DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
*****************************************************
#Post#: 660--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mafia conspiracy
By: Dr Schizo Date: October 16, 2022, 7:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=116.msg659#msg659 date=1665921623]
We don't do jokes our things which cause bigger sufferings to
others. For exmaple, no jokes about death, diseases, poverty,
etc. First it takes time to get used to such attitude but later
it becomes like a natural part of you. I for example don't do
such Phd-jokes and don't call anyone iditos and i don't need to
make any effort for that, it happens automatically. Yes,
sometimes i may call by accident or how to say, but i don't
remember such "accidents" and they are surely not intentional if
they happen.
[/quote]
I am in agreement that one shouldn't be using jokes about death,
diseases, poverty, personal attacks, etc on the forum. After
reading other posts made by members of this forum it is out of
the question, practising such believes that someone should for
example 'go kill themselves' is horrific.
My usage of PhDs are a way to avoid ratiating a large amount of
ego. Doctor of Philosophy I use because it indicates an
individual who has studied at a high level about some
fundamental nature of knowledge. There are obviously no
Universities that issue these specific Phds, but it is in my
opinion a better term to use than let's say 'Expert in Wows', as
that portrays a larger amount of ego because the language is
simpler.
The reasoning for 'PhD in Schizophrenics' is coupled to my work
in researching topics that would lable you. In higher levels of
language words like 'Deranged' would be used, in lower language
levels it would be 'skizo'. A compromise between these levels
was made. If you feel it is not appropriate for the forum I am
glad to revoke my PhDs or define them in a better way, as I am
not on this forum to make fun of anyone.
#Post#: 662--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mafia conspiracy
By: wows Date: October 16, 2022, 8:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Dr Schizo link=topic=116.msg660#msg660
date=1665924607]
one shouldn't be using jokes about death, diseases, poverty,
...
My usage of PhDs are a way to avoid ratiating a large amount of
ego.
...
The reasoning for 'PhD in Schizophrenics' is coupled to my work
in researching topics that would lable you.
[/quote]
First you seem to say that it is not ethical to play with more
serious topics bu then you seem to contradict yourself and still
do.
Secondly you say that your signature is like a mental exercise
for you that benefits you. If so, then isn't it egoic to put
yourself higher than others? As i gave examples, others have
broken bones etc and you are making jokes over them and call it
as a benefitial mental exercise for you. This is egoic and
causes suffereing to others which in a so called Karma-circle
will grow into world terrorism and finally arrives somehow to
you and makes you yourself suffer. Budhistic ethics are very
good and they don't suggest to cause others to suffer, or others
to lose some options, etc.
Thirdly you say something that i didn't understand. Sounds like
you are doing some kind of Researching thing, that is fine, but
what is the my part in it and what kind of labels do you mention
and what do you mean? Me has no role here, this forum is not
about me and not for me. Your goals should be to give something
for the society (your "research" for example), and work with
your ego and things (like your ego-exercise) but personally
someone like me or another forum member shouldn't be in your
goals in any way. It is a wows-related forum that discusses also
some psychology i would say. But it is not a palce where to feed
your ego or do any research related to anyone specific. So ,i am
confused what you said and what are your goals. Can you explain
in simpler words.
#Post#: 663--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mafia conspiracy
By: Dr Schizo Date: October 16, 2022, 8:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=wows link=topic=116.msg662#msg662 date=1665927080]
Thirdly you say something that i didn't understand. Sounds like
you are doing some kind of Researching thing, that is fine, but
what is the my part in it and what kind of labels do you mention
and what do you mean? Me has no role here, this forum is not
about me and not for me. Your goals should be to give something
for the society (your "research" for example), and work with
your ego and things (like your ego-exercise) but personally
someone like me or another forum member shouldn't be in your
goals in any way. It is a wows-related forum that discusses also
some psychology i would say. But it is not a palce where to feed
your ego or do any research related to anyone specific. So ,i am
confused what you said and what are your goals. Can you explain
in simpler words.
[/quote]
I should have said it better that one would be labled by others.
Often in society irregular thoughts are seen down upon and
depending on the severity of this 'difference' the one who
brings the 'alternative' thought up is ousted by society with
the usage of bad words. Studying the philosphy of wows is the
goal. Applying myself as having a Phd (even though it is not
entirely correct) I feel is better than saying in simple
language "I am good at wows" or "I am an expert", since studying
philosphy doesn't include any interpretation of 'skill' because
it is just a study, while saying "I am an expert" fuels ego. I
intend to avoid the ego-part while providing with alternative
theories not often discussed elsewhere (or accepted elsewhere).
#Post#: 664--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mafia conspiracy
By: wows Date: October 16, 2022, 9:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Dr Schizo link=topic=116.msg663#msg663
date=1665928329]
[quote author=wows link=topic=116.msg662#msg662 date=1665927080]
Thirdly you say something that i didn't understand. Sounds like
you are doing some kind of Researching thing, that is fine, but
what is the my part in it and what kind of labels do you mention
and what do you mean? Me has no role here, this forum is not
about me and not for me. Your goals should be to give something
for the society (your "research" for example), and work with
your ego and things (like your ego-exercise) but personally
someone like me or another forum member shouldn't be in your
goals in any way. It is a wows-related forum that discusses also
some psychology i would say. But it is not a palce where to feed
your ego or do any research related to anyone specific. So ,i am
confused what you said and what are your goals. Can you explain
in simpler words.
[/quote]
I should have said it better that one would be labled by others.
Often in society irregular thoughts are seen down upon and
depending on the severity of this 'difference' the one who
brings the 'alternative' thought up is ousted by society with
the usage of bad words. Studying the philosphy of wows is the
goal. Applying myself as having a Phd (even though it is not
entirely correct) I feel is better than saying in simple
language "I am good at wows" or "I am an expert", since studying
philosphy doesn't include any interpretation of 'skill' because
it is just a study, while saying "I am an expert" fuels ego. I
intend to avoid the ego-part while providing with alternative
theories not often discussed elsewhere (or accepted elsewhere).
[/quote]
My post had 3 parts and you ignored first 2 of them which means
you agree with those 2 parts. Those 2 parts proved that you are
egoic and also controversial.
You response for the 3rd part sounds still offtopical because
you talk about the Phd-Wows part and avoiding the asked
disease-part. Your response seem to again say that you do egoic
exercise which i already commented and you silently agreed.
Ignoring arguments, providing controversies and feeding your ego
is not acceptable for this forum. I don't believe that your
ethical part is ready yet. We got a clear proof that your ethics
is low, but we are sure that your intellectual part is almost
fine and little bit above the Wows community. You failed to
answer to msot of the 16 questions/arguments that i provided.
Yes you deny everything but that is what all our candidates to
here so we don't ask their opinion. You seem to be interested in
science but your ideas are so primitive and have so many
msitakes. For example, it should be obvious that you don't
define terms that you don't use. It is like walking on the
crowdy street and doing something inadequate that doesn't
benefit you: for example doing a front yoga split with legs.
Totally inadequate act just like defining a term that serves
only as a noise maker. Many mistakes with definitions etc. This
is far from the real menaing of science. Also you seem to title
yourself like some kind of mental disease doctor but i don't see
anywhere any sign of knowing that area or any scientific skill
at all. But the wows community has even lower skills and lower
ethics than you.
You had plenty of times to answer in this topic and that round
is over. I don't react anymore for your input here and the
results that i wrote are final.
I believe if you get better skills then come back here. If you
need help in creating yourself a forum then i am sure peopel can
help on that and i would have suggested too some things about
that. Because seems like you would benefit from a forum.
I should one day add to the rules which usernames and signatures
are allowed. Obviously you won't make a user like "Dr
NoseBreaker" into a christian forum and to many others as well.
In my opinion it is an obvious thing to understand but i agree
that it is better to write it into the rules clearly. Well, i
write when i write, i can't do it now, it has to happen itself.
#Post#: 741--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mafia conspiracy
By: test Date: October 20, 2022, 8:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Testing:
this is user Test who is in the Isolated Members group.
He can't reply elsewhere but can reply in this Isolation folder
as you see.
So, all banned people can at least reply to the debate topics
now. But maybe we should set the ended debate topics as ReadOnly
and Clsoed. Maybe not. I'm not sure.
Do they need a privilege to create a new topic in the Isolation
folder? I think not, i am not sure.
Well, tiem wil lshow how we set rights for them.
But now banned peopel have the possibility to talk/say. If time
shows that they say fine things then we can unbann them. We
should create in Google Docs some questionnaires for them that
they read, fill and sign before unbanning.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page