DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 408--------------------------------------------------
Interview 4
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 4:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
DirtyRabbit_sniper, Posted September 7
ok Fastmotion so, how do you explain your utility in that game
since you died and did nothing ?
I will never listen to your advices and I did well not to listen
to you
44% WR and 300PR are well explained... don't lie to yourself,
you must be a toxic person IRL with a lot of psychiatric
issues...
[/quote]
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/158313-batja-our-hive-called-batja/?tab=comments#comment-4258231
#Post#: 414--------------------------------------------------
Re: Interview 4
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 5:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
From Interview 1 we explained why cross-forum debating format is
bad:
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg142#msg142 date=1656959829]
P1. You continue to do crossforum dialogue which is a bigger
problem than any other you adress me. Because it is very
difficult to copy paste text from oen to another and etc. That
lead to some my posts here to disappear for exaple and i
mentioned. That is much bigger hassle/problem than any other
"problem" you adress me. Yes or no?
P2. It is a non-professional debating method that you make
appearance that what you say there has no replies and therefore
the topic owner agrees with all you write there. That is not
considered an adequate method. You could apply to some country's
prison service where a victim is put too to such situation where
he cannot give an answer or says exactly as was expected so that
the final protocol looks satisfying. You are building a similar
protocol there and that is not an adequate method.
P3. You refuse there to obey to our clan's adequate rules and we
proved that you failed in those already. For example, links are
not allowed, and you failed many times with them. We proved that
your links and all other things were inadequate. Before starting
any talk/interview you must agree with our rules. Our rules
don't allow links etc. But you continue to violate rules still.
P4. Your forum is not adequate there. For example it don't
explain when it closes topics or gives bans and the rules are
not adequate either. Therefore your activity in that thread may
lead to closing that topic and that results that many people
might lose a chance to achieve something. You close a door for
them. In older times there was a rule by an enlightened one who
said that not only stealing is prohibited but also obstruction
which leads to the situation where one loses a potential chance.
Do you understand those 4 points and understand that those al
ltogether are a bigger problem than anything that you address to
others?
We proved that you are not adequate. There is no need to deny it
i can list it again.
[/quote]
#Post#: 440--------------------------------------------------
Re: Interview 4
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 12:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=72.msg408#msg408 date=1663751040]
ok Fastmotion so, how do you explain your utility in that game
since you died and did nothing ?
[/quote]
in which game? you are not adequate because i don't know what
you are talking about.
#Post#: 441--------------------------------------------------
Re: Interview 4
By: wows Date: September 21, 2022, 12:39 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=72.msg408#msg408 date=1663751040]
44% WR and 300PR are well explained... don't lie to yourself,
you must be a toxic person IRL with a lot of psychiatric
issues...
[/quote]
Randoms 44% WR has nothing to do with today and Rankeds. Even if
accidentally today's ranked WR is 44% then you must agree that
you used a wrong number from wrong place and that is common for
stats-racism. You say that 300PR explains well something but i
have never understood what it means and i believe that most
people don't understand that PR-system. So, you are very naive
if you believe that peopel understand your PR-s. Rating 44% does
not explain anything to me and i have a separate Wiki-topic
specially for Stats. I ca nrepeat only that it explains wel
lthat your community is racist.
Then you say that i lie to myself. Why i should lie and does it
look that i am in pain? For example do you see that i complain
about WG and subs every day? No, because i don't see problems in
the game. The only complaint that i have is about racism and my
yoga is about making the world better so i try to cure out
racism from your community. But that yoga doesn't make you
suffer, so don't think that i lie to myself, or that i am toxic
etc. Does it sounds fair to you if i call you racist and you
call me toxic and all is fine? The slang term Toxic is
inadequate and i will cover it in our wikipedia later. In short,
wows racism is toxic if we use the term in your understandings.
I don't comprehend the IRL term and it is very typical that your
racist community calls people mentally sick, idiots, etc. For
that we have a wikipedia page where we explain why your
community does such titling.
Can you show which part of your post had a goal to make a
dialogue? My such question at the end surely tries to make a
dialogue. Don't you agree that peopel who don't do dialogues
can't usually do those and are not usually adequate?
#Post#: 449--------------------------------------------------
Re: Interview 4
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 21, 2022, 5:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=72.msg441#msg441 date=1663781998]
[quote author=wows link=topic=72.msg408#msg408 date=1663751040]
44% WR and 300PR are well explained... don't lie to yourself,
you must be a toxic person IRL with a lot of psychiatric
issues...
[/quote]
Randoms 44% WR has nothing to do with today and Rankeds. Even if
accidentally today's ranked WR is 44% then you must agree that
you used a wrong number from wrong place and that is common for
stats-racism. You say that 300PR explains well something but i
have never understood what it means and i believe that most
people don't understand that PR-system. So, you are very naive
if you believe that peopel understand your PR-s. Rating 44% does
not explain anything to me and i have a separate Wiki-topic
specially for Stats. I ca nrepeat only that it explains wel
lthat your community is racist.
Then you say that i lie to myself. Why i should lie and does it
look that i am in pain? For example do you see that i complain
about WG and subs every day? No, because i don't see problems in
the game. The only complaint that i have is about racism and my
yoga is about making the world better so i try to cure out
racism from your community. But that yoga doesn't make you
suffer, so don't think that i lie to myself, or that i am toxic
etc. Does it sounds fair to you if i call you racist and you
call me toxic and all is fine? The slang term Toxic is
inadequate and i will cover it in our wikipedia later. In short,
wows racism is toxic if we use the term in your understandings.
I don't comprehend the IRL term and it is very typical that your
racist community calls people mentally sick, idiots, etc. For
that we have a wikipedia page where we explain why your
community does such titling.
Can you show which part of your post had a goal to make a
dialogue? My such question at the end surely tries to make a
dialogue. Don't you agree that peopel who don't do dialogues
can't usually do those and are not usually adequate?
[/quote]
The coping here is top notch. "you aren't using my ranked stats
so your argument is wrong even if my ranked stats are just as
bad" that's basically what you are saying here
#Post#: 479--------------------------------------------------
Re: Interview 4
By: wows Date: September 22, 2022, 12:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=72.msg449#msg449
date=1663799322]
The coping here is top notch. "you aren't using my ranked stats
so your argument is wrong even if my ranked stats are just as
bad" that's basically what you are saying here
[/quote]
What do you mean and why you don't answer to my questions and
arguments?
and why are you derailing and spamming in this topic if to use
your terms and behaviour?
This topic is a dialogue between another person and me and we
make a debate here with him and your debate is in your topic.
Here the topic is what is in his text and he confirms what we
are going to debate about just like you had a chance to chose in
your topic.
We don't talk here about your opinions and we have enough of
proof that you are inadequate. Your account's signature is
racist/toxic and inadequate.
#Post#: 480--------------------------------------------------
Re: Interview 4
By: wows Date: September 22, 2022, 1:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=72.msg408#msg408 date=1663751040]
ok Fastmotion so, how do you explain your utility in that game
since you died and did nothing ?
[/quote]
I can explain if you provide a replay and stop being afraid of
me. Is that a fair deal?
#Post#: 487--------------------------------------------------
Re: Interview 4
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 22, 2022, 4:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=72.msg479#msg479 date=1663869531]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=72.msg449#msg449
date=1663799322]
The coping here is top notch. "you aren't using my ranked stats
so your argument is wrong even if my ranked stats are just as
bad" that's basically what you are saying here
[/quote]
What do you mean and why you don't answer to my questions and
arguments?
and why are you derailing and spamming in this topic if to use
your terms and behaviour?
This topic is a dialogue between another person and me and we
make a debate here with him and your debate is in your topic.
Here the topic is what is in his text and he confirms what we
are going to debate about just like you had a chance to chose in
your topic.
We don't talk here about your opinions and we have enough of
proof that you are inadequate. Your account's signature is
racist/toxic and inadequate.
[/quote]
What i did was reformulate your argument to make it shorter and
easier to understand for everyone. It's not an argument and is
so ridiculous it's not worth debating, you are just coping
I already explained in your topic of racism why stats weren't
racist
#Post#: 516--------------------------------------------------
Re: Interview 4
By: wows Date: September 23, 2022, 11:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=72.msg487#msg487
date=1663882974]
[quote author=wows link=topic=72.msg479#msg479 date=1663869531]
[quote author=SpeedrunBanAny% link=topic=72.msg449#msg449
date=1663799322]
The coping here is top notch. "you aren't using my ranked stats
so your argument is wrong even if my ranked stats are just as
bad" that's basically what you are saying here
[/quote]
What do you mean and why you don't answer to my questions and
arguments?
and why are you derailing and spamming in this topic if to use
your terms and behaviour?
This topic is a dialogue between another person and me and we
make a debate here with him and your debate is in your topic.
Here the topic is what is in his text and he confirms what we
are going to debate about just like you had a chance to chose in
your topic.
We don't talk here about your opinions and we have enough of
proof that you are inadequate. Your account's signature is
racist/toxic and inadequate.
[/quote]
What i did was reformulate your argument to make it shorter and
easier to understand for everyone. It's not an argument and is
so ridiculous it's not worth debating, you are just coping
I already explained in your topic of racism why stats weren't
racist
[/quote]
You didn't make an adequate reformulation because your added
into it a debunked term Bad and your opinion about it. and more.
That reformulation is inadequate and doesn't help.
And why are you derailing and spamming in this topic if to use
your terms and behaviour?
This topic is a dialogue between another person and me and we
make a debate here with him and your debate is in your topic.
Here the topic is what is in his text and he confirms what we
are going to debate about just like you had a chance to chose in
your topic.
We don't talk here about your opinions and we have enough of
proof that you are inadequate. Your account's signature is
racist/toxic and inadequate.
First you refer to my text with a term Argument and later you
say that that term is not appropriate. but why do you use then
inappropriate terms? Secondly, it is an irrelevant detail how
you call standpoints, arguments, claims, totally irrelevant. In
your community going into such details is called derailing and
spamming. In my text you can interpret 2 ways the 1st sentence.
First way is to take the word Arguments as for the arguments all
over the forum. Have you ignored them, yes you have just like
many counter-quaestions. Did you ignore questions and statements
in the current post too? Yes, you did. So, it does not matter
how you call things if you are wrong anyway.
You say that you explained why stats are not racist. I haven't
seen any adequate explanation from your side. I have explained
many ways everywhere that stats/WR is the ultimate truth in the
obsessed communtiy and toxicity/racism is build on it. Even your
goal in this forum and your signature and your mostly WR-related
opinions are all toxic/negative and used exactly like in
classical race-racism. I explained that the term Racism is fine
and you didn't provide anything adequate against. The same way i
debunked all your opinions here and you lost debates. It is
inadequate to repeat your debunked opinions and deny the loss in
debates.
In this topic the candidate itself reformulates what he wants
and you should stay only and only in your personal topic. I will
make atechnical forced solution for that next days so you cant
Derail and Spam. Can you understand that in your community your
behaviour would result in immediate ban and if some of your
opinions were against the community then you would get even
longer ban and they wouldn't tell you which your sentences were
the ban reason exactly. We don't do such things here if
possible. Can you for example agree to stay in your topic
without the admin using a force for that? Or do you really
request treatment like in your community that ban and no
explanations?
#Post#: 527--------------------------------------------------
Re: Interview 4
By: SpeedrunBanAny% Date: September 23, 2022, 4:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
You aren't debunking the term bad, you are just coping about
being bad
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page