DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 102--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 5:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
In point 3 you repeat what i said that reporting removes the
Human Rights. First question, why to repeat what i said? Second
question, what is the point of giving another inadequate link?
Is the goal to think that links make you appear more scientific
or smarter? Well, links, emoticons, spam, etc are not allwoed
generally, okay, so you don't look more scientific. Those 2
questions first for the point 3.
Then you say that a player can appeal somewhere after he has
been punished for no reason. Don't you agree that such
possibility is naive and inadequate? And then you say like who
don't take a lwayer and don't start to appeal is defenitely
deserving the punishment? Where from such sadistic ideas come
from? Then you say a popular idea that humans can also speak
without words. The first answer is, that why Humans should act
like not humans? Secondly, there is no way to express many
thoughts when your Human Rights are gone. For example ,how you
say that you have a radar or how you answer the question that
was typed to you in the chat? so, the points 1-3 are all
inadequate and wrong.
#Post#: 103--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 5:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
Isn't finding someone annoying also subjective ? So in the end
friendly fire is most of the time an unsportmanship behaviour
that should be punished
[/quote]
What do you mean in point 4? You say that msot things are
subjective. Right? So, ""unsportmanship behaviour" is subjective
to othen. Why a "unsportmanship behaviour" or other subjective
things should be punished? This makes a chaos. If we talk about
Karma points, then this makes a Karma soup. Yes or no?
#Post#: 104--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 5:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
About karma :
Yes, who am i to decide who plays well and who plays badly, I am
not an amazing player, however if the last surviving player of
my team manage to win, it's generally a good play and giving
them +1 will show them my appreciation for making us win. On the
opposite giving someone -1 isn't limited to pink player, but is
also something i can do to anyone if i find them annoying,
exactly like friendly fire. In my opinion karma is simply a
mesurement of appreciation team mates had playing with the
player. But it is generally accepted that having karma or not
does nothing so i won't try to change your personal use of the
karma system, i simply desired insight to you reasoning and i
got it.
[/quote]
In point 4 you seem to show obeying to authorities etc by askinh
"who am i"? Well, that attitude is brainwashed and not
democratic. It does not matter who you are, it does not matter
which grades you got in highschool, and no matter which stats
you have in entertainment games.
So, why do you ask who you are? Accidentally people say deep
truths sometimes and your question Who is actually a legendary
in non-dualism. So, it may appear that you maybe resonate to my
influence. That is the only good think that i see in your
response. Everything else is wrong and bad.
Hypocritically you say that you don't decide who playes well and
who not but the reality is that all Wows community does it every
day just look at the game chat and the official forum. So, it is
very unlikely that a typical Wows person like with typical
brainwashed opinions now don't decide who is bad or good in
entertainment. Very naive to believe your such opinion. And then
i nthe next sentence you even decide how good or bad you are by
saying " I am not an amazing player,". This is the act of saying
how good or bad someone is. So, why do you lie to yourself? And
why do you feel the urge to be amazing? And how do you define an
amazing player in the pub and in Wows?
Then you say that the last survived player deserves +1. Why do
you have such an inadequate opinion and non-democratic rule? The
first player who died in your game had the biggest impact to
your victory. Giving +1 is not a thing to give a positive thing
because i repeat that it is an irrelevant inadequate subjective
brainwashed soup. Explain why you use an inadequate thing and
don't you think that it makes you inadequate afterwords?
Then you demonstrate that you give -1 to subjectively not
pleaseant team mates. Again, +-1 is inadequate soup and why you
do it? Very often Wows brainwashed community even writes to the
chat they blacklisted someone or wil lgive -1 and asks others to
do the same. This is all prohibited in my rules and i have
explained that well somewhere. But the main question is why to
be inadequate with +-1?
Your definition of the subjective Karma soup is inadequate.
So, i answered everything.
#Post#: 105--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 5:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Below is the initial topic about +-1. I copy it here because
some posts may disappear etc.
So, i have explained why it is not wise to use +-1 msot times.
But you have not explained it adequately. Yes or no?
I have explained 1 rare situation when you can give +1. You
tryed to doubt in that rare detail but you failed to give an
adequate argument against that rare detail. Even if you will
manage to give an adequate response to that detail then details
are irrelevant and +-1 system is stil lgenerally inadequate as i
said.
In conclusion all of your repsonse was inadequate and typical to
your brainwashed Wows community. But there was accidentally 1
pearl in your text. And that pearl is beyound the knowledge.
Just like stories tell that there is something called a Creator
who creates Worlds and afterwords creates Knowledge inside those
Worlds. So, Knowledge is always lower than Creation and many
other things are above mind, knowledge, logics. Your pearl is
above knowledge. So, i greet you on that, and only that.
[quote]
1. Giving +1 is allowed only in following cases:
a) player name is pink.
b) other players talk in chat to give -1 to somebody. In
that cases it is allowed to give +1 to that person who is going
to get -1.
But why though ?
Why give +1 to the player with a pink name (it means they are a
player that is often AFK or damage their team mates)
Why give +1 to someone who is getting a -1
Why isn't it allowed to just give a +1
[/quote]
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/158313-batja-our-hive-called-batja/
#Post#: 106--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 6:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I also add here that everything the opponent said i have heard
before and proved it to be wrong. So, the Wows community has
always olny 1 certain allowed opinion/behaviour. There are no
other opinions, no other behaviours, but only certain well known
ones. Yes or no. Of course Yes and if you look my wows official
forum posting history then you see that i mention that i repeat
plenty of times the same defeated debates there. In the precious
debate there wasn't anything new, there wasn't a personal
opponent at all, no person, but Wows community, no person but
community. The opoonent said what community says, so it wasn't a
person, but a community. The person typically supported
violation of Human Rights just like Wows community always has
been doing. Supported all the popular such believes and acts
that the community has. Repeated again misterious terms that it
cannot define, etc. That person's mind equals the community
mind, no difference. Except 1 pearl.
Also funny is that i have to answer to this adequate forum here
because i technically can't do that to the inadequate forum.
This is very similar to reporting system where one can't talk
later and the team cries because of that. In the official forum
i asked from moderators that how can one understand which rule
was violated if you don't explicitly show that. And they ignored
the question, so i doubt that anyone understand which rules were
violated, i for exampel has not violated any rules. Also, when i
sugegsted improvements to the Moderating system then my
suggestion was deleted and i got again banned by Harry Potter
style rule violation which prohibits improvements. Etc. Doesn't
that all look funny? One writes there and i asnwer here. And you
are the ones coming to me just like every day i have customers
in my chat. So, if you wish to get enligthenings then come to
this forum and obey adequate rules.
I repeat that i have never ever lsot any debates and i have
proved that all popular opininos in the Wows community arewrong.
That is a fact. Deep in your minds you agree with that truth, so
put your ego down and come here and let's talk here adequately.
Why we have to do the funny 2-forum talking? The answer to the
why-question is that Wows community is inadequate but not me.
Yes or no? Yes, because i am totally adequate and have never
lost any debates and don't cause 2-forum talks like this here
now.
#Post#: 108--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 7:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
is there anyone else who wants to try to prove any allowed
popular idea from Wows community?
is there anyone who wants to try to approve violation of Human
Rights including +-1 system?
is there anyone who wants to try to prove that our rules are
inadequate?
is there anyone who has a different opinion than is allowed in
your community? For example, say that you like subs, like many
likes them, and give some other opinions that are different from
your brainwashed community?
i sugegst that answer into this forum otherwise 2-forum dialogue
is not good.
one more exercise:
show at least 1 topic i nthe official Wows forum which i
adequate?
Show at least 1 adequate person from Wows official forum. It
should have at least 100 posts. Show at least 1 and let's see if
he is adequate from his posting history.
#Post#: 109--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 8:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]first wanted to know your view on the karma system but
you have managed to make 10 post to my single answer, that amaze
me
Citation
Friendly fire should not annoy more than enemy fire, and,
there should not be even any annoying from the enemy fire.
No, I don't care if an enemy shoots me, that's part of the game.
If a friendly shoots me tho, he doesn't want to play with me and
should obviously refrain from playing then
Citation
Mentally well person enters a pub and playes 10 billiards
and won't even remember how many he lost or won and only thing
he remembers was that he enjoyed the entertainment. This is
mentally healthy and obviously Wows community is not mentally
okay.
You have it backward. If you go into a casino with 10 billiard
and only care about the thrill of the game you have a gambling
addiction, look it up, that's a real mental problem
Citation
You repeat here that wasting ammo means purposingly lowering
the chances to win. I already explained that wasting is
irrelevan compared to brainwashed tactics if we tal kabout
victory and even more irrelevant if we talk about mental health
in the Wows community.
No, wa [/quote]
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/158313-batja-our-hive-called-batja/?tab=comments#comment-4214760
#Post#: 110--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 8:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg109#msg109 date=1656767497]
first wanted to know your view on the karma system but you have
managed to make 10 post to my single answer, that amaze me
[/quote]
So did you get an adequate response for the Karma soup or not?
Yes or no? do you still hold your inadequate opinion about Karma
or not?
#Post#: 111--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 8:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg109#msg109 date=1656767497]
No, I don't care if an enemy shoots me, that's part of the game.
If a friendly shoots me tho, he doesn't want to play with me and
should obviously refrain from playing then
[/quote]
first you claim that you don't mind if the enemy shoots you
which sounds fine but it is difficult to believe but this is
another topic.
What is "should refrain from playing"? Does it mean that one
should stop doing something inadequate? But why the whole wows
community don't stop being inadequate? Is it adequate to report
subs, adequate to treat people by highschool grades or by Indian
Caste system like they do with the stats mentality? Etc. No, it
is not adequate and therefore isn't it hipocritical to ask in
some details others to be adequate but yourself violating even
Human Rights?
If you get annoyed by friendly fire then this is your problem.
Don't get annoyed, and don't cause it. And +-1 does not solve
any friendly fire but causes violation of humanity.
#Post#: 112--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 8:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg109#msg109 date=1656767497]
You have it backward. If you go into a casino with 10 billiard
and only care about the thrill of the game you have a gambling
addiction, look it up, that's a real mental problem
[/quote]
I think you are wrong yourself. Addict wants to win and the
entertainer doesn't care if he wins if we talk about gambling
industry. For example in the stock market most investors want to
become more rich and that is the goal. and they are of cause
addicted to money and stock markets but the main aspect is that
hey want to win. You seem to claim the opoosite and say that a
stock investor has a gambling addiction if he don't like winning
but the process. Successful traders write clearly and adequately
that sucess starts when they put all emotions away and don't
expect any victory. If one starts to act emotionally so that
only the urge to win is in his mind then this is an addiction
and ends with failure. So, your definition of addiction is
opposite than adequate wworld has.
You mention mental problems. It is very typical in
non-democratical countries that after the loss in argumentation
the opponent is called mad with mental problems and the next
step is to silence him so that he disappears. In Wows it is a
typical argumentation method. I think you try to prove now that
i have mentally something wrong because you lost all arguments
and the next step is that you try to ban me somehow. That is
very typical for Wows community. I don't practice inadequate
methods compared to your community so i don't call anyone mad. I
call inadequate or brainwashed but not mad, not fat, not stupid,
etc.
I like pub's snooker example more but your casino example is
fine as well. I repeat that mentally stable person should act in
a pub and in wows the same way.
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page