DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 87--------------------------------------------------
interview 1
By: wows Date: June 22, 2022, 2:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This topic became an interview number 1.
I create a general new topic to introduce generally interview
rules.
--
In this topic we prepare new potential clan members for the
interview which determines if he gets in to the clan.
1. The potential candidate must make a dialogue which
demonstrates his mental system.
2. The caln owner is the interviewer and has never lost any
debates before.
3. Candidate can contact the clan owner in the game chat. After
a short discussion in the chat the interviewer can immediately
grant or propose the candidate to make an account to an adequate
forum liek this one here and make a dialogue here after which he
explains the results.
4. Example topics:
4.1 Chose any popular brainwashed (defeated) belief that the
community holds and try to prove it. Or, try to prove an
opposite. For example, prove that WG is bad or good, CVs/Subs
are bad, stats matter, DDs msut split etc. If you fail to chose
a mainstream false belief for the topic then the interviewer
choses a random one from those.
4.2 Chose any topic from non-duality and make a statement on it
and defent it. For example, prove that Wows community is smarter
than birds if we know that birds are actually more evolved
because they don't have the illusional self. Etc. If you fail to
chose such topic then the interviewer choses a random one.
5. It doesn't matter how convincing or sucessful you are in your
opinion in the debate. Your opinion does not matter just like
wows community's and birds' opinion doesn't really matter. So,
you must be happy that you had a chance to resonate in the
interview and the result is not important. We don't need any
candidates/members and there are plenty of clans where you can
go.
6. After you become a member you must promise to follow our
rules. For example, you are not allowed to give +1 to players,
andn ot -1, reporting not allwoed, brainwashed attitudes not
allowed, etc. We introduce you those rules but you don't have to
learn them because the right candidate already takes such rules
as normality or already follows them.
7. You can always leave the clan or do whatever you want. We
don't have any plans because we don't believe in free will and
thus there is no point to want to plan anything.
Posted that post also to the official forum:
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/158313-batja-our-hive-called-batja/?tab=comments#comment-4208372
#Post#: 91--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 1, 2022, 4:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
[quote]
1. Giving +1 is allowed only in following cases:
a) player name is pink.
b) other players talk in chat to give -1 to somebody. In that
cases it is allowed to give +1 to that person who is going to
get -1.
[/quote]
But why though ?
Why give +1 to the player with a pink name (it means they are a
player that is often AFK or damage their team mates)
Why give +1 to someone who is getting a -1
Why isn't it allowed to just give a +1 [/quote]
HTML https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/158313-batja-our-hive-called-batja/?tab=comments#comment-4213967
#Post#: 92--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 1, 2022, 4:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg91#msg91 date=1656667334]
the player with a pink name (it means they are a player that is
often AFK or damage their team mates)
[/quote]
1. The term AFK is not allowed because it is misleading. Most
times peopel are not Away From Keyboard but disconnected to the
game because the game has software errors, or internet is bad,
etc. But the person is most times near the keyboard. Sometimes
person answers a phone call near the keyboard but they are never
away from the keyboard. The term AFK is totally misleading
therefore and misleading things are not allowed. You can use "he
lost internet" or "he got disconnected" etc because those terms
are 90% of times true but being away from keyboard is 90% of
times false. Using misleading terms makes people's mind
brainwashed. They really start to believe that peopel are away
from keyboards and other illusional things.
2. Pink name doesn't happen because AFK but mainly because WG
software has errors. Very typical is that you log into the
battle and then the game crashes. You restart the game and log
int othe same battle and the game crashes again. You try 15
different solutions (changing drivers, restarting computer, etc)
and each 15 times end with a crash. The player is reported by
brainwashed people and he gets a pink name plus the obligation
to play 16 Coop battles. This is the main reason.
Beside game crashing the name gets pink for 2 next battles when
the player shoots too many times team mates. Because shooting
team mates doesn't make any technical damage in the battle then
it is absurd to give penalties for such. So, it is wrong to make
any name pink or give any penalty because of friendly fire.
Either disable the friendly fire at all, for example lock guns
when one aims to the team mate, or ignore the act.
There is nothing so bad in shooting team mates if it is an act
of communication. For example if 1 person doesn't have the Human
Right for speach then he expresses his thougths by shooting
others. There is nothing wrong in a such creative speak method.
Let's say someone wrotes something annoying etc and why you have
to silently listen to it isntead of sending torps into him as an
intelligent answer? The answer is not less intelligent than the
words said first by the team mate. Friendly torps don't affect
the result anyway and are like toy water pistols in real life.
Most times the guilty side is the one who got the friendly
bullets in. Very rarely there are some who don't deserve any
bullets. So, most times the innocence friendly fire is fine and
it is a msitake to make a player name pink after it. Certainly a
bigger issue is if the game violates Human Rights, or includes
thievery or gambling.
The name goes pink also when peopel report one because
Unupported Behaviour. For example if a team doesn't do the
tactics that the brainwashed Wows community allows then
brainwashed people report and the name gets pink. It is obvious
that brainwashed community has bad tactics and wrong believes so
it is not wise to follow any tactical suggestions from them. In
one battle one team mates wrote i nthe chat that i should go to
the J1 location where one becomes useless. I went and wrote that
i do as the team wants. After that the team lost and reported me
for Unsupported behaviour. I did exactly as the team wanted this
time and the real problem was that the team's opinion were
inadequate about J1. There are many other examples for
Unsupported B but all them are inadequate.
So, it is a fact that pink name players have not done anything
wrong but the other players and WG has done a lot wrong. This is
the fact and therefore it is absurd to threat pink players badly
etc. Intead, they have not made msitakes, but others have.
It is not allowed to ask strangers o nthe street to go ra-pe or
damage otherways someone you don't like. Because other's don't
know the person at all who you wish the damage. And why should
anyone damage at all others? Therefore it is not allowed to ask
others to ra-pe or report someone. And reporting is anyway
abused as we describe here so why to use such inadequate tool at
all. So use it to satisfy their rap-ing desire some use the tool
to feed their egoic opinions other ways and some use it if they
don't like your ship types or body weight. So, why to use
reporting at all if it is so inadequate tool? It is not allowed
to report, to give +-1 therefore.
So, there is no AFK but buggy software. There is no problem in
friendly fire but in violating Human Rights by removing right of
speach. And reporting and +-1 are abused inadequate tools. The
pink player has not done anything wrong. To balance brainwashed
hostile Wows community's behaviour one must act opoosite way to
them. For example, if someone is going to report a pink player
then you add immediately 10 times +1 to that pink player. That
makes the balance fine.
Giving +1 and -1 makes an inadequate soup of Karma. Some give +1
if they like your jokes and others if they like your playing
style. But both are inadequate because who defines which jokes
are objectively good and which playstyle is good and what is
good? The total +3 is misleading because what does it show? Does
it show a good sense of racist humor by someone or does it mean
a good tactics by someone or what does it show? It shows nothing
but an irrelevant soup. Therefore it is not allowed to do
inadequate things like using inadequate tools.
#Post#: 95--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 1, 2022, 5:20 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
The silent communication is that they finds me even more
annoying than the enemy and they'd rather show it to me than
engage the enemy efficiently, purposingly draging both themself
and the team down. One also doesn't go pink from 1 or 2 torpedo
hit but from 15, so they really have to go out of their way to
get pink from friendly fire, and they will 100% useless to the
team in the process
[/quote]
It is a fact that Wows community is not mentally fine but is
sick with brainwashed sich double standard wrong opinions.
Therefore it is irrelevant what annoys them and it is
therapeutically benefitial to annoy them more. The problem is
that Wows community gets anxiety and stress because things they
should not in entertainment activities. For example, if they see
a wonderful Sub ship in their team then they report it and
become annoyed- the cure is to add more Subs to the game. Or
which cure you suggest to your community i nthat case?
Explanations don't cure so effectively because the brainwash has
been so strong.
Friendly fire should not annoy more than enemy fire, and, there
should not be even any annoying from the enemy fire. Mentally
healthy person don't care about results in the entertainment and
don't care about highschool grades and Wows stats. Mentally well
person enters a pub and playes 10 billiards and won't even
remember how many he lost or won and only thing he remembers was
that he enjoyed the entertainment. This is mentally healthy and
obviously Wows community is not mentally okay.
You repeat here that wasting ammo means purposingly lowering the
chances to win. I already explained that wasting is irrelevan
compared to brainwashed tactics if we tal kabout victory and
even more irrelevant if we talk about mental health in the Wows
community. Friendly fire can be a good educational/healing
method for the community and the Human Right in other form that
was taken away. What is more significant - violating Human
Rights, for example torturing people, or, not covering a face
while coughing while in the public transport? Mentally healthy
people would ignore the uncovered cough and also ignore friendly
fire etc but would not ignore when Wows community reports Subs
and takes the right to speak away etc.
So, i already answered to that idea 2 times in total now.
#Post#: 96--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 1, 2022, 5:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I repeat: AFK is not an adequate term.
WG's Wiki does not define what is AFK but has such term in their
title. The Wiki mentions inactivity and other things but does
not tell which of those are the definition for the term AFK.
Therefore WG's Wiki is useless if we talk about terms like AFK,
or Arcade. There are nowhere adequate definitions about those
terms. Therefore i repeat that the term AFK is not adequate and
better not to use it. There is no need to use terms that one
cannot define. WG cannot define what is AFK or Arcade, also in
Wows official forums you don't find an adequate definition for
those terms.
Literally and gistorically the term Away From Keys means that
one goes to toilet or to kitchen. That is AFK. If one is
inactive then that is not AFK but in-active. I repeat that msot
times those who are titled as AFK are nicely near their
keyboards. So, there is no need to call them AFK.
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg95#msg95 date=1656714002]
About pink players :
HTML https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Teamkilling#AFK_and_abandoning_ship<br
/>
[quote]
AFK and abandoning ship
While not properly teamkilling, violations such inactivity, and
leaving early all affect your team. They are considered
unsportsmanlike conduct, and are penalized automatically much as
is teamkilling.
Leaving a battle early, while you're not dead yet, via the <esc>
- Exit Battle mechanism is clearly intentional and will incur a
penalty.
Disconnecting in the middle of a battle is usually not under the
player's control, yet in general is treated as "leaving early".
A game crash is treated as a disconnect. It is often possible to
reconnect or restart and rejoin the battle, in which case no
penalty is applied. A "flaky ISP" is no defense.
Another form of inactivity is a failure to load into battle.
This can be due to several possible software glitches or a shaky
internet connection. There is usually plenty of time to restart
the game and enter battle to avoid a penalty.
Be aware that repeated such violations can earn orange status or
worse.
[/quote]
[/quote]
That article is not adequate.
It says that
[quote]"It is often possible to reconnect or restart and rejoin
the battle, in which case no penalty is applied"[/quote].
That means that sometimes it is possible to reconnect to the
crashed game. It means that it is that sometimes it is but
sometimes it is not. So, sometimes something is possible and if
one has such luck sometimes then he won't get any penalties and
no pink name. Right? In short, luck determines if one gets a
penaly and a pink name or not. Yes or no? Yes. Is it adequate to
have such penalty system based on luck? No. Is that Wiki article
adequate then? No. How to be adequate? Adequate behaviour is not
to give penalties by luck. And, honest would be to say that the
game disconnects and crashes so often and penalties applied
because of that often. That is the honest reality.
So, that Wiki article is inadequate. It does not define the term
which it uses and it is not honest and it explains that
penalties depend on luck which is inadequate thing.
What was the goal to post WG wiki page link? Was the goal to
define the term AFK? If so, then this goal failed. Was the goal
to define pink players? Well, it doesn't mention the word Pink.
So, what was the point of the link then?
#Post#: 97--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 1, 2022, 5:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg95#msg95 date=1656714002]
Being disconnected happens to everyone. But from there to
claim every pink player encountered a connection problem is a
immense leap in logic and there is an abysmal lack of proof
supporting this claim.
[/quote]
There is nothing wrong with logics. Logics means conclusions and
it does not matter how strong evidence some conclusions and
statements have their are still logical and comes from logical
reasoning. It is totally logical to say for example that "all
players have connection problems because it is the most common
issue"- that is totally logical, and no matter how true of false
it is, it is logical to conclude things. so, there is no problem
with logics.
[quote]
every pink player encountered a connection problem
[/quote]
Where do you see that i mentioned the word Every?
Here you see the word Mainly instead of Every:
[quote]
2. Pink name doesn't happen because AFK but mainly because WG
software has errors.
[/quote]
So, let's assume that you made a typo and meant the word Mainly
instead of the word Every. Well, you mentioned yourself that
Being disconnected happens to everyone. So, by your own believes
peopel get disconnected often and you even say that every one
fro mthe playerbase gets disconnected- that makes it a very
common thing. Why not to believe that msot times you see a pink
player then it is Mainly because of the disconnection which
happens to EveryOne? That sounds logical.
If you can find an adequate data that shows the main reason for
pink players then let's read it. But you haven't shown any such
data and believe that my opinions are definitely wrong then your
such approach is not adequate. Provide evidence that your
opinion is more right than mine. Let's assume that you will
succeed and show that pink players are not because of WG
software and other issues that i mentioned- in that case you
haven't still explained why to use +-1 on any players. I on the
other hand have explained that +-1 is not adequate, and only
some rare cases is fine (like for giving +1 to pink players).
I can continue commenting from the sentence " It is however..."
tomorrow.
#Post#: 98--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 4:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=16.msg95#msg95 date=1656714002]
It is however not the only case of being pink, like with
friendly fire, yes it won't do damage anymore, but it's torpedo
that the team mate won't have when they need it finally engaging
the enemy.
[/quote]
The term Pink may be misleading so i define it here properly:
pink is a cosmetical mark that show that a penalty was executed.
Pink = penalized/punished. When you write that pink color is set
for many occasions then i think more better would be if you
phrased by replacing the word pink with Penalized/Punished.
You say that peopel get punished/pink if a team member wastes a
torpedo on alleys. This is what your long sentence shows. I
think you lost your thought while constructing the long
sentence. Wasted torps are not connected to punishment as you
describe. Do you agree? Yes or no? If you want to say that
wasting bulelts, torps and other useful tools need a punishment
then this is wrong because wasting happens all the time and the
major factor for the loss are brainwashed tactics and believes
which makes wasted tools irrelevant. The honest explanation is
that wasting is not a loss it is just an excuse for sadistic
minds to punish others in entertainment, and copy the
brainwashed community's behaviours, isn't it? Players do
sometimes educational team damage to some racist brainwashed
Wows members by shooting 12 torps from behind into them and then
go continue to play and get TOP 1- that demonstrates that
wasting resources is irrelevant.
Some players do friendly fire jsut for fun too and later report
others who do friendly fire which is an example of double
standards in Wows brainwashed community and double standards,
thievery, brainwashing etc are much bigger problems than a
firendly fire or etc.
#Post#: 99--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 4:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]
The silent communication is that they finds me even more
annoying than the enemy and they'd rather show it to me than
engage the enemy efficiently, purposingly draging both themself
and the team down. One also doesn't go pink from 1 or 2 torpedo
hit but from 15, so they really have to go out of their way to
get pink from friendly fire, and they will 100% useless to the
team in the process
[/quote]
It is a fact that Wows community is not mentally fine but is
sick with brainwashed sich double standard wrong opinions.
Therefore it is irrelevant what annoys them and it is
therapeutically benefitial to annoy them more. The problem is
that Wows community gets anxiety and stress because things they
should not in entertainment activities. For example, if they see
a wonderful Sub ship in their team then they report it and
become annoyed- the cure is to add more Subs to the game. Or
which cure you suggest to your community i nthat case?
Explanations don't cure so effectively because the brainwash has
been so strong.
Friendly fire should not annoy more than enemy fire, and, there
should not be even any annoying from the enemy fire. Mentally
healthy person don't care about results in the entertainment and
don't care about highschool grades and Wows stats. Mentally well
person enters a pub and playes 10 billiards and won't even
remember how many he lost or won and only thing he remembers was
that he enjoyed the entertainment. This is mentally healthy and
obviously Wows community is not mentally okay.
You repeat here that wasting ammo means purposingly lowering the
chances to win. I already explained that wasting is irrelevan
compared to brainwashed tactics if we tal kabout victory and
even more irrelevant if we talk about mental health in the Wows
community. Friendly fire can be a good educational/healing
method for the community and the Human Right in other form that
was taken away. What is more significant - violating Human
Rights, for example torturing people, or, not covering a face
while coughing while in the public transport? Mentally healthy
people would ignore the uncovered cough and also ignore friendly
fire etc but would not ignore when Wows community reports Subs
and takes the right to speak away etc.
So, i already answered to that idea 2 times in total now.
.
#Post#: 100--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 5:01 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Looks like some posts disappear somehow.
So, i don't know if to continue to write.
#Post#: 101--------------------------------------------------
Re: interviews for clan membership
By: wows Date: July 2, 2022, 5:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I replied to first 2-3 sentences at least. So, go ahead and
reply to them. Maybe you fail to respond even to those? I will
investigate later why posts disappear.
But in conclusion all you said was wrong. Mostly your text
contained copy paste links which had inadequate texts fro
mauthorities. Secondly, you didn't define terms. Also you didn't
explain why +-1 is bad or wrong but i explained it well.
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page