URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       wows forum
  HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Wiki
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 160--------------------------------------------------
       Wows is NOT an arcade game
       By: wows Date: July 25, 2022, 1:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Wows is not an arcade game. There has never been any adequate
       explanation why it could be arcade.
       People can't even define the old term Arcade.
       Go to google and see what arcade looks like:
  HTML https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=arcade+games
       #Post#: 1167--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wows is NOT an arcade game
       By: Hanuman Date: March 29, 2023, 1:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Wows community likes wikipedias and wikipedia itself debunks the
       illusional belief that wows is an arcade game type. Wows is not
       an arcade game because it does not accept coins.
       [quote]
       All arcade video games are coin-operated...
       [/quote]
  HTML https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcade_video_game
       #Post#: 1199--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wows is NOT an arcade game
       By: wows Date: April 26, 2023, 12:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       An example how the community believe that Wows is an Arcade
       game:
       [quote]
       [quote]Karasu_Browarszky said:
       The level of complexity in this game exceeds that of an arcade
       game. We've touched on this before, and we disagree about it.
       Nonetheless, my view is that an arcade game has to have a
       relative fast learning curve. The complexity in this game
       actually exceeds what you would find in a simulation game. It's
       just less enjoyable[/quote].
       Again. Thats just your Old Fashioned Idea of what an Arcade Game
       should be.
       Do You know just how Simple Anno 1600 is compared to Anno 1800 ?
       lol
       Hell. Thinking back on it. Command and Conquer Tiberian Conflict
       was called an RTS back then. Nowdays its Complexity would barely
       Qualify as a Minigame.
       [/quote]
  HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/169384-my-last-day-in-world-of-warships/?page=2&tab=comments#comment-4382110
       Let's make the upper dialogue shorter:
       A: Wows is not an Arcade game because it is more complex than
       Arcade coin machine games.
       B: You have wrong and old definition for the term Arcade.
       So, the A says truth and truth happens very rarely in the
       debunked community. He says that Arcade games are simplistic.
       Yes, it is true, just look those old coin machines which had
       cartoon-like graphics, no teams connected to the internet, no
       precise controls like computer mouse, no human opponents, the
       coin games didn't require any forecasting how the opponent human
       would act, there was just a dummy alorithm your opponent. Etc,
       etc, obviously all that coin games aka Arcade games had was much
       more simplistic and primitive than computer games todays between
       humans connected to internet. So, the opponent A says correctly
       that Wows is not an Arcade game because it is not as simplistic
       as coin games were. And his opponent B didn't prove that Wows is
       still very simplistic or requires coins.
       The A said the truth but he could have used a stronger argument:
       the official definition of the term Arcade says a game must
       require coins or look like the coin games. Does Wows require
       coins or look like old coin machine games? No.
       The B says that there may be a new redefinition of the term.
       Well, Wiki doesn't contain a new definition, and WG has not
       provided a definition either. So, the B loses because he can't
       provide a source which redefines the term. Why should the world
       give a new meaning for a historical machine that can't be seen
       anymore today anywhere?
       The community likes authorities and encyclopedias, so why the
       official Wiki doesn't say a new meaning for the word Arcade and
       why it does not show Wows logo there?
       The A is a rare example in the debunked cult and will be
       silenced surely, but he himself has only moved a tiny bit closer
       to the truth. He is still 99.3% cult-minded mass-r-a-p-e lover
       like his community and forum. But he is awakening and started to
       sense 1 aspect of the term definition.
       The B seems to give an example how the term Minigame has been
       redefined nowadays. Again, provide the proof where it is
       redefined? But first stay in the Arcade topic and provide
       redefinition links or admit that you and your community has
       again been debunked.
       Additionally the B seems to say that the meaning of the
       Complexity term has i relative, and he has an opinion that some
       games are more complex than many others believe. Well, first,
       show how is a coin machine more Complex than an internet
       computer? A classical understanding of the erm Complexity says
       that all internet multiplayer games are more complex than coin
       machine single player games because human factor makes endless
       amount of moves an opponent can do and thus the game can flow
       endless amount of ways whereas single player coin game has a
       finite algorithm. In computer science the term Complexity is
       also defined more or less on the amount of ways a game can flow,
       or how many variables/conditions it has. And Wows has a human
       opponents and is therefore always more complex than a single
       player game against the so called Computer.
       So, that debunks again the Wows community.
       A dialogue:
       Wows cult: Wows is Argate.
       Non-cult: why Arkate wiki page does not have ship logo?
       Wows cult: your opinion is wrong because your stats and skin
       color are bad. We black list you know, bye bye.
       #Post#: 2020--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wows is NOT an arcade game
       By: wows Date: November 4, 2024, 11:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The misused term Arcade is abused this way that it is used as an
       opposite word to the term Realistic.
       Obviously all computer games are not realistic at all, and good
       that they are not.
       The correct meaning of Arcade is: a coin accepting old video
       game machine. Wows does not accept coins, hence is not Arcade.
       If you want to describe the level of realism them find other
       words, why not to just phrase "quite realistic".
       Compared to Warthunder ship game mode the Wows is very very
       realistic, and everything else very as well. Compared to other
       video games Wows is very very realistic, the water and waves
       look almost like real, ships shoot like they shoot in real life,
       etc etc.
       Absurd is to wish that in Wows torps would swim 20 minutes long
       like in real life.
       #Post#: 2459--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wows is NOT an arcade game
       By: wows Date: March 24, 2025, 10:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you google "Arcade game meaning" you see that the responses
       talk about coin-based Pac-man, and describes such games as
       singleplayer games against a computer using cartoon-ish
       characters like a pac-man or a fantasy soldier, etc. Multiplayer
       Wows does not look anything likePac-man, does not take any coins
       in, is not a single player either.
       There is no similarities between Pac-man and Wows, hence you
       can't even use an unofficial adjective Arcadeish for Wows.
       Coop and Ops as single player game modes are little bit similiar
       to Pacman because you don't play against humans, but you still
       play in a human team which Pac-man never had, and you still have
       quite realistic looking objects like ships, waves, sky etc,
       while Pacman has fantacy characters that don't exist in reality.
       So, Pacman is arcade and arcadeish, but Wows never. And not only
       Wows, byt all modern computer games.
       There is no place to use the word Arcade in Wows. Not only me
       and Googling proves that, but also common nondelusional
       reasoning proves.
       There is no need to anything to try to look like Pacman and not
       to look like it, no need to look realistic either, the gosl is
       to entertain, and obviously appearantly human minds adds some
       ideas from the real life to entertainments, but that happens
       only as unevitable thing, there is no goal and no need to be
       realistic or arcadeish. The goal is to entertain.
       There is nothing arcadeish in Wows. Arcadeish=Pacmanish.
       #Post#: 2460--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wows is NOT an arcade game
       By: Hanuman Date: March 24, 2025, 11:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Wows community uses a term Arczde Elements in the meaning of
       "Not realistic/historic":
  HTML https://www.devstrike.net/topic/6404-apparently-some-nerfs-are-coming-fr-the-panamerican-bb-line/page/3/#findComment-104256
       So, as already proved many times and ways the Wows and Arcade
       have nothing in common.
       Play 1 game in Pacman or Asteroids etc to sense what is the
       meaning of Arcade. Then play Wows and sense the clear
       difference. Multiplayer human-versus-human are never anything
       that Arcade means, no arcadish nature, no arcade elements.
       Unrealistic elements like a drawn circle cap with letter A does
       not occure in real life but in many games because there is no
       goal to copy reality and no possibilty to copy, and no need to
       title such non real life occuring things as Arcade elements.
       There is no need to ever measure how much non real aspects are
       in any game.
       And such calculation is fundamentally imposdible because real
       life has endless amount of elements. For example Wind,
       Earthqakes, fish, etc, you can end up that Wows and all other
       games have 0.0003% of elements that exist in real world. You can
       end up that Wows is 99.993% as real life, just pick your
       elements amount which you like.
       So, there is no place for Arcade term, and no way to measure it.
       It is hilarious how Wows community is totally delusional about
       Arcadeness and other things.
       #Post#: 2461--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wows is NOT an arcade game
       By: wows Date: March 24, 2025, 11:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can google that in real life loading 1 torpedo tube takes
       long long time, not 1 minute like in Wows. Even your own
       imagination and common sense should tell that, beside the
       google. It is not a lightweight bow arrow that you just take
       from a bag in seconds.
       It takes surely minimum of 10 minutes to reload a torpedo tube,
       and 15 times more time to reload 15 torps, and later the aiming
       takes long time as well.
       So, computer games with torpedos like Wows can never do so long
       time wasting, and there is no sane goal to even wish they would.
       The goal is Entdrtainment.
       You can pick plenty of other examples beside the non rezlistic
       torpedo example. There is no need to title such non realistic
       thing negatively, no need to title as Arcade.
       There is nothing Arcadish in Wows, and no need to be realistic
       either. If you wish to categorize games by realisticness then
       you are as wrong as a restaurant visitor who tries to judge a
       restaurang by the paintings on the restaurant walls, talking if
       those paintings are original or replicates and even titling the
       paintings as Arcade. There is nothing Arcade on such paintings
       and on any paintings, and it is totally irrelevant how those
       paintings are, and there is nothing Arcadish in Wows and it is
       totally irrelevant how realistic anything is there. There is no
       sane way to measure nonrealisticness levels in restaurant
       psintings and computer games. Thrre is nothing good or bad if
       anything is realustic or non realistic on restaurant walls or on
       a computer game.
       #Post#: 2462--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wows is NOT an arcade game
       By: Hanuman Date: March 24, 2025, 11:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The word Arcade means this:
  HTML https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8wJ6qi33cnY
       Look with both eyes on the video and try to sense what is
       Arcade. Does Wows look like this? No? If No, then Wows is not an
       Arcade game. Do you see any tiny bits in the Pacman game video
       similar to Wows game? Maybe both have a screen, both have moving
       colors on the screen, but that irrelevant tiny common thing does
       not define as an Arcade element or Arcadeish. Arcade is a single
       player game against a computer, Wows Randomz is totally team
       based real time game and hence never Arcade/Pacman, and Wows
       does not take coins in, and does not have cartoon looking
       fantacy characters like round Pacmans but has has clearly real
       life looking ships, sea waves, etc.
       If your eyes see that Pacman video is totally different than
       Wows, then why you keep titling Wows as arcadish?
       #Post#: 2698--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wows is NOT an arcade game
       By: Hanuman Date: May 14, 2025, 9:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Answer to the following 2 questions test:
       1. Do you believe that coin based Pacman game machine represents
       an arcade game? Yes or no?
       2. Do you believe that Wows is an arcade game too like Pacman
       is? Yes or no?
       If you answered Yes to both questions then you believe that
       Pacman and Wows are arcade games. Next, do you see any
       differences in those believed 2 Arcade games? For example, does
       Pacman screen show anything that occures in real life, like
       tanks, ships, trees, clouds, water? No? Does Wows have something
       that mimics real life, like ships, trees, water? Yes? So, you
       call both games as Arcade but they are totally different, one
       shows things that has nothing relating to reality, just
       imaginary cartoon Pacman characters, while the other has things
       that makes every human mind to recognize real life objects, like
       ships and water and fish, and additionally humans can even say
       which historical ship or real life nature object it is. So,
       totally 2 diffetent games but you call them both Arcade. And one
       even takes coins in. Do you comprehend that you call 2 totally
       different things as similar things if you label them with the
       same term? Do you see any contradiction in your believes?
       *****************************************************