DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 123--------------------------------------------------
interview 1
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 11:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg115#msg115 date=1656772265]
You obviously have severe connection issue to assume everyone
get disconnected that often. This is a logical assumption
derived from your belief.
Now YOU said every player have connection problem because it is
a common issue. Do YOU have data that proves it ? I don't think
so, you just assume everyone does because you do (according to
my assumption)
What i meant when i said it happen to everyone is that it CAN
happen, not that it does regularly
[/quote]
You say that i talk from my experiences but i talk about many
people's experiences. I have seen many to have connection
problems. I have talked to them. Disconnectings and crashes are
not dependent from individuals but mainly because of software
bugs and therefore not dependent on individuals. You expressed
yourself that many get those crashes and i have seen others to
get them enough too. What is not logical here then if such
things happen to many and often? And what do you plan to achieve
if you can show that it doesn't happen so often. I repeat the
text earlier that if there are at least 100 punishments a day
because crashs then even that amount 100 is enough to declare
the punishment system inadequate. But you don't have any data or
arguments to prove anything about those 100 but you seem to like
to push your proofless opinion still on this irrelevant detail.
I gave enough evidence with the 100 example and added that
reporting also creates those pink/punished statuses with no
adequate reason. And all that together are more than enough to
say that reporting, +-1 Karma soup, etc are not adequate things.
Therefore those things are prohibited but only pink players are
allowed to get +1 to balance the inadequate reporting system. I
have provided totally valid explanations to support such rule
but you haven't provided not even a single adequate arguments.
Yes or no?
#Post#: 124--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 11:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
i think i lost some posts again andi repeat that this is
because of 2-forum dialogue.
#Post#: 125--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 11:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
So, let's make shorter then.
do you agree that you lost the debate? Yes or no? If yes, then
express yourself with short 2-3 sentences.
your main goal was to show that game doesn't crash so often but
i defeated that argument by saying that even if the game crashes
little bit and produces punishment like reporting does then the
system is inadequate and one should avoid such system.
#Post#: 126--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 11:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
Just report them.
[/quote]
I repeat: reporting and other inadequate tools are not allowed.
I repeat: i have given clear explanations that you are
inadequate. Why should i listen to inadequate community members
and do inadequate things like reporting?
#Post#: 127--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 11:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
Good player can easily recognise a good play because they are
good. Why are they good ? cause they have good stats.
[/quote]
The popular brainwashed belief in stats. you can search this
forum where we have defeated the stats argument and also i nthe
official forum we have done it. So, what is the point that you
predictably repeated your community's mind now with that stats
opinion?
Stats don't matter. They don't matter in our debate and they
don't matter in any debate. Define a good snooker enjoyer at the
pub and a good player in wows? A good one is the one who enjoys
his entertainment and does not remember how many games he won or
lost.
If one had a good stats at highschool then that doesn't make him
a millionaire later because stats are irrelevant. The same goes
with Wows stats. You can read all the arguments about the stats
elsewhere. It is a defeated debate for your community. And it is
totally irrelevant. Very often your community tries to win
debates by saying in style "because you had 10 years ago lower
stats in higschoo lthen your opinions today about climate and
Covid politics are wrong and worse than mine". Does it sound
adequate? No. But in Wows people try to win debates this
inadequate way. Looks like you try to finally say that because
you had better highschool and Wows stats so you won the debate?
Well, this is very typical for your community and nothing new.
I repeat: you lost the debate. Show at least 1 thing in were you
or your community is right?
#Post#: 128--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 11:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
Then you say that the last survived player deserves +1. Why
do you have such an inadequate opinion and non-democratic rule?
Because i want to give a +1, and i can do it because WG gave me
that power. If they sees it in port, they'll know someone
appreciated playing with them and that what they did was a good
play and they'll want to do it again, positive reinforcement. In
my opinion they deserve it because if they were dead, we would
have lost. Ofc there's is gonna be exceptions
[/quote]
Your text is inadequate. I repeat the question: Why do you have
such an inadequate opinion and non-democratic rule?.
There is nothing right and good if you give something to others
by your subjective mind and leave others without. Either give to
all team members or don't give to anyone. It is better not to
give anyone because i have explained that Karma soup has no
adeqaute meaning and causes violations of Human Rights etc. do
you want me to copypaste that text again here? Do you agree that
your whole opinion was inadequate about +1 or not?
#Post#: 129--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 11:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
The first player who died in your game had the biggest
impact to your victory.
Depends.
[/quote]
If you say Depends then you agree that you were wrong. I
explained that things depends and are subjective etc and you
agreed which proves that your +1 is inadequate. so, we proved
clearly that your +1 is inadequate even in your own believes and
you confirmed saying Depends.
This proves clearly that your are wrong even in your believe
system. But the adequate belief system beleives that the whole
soup is inadequate no matter how you use it. And that made you
lose the debate.
#Post#: 130--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 11:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
In my opinion karma is simply a mesurement of
appreciation team mates had playing
with the player. But it is generally accepted
that having karma or not does nothing so i won't try to change
your personal use of the karma system
[/quote]
Your definition is not right about the Karma soup. The soup
doesn't measure anything clearly. Did you understand my
explanations that the soup is inadequate and don't measure
anything adequately? Maybe the post where i did it got lost,
some lost disappear because it is confusing to operate with 2
forums. do you agree that you are wrong in your Karma soup
definition or not? Yes or no?
#Post#: 131--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 12:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
Pat yourself on the back more, but don't deceive yourself. You
have not proven anything, you have rejected my arguments
claiming "brainwashing" or "irrelevance" but without arguing why
it's irrelevant, or even why "brainwashed" arguments were bad
[/quote]
It is very typical that your community says at the end that the
opponent didn't prove anything and didn't win any debates.
I have proven very clearly that you lsot the debate. Do you want
me to repeat the argumetns that you failed to respond
adequately?
I asked many times from you to show how your text shows that my
rules about the Karma system are wrong? You ignored the question
and other arguments or didn't provide any reasonable answer. I
on the other hand demonstrated clearly how inadequate the Karma
soup is. Additionally i showed your msitakes in irrelevant
details like where you failed with terms, with links, etc. I
didn't ignore any arguments o nthe other hand. It is your job to
provide proof and data that my opinions are wrong and not my job
to provide evidence. You came and failed to provide proofs and
data and other things but i succeeded to explain that my
standpoints are valid and didn't see any adequate
counter-arguments.
In adequate world this is called my victory i nthe debate, not
yours.
I use 2 titles mainly: brainwashed and irrelevant but never
titles like your community uses (stupid, mad, etc). Brainwashed
is quite official word and i don't have a better English word.
Your behaviour is equal to your community ones and you repeat
the same mistakes they have and you have their allowed 1
opinion. This is called brainwashed. The word Irrelevant means
thinbgs that don't affect the main topic much. For example,
gramamr doesn't affect the arguments. Highschool stats and wows
stats and Indian Caste status doesn't affect anything. And if
you debate on a small sub-argument then it is irrelevant too.
For example if the topic is "is the Wows Karma system against
Human Rights" then a subtopic about inadequate punishments by
game crashes is just 1 example of many and is irrelevant
therefore.
#Post#: 132--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 12:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
You have yet to show that being chat ban is always bad. But i
will entertain you and say why someone getting chat banned is a
bad thing, with an analogy you like so much : if someone is
getting verbally abused, it's only right to punish the abuser so
he can't abuse that person anymore. It's the same as a child
predator being forbidden to go near a school.
I'm sorry you got banned from this forum if only because it
makes answering to you inconvenient
If you wish to discuss chat banning more, we can do it, but
don't do it in a multiple of posts, it's hard to follow
[/quote]
I already explained that chatbanning is laways bad like any
Human Rights violations and you can find a link from this forum
where i have explained it in more details. I remember i already
explained also in our debate why chatbanning is always bad. I
gave an explanation that the person without ability to talk
cannot say that he has radar and answer questions in the chat.
That is already an enough explanations that chatbann always is
bad. Because always the team suffers if the person cannot give
them helpful info. Secondly, every human deserves Human Rights,
even the biggest criminal, that's why they titled the rights as
Human Rights. So i have provided proof about chatbann
andeverything already. But you very likely deny everything.
Chatbanning is one main factor in the inadequate punishment
system the second are game crashes and some other factors
perhaps. But it is enough to say that Karma/punishment system is
not human, not fair, not adequate. And we gave enough exmaples
and proof.
I didn't understand your example with abusers. But i don't
bother reeading that irrelevant text 2nd time. I repeat: Human
Rights are more important than your egoic community mind and
wishes.
You say that you are sorry that we have inconvenient dialogue
between 2 forums. I respond: if you really mean your words then
prove them and make the account here. Otherwise you lie.
Secondly, i don't mind a ban from that forum and i have too many
Customers so that i don't have time for other forums and chats
anyway. I repeat: show at least 1 person or topic who is
adequate in your official forum? There is nothing adequate but i
we needed a demo and an experience of an interview and now we
achieved it. We had done interviews i nthe game chat this far
only.
I don't wish to talk about anything else because it will not be
productive. Can you first demonstrate that you agreed that you
lost this debate? After that we can close the debate and move to
a new one otherwise it is pointless to jump to new and new
topics.
Did you understand that you were wrong i nthis debate or not?
I believe you deny and there fore i don't think you are adequate
enough to talk to us.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page