DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
WebWar
HTML https://webwar.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Πολιτική &#...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 23539--------------------------------------------------
ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΜΟ]
1; = ΑΦΥΣΙΚΗ ΑΝ\
1;ΣΟΤΗΤΑ
By: Pinochet88 Date: June 17, 2016, 6:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Όπου και να
επικρατεί ο
σοσιαλισμό`
2;,
δηλαδή όπου
αυξάνεται η
ισχύς του
Κράτους
έναντι της
κοινωνίας
και οι
υποθέσεις
των
ανθρώπων
καθορίζοντ^
5;ι
σε όλο και
μεγαλύτερο
βαθμό από
την κρατική
εξουσία,
πάντα μια
μικρή
μειοψηφία
συγκεντρών^
9;ι
όλον τον
πλούτο. Μα
εξάλλου
γιατί ο κάθε
κουφιοκεφα_
5;άκιας
σήμερα
μπορεί να
είναι
σοσιαλιστή`
2;,
δηλαδή να
θέλει να τα
εξουσιάζει
όλα τα
Κράτος;
Επειδή
αγαπάει
τους
συνανθρώπο`
5;ς
τους και την
κοινωνία; LOL.
Προφανώς
επειδή
ονειρεύετα_
3;
να γίνει
αυτός
κάποτε ο
εξουσιαστή`
2;
και να
εξουσιάζει
τους
συνανθρώπο`
5;ς
τους, ούτως
ώστε να
πάρει
εκδίκηση
για τη
μίζερη και
άθλια
ζωούλα του.
Καθώς η
δύναμη του
Κράτους,
δηλαδή η
συλλογική-"δ&#
951;μόσια"
ιδιοκτησία,
αυξάνεται,
αυξάνεται
και ο
συγκεντρωτ_
3;σμός
του πλούτου
στα χέρια
λίγων
ισχυρών
ανθρώπων
που έχουν
διασυνδέσε_
3;ς
με τον
εγκληματικa
2;
μηχανισμό
του Κράτους.
Αυτοί είναι
οι πιο
μοχθηροί, οι
πιο βίαιοι,
οι πιο
κακούργοι,
οι πιο
μισογηγενε^
3;ς
(δηλαδή
εκείνοι οι
άνθρωποι
που μισούν
τους
γηγενείς:
στην
περίπτωση
της Ελλάδας
οι
άνθέλληνες-	
56;ισέλληνες),
τα πιο
αρρωστημέν^
5;
αντικοινων_
3;κά
στοιχεία.
Αυτοί σε
κάθε
κρατικιστι_
4;ό
καθεστώς,
επωφελούντ^
5;ι
της
μιζέριας
και των
καταληστευ_
6;ένων
συνανθρώπω_
7;
τους και
πλουτίζουν
και ζουν
πλουσιοπάρ_
9;χα
και
απολαμβάνο`
5;ν
τη χλιδή ενώ
όλη η
κοινωνία
βυθίζεται
στο σκοτάδι
της
υπανάπτυξη`
2;,
του
σκοταδισμοa
3;
και της
παρακμής
που
επιφέρει ο
κρατικισμό`
2;!
[hr]
Socialism’s One Percenters
By Thomas DiLorenzo
A defining characteristic of socialism in all its forms in all
places and at all times is a relatively small political elite
(and its “private sector” cronies) that lives lavishly by
plundering its population, destroying its economy, imposing a
regime of equality of poverty and misery; and turning almost
everyone into a dependent on the state for survival. Joseph
Stalin was the wealthiest man in the world during his time, not
the Rockefellers, Morgans, or anyone else, as the de facto
“owner” of the entire Soviet Union. African and Latin American
socialist political thugs in the “post-colonial era” have long
been notorious for becoming millionaires or billionaires, with
Swiss bank accounts galore, while their people starved and
begged them for subsistence. Socialism’s one percenters make
today’s Wall Street plutocrats seem impoverished by comparison.
The latest glaring example of the disgusting and immoral
corruption of socialism’s one percenters is Venezuela, a country
that has “long been the darling of the [socialist] Left,”
according to a June 16 article in the Daily Mail. The article,
authored by Jake Wallis Simons, has the headline: “Super-rich
socialists quaff champagne in Venezuelan country clubs while
middle-class mothers scavenge for food in the gutter . . . even
the dogs are starving.”
Venezuelan socialism, known as “Chavismo,” after the wealthy
socialist one percenter Hugo Chavez, has indeed destroyed the
country’s economy. Thanks to government-imposed price controls
that hold prices below costs, supermarkets are empty, everything
is in short supply or simply unavailable, and middle-class
people are literally “rummaging in stinking piles of rubbish for
cabbage leaves . . . and fetid meat,” according to the Daily
Mail article, which includes dozens of pictures of these
pathetic scenes. Among the most disturbing pictures are those
of starving dogs and other animals in this socialist “paradise.”
Nationalization, price controls, and suffocating government
regulations have so destroyed the remnants of capitalism that
hospitals can’t afford toilet paper, let alone medicine; people
wait in queues for ten our twelve hours a day, just like in the
old Soviet Union, in hopes of buying something – anything – that
might come up for sale in hopes of trading it for things they
actually need; there is raging hyperinflation as the government
tries to print money like mad to continue paying for its
socialist fantasies; and crime is the worst of anywhere on
earth. One middle-class woman is quoted in the article as
saying “Chavez’s legacy is people like me looking for food in
the garbage.”
Black markets are pervasive, also just like the old Soviet
Union, but the wealthy make out the best from this situation
because only they can afford to pay the astronomically higher
black-market prices or to pay the bribes demanded by black
marketeers. The politically-connected socialist elite lives
high on the hog, entertaining themselves quite lavishly at such
places as the Caracas Country Club, where the membership fee
alone is almost 500 times the average annual salary of a
middle-class Venezuelan worker. The Daily Mail article is
adorned with pictures of “lavish parties and tables groaning
with gourmet food.” It quotes one wealthy Chavez crony as
saying, “Should we stop enjoying ourselves just because the
country is burning?” Well, of course not. (This reminded me of
the scene in “History of the World, Part II” where Mel Brooks,
portraying the revolutionary-era King of France, is approached
by an alarmed aid who says: “Sire, the peasants are revolting!”
To which the “king” answers: “They certainly are”).
“Those rich people are thieves,” says the woman quoted by the
Daily Mail. “They are government cronies and they stole the
country’s money . . . . We had a socialist revolution and these
are the results.” “I feel cheated. Our socialist dream is
falling apart,” said another pathetically-duped victim of Bernie
Sanders/Hugo Chavez-style socialism.
Meanwhile, according to a recent poll, 46 percent of American
“millennials” say they could vote for a socialist for president,
who they believe would end political cronyism, “get money out of
politics,” and redistribute the wealth of the
politically-connected one percenters to them. This, of course,
is complete nonsense and an expression of extreme ignorance. As
F.A. Hayek explained in his classic, The Road to Serfdom, the
reality is that under socialism, “the only power worth having is
political power.” It is capitalism, private property, and
markets that provide the most potential for economic
opportunity, economic advance based on merit, hard work,
savings, entrepreneurship, and individual initiative. Who says
the government schools are not teaching the kids much these
days?
HTML http://bc.vc/EwYBl82
*****************************************************