DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 532--------------------------------------------------
Re: interview 5
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 23, 2022, 4:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=73.msg507#msg507 date=1663934465]
[quote]The problem is that your wiki are bad and i'm just
showing you why[/quote]
You and your community has lost all debates and are inadequate
and also with that Bad-titling opinion.
We declare your both debate topics ended with your loss and i
provided clear reasons.
Your proofless titling opinion about Wiki is irrelevant. And i
bring your input from there to here.
In my opinion your skills were 10% above the candidate from
Interview 1.
I will write a summary later. Do you prefer if I block your
account or we just agree that you won't post anywhere than your
topic here? You have denied all the rules here so you probably
deny such rule too and then we are forced to block totally.
[/quote]
I have shown that :[list]
[li]You derail topics[/li]
[li]You refuse to look sources up[/li]
[li]Your english is lacking[/li]
[li]You refuse to understand basic arguments[/li]
[/list]
Arguing with you is like debating a toddler. It's so easy it's
entertaining, but when you obstinate in being wrong too much
it's becomes very tiring.
I'll check back in a year to see if you got better in english,
better as a player or better at arguing
Btw : the guy from interview 1 is right and you should listen to
him. He's made great points
#Post#: 533--------------------------------------------------
Re: interview 5
By: wows Date: September 23, 2022, 4:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=73.msg530#msg530
date=1663969958]
[quote author=wows link=topic=73.msg506#msg506 date=1663932529]
[quote]It's called a survey. That's what you do when you ask for
a population's opinion. a survey. look it up in the
dictionary[/quote]
No, it is not called a surgery.I don't suggest you to look
anywhere compared to you. I didn't talk anything about surveys
and you can't prove that I did. But I can prove that you were
wrong, because I know that I didn't talk about surveys. As you
see there is no need to give dictionary links and no need to
even mention dictionaries. And without all that to prove clearly
that you were wrong.
In the official forum all surveys that I saw were inadequate and
I believe that survey methods don't work easily on brainwashed
communities and that's why I don't recommend it. But I suggested
an other method but you didn' understand which. It wasn't a
survey method. And it is an irrelevant detail which methods
someone suggests. The relevant thing is that you lost your main
arguments.
[/quote]
SURVEY :
HTML https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/survey
Stop
assuming you know everything and when you don't know a word just
google it. You really need to look stuff up.
Btw this is an exemple of you derailing a topic
[/quote]
No, it is not called a SURVEY. And i provided the proof.
#Post#: 534--------------------------------------------------
Re: interview 1
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 23, 2022, 4:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The guy you are arguing against is right on every point.
You'd do well to listen to him if you want to improve in your
english skill, your player skill and your arguing skill
#Post#: 535--------------------------------------------------
Re: interview 5
By: wows Date: September 23, 2022, 4:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=73.msg532#msg532
date=1663970085]
[quote author=wows link=topic=73.msg507#msg507 date=1663934465]
[quote]The problem is that your wiki are bad and i'm just
showing you why[/quote]
You and your community has lost all debates and are inadequate
and also with that Bad-titling opinion.
We declare your both debate topics ended with your loss and i
provided clear reasons.
Your proofless titling opinion about Wiki is irrelevant. And i
bring your input from there to here.
In my opinion your skills were 10% above the candidate from
Interview 1.
I will write a summary later. Do you prefer if I block your
account or we just agree that you won't post anywhere than your
topic here? You have denied all the rules here so you probably
deny such rule too and then we are forced to block totally.
[/quote]
I have shown that :[list]
[li]You derail topics[/li]
[li]You refuse to look sources up[/li]
[li]Your english is lacking[/li]
[li]You refuse to understand basic arguments[/li]
[/list]
Arguing with you is like debating a toddler. It's so easy it's
entertaining, but when you obstinate in being wrong too much
it's becomes very tiring.
I'll check back in a year to see if you got better in english,
better as a player or better at arguing
Btw : the guy from interview 1 is right and you should listen to
him. He's made great points
[/quote]
You haven't shown what you claimed and i have proved it.
#Post#: 537--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: interview 1
By: wows Date: September 23, 2022, 5:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=16.msg534#msg534
date=1663970314]
The guy you are arguing against is right on every point.
You'd do well to listen to him if you want to improve in your
english skill, your player skill and your arguing skill
[/quote]
No he is not, and a clear proof is provided. You are in a
typical "denial" phase. All debating is over, you had chance,
and now i write out the results next.
You failed even with understanding that you should not post into
other people's interview topics.
#Post#: 538--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Typical brainwashed defeated believes
By: wows Date: September 23, 2022, 5:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=14.msg526#msg526
date=1663969315]
[quote author=wows link=topic=14.msg515#msg515 date=1663949425]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=14.msg483#msg483
date=1663880695]
[quote author=wows link=topic=14.msg468#msg468 date=1663845224]
In the beginning of the topic is mentioned food companies and
one popular average food company is Subway and their revenue is
10x bigger than WG's. And that example proves my 1st post ideas.
If you remove expenses from WG's sales then it would still be
some hundreds of millions per year which is big money for you if
we stay on your personal level and context of as you typically
are. But if we compare adequately that number to sandwich
companies as I described then it is not so profitable business
type.
[/quote]
It doesn't matter who is making the bigger profit. The point is
that wargaming is a profitable buisness
[/quote]
So, you admit that you were wrong in a financial term and got
smarter. At least soemthing useful for you and other readers.
Your post is offtopical and mine is not.
You say that someone has good profit in your opinion but it is
irrelevant what you think and what you think is good. Your
example seems to be close to the brainwashed picture that draws
the your Good even as Best. When WG comes out with new products
then you can see more examples how the brainwash spreads when
peopel comment that the company makes huge sales and others
repeat then similar thoughts. Such brainwash tends to grow until
illusion that WG is the richest company in the world. To
enlighten/balance such talks i added comparisions with food
companies. That is enough for that topic and no need for any
personal opinion. One can collect examples later of posts/videos
where people again spread amazing words about sales and profits.
But you add that your personal point still at the end that WG is
profitable company. Well, do you want people to think that it is
opposite of profitable and goes bankrupt soon? In this forum and
topic i don't think that such personal offtopical opinions are
useful.
[/quote]
You are the one arguing that it's not a profitable company
because it's less profitable than others which is a bad
argument. WG is profitable, you recognize it and you still class
it as "Defeated brainwashed believes" when it's obviously not
[/quote]
You are repeating again the same again which i debunked all.
#Post#: 539--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Read this first, and say Hello here
By: wows Date: September 23, 2022, 5:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=2.msg424#msg424
date=1663766635]
I know what is a metaphore
[/quote]
it does not matter what you believe to know. You failed in many
things, including terms. You can read all that later in resume.
#Post#: 540--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Truth: Wows community are afraid of me
By: wows Date: September 23, 2022, 5:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=59.msg521#msg521
date=1663968415]
Easy : every post in the official wows forum where you are not
present isn't derailing
Also it's higher quality because they write higher quality
english. They also do not make 20 lines post because they are
concise and can carry their idea better with less words
You also do not understand what other people are telling you.
Your answer are therefor always inadequate to what they tell
you. This also contribute to derailing
[/quote]
I proved that you failed with the prohibited words like Simple
and Easy. Also your new claims are wrong and you would fail to
prove those to be right jsut like you failed with all your
link-based claims. Your other posts repeats your debunked
opinions.
You didn't respond to previous arguments in here and elsewhere,
so you failed in all those.
There is no need to throw random tweets anymore, the debating is
over. most of your posts go to your personal topic, so you can
say jsut there your final words if you wish. for me easier later
because less posts to move to there.
#Post#: 541--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: reporting
By: wows Date: September 23, 2022, 5:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=56.msg520#msg520
date=1663968200]
First : you answered with 4 post. That's spaming. Spaming is not
allowed according to your own rules
Second : I don not think wargaming gives bans for no reason. I
never said that
Three : this is not an exemple of reporting. It's only someone
saying he is going to report you
[/quote]
I explained that you are wrong about 4 spots and spamming and
all other things. I won't do any debating anymore, you had your
chance to prove what is spamming etc. but you didn't, but i
proved nicely things and that goes to the resume. There is no
need to post anywhere else anymore, just post to your personal
topic. Everything moves there anyway.
#Post#: 542--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Term: support
By: wows Date: September 23, 2022, 5:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=69.msg519#msg519
date=1663967982]
[quote author=wows link=topic=69.msg498#msg498 date=1663907826]
Your opinion is proofless and wrong and inadequate.
[/quote]
You are litterally arguing that the dictionary is wrong. The
actual reference for english language, you are saying it's
wrong. Do you realise how much of a clown you make of yourself
right now? You are arguing that the thing that cannot be wrong
is wrong
That's an impressive level of coping
PS : cope about PS being inadequate, it's a great way to give
complimentary information and to add something for a totally
different subject
[/quote]
I explained very clearly why dictionary and other sources were
wrong for all interview candidates. There is no point to try to
bring up anymore those links-debate. Everything was said with
links and everything else, debating over. We all know that
candidates get emotional at the end and try to deny everything.
I use adequate methods and those should not create any emotions.
I won't do any personal attacks etc i nthe resume text. I name
there even my 2 mistakes, as i remember one was fast reading,
and the second a term issue, thats it. But no debate loss, no
racism etc. So, you shouldn't deny or prove something anymore.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page