DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debate rules
*****************************************************
#Post#: 1118--------------------------------------------------
irrelevant noise forbidden
By: Moderator1 Date: March 13, 2023, 12:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant noise is for example if one imitates sheep noise:
baa, baa.
It is not adequate to do noises and other behaviours that have
no rational value.
For example saying "You are faschist, baa, baa" is not allowed
because the Baa at the end misleads and confuces and does not
make any argument stronger or more trueful.
There is no need to post spam images and emoticons between legal
law texts and between debates and elsewhere where sanity is
important.
There is no need to say Hello, Bye, Regards in debates and in
internet at all. The explanation is the same that it is a noise
that obstructs, but also life has shown that it has ego-feeding
attributes, and, it may try to impress the debate judges with
irrelevant attributes, and usually debators make conflicting
ethics, for example they may say "Hello you idiot"- so, if Hello
is in their internet cultuer politeness then calling others to
be idiots is nowhere ethical (except in the racist communities
etc).
Shortly: no noise, no Lols, emoticons, spam images.
(also usually no links and no copy paste but i think we should
make a separate topic for that.)
All that is allowed are clear simple statements that explain
your opinion, and then adequate responses.
No noise.
I can later construct an example why noise is not adequate.
#Post#: 1207--------------------------------------------------
Re: irrelevant noise forbidden
By: Hanuman Date: May 4, 2023, 10:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
An example of a typical spam picture posting as an argument:
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/132108-general-cv-related-discussions/?page=511&tab=comments#comment-4384157
Note that in that typical post the debunked community memer
posts a spam picture in response to an argument.
This is typical to the inadequate community but not allowed in
adequate areas like this forum and in life.
You lose the debate if you post spam or act like Wows community.
Only adequate way is allowed to act.
If you like inadequate methods then i can post a spam picture
which has a message "Your community lost again a debate" and ban
you. Would the debunked Wows community like it?
*****************************************************