DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 459--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Typical brainwashed defeated believes
DIR By: SpeedrunBanAny%
Date: September 21, 2022, 6:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: wows link ---
>
> Reporting in entertainment someone for not playing well. Don't
you think it is not reasonable.
> If yes, then the whole Reporting system is not reasonable.
>
> Examples. Let's assume that in a pub someone loses often.
Would you go to a bar tender and say that he plays really badly?
No. Why would you do it then in Wows?
>
--- End Quote ---
You do not understand how reporting works do you ?
#Post#: 460--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Typical brainwashed defeated believes
DIR By: SpeedrunBanAny%
Date: September 21, 2022, 6:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: wows link ---
>
> Not so often but still from time to time you hear an opinion
that Shima is not suitable for Ranked.
> That is totally wrong opinion. Shima has 2 things that are
best among all other DDs. Even 1 strong side would be enough but
it has 2 such strong features. So, it is definitely a fine ship
with it's 2 features.
>
> First feature is the best concealment. That makes it the best
scout in the game. Isn't that a strong feature? The second
feature is to have very good torps. Japanese torps deal lot of
damage and Shima has additionally good torpedo reload time for
the 15 torps. So you can send plenty of torpedos out which all
deal good/best damage. So, you psot for your team and make
plenty of torpedo damage- how can that be not suitable for
Ranked or any other game mode?
>
> I understand that if one says that Elbing is bad because it
has the slowest torps that everyone can dodge, and ship
manuverability is so bad that it eats all torps and bulelts. And
guns reload slow etc- Elbing is weak but Shima certainly not.
>
> The 2nd popular belief is that shima's 20km torps are somehow
a bad choice. This is 100% an adobted popular brainwashed
opinion. All maps in Ranked and Randoms are big enough for
provide more than 12 km or swimming for torpedos. So, it is
totally wise to use even 30km torpedos if they were such option.
Do those 20 km torpedos hit at 12+ km ranges? Of course they do
and the DD is totally safe at 12-20 km range when sending them
out. Shima's 12 km torpedo option doesn't provide better
swimming speed, only +6 km/h. That is no difference, 6 is so
small irrelevant number. If they added +20km/h then that would
be Halland's torpedo speed and remarkable, but +6 is irrelevant.
And 12 km option provides +2800 damage per torpedo. Does that
make a difference? No. Because 21k torpedo damage is as good as
24k damage and aiming matters more than +3k damage. so, the 20km
option is best and totally suited for Ranked. If i ask why 12 km
is better then people can't answer or reply wwith "Ligma". That
proves that wows community is brainwashed and can't explain
their believes.
>
--- End Quote ---
People say this from their personal experience : they have more
success using 12km rather than 20km torpedoes on shima.
Objectively, 12km torpedoes have more advantages than the 20km :
- they are stealthier, therefor a target will have more
difficulty to dodge
- they are faster, therefor a target will have harder time to
dodge
- they do slightly more damage
But if you have more success using 20km torpedoes on shima,
continue to use the 20km torpedoes on shima, that's what makes
you win, and winning is good
#Post#: 461--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Typical brainwashed defeated believes
DIR By: SpeedrunBanAny%
Date: September 21, 2022, 6:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: wows link ---
>
> But the topic that say that skills don't exist if general
stats are low is totally wrong. Maybe one example could be with
some school math contest. The lowest grade person from a class
can win it every year. and his low grades doesn't prove that his
skills are missiing, no, the skills are there and show up once a
year.
>
> The goal of such example is to explain that stats don't
matter.
>
--- End Quote ---
In wows I do not want to win once a year, i want to win as often
as possible (more xp so more ships). Therefor i want someone who
can win as often as possible, not the guy who wins once a year.
And if skills show up once a year, it's way more likely that
it's just luck
#Post#: 462--------------------------------------------------
Re: interview 5
DIR By: SpeedrunBanAny%
Date: September 21, 2022, 6:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: wows link ---
>
> Obviously Wows community doesn't care about the
credits/XP/loot they receive. Simple proof is to visualize a
typical wows player when they play. There won't be any picture
of a player having credits etc in his mind and calling racial
slogans if they believe they won't get enough credits.
>
--- End Quote ---
You haven't seen the wows subreddit then. There is a lot of
question about how to grind credits faster. also i never said
anything about calling people racial slogan, pretty weird you
bring it up
#Post#: 463--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: support
DIR By: wows
Date: September 22, 2022, 2:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
My definition about the Wows term Support:
Support means to help your team mate against the closest
threat/enemy.
You link's definition says that Support means Advocate and many
other false things. Do you agree that your link's definition is
wrong and mine is right?
#Post#: 464--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Truth: Wows community are afraid of me
DIR By: wows
Date: September 22, 2022, 2:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: SpeedrunBanAny% link ---
>
> There is frankly too much exemple of you derailing the topic
in the official wows forum. If someone wants a proof, they only
need to check your post history on the official wows forum.
>
--- End Quote ---
Can you give adequate examples of my spamming or derailing
posts? The link you provided with a post is not a valid example
because as I explained I just answer to people in that and other
posts and they start those topics and questions. The example
post you gave shows that the person I answer is offtopical and
derailing etc. Can you provide examples or proof where I started
offtopical questions there? I don't remember that I asked
anything from anybody. If you cannot show examples then your
opinion was wrong. The same example topic contains much
offtopical talk by others and they initiate those there in your
example.
#Post#: 465--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Truth: Wows community are afraid of me
DIR By: wows
Date: September 22, 2022, 2:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Secondly, do you think that the reasons matter if people don't
know the reasons anyway? I provided the proof that people don't
know.
You din't provide evidence why peopel are not afraid of me.
Can you show where your and your community posts have higher
quality than mine in regards of derailing, spam, etc? Even in
this topic here you are offtopic, derailing, on personal level
etc and in the Wows official forum in my topics there po eople
are too. I proved that you are inadequate in this topic and can
prove that I am not in the official forum.
#Post#: 466--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: racism
DIR By: wows
Date: September 22, 2022, 3:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You talk about race-racism but the topic lists ship type racism
and stats-racism.
You forgot to answer which other term is more suitable than
prejudice and racism. Obviously the prejudice is not
suitable.Wows stats-racism has the same nature like race-racism
so the term stats-Racism is fine and by default just racism. I
gave examples somewhere that wows community after loosing
debates does stats-racism and personal attacks. In race-racism
it is the same and prejudice is not suitable to call it.
Answer to your 3 questions is Yes if we talk about race-racism
but in Wows context we don't because we don't see skin colour.
Different words have different meanings in different areas. For
example the word Support may have different meaning in common
dictionaries but in special dictionaries even more different.
Also slang is another example. As I explained media uses many
literature-colored words.
I have explained that your listening to others illusion is wrong
and debunked somewhere here. In brainwashed Wows all have same
faith and tactics, there are nobody who don't listen, yet the
stats are different among them. So, the illusion of listening
and learning is wrong. In football, wows etc there are not much
knowledge and the community doesn't educate. And you agreed
somewhere that there are no golden knowledged. So, the listen
smarter ones idea is debunked.
You often title humans and say that you have extreme emotions
like feeling disgusting etc and is common to your community. I
call it as inadequate behaviour and don't do inadequate things.
My 2 title terms that I use are Brainwashed and Racist, and I
explain well when I use them. But I don't feel any mental peaks
during it because world is full of modern slavery, racism etc
and there is nothing special about it. Do you agree that your
community does the opposite and titles a lot, has instable
emotions and does the racism which you may call with another
term if you like.
--- Quote from: SpeedrunBanAny% link ---
>
>
> Do you agree that stats are not a biological trait yes or no ?
the answer is "yes, stats aren't a biological trait"
>
> Then do you agree that judging based on stats does not enter
the wikipedia definition of racism yes or no ?
>
> Then do you agree that you whole definition for calling people
racist when they show you your stats is unfunded yes or no ?
>
> This "Wiki page for defining the term racism" is just you
trying to justify calling people racist when they aren't
>
> People are dying due to prejudice caused by actual racism and
you would compare yourself to them? All of that so you have an
excuse to not listen to them. This is disgusting behaviour from
you
>
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 467--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: reporting
DIR By: wows
Date: September 22, 2022, 4:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: SpeedrunBanAny% link ---
>
> If you refuse to use the means that YOU CAN USE (unlike a
lawyer, it doesn't take money and time to write to WG's
support), that's your problem. Don't say you can't know why
you've been chat banned if you refuse to ask
>
--- End Quote ---
Seems like you agree with the lawyer example but disagrees with
the WG Support example. That is contradictory because both
examples require similar things and mainly stress. Mature people
defend themselves from stressful things and many times they
would win the case if they started the stressful process. It is
very inhuman to blame people who stay away from stress. In Wows
it is widely known that WG Support acts inadequately and that
community reports inadequately too, so it is wise to keep away
from such stress but keeping away doesn't prove that one
deserved any penalty.
At the end you don't seem to understand why people don't know
the penalty reasons. But I provided many explanations why. The
fact is that people don't know and it does not matter if they
take a lawyer or not. They are not responsible that they don't
know. I don't still know why I got banned from the forum and
game chat and it does not matter what is your opinion about why.
Also it does not matter if I go ask or not. I even asked in the
forum but didn't get an answer. I gave an example from Wows
official forum where another person didn't know why.
Reporting and contacting support in entertainment is immature
in my opinion and I never do it. But important is to understand
that people who don't know why they got penalty are not any way
deserving such unknowing and they don't have to contact anybody.
#Post#: 468--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Typical brainwashed defeated believes
DIR By: wows
Date: September 22, 2022, 6:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You mention the term profit but your link shows the term revenue
which are different terms. In my opinion it is fine if you use
whichever terms because the terms are irrelevant.
But often in loosing debates your community starts to do
irrelevant talks about grammar, and terms, like you earlier did
with the term Racism.
In the beginning of the topic is mentioned food companies and
one popular average food company is Subway and their revenue is
10x bigger than WG's. And that example proves my 1st post ideas.
If you remove expenses from WG's sales then it would still be
some hundreds of millions per year which is big money for you if
we stay on your personal level and context of as you typically
are. But if we compare adequately that number to sandwich
companies as I described then it is not so profitable business
type.
--- Quote from: SpeedrunBanAny% link ---
>
>
>
>
HTML https://incfact.com/company/wargamingusa-austin-tx/#:~:text=Wargaming%20Usa%27s%20annual%20revenues%20are%20%24100-%24500%20million%20%28see,Software%20Publishers%20industry.%20What%20is%20the%20company%27s%20size%3F
>
> WG USA (only the american branch of WG) is registering a
profit between 100 and 500 million per year. Looks pretty
profitable to me
>
--- End Quote ---
*****************************************************
Page 6 of 15
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page