URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       wows forum
  HTML https://wows.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Debates, Interviews
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 645--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: wows Date: October 15, 2022, 9:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Dr Schizo link=topic=116.msg632#msg632
       date=1665760486]
       It is not necessary to have any specific clan play the division,
       one team of DDs has to completelly stomp the other side. It is
       also very hard to test this theory out, you only have to find
       the matches by pure chance as you cannot determine what
       teammates/enemies you will have. I hope these findings are
       interesting, a lot of work went into this one. King regards.
       [/quote]
       You say that it is difficult to test your theory. But i have
       tested your recent theories and provided replays and nothing
       difficult. 14. Don't you agree that it is easy to test your
       theory? Just play Randoms and once you get a MM that has a Blue
       team then take that replay and if you wish then previous 10
       replays as well and wait for the next such MM. Let's say you get
       20 replays and 2 times the needed MM. So, that is already enough
       to verify your claims. You can continue the next evening if you
       really wish to get ca 5 needed replays in total. But i think you
       get an answer much sooner. So, there is nothing difficult.
       15. Why do you use the phrase "King regards" if we don't suggest
       it?
       #Post#: 646--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: wows Date: October 15, 2022, 9:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Dr Schizo link=topic=116.msg638#msg638
       date=1665789835]
       Personally, I use the Matchmaking Monitor, otherwise shortened
       to 'MM', as a visual indicator that is tied to danger levels. It
       can be easily used just visually, since red often means danger
       and something to avoid, while green is the opposite and should
       perceived as something positive. This can be applied to normal
       situations, like a traffic-light (red, yellow, green). You want
       to go on green but stop on red? If I were to apply your line of
       thinking, a team consisting of 'red' and 'yellow' would be
       considered a tomato soup (filled with traces of pasta). 'Purple'
       on the other hand can be seen as odd, especially given that it
       has a gradient of colours, because it doesn't equate to any
       special matching against another colour. Eggplant is the most
       equivalent, and I believe it should be avoided (it gives my
       stomach a run for its money). Whatever soup is being served will
       be interpreted with different feelings. Tomato soup with celery
       or pasta will fill your stomach differently, taste different
       depending on the spices used, it all makes sense in my head.
       Your comments about me being a 'stat-racist' seem arbitrary,
       since I am not a believer of such nonsense. The usage of the
       'soup' is simply for conveying feelings, not more, not less.
       [/quote]
       Your text is racist because you treat people by their historical
       data and we call it here stats-racism. You describe that you get
       positive and negative feelings based on person's data. For
       example, if you see a data that show black skin color and low
       income then by your text one gets negative feelings and acts
       differently and treat those peopel differently that peopel with
       other profile. This is a clear racism. 16. Don't you agree?
       Can you answer those 16 questions and then i answer to your
       questions and comment your other opinions. We can treat that
       topic here as an interview, so please be adequate. I hope we can
       determine here your level and then decide if it is wise for you
       to stay here. It may be that you are on the Wows community level
       and that is not enough here. You seem to be also racist and
       repeat Wows community popular beleives which we have earlier
       debunked. If you really need a different forum than the official
       then why not to go to where you fit or make one like i did? but
       let's first complete this interview here. Maybe i misunderstand
       your text here etc, so, please answer for the numbered questions
       first and do it adequate way. No King-phrases, no links, no
       racism, etc.
       #Post#: 649--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: wows Date: October 15, 2022, 5:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]
       PhD in Schizophrenics, Phd in WOWS, PhD in Sub
       [/quote]
       Looks like you try to laugh over people who have either mental
       or other difficulties. This behaviour is typical for Wows
       community. 17. Do you agree?
       In this forum we don't laugh if an animal is injured or a person
       is bleeding after a car accident or if someone has other
       sufferings. We have a rule that we don't title others as idiots,
       etc. We have proved that Wows community cannot define most
       medical conditions and other terms. Do you agree that your
       signature is not adequate?
       Do you agree if i use you as an example of Wows community's
       morale level in our Wikipedia?
       #Post#: 650--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: Dr Schizo Date: October 15, 2022, 6:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I will be brutal in my response because I am looking to sharing
       more research on this forum and minimize time spent 'debating'.
       It is not polite to ignore someone in a forum, so I will take my
       time in my response.
       1) I do not agree. The definition is acceptable but not perfect,
       it can be left up to interpretation of its uses which I have
       done. This is exactly what lawyers do.
       2) Everything I write is of benefit, the wows mafia describes
       what is occuring in this game. Do you know if I will not use it
       for the future? There is no need to be judgemental of others.
       3) World of Warships and World of Tanks have never stated the
       word Mafia, it is of my own creation. Isac Newton didn't take
       the definition or application of gravity from nowhere, he
       figured it out and published it as research. I intend to do the
       same.
       4) Destroyers do not feel remorse because they are not witnesses
       of their crimes. I determine this from them being unspotted or
       using 'illegal' tactics for their killings.
       5) "...qualities such as concealment distance, long range
       torpedos and decent firepower (mostly from fire chance)." It is
       used as an example of a quality of which they possess. So in
       this sense it is accurate, because some destroyers have either
       one of more of these listed.
       6) Yes, because they have the tools for each engagement. The
       combination of low concealment range, torpedoes and/or guns make
       them suited for against each class. This is not the case with
       other classes. Here is a rundown on the matchups for the
       destroyers:
       DD vs Sub: DDs can use depth charges and are nimble enough to
       dodge torpedos. The concealment of both are equal.
       DD vs DD: Equal fight, luck and matchup (which dd vs which)
       determines the outcome.
       DD vs cruiser: Concealment difference in favour of the DD. DD
       uses torps (hydro doesn't help since it doesn't last forever).
       DD vs BB: Same as cruiser but guns are more devastating since
       BBs have slow reload.
       DD vs CV: Concealment and nimblesness favours the DD. If the DD
       remained unspotted for long enough he can sneak up on the
       carrier.
       7) Destroyers have perfectly workable guns, some are better than
       others yes. There are aspects to consider why having slow guns
       can still be a benefit. It's called 'tradeoffs'. Consider your
       example of fighting against a BB: DDs have small guns but a
       small ship, they fire fast and the ship is nimble. It means that
       the DD can outmanouver (dodge every salvo from the BB) and
       continuously fire for small but consistent damage (HE-pens and
       fires). Larger ships, like cruisers, have better firepower but
       suffer from inability to dodge and will take more damage than
       DDs. BBs versus BBs will take the longest time, because unless
       one ship is broadside (able to take citadels) the damage must be
       relied on from overpens, normal pens from AP or pens + fires
       from HE (both cruisers and destroyers do this better).
       8: Battleships have guns but if the target is undetected there
       is no way he can hit him, the BB dies to torpedoes. The DD can
       stay unspotted forever since he has good detection and faster
       speed than BBs. The consumables you listed are only temporary in
       their action time. Radars doesn't last long enough to kill the
       DD (the DD already knows this counter and will dodge the shells
       when being spotted, as the radars only last long enough for 1 or
       2 salvos at best). The hydro is maximum 6km range (german
       battleships), which is just further than the smallest detection
       range of DDs (DD can stay outside this zone with ease).
       Torpedoes often do not have the range required to hit dds (some
       are short range only, Schlieffen is exception with 13.5km, but
       these are slow in reload and in the water). Secondaries cannot
       target (and thus hit) ships which are not spotted (DD stays
       outside detection range). For gun-focused DDs (or those with no
       torpedos), you engage the BB from long range to avoid
       secondaries/torpedos. Guns only shoot every 30s (some are better
       but not better than 20s) and you time the dodge with this timer.
       9) The word 'Always' should be used because it is a part of the
       English language. The word 'Better' should be used because it is
       a part of the English language. These words should be used
       because they are appropriate. 1 better DD can be the difference
       between win/loss if you hold other variables constant, which in
       science we do.
       10) I disagree. A better DD can be a determining factor.
       11) Agreed. The image was provided from a colleauge of mine, it
       does not contain a Gurka division but instead 3 'purple' DDs.
       The example should have not been exampled.
       13) Disagree. As I have previously stated, the 'soup' is a tool
       for conveying meaning, not more, not less. Even if it is not
       suggested there is nothing stopping me from using it, of which I
       have stated it is not the same reasons that you believe the
       Wows-community uses it for. Having the 'info' on my screen would
       make my screen extremely racist, since it shows me all different
       kinds of colours. See the following image:
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/Pi6bzFa
       
       Your comprehension of colours make you racist. Are traffic
       lights racist because we value the colours differently? Green
       means go red mean stop. Applying the colour palette to racism is
       dumb and should be avoided since doing so will make the entire
       world (that's filled with colours) wrong. One way to avoid this
       could be to travel to 1950 since then there was no colours (only
       black and white).
       14) Better wording would have been: 'Time consuming'.
       15) You don't suggest it, but the English language does.
       Politeness is how you build relations with individuals you
       previously did not have any interactions with.
       16) Disagree. I have never once stated that I am using
       'historical data' to determine treatment of other people. The
       feelings are against colours (example red, green, blue), not
       peoples. I am assuming you are trying to frame me by connecting
       the 'soup' with 'stats' and 'performance' and other nonsense
       that you have already told us is not to be thought about from
       the Wows-community. You are assuming I'm treating people
       differently because of colours/stats/racism even though I never
       stated this, it only exists in your head because you have made
       this arbitrary connection, which would make you have the same
       line of thought as the Wows-community. That is blatant racism of
       thought.
       17) Disagree, I do not agree to being used as an example of the
       Wows-community since I am not of member of that community. You
       are making a connection between words and meanings that do not
       compute together. Does a Doctor in Philosopy in mental illneses
       make fun of his patients? Assuming that your opponent is playing
       foul is not sportsmanlike, if a fotball team is constantly
       accusing enemy teams of doping then you are in constant fear
       that he might beat you. Accusating out of thin air, or as in
       your example, crying-wolf, should not be practised since it is
       equivalent of following the wows-community.
       #Post#: 652--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: wows Date: October 15, 2022, 7:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Dr Schizo link=topic=116.msg650#msg650
       date=1665874998]
       [quote]2. Why to do something that has no benefit? It is like
       declaring a variable that you never use later.[/quote]
       2) Everything I write is of benefit, the wows mafia describes
       what is occuring in this game. Do you know if I will not use it
       for the future? There is no need to be judgemental of others.
       [/quote]
       The Question 2 asked about the general Mafia term not about your
       personal Wows Mafia term. Q2 asked why you defined that general
       Mafia term like an unused variable that doesn't produce any
       benefit for your further text. You responded that maybe you will
       use that general term later. But it does not look that you will
       use it later because you have your own personal Wows Mafia term
       and you talk about that. If you need to use some terms/variables
       later then you define them later. Until now your defining of the
       general Mafia is unnecessary and has no benefit. Your answer
       "maybe i later use that resource" is not adequate. Professional
       is to have as less noise as possible. Admit that you made a
       mistake in Q2. If you deny the obvious msitake and/or say that
       there is no need to be so judgmental etc, then we can have
       another debate how judgemental is wise to be. In my
       understandings you asked yourself a response to your writing and
       in Q2 i gave a simple proof that you made a msitake. There
       isnothing too judgemental etc. I provided some links under
       Debating rules topics where one article explains that chilidish
       denial like you seem to do now is considered a loss in debate. I
       don't see any point to listen your next response to the Q2 and
       read it as you lost it. So, let it be a loss. If you make
       reasonable amount of mistakes then it is fine, but if you deny
       obvious mistakes then that means that this forum is not for you.
       Because you wil ldeny everything here and therefore you don't
       have any progress and act like a typical Wows community member.
       We are here above the Wows community.
       I will go later through other 16 points.
       I understand that the official forum doesn't let you produce
       such topics. Well, i don't mind such topics and they are 1%
       higher in quality than typical official forum topics. But only
       1% and seems like there are other problems (ego and ethics
       problems and at least partially believing in Wows community
       believes, racism etc). So, i'm not sure how we will decide
       later.
       The Q2 is a small mistake and i can explain it later why your so
       called subconscious mind did it. But there are many such smaller
       msitakes, i will show later. Those small mistakes are fine in
       total if you don't deny them. But definitely not okay seem to be
       the other things, lets see those things later.
       #Post#: 653--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: wows Date: October 15, 2022, 7:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Dr Schizo link=topic=116.msg650#msg650
       date=1665874998]
       [quote]PhD in Schizophrenics, Phd in WOWS, PhD in Sub[/quote]
       17) Disagree, I do agree to being used as an example of the
       Wows-community since I am not of member of that community. You
       are making a connection between words and meanings that do not
       compute together. Does a Doctor in Philosopy in mental illneses
       make fun of his patients? Assuming that your opponent is playing
       foul is not sportsmanlike, if a fotball team is constantly
       accusing enemy teams of doping then you are in constant fear
       that he might beat you. Accusating out of thin air, or as in
       your example, crying-wolf, should not be practised since it is
       equivalent of following the wows-community.
       [/quote]
       Your signature with 3 Phd phrases does not look to others as a
       serious thing because in computer games people don't get Phd's.
       So, they interpret your signature as a joke. So, you make a joke
       about mental illnesses and this is very typical for Wows
       community. They title other as idiots etc quite often. In this
       forum we don't have so low ethics level that we laugh over any
       sufferings. Your response for Q17 was again a disagreement of a
       clear proof. Very likely you don't have any degrees in a
       computer game and in one disease. I declare that question as
       your loss, msitake. And it is a very big ethical msitake,
       probably even bigger than the racism. What your signature does
       is typical for Wows community and we don't allow here so low
       level ethics. You must be above Wows community. For example, i
       never title anybody. If i compare Wows community behavior with
       some disease then i define immediately the disease and show
       clearly the connection. But never just calling someone idiot or
       making fun of people having idiot-diagnosis. I thought it should
       be obvious that people don't do jokes about such things liek
       death, diseases, poverty, etc. But i should write that to the
       forum rules clearly later.
       You lsot Q17 and you continue to have your such signature. This
       is not acceptable. Even if you remove cosmetically such
       signature then it takes some years to obtain a higher morale.
       That's why i think you are not ready yet for that forum here. I
       don't feel any need for any signature and don't title others and
       don't feel any need to make Phd-jokes. Why you and your Wows
       community feels a need to do it- i don't know.
       #Post#: 654--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: wows Date: October 15, 2022, 8:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Dr Schizo link=topic=116.msg650#msg650
       date=1665874998]
       [quote]15. Why do you use the phrase "King regards" if we don't
       suggest it?[/quote]
       15) You don't suggest it, but the English language does.
       Politeness is how you build relations with individuals you
       previously did not have any interactions with.
       [/quote]
       Your response seems to be that King Regards is politeness, and
       common in english, and suitable when speaking with strangers
       first time. Well, all 3 opinions seem to be far from reality. In
       english they use Kind Regards and not King Regards. That proves
       that your King-phrase is not common. You are familiar with
       people in this forum so your excuse to have the King-phrase
       because peopel here are strangers to you is not adequate.
       Even Kind Regards is not polite because in general ethics the
       rule is that you must obey the house rules. For example, if you
       travel to a society where is expected that you spit into your
       hand before shaking hands with the other stranger then you do it
       and no matter if it is politeness in your opinion or not. We
       have many times informed you that we don't think that
       King-phrases, NB-phrases, etc, are polite or good. And the house
       rules here are reasonable and you haven't proved that they are
       wrong. You jsut gave 3 arguments which failed. Specially if you
       try to demonstrate some kind of scientific style then there is
       no place for such King-phrases. Science doesn't care about kings
       and other noise. I have explained in many topics that cosmetic
       politeness is not ethical. For example, it may turn into sadism,
       sarcasm, etc. In this forum we are above of a primitive belief
       like "Kind regards is always everywhere polite and good".
       You shouldn't use King-phrase, and it is not polite, and is
       disrespectful against this forum rules. This ethical mistake is
       quite big but smaller than racism and much smaller than irony
       over disabilities.
       #Post#: 655--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: wows Date: October 15, 2022, 8:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Dr Schizo link=topic=116.msg650#msg650
       date=1665874998]
       [quote]In World of Warships the Mafia counts as the destroyers.
       In World of Warships and World of Tanks the term Mafia does not
       mean what you said. 3. Do you agree that it is a msitake to
       claim so?
       You should have just said that you define a new term for your
       next text and use it later.[/quote]
       3) World of Warships and World of Tanks have never stated the
       word Mafia, it is of my own creation. Isac Newton didn't take
       the definition or application of gravity from nowhere, he
       figured it out and published it as research. I intend to do the
       same.
       [/quote]
       You seem to admit that you were msitaken with Q3. I repeat that
       You should have just said that you define a new term. The result
       is that you made a false statement. There is no such Mafia term
       in Wows so you sohuld have rephrased and said clearly that you
       are giving your own new term.
       This is a small irrelevant mistake with english language, or,
       maybe call it a phrasing-mistake, etc. It is an irrelevant
       msitake, but there are too many such smaller msitakes which
       makes your whole text quality quite low. And the idea i nthe
       overall theory/text is also weak. For example, your typical
       theory says that a platoon of experienced performers makes a
       victory very likely. Well, obviously yes, why to show such truth
       as a new idea at all. If you try to practice some kind of
       scientific style then fine but i don't see much talent yet
       because too many msitakes, and also low ethics.
       #Post#: 657--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: Dr Schizo Date: October 16, 2022, 6:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I will make use of my free time to revise the mafia conspiracy
       into a better work, there is obviously too many flaws according
       to the Guru with a capital G. This way we can avoid persuing war
       and other nonsensical actions.
       #Post#: 659--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mafia conspiracy
       By: wows Date: October 16, 2022, 7:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You didn't convince that your "PhD in Schizophrenics" is
       adequate. But my explanations about that phrase look convincing.
       Ethics is a complex topic and one may say that it is not so
       ethical either if i address a community as racist etc. Yes, it
       is in a way not ethical but there are no better milder methods
       cure for racismic things and other things that cause sufferings.
       So, i find my methods little bit unethical but not so much. I
       explain clearly why i call a community racist and i am open to
       debates on that and other topics. Also you find media to use
       such term and so in overall i don't think that i cross ethical
       borders too much. But it is difficult to say where are the
       borders. One solution is that the house owner explains the rules
       and Borders. I explained that your Phd-phrase can be interpreted
       as a low ethics and may cause sufferings. For example, let's
       assume that your relatives, brother-children-mothers break their
       bones and have also mental disabilities, how do you feel when
       someone in front of you start to make jokes about broken bones
       and do your Phd-jokes at the same time when your those relatives
       are in pain? Would you enjoy the jokes and would they enjoy it
       as well? Probably not and you would call such Phd-jokes
       unethical.
       We don't do jokes our things which cause bigger sufferings to
       others. For exmaple, no jokes about death, diseases, poverty,
       etc. First it takes time to get used to such attitude but later
       it becomes like a natural part of you. I for example don't do
       such Phd-jokes and don't call anyone iditos and i don't need to
       make any effort for that, it happens automatically. Yes,
       sometimes i may call by accident or how to say, but i don't
       remember such "accidents" and they are surely not intentional if
       they happen.
       A short suggestion: be a good lawyer, and be a good monk. The
       former part is fine for you. You seem to be quite fine by
       answering/responding, but little bit weaker in creation/stating.
       more liek a passive lawyer, a defensive vehicle. A good Lawyer
       must be good both in attack and defense, and your defense skilsl
       are fine. The monks part means ethics and that is not fine in
       you. In overall you are over the Wows community little bit, and
       that is sufficient for that forum here.
       We can make a deal that contribute here for others and for your
       own development but also try to keep ethical/monks part at fine
       level. Phd-jokes hints that that part of yours is not fine but
       there were also hints to racism etc. I don't go through all
       those. I don't like a Guru and Moderator role, but in the
       dualistic world it is inevitable. I still suggest additionally
       that try your hand in creating a forum yourself. It gives good
       experiences. Your input in overall has been benefitial for
       others. But i don't really feel any need for anyone here. And
       specially i am against if i sense potentially wrong energy.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page