DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 133--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 12:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg91#msg91 date=1656667334]
[quote]
[quote]
1. Giving +1 is allowed only in following cases:
a) player name is pink.
b) other players talk in chat to give -1 to somebody. In that
cases it is allowed to give +1 to that person who is going to
get -1.
[/quote]
But why though ?
Why give +1 to the player with a pink name (it means they are a
player that is often AFK or damage their team mates)
Why give +1 to someone who is getting a -1
Why isn't it allowed to just give a +1 [/quote]
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/158313-batja-our-hive-called-batja/?tab=comments#comment-4213967
[/quote]
Did you get an adequate answer to your "But why ?" questions?
All the explanations i gave in debate were totally adequate. But
your explanations were not. You could not provide any adequate
counter-arguments against the +-1 rule that i suggest. You tried
to propagate your community allowed belief which loves +-1 and
other inhuman things. I repeat that all believes and opinion and
behaviour in Wows community are wrong and we have proved it
clearly. Obviously you deny everything which is common to
brainwashed sociums. But proofless denial is not adequate.
You accidentally said 1 pearl. But that was a random occurence.
Everything else was just your community mind speaking not you.
Such interview shows that you are not adequate to our clan. And
it does not matter what you think or which grades you had in
highschool or what some authorities believe. I hope you
understand that those things does not matter. We refuce to do
any interview with you during next 1 year. After that you can
apply again.
#Post#: 141--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 4, 2022, 1:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
The problem when you take my post sentence by sentence is that
you focus on the small details and fail to grasp the whole
picture i'm presenting
I invite you to read future post fully before you start
answering. Each one of your post focus on a single sentence i
said and then go on a different tangent making answering to
everything very annoying.
Not to mention post such as :
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com/general-discussion/interviews-for-clan-membership/msg122/?PHPSESSID=2b4daee6eb9b9ca2e92d334b8f54c218#msg122
image.thumb.png.cb760399c7b11321fd84c099926ff99f.png
Yes it does, the intellectual dishonesty you show by refusing to
scroll up on the page to see the text i'm pointing to and then
claim that the page doesn't contain the text is incredible.
The guts needed to call every argument inadequate and proceed to
not prove it because it's inadequate is also incredible
It would be praise worthy if it wasn't so sad
Since the discussion has become such a mess, i will go first and
regroup all the different topics we approached in separated
coherent post
[/quote]
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/158313-batja-our-hive-called-batja/?tab=comments#comment-4215601
#Post#: 142--------------------------------------------------
interview 1
By: wows Date: July 4, 2022, 1:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg141#msg141 date=1656958594]
The problem when you take my post sentence by sentence is that
you focus on the small details and fail to grasp the whole
picture i'm presenting
[/quote]
You say that my response methods have some kind of problem.
But we proved earlier that your methods are problematic and
bigger obviously compared to those you state towrds me.
Let's repeat again all your problem and compare those to those
you adress to me.
P1. You continue to do crossforum dialogue which is a bigger
problem than any other you adress me. Because it is very
difficult to copy paste text from oen to another and etc. That
lead to some my posts here to disappear for exaple and i
mentioned. That is much bigger hassle/problem than any other
"problem" you adress me. Yes or no?
P2. It is a non-professional debating method that you make
appearance that what you say there has no replies and therefore
the topic owner agrees with all you write there. That is not
considered an adequate method. You could apply to some country's
prison service where a victim is put too to such situation where
he cannot give an answer or says exactly as was expected so that
the final protocol looks satisfying. You are building a similar
protocol there and that is not an adequate method.
P3. You refuse there to obey to our clan's adequate rules and we
proved that you failed in those already. For example, links are
not allowed, and you failed many times with them. We proved that
your links and all other things were inadequate. Before starting
any talk/interview you must agree with our rules. Our rules
don't allow links etc. But you continue to violate rules still.
P4. Your forum is not adequate there. For example it don't
explain when it closes topics or gives bans and the rules are
not adequate either. Therefore your activity in that thread may
lead to closing that topic and that results that many people
might lose a chance to achieve something. You close a door for
them. In older times there was a rule by an enlightened one who
said that not only stealing is prohibited but also obstruction
which leads to the situation where one loses a potential chance.
Do you understand those 4 points and understand that those al
ltogether are a bigger problem than anything that you address to
others?
We proved that you are not adequate. There is no need to deny it
i can list it again. It is enough to remember that all your
links were wrong. We can take sentence by sentence and see that
they were wrong. The same thing with many other your mistakes,
there is no space to deny. So, we proved you are inadequate and
we wrote that you can apply after 1 year again. Don't you
respect such decision? If you respect then why do you continue
to write and repeat all problem P1-P4 and again all you say is
pure brainwashed defeated Wows community believes.
You say that i fail to respond to a bigger picture. That is not
right. I can copy paste what i said in a bigger picture way. I
said that your msot text concentrated to an irrelevant detai
land even there you said that you didn't succed i nthat. I on
the other hand said that you were offtopic from the main topic
and couldn't prove that my rules are good or bad. Do you
comprehend that your opinions about other clans' rules are not
important anyway and there are even some sociums where one gets
banned when talking about moderation rules or other rules. We
don't have anything against Karma rule topic but you failed in
that. I can repeat, show where did your arguments about our
Karma rule had any adequate value? I didn't see any such
argument. If you manage after 1 year to show one such argument
then we might consider change our clan's rules.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page