DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 275--------------------------------------------------
News
By: wows Date: August 24, 2022, 11:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
We can share spontaneity after reading some upcoming news from
somewhere or from the official News Blog:
HTML https://blog.worldofwarships.com/
Right now i looked and didn't get an yreaction to those news
there, but surely in the future someone wil lget.
#Post#: 280--------------------------------------------------
Re: News
By: Sllab Amgil Date: August 25, 2022, 7:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello, are news worth following?
In my opinion news are just another form of washing brain, how
do you know that war game is telling the truth? You only have
one source and they control it. In order to not have my brain
washed I am avoiding war game news and also decreased the
frequency of taking a shower.
I like surprises and avoiding the news allows me to discover
things in game. For example recently I discovered those DDs that
seem to be bugged - sometimes they disappear under water. I hope
war game fixes that bug fast as it is very annoying.
#Post#: 281--------------------------------------------------
Re: News
By: wows Date: August 25, 2022, 8:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
you are absolutely right.
in recent days i am amazed how many nice thought you all share
here.
#Post#: 282--------------------------------------------------
Re: News
By: wows Date: August 25, 2022, 9:55 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Such news have a positive side: it prepares people for suprises.
Suprises may cause stress for many and some medical conditions
get very strong response if even a minor irrelevant thing
changes. So, in a way it is like a warning "mind your
step/head".
Transparency is never 100% in business. For example there are
many business secrets that are kept in secret. Etc. Therefore it
is welcomed if at least some transparancy is shown and news are
such kind of transparancy. Or call it perhaps: some kind of
democracy etc. So, it is better to have than not to have some
news.
From a forum perspective every topic and seed another ideas. And
as you see we have a dialogue now here because of the news
topic. Some can read our talk here and a new idea might arise in
his head afterwards.
Such blogs appeared first to business sites around 2010 as i
remember. Businesses thought such blogs make the customers feel
somehow more trusty or so. And blogging is a popular tool
anyway, even sportsmen blog and psychologists suggest it. Etc.
Why not to have a news diary/blog if other companies have it as
well, so the WG has one too. For sure such news blog is a place
to advertise. When they mention that a new event or vehicle is
coming soon then that is already an advertising which one or
another way wll collect money from children.
I can add from some personal experience a thought here that it
is not wise to be too transparant and informing etc. Because
humans will abuse that, this is the human nature. For example,
when i posted 2 educational replays to the official Wows forum
then i got immediately reported for those postings as
unsupported behaviour, and i got 2 days account locked. So, my
goal was to demonstrate and educate and all good, but the
reaction was like humans are. That's why they use the term
Business Secret- if everybody would start to reveal those
secrets then the businesses would collapse. A good example is
that most humans don't understand how shops work nd what "60%
off" really means. Once you educate all of them with the secret
how to do shops then there will appear billions of shops and all
current shops would bankcrupt. And there are other reasons why
better to have only moderate transparancy. But today's world is
moving often to very non-transparant direction. So, in general,
i suggest to increase transparancy. Even this forum is an act to
increance the transparancy. For example here it is allowed to
suggest any kind of improvements and no need to ban anybody for
that. Etc. And that small News topic may be some good as well if
it seeds some good ideas like our dialogue has.
#Post#: 303--------------------------------------------------
Re: News
By: wows Date: August 27, 2022, 1:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
German Elbing-line seems to get some boosts in next game
version.
The slow HE-guns have now the biggest 12% of fire probability
among DDs.
But those guns are so slow (ca 6.2 seconds) that i don't think
that the 12% over 8% or 5% would change anything.
Other DDs don't have 6.2 seconds main battery reload time but
have 2 second or 3 seconds and their 5-9% of fire chance will
still make more fires. As i understand the math is that Daring
has 2.5s/9%/1700 and elbing will have 6.2s/12%/1800 then Daring
will shoot 2 salvos while elbing makes 1 salvo. So, Daring sends
12 bullets during at 9% firerate while Elbing sends 6 bulelts
ate 12% fire probability. And the corresponding average fires
will be multiplications, like: Daring makes 12x9%=1.08 bulelts
will produce fire during 2 salvos among 12 bullets. And Elbing
responds with 6x12%=0.72 bullets or in others word zero bulelts
make fire. So, Daring always makes more fires than Elbing
because it has faster gun reloads.
I don't think that such boost would make any change to the
Elbing.
Elbing's concealment boost would be also quite useless because
it has so bad manuverability but manuverability is very
important while spotting. If Elbing had the best concealment in
the game and went to spot and become spotted then he would die
immediately because he can't turn back anymore because he just
can't turn much. I'm not sure how to boost such ship. Maybe the
solution would be to give him the same fire rate like Shima has,
around 5-6 seconds reload. But even then spotting is still
almsot impossible and guns are still weak against most Dds- such
ship can't spot and can't win against other DDs. So, it is a
very difficult DD and i suggest it as a challenge. If one
manages to complete let's say Silver league with mainly Elbing
then that is a very big achievement. If both teams have 1 elbing
then it is more interesting of course but it is so rare ship
that it is difficult to get an elbing in both teams.
[quote]
25.08.2022 11:00
Development Blog
Balance changes - 0.11.8 Public Test
We're applying balance changes to the following ships ....
[quote]
VII Z-31, VIII Gustav-Julius Maerker, IX Felix Schultz, X Elbing
Maximum HE shell damage increased: 1,700 to 1,800
Chance to cause fire increased: 8% to 12%.
[/quote]
[/quote]
#Post#: 315--------------------------------------------------
Re: News
By: wows Date: August 30, 2022, 6:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I found from outside such topic below.
It talks that one made a Mod and it violated some rules and the
creator didn't get permission to distribute the mod and feed his
ego.
The question Who am I is legendary in his essay.
You can read about that question there:
HTML https://www.nonduality.com/ramana1.htm
Some people prefer to ask questions "Who am i not" fo decades
and finally there will be only few options left what one can be.
Eliminating emotions, thoughts, astral body, etc, one arrives to
the answer. But titling yourself as a unicum player, or Modder,
or doctor, or cool person etc, is very egoic and illusional. But
this is how the life is- first one is ego-self, then
observing-sef, and from there a gap ahead to
non-duality/selfless.
[quote]
WG lied and blamed me for not accepting their "truth".
Who am I?
I'm a modder who revive/maintains abandoned mods and also
develops new ones.
[/quote]
HTML https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfWarships/comments/wxvbzs/wg_lied_and_blamed_me_for_not_accepting_their/?ref=share&ref_source=embed&utm_content=body&utm_medium=post_embed&utm_name=430317d1ec1141eea14f544beec0a736&utm_source=embedly&utm_term=wxvbzs
#Post#: 338--------------------------------------------------
Re: News
By: wows Date: September 5, 2022, 11:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
From the official forum i see mostly same repeated opinions.
That proves that the repeater-community is brainwashed.
The below post is easily debunked as all Wows community opinions
have been.
1. Wows contains mainly from children and children don't have
usually an adequate opinion. This is because they haven't seen
the life much and can't even do intermediate math. Any childrens
opinion about how a business should run or how to change a game
is obviously immature. So, any opinion that Wows community has
is always wrong. And the current below example about subs too.
There was a Homer simpson cartoon where a kid had to design a
car for average people and that car project become a failure
because children cannot comprehend such topics. The same is with
computer games- if you let them to make any significant change
there then it will be a failure and a bankcrupcy.
2. The authority "Community Engagement Manager" is an irrelevant
role and no matter what he says. And if people say something
then there is no need to believe that their saying represents
the company opinion or their political party opinion. People say
lot of different rubbish, specially when they talk with kids.
For example, they say many fairytales to kids.
3. The post below gives his own opinion as "Dont put them in
game.". What if one responds with the exact opoosite own opinion
"putthem into a game"? That would be an equal opinion, and the
conversation is over. If one dislikes such proofless
counter-opinion then why one didn't provide an adequate proof
himself at first hand. The proof in style "many have the same
opinion as me" is not adequate. Many billions don't like pigs
and pork either, so should we kill all pigs now from the planet?
No. The same way we don't have to listen Wows community opinion
and we have debunked them all.
4. Many people like subs but the reason why it is not visible is
because Wows community is racist and not democratical. It
atatcks and silence quickly other opinions. Why should any
opinion from such community be listened at all? and that
community has lost all arguments that i have done with them,
this is a fact. Including the subs topic, i have plenty of times
debunked it.
[quote]
“We can see a lot of people dont like subs, what do you want us
to do?”
Just_Cheg - Community Engagement Manager
So wg dont know what to do? Any ideas from it is :
Dont put them in game.
[/quote]
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/164402-%E2%80%9Cwe-can-see-a-lot-of-people-dont-like-subs-what-do-you-want-us-to-do%E2%80%9D-%EF%BB%BF-ideas-what-wg-can-do/
#Post#: 587--------------------------------------------------
Re: News
By: wows Date: October 4, 2022, 8:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The news says one can research Submarienes and no need to rent
anymore.
In my opinion Subs are a very nice add-on to the game and i have
always said that. When i say that or anything else then i don't
have any egoic opinion tide to it. For example, if one plays
mostly helicopters and a new vehicle type is "AA cannon" and he
says that he don't think that the new vehicle type is good for
the game then that is obviously an egoic opinion that actually
means "i want to feed my ego more with more victories so don't
add new vehicles that decrease the victories quantity for ME".
The bad thing is that now people must spend time grinding lower
tier subs which is quite boring. But, not so long time either. I
suggest to get 2 T10 subs and the captains from the rental Subs
are fine to put it.
[quote]
Update 0.11.9 brings the following new features:
German and U.S. Submarines in Early Access
...
All aircraft carriers of Tier VI and above will receive a
variant of Depth Charge Airstrike that activates automatically.
...
[/quote]
HTML https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/game-updates/update-0119-submarines/
#Post#: 793--------------------------------------------------
Re: News
By: wows Date: October 31, 2022, 8:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Some news for the next game version.
The word "pass" i pronounce exactly the same as the woman i nthe
video and opposite the man's american pronounciation. How do
you?
As you have seen then my gramamr and language skill in overall
is somewhere in Average level and make msitakes and obviously i
don't correct them, and in pronounciation it is the same. But it
is 90% of British official pronounciation and tonality, and 10%
american. So, you can imagine how i say the a-latter in: dance,
pass, past, etc, but 10% of times i use the american version and
they the "a" like all say Can, Have, etce. How do you pronounse?
In the video i udnerstood that they make a new Zao that has even
less armor than Zao. It would be probably a very fragile ship
then. This is my first opinion.
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfYPlCpaufw
#Post#: 939--------------------------------------------------
Re: News
By: Moderator1 Date: November 25, 2022, 8:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Today i saw first time in a battle a new Dutch DD.
Specs says that it has fine concealment so it is quite usable
ship. Seems liek it doesn't have a radar and not smoke but has
an airstrike instead like dutch vehicles. That combination od
consumables is new and should be tried. I am not sure which next
combinations can be given out: maybe: no torps, but airstike,
smoke, hydro? There are surely more combinations and for
cruisers i am pretty sure one day appears a vehicle with smoke
and a radar and torps, it is just a matter of time.
For me it is interesting and i trust WG because i haven't seen
any his balance-mistakes so i doubt the new ships would have any
trouble for the game.
Would i buy a Dutch DD? Well, i have ships with good concealment
and i prefer long torping ability, if it has long range torps
then maybe i would consider, but i have already plenty of such
ships and i don't think that airstrike is something so amusing.
[quote]
Tromp — Dutch Tier X destroyer.
In addition to torpedoes, the destroyer's arsenal also includes
an HE Bomb Airstrike, previously seen only on Dutch cruisers.
Tromp's Airstrike has a short maximum range, but a fast reload
time.
The ship has good concealment and is able to quietly sneak up on
the enemy to effectively use Airstrikes or torpedoes. When
engaging in gunnery combat or when capturing points, you should
take into account that the destroyer does not have a smoke
generator. The destroyer's consumable supply is limited to an
Engine Boost, which will help at the right time to temporarily
increase the ship's otherwise low speed.
[/quote]
HTML https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/353
HTML https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Tromp
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page