined to bring you the product and make it the
       best it can be. Unfortunately, we are being actively hampered by
       an orchestrated internet hate campaign, legal red tape, and we
       are in the process of recovering a sum of money which is
       unaccounted for in relation to sales of the original Vega – this
       relates to the period before I took over as Managing Director."
       Eeek! But what about customer money?
       "It’s safe. It was ringfenced from the beginning and anything
       you hear otherwise is completely untrue. The disputes are about
       the proceeds from the original Spectrum Vega. Retail of the
       Vega+ will happen after all the backers have their machines.
       "In the meantime, the £20,000 donation we made to Great Ormond
       Street Hospital was made from profits from the original machine.
       We intend to honour our pledge to continue donating part of RCL
       profits in relation to the sales of the Vega to them.”
       One other matter of concern is that when there have been
       problems, comments have been deleted from your Indiegogo page.
       Generally, that’s not the done thing.
       "True. It’s not something we do lightly. Much of what has been
       deleted is rude, multiple posts (sometimes over 100), attacks on
       other backers and offensive. Some of it comes from elements that
       are not only known to us, but to Indiegogo as trollers and
       spammers.
       "We’ve worked closely with Indiegogo over what we should do and
       are only deleting posts that break their community guidelines,
       after confirming with Indiegogo that it was the right course of
       action.
       "Anyone who leaves constructive criticism, questions or concerns
       will be respected, but we can't promise to respond directly to
       them all individually. We also get bucket loads of supportive
       messages telling us that people want the product to be right and
       not rushed."
       The main complaint is the lack of communication over a delivery
       date. What do you say to those people?
       "The delivery date was set pre-resignation of the original
       management team. Because of this we had to start from scratch as
       none of the previous work was handed over.
       "We have been cautiously optimistic throughout the production
       period. Imagine if we’d given a delivery date of this week and
       then found the button issue? People would be understandably
       angry about that instead.
       "We've opted to stop giving delivery dates until we are 110 per
       cent certain that we are going to meet them.
       "What we do want to make clear is that we’re all working harder
       than you can ever know to get you the console in a form that’s
       worthy of your investment as soon as possible and thank those
       who have kept the faith despite understandable frustration.
       "We’re genuinely as sorry as anyone for the delay. We’re also
       sorry on behalf of all those spreading the misinformation that
       is floating around, and we’re sorry that we can’t currently
       explain why in more detail.
       "We will deliver. It will be brilliant. In the meantime, don’t
       believe everything you read elsewhere on the internet. This
       remains a labour of love for all involved and we are passionate
       about exceeding your expectations."
       Retro Computers Limited (RCL) has asked us to point out that two
       former directors of the company have publicly distanced
       themselves from the Spectrum Vega project and are now trading as
       Retro Games Limited (RGL), a separate business with no
       connection. As such they do not speak for RCL or the Vega or
       Vega+ brand. µ
       #Post#: 279--------------------------------------------------
       Re: (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: Peeto Date: November 30, 2016, 4:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Now her answers looks professional and diplomatic. Suzanne
       Martin looks like right person. Can we clone her to have more
       Suzanne Martin at RCL ?
       #Post#: 286--------------------------------------------------
       Re: (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: IngDuenas Date: December 2, 2016, 2:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello guys,
       I agree with the article, I think RCL's explanations are
       reasonable. RCL posted today just a video and of course it
       started another chain of requests for refunds, complains, etc. I
       just had it with those guys so I guess I sort of lost it when I
       posted in the Vega+ crowfunding page :)
       RCL is almost there, we can see it and if it miserabily fails
       (what seems unlikely at this point) so be it, some of us waited
       30 years for something like the Vega to show up, is it not worth
       waiting a little longer?
       Being a developer myself I understand how bad the RCL folks must
       feel, I guess because of the money involved they thouht to do
       this out of love for the Speccy and nothing more. I know if I
       were in their shoes I would have refunded the complainers just
       to stop with the negative comments.
       Cheers,
       Jav
       #Post#: 288--------------------------------------------------
       Re: (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: Jools Date: December 4, 2016, 4:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Jav, if people feel they have been let down or not treated
       correctly, they have the right to question or complain. This is
       their right.
       If you feel happy with RCL, this is your opinion and your right
       to feel happy.
       But what is your right to tell others they are wrong or have no
       right to complain? How others feel may be due to completely
       different circumstances and situations which you are not aware
       of.
       You will notice there are far less people complaining through
       the Indiegogo page than before, this is due to two reasons, some
       have given up trying to ask questions or voice concerns, some
       have been blocked. Do you think its right to silence those that
       question your actions?
       Jools
       #Post#: 290--------------------------------------------------
       Re: (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: Cuchulainn Date: December 4, 2016, 5:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We just have to hope that the backers will be the first to get
       the devices.
       Last year by the Recreated ZX-Spectrum (by Elite) it went wrong
       after all when
       3th party sellers placed orders also.
  HTML http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2016-07-08-when-kickstarters-go-bad-chasing-down-the-recreated-zx-spectrum
       #Post#: 291--------------------------------------------------
       Re: (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: IngDuenas Date: December 6, 2016, 9:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       They surely have their rights, I am not questioning that but I
       have seen many very agressive posts or just downright rude, I
       think that is not the way after all, it is a public enterprisse
       and some people, like me, are bothered by that kind of comment.
       They can address their concerns directly to RCL. All we now know
       for sure is delays have happened but we all seen footage of good
       working almost finishd models. As it has been said over and over
       again, the nature of crowfunding is like that, we are not
       dealing/investing in a well stablished company but just a bunch
       of folks trying to create something new. If one reviews just the
       computer manufacturing companies of the Speccy era, one can see
       that Apple, Commodore, Sinclair, etc., they all ran into
       troubles that caused delays for most models (Amiga, delayed by
       the ownwer ship of the Amiga chips, the QL, delayed for months,
       the MacIntosh, delayed because of Steve Jobs' obsession for
       perfection and the list goes on an on).
       I constantly run into technical issues when developing my
       products which for the most part are based in previous work, I
       have a few decades of experience designing electronic devices
       and I still face design issues that sometimes takes weeks if not
       months to correct. Just recently, I designed a new RGB capable
       LED display using a new type of LEDs named WS2812, the display
       works fine but the most basic effect which is the right to left
       scroll flickers and I have not been able to correct it yet! I do
       know now why this happens and I find it unacceptable to ship a
       product which is not 100% as I intended it to be, the delivery
       has been halted until I can fix that (or change the basic
       concept of how I handle the shifting). I only know that well
       about delays, hate them but happens as part of the process.
       I still think RCL will deliver, we will have or Vega+, I much
       rather have a good, revised, working product rather than
       recieving something that breaks down right away. Is my reasoning
       so of?
       Cheers,
       Jav
       
       #Post#: 292--------------------------------------------------
       Re: (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: Jools Date: December 7, 2016, 5:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's been said so many times but I will say it again and I
       imagine keep on having to say it but...
       The issue with RCL is not, NOT, the delay but the level and
       detail of their communications with backers. (nothing else)
       There are people that paid for the main perk with the assumption
       that the would have the device as a xmas present. This is
       reasonable, irelevant of whether they were treating Indiegoog as
       a shop or an investment opportunity. But this is NOT the issue.
       However just to clarify the other point, RCL are not just a
       bunch of friendly guys trying to do us all a favour. They are an
       established Ltd company govern by UK company law and this is the
       second product they have produced. The first being the ZX Vega.
       On that last point, the ZXVega+ is just an iteration of the
       ZXVega and this is important as it should have been just an
       interation but RCL separated themselves from the original team
       that designed and built the ZXvega so they had to start from
       scratch.
       On starting from scratch, I am building a handheld gaming device
       from scratch, I started it two weeks ago when the hole 'much
       much more' update debacle happened. This is of interest here as
       it gives some indication to what RCL are gaining, to correct the
       thinking we need to give them a break.
       My device consists of:
       Raspberry Pi Zero £4
       12 Momentary Switches (buttons) £24 (+£6 prototypes)
       64GB Micro SD £16
       Bluetooth Dongle (£4)
       WiFi Dongle (£6)
       Adafruit 3.5" 480x320 TFT Touchscreen £45
       Stereo flat pan speakers £6
       Raspbian OS Free
       RetroPie Emulator
  HTML https://retropie.org.uk/
       (this emulates all
       these systems
  HTML https://github.com/RetroPie/RetroPie-Setup/wiki/Supported-Systems)
       I do plan to 3D print a case once the custom PCBs are finished
       So I am building a one off device for the same price as the
       vega+ but mine will be ready before xmas. around 5 weeks working
       odd evenings and occassionally at weekends.
       Now obvioulsy RCL are not using these costs, it's a fraction,
       and all production run costs are covered by the campaign so
       there will already be (or really should be) considerable profits
       just from the campaign, retail will be the real profit
       generator. This is where crowdfunding campaigns really win as
       the financial backers are not stock or IP holders, so once perks
       are given the campaign owner is free to run. I have been engaged
       with venture capital and angel backers on multiple projects and
       this is where those backers will demand they are in the loop and
       expect hefty returns on investment. So our requests for
       information are pretty petty and RCL are really the winners
       here. We do NOT need to feel we owe them somenthing for their
       valient efforts.
       I've got here and realised I've written too much, but if your
       reading this, thanks, I don't expect many will but I will get
       replies saying, back off, leave our heroes alone they are trying
       their best to give the world what the world has been waiting 30
       years for... no they're not.
       Jools
       #Post#: 293--------------------------------------------------
       Re: (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: Peeto Date: December 8, 2016, 2:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OK guys, so they just fired me out of backers, given my
       proactively refund, which I never asked for. I asked them to
       cancel it. What can I say more.
       #Post#: 296--------------------------------------------------
       Re: (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: Jools Date: December 9, 2016, 4:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just replied to your other post on this, my main questions is
       did you at any point ask for a refund, if not then they can't
       offer or provide a refund.
       Interested to know how they refunded as we paid Indiegogo and
       they can't offer refunds on this now RCL have the money. A lot
       of people are having trouble getting refunds.
       Jools
       #Post#: 297--------------------------------------------------
       Re: (RCL) Interview with the Inquirer 28Th Novermber 2016
       By: Peeto Date: December 9, 2016, 4:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I never ever asked for it. I told them my honest opinion without
       beeing rude, that this campaign is misusing good brand name zx
       spectrum for this scandal and they marked my contribution as
       refunded off indiegogo. I told them, I am not asking for refund,
       but for honest information on progress, after this I was out.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page