DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 421--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: stats
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 21, 2022, 7:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=70.msg419#msg419 date=1663762365]
Can you show were in your text answered to my question?
The question was: Can you explain how one do actively choose to
stay bad at the game?
[/quote]
Once again the answer was alrteady provided in my previous post
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=70.msg417#msg417
date=1663762108]
By believing to be good and dismissing anyone prooving you wrong
by calling them racist, you are refusing to learn from better
player and actively choosing to stay bad
[/quote]
You continue to show that you don't read a post in its totallity
before answering
#Post#: 423--------------------------------------------------
Re: interview 5
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 21, 2022, 8:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Stats are an objective mesurement of your past performance.
There is a lot of different stats, the most regarded being :
[list]
[li]WR the win rate in %, showing the proportion of previous
games won. It is an adequate predictive stats of the likelyness
of a player to win the next gam[/li]
[li]PR the pro rating, is a standarized statistic made by the
wows community showing your stats relative to the server
average. it is influenced by damage at 60%, 30% frags and 10%
wins[/li]
[li]Damage, shows the damage dealt over the previous battles. it
shows the average damage one can expect from a player[/li]
[li]SR the survival rate, showing the proportion of previous
game survived. It is an adequate predictive stats of the
likelyness of a player dying in the next game[/li]
[/list]
Of course they are only averages. It is entirely possible to
outperform or underperform in the next game. It does however
show what can be expected from a player
#Post#: 424--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Read this first, and say Hello here
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 21, 2022, 8:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I know what is a metaphore
#Post#: 425--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: stats
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 8:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=70.msg421#msg421
date=1663765191]
[quote author=wows link=topic=70.msg419#msg419 date=1663762365]
The question was: Can you explain how one do actively choose to
stay bad at the game?
[/quote]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=70.msg417#msg417
date=1663762108]
By believing to be good and dismissing anyone prooving you wrong
by calling them racist, you are refusing to learn from better
player and actively choosing to stay bad
[/quote]
[/quote]
So, the question was generally how a player can chose if to
become good or bad.
And your answer is that faith/believes determines how good one
is. Right? Do you really think that faith in different
religions, different food, different other things, determine how
good one can become in a specific area? Let's take a university
student who is an averade christian in his faith and in many
classes religion topic is involved and he gets average results
compared to 2 other christians who one gets the best results and
the 2nd the worst results and they were both very dedicated
believers. Doesn't that example show that it does not matter
what people believe and success doesn't care what people
believe? Very surely such students example occures i nreal life
and you can invent other similar examples. Some sportsmen are
top athletes but use methods/tactics that others don't think are
good ones. So, in general your answer is not right that faith
determines anything. You can surely find among Wows players
people with similar believes but very different stats. Next,
let's look into more specific which beleives you are talking
about.
You say "By believing to be good ... you are refusing to learn".
That part of your opinion talks about s specific faith, a belief
about one's skills. If you try to say that people with high
self-esteem don't succeed in life then the practical picture is
opposite in life. And in entertainment games it is also so that
more positive self-esteem is good and doesn't make any problem
to entertain, practice and learn. Stressed low-esteem situations
people get panic attacks and can't concentrate. So, it is
totally fine to believe that one is good in entertainment and
that doesn't halt practice and doesn't stop those people to read
knowledge from forums etc. Part of the community life is to
visit forums and no matter if one wants or not he reads
automatically knowledge from there, no matter how high/low
self-esteem/stats he has. Specially in the official Wows forum
there looks like only one allowed truth is out there and wrong
knowledge is silenced quickly- so there is no possibility that
the community doesn't get the information that you call
knowledge. And if you think that some people who read the
allowed truth/knowledge from the forum dare to not to believe in
it? Obviously the community doesn't have different opinions but
only allowed ones and everyoen are afraid to think about other
alternatives. If Wows community had peopel who dare to believe
that the allowed truth/knowledge is wrong then those people
would show themselves up more often i nthe forum. But you almost
never see them i nthe foru mand i nthe battles all act the same
way, so why do you think that people don't believe in the
allowed truth? In Rankeds i see all the time same brainwashed
attitudes, tactics and opinions, very rarely something else. And
all those people have different stats, but the same believes.
Gold members are 40% - 60 % Randoms WR but all do the same
tactics like DD splitting et that are suitable for Randoms and
not Rankeds, all talk like one same community. Different stats
but the same faith because say belong all to the one Wows
community that puts the same faith into everyone. And obviously
many of them have higher self-esteem, many lower and among al
lthose the stats again vary.
We have described elsewhere that there are nothing to much to
learn because entertainment games are primitive. We have proved
that it takes a weak to learn pub billiards and computer Wows
knowledge and mainly latetr one containes about aiming. The
practice later improves the learned aimiming concept, after 2
years one can aim better no matter if he visited forums or not.
Practice is the main teacher and the amount of knowledge is very
small, 5-6 items like in billiards, football. So, there is no
point to lsiten smarter ones and if you open the official forum
or youtube channels then there are almost no teachings. So, you
learn anyway with practice and there are nothing to learn but to
practice and no smarter ones because not much knowledge and no
tutorials. People believe vary everywhere in the life and that
doesn't determine success. Usually in life things are opposite
than you said, things are so that if you believe you are good
you become good. In some spiritual texts they give some
spiritual proof as well for that. so, things are opposite than
you said and the proof was just what i provided.
You say that some peopel refuse to learn. There really are no
such. The proof is such that the community is so obsessed with
stats that they all want to do anything to get good stats and
they all act the same way liek the whole community. No
refusings.
You say "By believing to be good ... you are refusing to learn"-
can you provide examples for that opinion. All the arguments i
provided debunks such opinion and in the real life and Wows
things are opposite than you said.
You say such many-conditioned claim:
"By believing to be good and dismissing anyone prooving you
wrong by calling them racist, you are refusing to learn from
better player and actively choosing to stay bad"
Can you provide many such example accounts that follow your
multi-conditioned rule? They must have a posting history where
they call other racist etc. There are not much such examples so
your whole response doesn't answer to the question. "Can you
explain how one do actively choose to stay bad at the game? ".
The question is that how players chose to become good or bad and
your response contains such a complex multi-conditioned rule
that has no logics inside and filters out maybe 1 person only
but the question was about general player and asking how he
choses his success. Your reply said that one must call others
racist and that is an active choise for general players. No, all
the explanations given above, and thinking logically, it does
not matter what one posts anywhere. If you want to talk about
real reasons why some people are more successful in
entertainment or in life then things are opposite than you said.
You mention a term "active chosing". I think you agree that the
word active not needed. If you really want the word Active to
stay then that would mean choosing very implicit/clear, like
choosing on the table between apples and oranges. That is a very
active picking. In your example active would mean that someone
really starts to position always on all maps like described in a
forum which says that such positioning guarantees the best
results and one reads it and does it and then this is really
active choise of positioning advice. But your sentence doesn't
have anything so concrete, you mention faiths and postings etc.
So, the word Active is not needed at all.
Your sentence describes your belief about my knowledge and the
reason why it is such. There is no need to talk about personal
level. Secondly, your multiconitioned opinion was wrong as i
described. Multi-conditioned rules are often error-frindly and
doesn't cover the majority. In the Knowledge topic we talk
separately about knowledge but here i mention again that you are
wrong in that.
There is no "active" or "non-active" choice in humans mind. They
all have already an obsessed belief that stats matter and they
all act the same way in battles and talk the same mentality.
There are no doubts i ntheir mind and they all have different
self-esteem and different stats. They all talk in the forum what
you consider as the right truth, because the forum silence
imemdiately all who are not brainwashed. Every part of your
claim was wrong. Can you provide any proof to your claim.
Because your whole post was on the personal level in the
beginning which is offtopic and inadequate method so i moved
eyes quickly over and thought that the last sentence is also
ignoring the main question and talks about someone particular.
and i nthat case tht is not an answer, but jsut a response on
the personal level. Maybe it was because all conditiones that
you provided in your last statement filters our very few
exemplars but we talk here about thousands people as we should
in the forum. Here you have following options:
1) prove that your response covered everyone and not me. this
topic is not aobut me or you.
2) or provided counter-arguments to my given ones.
if you fail in either 2 points then this proves that you didn't
provide an adequate answer.
#Post#: 426--------------------------------------------------
Re: interview 5
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 9:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=73.msg423#msg423
date=1663765714]
Stats are an objective mesurement of your past performance.
...
Of course they are only averages. It is entirely possible to
outperform or underperform in the next game. It does however
show what can be expected from a player
[/quote]
All statements seem to be partially correct.
1. Stats are a measurement of the history. True. They measure in
a way what happened in the history.
2. Stats don't matter and one can outperform better stats
players in next batltles. True. Because history doesn't know
about tomorrow, life has many variables, like bad internet, etc.
3. Stats can be used to predict future. True. For example, most
beginner stock market investors start by making predictions on
historical data, but intermediate level investors ignore it.
So, as you see i have most opinions opposite from the wows
community but sometimes partially my opinions agree with the
community and you included.
From my points 1-3 you can conclude that tstas don't matter,
also from your points you can conclude that. Therefore we have
proven that stats don't matter.
The phrase "matter" there refers to the obsessive stats-racism
that Wows community does every day. For them stats matter just
as strongly like skin color matters to a racist person.
For them stats really matter a lot.
If you debunked them jsut like me then the debate is over and we
agreed suprisingly and also mentioned as a conclusion that wows
community is very racist and for them stats matetr a lot.
#Post#: 427--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: stats
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 9:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=70.msg417#msg417
date=1663762108]
You certainly do not show any intent of getting better at the
game and dismiss people better than you as being racist.
You believe to be good at the game solely because you can reach
gold rank 1. However your ranked win rate is 42% both overall
and recently. You obviously get lucky streaks to achieve rank 1
gold with 42% win rate
[/quote]
do you agree that you are inadequate because you do use the time
inadequate methods?
In the above example is a proof that you do a so called personal
attackwhich is considered inadequate and irrelevant for debates.
This time when my eyes saw such inadequate lines i didn't really
bother reading much longer the 3rd line because i thought it
continues about personal irrelevant talk and ignores the main
question. Your inadequacy result that people dismiss some info
you say. Your signature has the same inadequate info, also spam
pictures and other your community methods are not fine
therefore.
This topic is a Wikipedia topic and should remain quite clean.
You provided inadequate input here which i msut move to your
personal topic later. But you failed to answer in this topic to
arguments and were debunked.
#Post#: 428--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Truth: Wows community are afraid of me
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 9:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=59.msg406#msg406
date=1663720565]
The reason you got banned from the official forum are the
following :
- spaming a lot of messages
- derailing topics
People are certainly not afraid of you. At first they are
entertained then they become annoyed by your spam and derailing
[/quote]
In this wikipedia folder topics we don't talk about specific
examples. We talk here why people don't prefer to debate in this
forum adequately with me but prefer official forum like
interviews 1-4. It does not matter why someone was banned from
somewhere by someones opinion.
But again, your opinion is wrong even for that offtopical
opinions. So, i move your input to your persona ltopic later. If
you wish to get proof why your opinion is wrong then you must
first agree to be adequate. Secondly, let's end 1st debate in
your topic and then decide which last topic we chose. If you
want to pick the last topic as this one here, then we ca ndo it.
Why do you think that you know what reason the moderators had in
their mind when banning? So, if you are not the moderator then
why do you provide a guess for my banning reasons?
Secondly, do you think that the reasons matter if people don't
know the reasons anyway? I wrote to moderators that what was the
reason and they didn't answer. Why do you think the reason
matters at all if people dont know and understand the reasons?
You say that i got ban because of many messages. but that claim
is wrong because others made more messages and i put many
answers into one post al lthe time. Secondly i didn't start a
dialogue with people, they asked me al lthe time and answerinf
everyone is just an adequate method. It does not matter how many
posts people do. I made some posts, others made more, so why to
ban anyone because of that? Internet has plenty of space for all
messages. That debunks your opinion about many messages.
Secondly, i didn't spam but the Wows community does it al lthe
time because they are inadequate. You can compare your posts in
our dialogs with mine and which looks mor ecloser to the term
spam? Yours ofcourse, because we proved you and your community
use inadequate methods. So, i don't spam and your whole opinion
is wrong.
Derailing means changing the topic. I was always in topics with
all posts but when i had to answer to offtopical questions then
the answer was also offtopical but most times i added to the end
some thought about the main topic and a request to keep in main
the topic on next posts. So, i didn't derail because it is an
inadequate method. I never used personal attacks like you and
your community, etc. So, i stay nicely in the topic most of the
times.
You din't provide evidence why peopel are not afraid of me. I
feel they are afraid otherwise they wouldn't do cross-forum
dialogue and they would prove the community allowed believes
here very easily. If few peopel here are entertained then that
is fine and they are part of the proof. For example i will use
your posts in the Wiki that we are building. This is helpful for
the community and entertaining for some others, win-win. I don't
mind, jsut i ask some simple rules to follow.
It is very typical that after loosing debates people run away
saying that they are bored by that moment.
#Post#: 429--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: stats
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 10:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
If you fail to provide an adequate response to my previous posts
then we declare the debate over with your loss.
Because the one who can't answer doesn't have an answer.
Adequate action would be to come and say: "you are right, you
won", but in wows community the level of adequancy is very low,
your posts are example and proof for that. So, you may chose to
just ignore and run away without giving any answer.
If you agree that you lost the debate then i agree to chose only
1 more topic for a debate with you like i did in previous
interviews, and refuse for the 3rd one. and i repeat that you
msut behave above Wows community level. You can't ignore
questions. you can't title people to idiots, bots ,etc. Not
allowed to use weird emoticons. Not allowed to change your
statements by modifing old posts. Not allowed personal attacks.
Not allowed to use terms that you cannot define. Etc. Al lthose
are in my opinion obvious rules. Maybe i should lsit them
somewhere.
So, you have following options:
1) run away, letting counter-questions unanswered. That means
you lost the debate and proved what we haved proved for Wows
community.
2) answer inadequately. Either changing the topic, showing
personal stats, posting a spam image, giving totally nonsense
multi-condinioned illogical statement, etc. That means you lost
the debate.
3) write clearly that you lost and then you have an opoortunity
to pick 1 final last topic.
4) post totally nonsense to the forum. like buy-drugs links etc.
then i ban you.
#Post#: 430--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: support
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 10:19 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=69.msg398#msg398
date=1663714380]
[quote]Can you or your Wows community give/show that term? We
have shown that Wows community fails in most terms. Can you
prove the opposite and show what the term means?[/quote]
HTML https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/support#:~:text=Definition%20of%20support%20%28Entry%202%20of%202%29%201,company%20to%20users%20of%20its%20products%20customer%20support
[/quote]
you link is inadequate because it does not explain what the
support means. If you have an illusion that it does then you are
wrong. also i nearlier interviews your community members failed
with links and we proved that al ltheir links contained wrong
info. So, your link does not answer the question. I can later
copy paste a description why links are generally prohibited in
this forum and why most times they don't answer questions. If
you want to chose your link as your final debating topic then
you can but in that case you won't get an answer to other ones.
Al lthe other topics are declared inadequate and i won't provide
proof. Because it is timeconsuming and repeating. Most of your
mind is equal to your community's mind, for example the links
thing, and i have debunked al lthat somewhere, so i won't bother
to repeat. But i agree to do 1 more debate after we end the 1st
one. We can debate about that link if you want. This wouldn't be
anything long, will go quickly like in previous interviews.
#Post#: 431--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: fun
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 10:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=62.msg400#msg400
date=1663715168]
[quote]Funny is that it is not allowed to say that Subs/CVs are
fun. Obviously they are fun because they have the same similar
features like other ship types that make joy.[/quote]
You are allow to say that. People don't have to agree with you
either, that's all
[/quote]
If only it would be so democratic as you express. The reality is
opposite of what you say. We describe in other topics that.
First proof is that you don't see much different opinions and
attitudes in brainwashed communities. for example, your opinions
are exactly those that are allowed and popular and spreaded
every day in the official forum. And i nthe forum you see the
same picture. Such symptom is one proof that there is not
allowed to have other opinions. The 2nd proof is silencing. For
example you as an example of your community uses phrases like
"be ashamed" etc. The official forum silence different-thinkers
all the time this and other ways. so, i nreality there is not
allowed to have different opinions. If you prove to be adequate
then we can debate on that in naother topic. If your recent
topics end with clear status "inadequate" then we won't and we
make probably a rule that all your input can go only to your
personal topic.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page