DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 484--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Typical brainwashed defeated believes
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 4:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=14.msg471#msg471 date=1663849889]
You describe obsessive behaviour in entertainment which is not
mentally fine and makes stress and sufferings. While a typical
entertainment enjoyer like me enjoys and relaxes you as obsessed
wows typical player are stressed and spreads negativity.
I assume there are psychological reasons why one is mentally
unstable and obsessed etc and so called toxic. The cure for such
sufferings is a guru in my opinion. Lot of dialogues, debates,
which the sick one obviously loses but little by little comes to
reality and becomes well.
If one claims that he likes the so called toxicity/racism, then
it is sadism and grows sooner or later bigger problems, like
crime, suicides, etc.
[/quote]
You are just coping because you are bad and can't win often.
Your reasoning is "i don't care if i win i had fun". This is
another reason you still are bad at the game. You don't see a
point to improve because you aren't looking to win
[quote author=wows link=topic=14.msg471#msg471 date=1663849889]
I don't see why it is not enough to show skills 1 time per year
like in sports? But in Wows I am every day many times TOP 1 in
Gold league, and that is the truth and can be proved if someone
doubts again. Isn't that enough to prove skills and enjoy
victories? It can't be luck even for the most brainwashed
believer and again proof replays can be provided.
[/quote]
I have seen many screenshots of you at the bottom position on
the scoreboard and 0 of you occupying the top position. When you
say you are 1st very often, i expect you to provide proof. You
have played 11 ranked game today :
HTML https://wows-numbers.com/player/503598166,Fastmotion/?type=rank<br
/>(picture at the time of writing :
HTML https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/948695325151993928/1022617857256861787/unknown.png?width=1165&height=559<br
/>) Were you first in at least 3 or 4 of them ? Going into
details, you played 5 games in shimakaze, dealing an average of
13000 damage per battle (which isn't even the damage of 1 shima
torpedo. Which means you land less than 1 torpedo per game on
average. Which is a very bad performance) and only winning 1. I
don't think you were at the top of any scoreboard in theses
shima games. You died Without doing any damage in your vampire
II game so I very much doubt you were first in this game too.
Doing well 1 time can happen out of luck. It isn't show of skill
that happen once in a while. You just get lucky sometimes
without knowing why you are suddently doing well because you
happen to be in a good position. This is the difference between
you, a 42% player and a 65% player, they will get into this good
position by skill and you will get into it by luck
#Post#: 485--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Typical brainwashed defeated believes
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 4:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=14.msg481#msg481 date=1663872220]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=14.msg460#msg460
date=1663801853]
People say this from their personal experience : they have more
success using 12km rather than 20km torpedoes on shima.
[/quote]
Your opinion differs from mine here but we can't convince very
easily whose opinion is mor close to the truth.
Your opinion about people is different than mine.
Your opinion is that people say things based on their
experience.
I don't have such opinion because folowing reasons. Many 12-km
supporters talk come in battles from primitive ship holders and
not DDs. So, i doubt that they have much experience with DDs at
all and doesn't understand much about torpedo attribues and DD
roles at all. And their opinion originates therefore from
elsewhere than their experience. In game chat people say often
things that are popular to say and popular in forum to say and
12-km opinion is visible from tiem to time. and they have just
copied that opinion from others. It is obvious that they
wouldn't dare to say anything that is not popular, so express
their community belonging as the community opinion about DD
torpedo things. The community does not spread the opinion that
20 km torps are better so they are afraid to come out with such
opinion. That's why they jsut repeat all together that 12 km
torpedo is better and many of them express it typically toxic
way that is common for the community. So, they attack those who
don't believe community opinions. And partially show that they
have the so called knowledge/opinion and look smart.
I personally haven't seen much success with 12 km torps from
other players.
[/quote]
No sources, no statistics, you are saying things you think are
true without any support. the entire thing can be ignored. I can
find many people playing shima on youtube and explaining why
they use 12km torpedoes. This part also shows you like posing as
a victime a lot
[quote author=wows link=topic=14.msg481#msg481 date=1663872220]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=14.msg460#msg460
date=1663801853]
Objectively, 12km torpedoes have more advantages than the 20km
:[list]
[li]they are stealthier, therefor a target will have more
difficulty to dodge[/li]
[li]they are faster, therefor a target will have harder time to
dodge[/li]
[li]they do slightly more damage[/li]
[/list]
[/quote]
It something has 1 big advantage and the other 3 minor
advantages then the math 1 is less than 3 doesn't make the first
one worse because all 4 advantages have different weight. 1 big
can be msot times better than 3 or 5 small ones in total.
The advantages you named are useful in smaller maps which has
lot of rocks. But in Rankeds and in Randoms most maps have lot
of water for 20 km torps and not much rocks and lot of 12-km
radar cruisers. That makes obviously 12km range better in
general.
[/quote]
What you think are big advantage may be a very small advantage
to other players. it's a trade off : you get longer range on
your torpedoes but it's harder to hit with them. You value the
safety of the long range. Other players value the consistency of
hitting. Both are valid
[quote author=wows link=topic=14.msg481#msg481 date=1663872220]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=14.msg460#msg460
date=1663801853]
But if you have more success using 20km torpedoes on shima,
continue to use the 20km torpedoes on shima, that's what makes
you win, and winning is good
[/quote]
At the end you give a suggestion to someone which torps he
should use and the suggestion is not based on listening someone
smart and not lsitening educational tutorial and not providing
any proofs. First comment is, that nobody asked you what is your
suggestion. The topic title talks about brainwashed things and
those things have no explanations/proofs just like your
suggestion here. Why should anybody listen to such suggestions.
And why people have illusions that there are many golden
suggestions and knowledge in the game?
[/quote]
I never suggested you use the 12km torpedoes. I only said that
the 12km torpedoes had other advantages the wows community
values more and showed that there was an actual reasoning behind
that and therefor it wasn't brainwashing. I also said i didn't
care what torpedoes you used
#Post#: 486--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Typical brainwashed defeated believes
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 4:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=14.msg482#msg482 date=1663873785]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=14.msg459#msg459
date=1663801634]
You do not understand how reporting works do you ?
[/quote]
You don't understand that your post is inadequate, do you?
If you are unable to explain why your post is inadequate then
why to answer to you here. We isolate you to your one topic and
teach you what is adequate and what not. When you came to this
foru mthen you were asked to be adequate and over your wows
community but i have been noting your mistakes so many times by
now.
Your question assumes soemthing and doesn't provide any
explanation why it assumes so. Is offtopical or called Derailing
and spam in your community language.
You are again wrong with your assumption/opinion but i don't
give you the explanation/proof because:
1) you are not adequate.
2) one doesn't have to prove what thoughts he has and what his
senses sense. I explained that idea in the official forum with a
oven chicken recipe.
[/quote]
Your rant on the reporting system shows a deep incomprehension
of the karma system, the report system and the punishment system
of wows. None of it works like you describe, don't spread
misinformation
in port you can see a number next to your username if you click
on it. This number is your karma. This number has no purpose in
the game
In battle you can open a menu to report or compliment a player.
Reporting decreases this number by 1 and complimenting increases
it by 1
Getting a chat ban, someone has to open a ticket on the website
of wargaming and someone will review the replay and decide if a
chat ban is necessary.
#Post#: 488--------------------------------------------------
Re: interview 5
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 4:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=73.msg474#msg474 date=1663862311]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=73.msg462#msg462
date=1663802319]
You haven't seen the wows subreddit then. There is a lot of
question about how to grind credits faster. also i never said
anything about calling people racial slogan, pretty weird you
bring it up
[/quote]
Can you provide proof that wows official forum and your named
forum has lot of grinding questions among other questions? I
looked into the official forum and there the picture debunks
your statement.
Do you agree that my 3 points and your 3 points above are al
ladequate and we can conclude from them that stats don't matter.
There is no need to start to define what mattering exactly
means, you understand that generally they are not important and
don't have any place in argumentations. Do you agree tha twe
both agreed with 3-points on that and we close that debate as
agreed-agreed?
Your 2nd topic seem to be be a detail that says how battle XP is
connected to other things. Yes, things are connected in life but
are still considered as irrelevant details or not exact
causes/reasons. You statement seems to be like this:
"Wows community wants to have betetr battle XP to get more
ships, and that why acts toxicly".
Do you agree that this is your 2nd and last debate topic and we
can close the first topic with agreed-agreed status?
Your 2nd topic can be debunked so that peopel care about Randoms
WR as we deescribe and all their behaviour and opinions talk
msotly about Randoms WR which they call also Stats. They don't
mention XP and ships which are long way conencted to ship
quantity etc. And that explanation debunks your opinion. Do you
want such 2nd topic or we can chose one last different one. you
won't be able to talk later because you have too much
inadequancy. You lose all arguments and use persona llevel
attacks etc, ignores questions, derailing, offtopic, etc. You
can have 1 last debate topic i nnext days and then i isolate you
into your personal topic somehow, and maybe even i sometimes
reply to you there.
[/quote]
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/179151-most-efficient-method-for-credit-grinding/<br
/>There, it took 5 second of google search to find proof.
You still don't understand why people care about win rate :
[list type=decimal]
[li]People want to win to grind XP faster[/li]
[li]It's easier to win if you have better team mates[/li]
[li]You can mesure how good a person is from their stats[/li]
[li]People care about other people stats[/li]
[/list]
Simple
#Post#: 489--------------------------------------------------
Re: interview 5
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 4:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=73.msg475#msg475 date=1663864219]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=73.msg450#msg450
date=1663799567]
Proof for your claim : nada. And you do no effort to counter
this reasoning. You have no argument against it you are just
saying "you are wrong"
[/quote]
That is not true. As you see i provided there an explanation
that the "majority looks so". That is not very strong argument
but it is a reasonable argument and you can't expect any
scientific proofing method in such topics.
[/quote]
It's called a survey. That's what you do when you ask for a
population's opinion. a survey. look it up in the dictionary
[quote author=wows link=topic=73.msg475#msg475 date=1663864219]
For example you said that you nkow what is in my mind but you
didn't provide much arguments as i remember. So, my explanation
is fine. You can say "look into the official forum and see that
most hate WG" or "look into forum and see that peopel are
obsessed with Randoms WR and not XP". So, you are not right if
you say that i don't provide any proof. If you can show where i
missed any of your questions then i go and provide answer. I can
list about you long listing of non-professional methods
including that you haven't answered to all my arguments and
questions. Because your community has so many inadequate
behaviours then we isolate you into your one personal interview
topic and declare the interview completed. If you there want to
do additional debates then we can trade that first you obey to
adequate methods and admit that you lost previous debates and
then i agree to do here 2nd/3rd debate with you. It doesn't look
like banning but is isolating and the explanations are very
clear. All previous interviews anded with the community member
to run away but you don't have to run away you can stay in your
topic and write there everything opposute to my Wikipedia if you
wish, i won't mind. But i label you as inadequate in away and
therefore i won't react to your opinions in that topic. If
someone comes to talk to you in that topic then i don't mind. In
the interview topics we can keep inadequate things but elsewhere
it is against rules and specially i nthe wikipedia topics. do
you think that it is professional if wikipedia contains your
comunity personal attacks and offtopical opinions? No, that
would be bad for the community.
[/quote]
The problem is that your wiki are bad and i'm just showing you
why
#Post#: 490--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: stats
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 4:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Believing in god" is faith. "Believing something" isn't. It
just means you think something. I guess that of your 2
university degree, english wasn't one of them
#Post#: 491--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: stats
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 4:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Your coping is funny. You have bad stats so you want to believe
they don't matter so you can pretend to be good
No, no one will judge someone who has 11 battles as being good
or bad, no matter how many they won or lost. They will only
think "they only have played 11 battles, they must be a new
players"
The problem with recent win rate is the following :[list
type=decimal]
[li]Toss a coin, did it land head or toe ?[/li]
[li]It is possible for 5 consecutive toss to only land on
head[/li]
[li]Does it mean this coin only land on head ?[/li]
[li]No. If you toss the coin a lot of time, the ratio head:toe
will stabilize around 50%[/li]
[li]A lot of coin toss are more reflective of the coin chance to
land on either face, similarly, a lot of games played are more
reflective of a player's skill[/li]
[li]Therefor, recent win rate needs to be calculated over at
least 100 games to be the most reflective possible of a player's
skill and not of its luck[/li]
[li]When the recent win rate shows improvement compared to the
overall win rate and that a significant number of games have
been played, we can say a player is improving. The opposite is
also true[/li]
[/list]
#Post#: 492--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: racism
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 5:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
IQ isn't the result of one's choice and neither is their ****
size
Your wows stats is a result of your skill in wows, it is logical
to judge your game performance on your game stats
Society judge you on your skill in other fields, will you call
the society racist because of it?
#Post#: 493--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Truth: Wows community are afraid of me
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 5:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Over replying to people when you have been thouroughly defeated
in a debate is spaming
Why did you write 2 post for my 1 post ? this is also spaming
#Post#: 494--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: reporting
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 5:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It's not like WG gives chat ban for no reason either
When someone gets chat ban, someone else took the time to file a
ticket to WG and WG validated the chat ban. This is proof that
the chat abn was deserved
If you wish to contest a chat ban but refuse to make an effort
then WG says that's your problem, suck it up and wait for the
chat ban to end
If you got a problem with that system, talk to WG
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page