DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
WebWar
HTML https://webwar.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Φασισμός
*****************************************************
#Post#: 17013--------------------------------------------------
ΥΠΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΙ 	
17;ΝΤΕΛΩΣ ΟΙ ΜΗ
; ΛΕΥΚΟΙ
By: Pinochet88 Date: October 12, 2015, 11:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Διαβάστε
και ΦΡΙΞΤΕ:
Έτρωγαν τις
καρδιές των
συν"ανθρώπω	
57;"
τους,
μεθούσαν
στο αίμα και
υποδούλωνα_
7;
τη μάνα τους
οι
κατεκτημέν_
9;ι,
δήθεν
καταπιεσμέ_
7;οι,
υπάνθρωποι!
Columbus Day Special
Life Styles: Native & Imposed
Kevin Beary
2,854 words
For decades now, African American leaders have been calling for
a formal United States apology for the American role in the
slave trade, with some even demanding reparations. Indian tribes
proclaim their tax-exempt status as something they are owed for
a legacy of persecution by the United States. Mexican Americans
in the southwest United States seek to incorporate this region,
including California, into Mexico, or even to set up an
independent nation, Aztlan, that will recreate the glories of
the Aztec empire, destroyed centuries ago by the imperialistic
Spaniards.
That we live in an age of grievance and victimhood is not news.
But did these peoples — these Mexican-Americans, these Native
Americans, these African-Americans — really lose more than they
gained in their confrontation with the West? Were they robbed of
nobility, and coarsened? Or did White subjugation force them to
shed savagery and barbarousness, and bring them, however
unwillingly, into civilized humanity?
Today our children are being taught that the people who lived in
the pre-Columbian Western Hemisphere were not “merciless Indian
savages” (as Jefferson calls them in the Declaration of
Independence), many of whom delighted in torture and
cannibalism, but rather spiritually enlightened “native
Americans” whose wise and peaceful nobility was rudely destroyed
by invading European barbarians; that the Aztecs were not
practitioners of human sacrifice and cannibalism on a scale so
vast that the mind of the 20th-century American can hardly
comprehend it, but rather defenders of an advanced civilization
that was destroyed by brutal Spanish conquistadores; and that
Africans were not uncultured slave traders and cannibals, but
unappreciated builders of great empires.
But just how did these peoples live before they came into
contact with Europeans? Although historical myth is ever more
rapidly replacing factual history, not only in popular culture
but also in our schools and universities, we may still find
accurate historical accounts buried in larger libraries or in
used book stores.
Aztec Civilization
In his famous work, The Conquest of New Spain, Bernal Diaz del
Castillo describes the march on Mexico with his captain, Hernan
Cortés, in 1519. The Spanish forces set out from the Gulf of
Mexico, and one of the first towns they visited was Cempoala,
situated near the coast, where Cortés told the chiefs that “they
would have to abandon their idols which they mistakenly believed
in and worshiped, and sacrifice no more souls to them.” As Diaz
relates:
Every day they sacrificed before our eyes three, four, or five
Indians, whose hearts were offered to those idols, and whose
blood was plastered on the walls. The feet, arms, and legs of
their victims were cut off and eaten, just as we eat beef from
the butcher’s in our country. I even believe that they sold it
in the tianguez or markets.
Of their stay in Tenochtitlan, the present-day Mexico City and
the heart of the Aztec empire, Diaz writes that Emperor
Montezuma’s servants prepared for their master
more than thirty dishes cooked in their native style. . . . I
have heard that they used to cook him the flesh of young boys.
But as he had such a variety of dishes, made of so many
different ingredients, we could not tell whether a dish was of
human flesh or anything else. . . . I know for certain, however,
that after our Captain spoke against the sacrifice of human
beings and the eating of their flesh, Montezuma ordered that it
should no longer be served to him.
In renouncing cannibalism, was Montezuma cooperating in the
destruction of his Aztec “cultural roots,” or was he aiding a
victory of civilized custom over barbaric?
A few pages later, Diaz provides a detailed description of
the manner of their [that is, the Aztecs’] sacrifices. They
strike open the wretched Indian’s chest with flint knives and
hastily tear out the palpitating heart which, with the blood,
they present to the idols in whose name they have performed the
sacrifice. Then they cut off the arms, thighs, and head, eating
the arms and thighs at their ceremonial banquets. The head they
hang up on a beam, and the body of the sacrificed man is not
eaten but given to the beasts of prey.
Diaz also describes the great market of Tenochtitlan, and its
dealers in gold, silver, and precious stones, feather, cloaks,
and embroidered goods, and male and female slaves who are also
sold there. They bring as many slaves to be sold in that market
as the Portuguese bring Negroes from Guinea. Some are brought
there attached to long poles by means of collars round their
necks to prevent them from escaping, but others are left loose.
Following the ceremony in which humans are sacrificed to their
gods, high-ranking Aztecs eat the flesh of the victims. A
Spanish witness commented:
This figure demonstrates the abominable thing that the Indians
did on the day they sacrificed to their idols. After [the
sacrifice] they placed many large earthen cooking jars of that
human meat in front of their idol they called Mictlantecutli,
which means lord of the place of the dead, as it is mentioned in
other parts [of this book]. And they gave and distributed it to
the notables and overseers, and to those who served in the
temple of the demon, whom they called tlamacazqui [priests]. And
these [persons] distributed among their friends and families
that [flesh] and these [persons] which they had given [to the
god as a human victim]. They say it tasted like pork meat tastes
now. And for this reason pork is very desirable among them.
Plainly it was the Spanish who stamped out human sacrifice and
cannibalism among the people of pre-Cortesian Mexico. As for
slavery, it is as obvious that the Europeans did not introduce
it to the New World as it is that they eradicated it, albeit not
immediately. Moreover, the moral impulse to end slavery came
from the West, specifically out of England. Had the Aztecs,
Indians, and Africans been left to their own devices, slavery
might well have endured in North and South America, as it does
in parts of present-day Africa.
North American Natives
In his epic work France and England in North America, the great
American historian Francis Parkman describes the early
17th-century recreational and culinary habits of the Iroquois
Indians (also known as the Five Nations, from whom, some will
have it, the United States derived elements of its
Constitution). He tells that the Iroquois, along with other
tribes of northeastern United States and Canada, “were
undergoing that process of extermination, absorption, or
expatriation, which, as there is reason to believe, had for many
generations formed the gloomy and meaningless history of the
greater part of this continent.” Parkman describes an attack by
the Iroquois on an Algonquin hunting party, late in the autumn
of 1641, and the Iroquois’ treatment of their prisoners and
victims:
They bound the prisoners hand and foot, rekindled the fire,
slung the kettles, cut the bodies of the slain to pieces, and
boiled and devoured them before the eyes of the wretched
survivors. “In a word,” says the narrator [that is, the
Algonquin woman who escaped to tell the tale], “they ate men
with as much appetite and more pleasure than hunters eat a boar
or a stag . . .”
The conquerors feasted in the lodge till nearly daybreak . . .
then began their march homeward with their prisoners. Among
these were three women, of whom the narrator was one, who had
each a child of a few weeks or months old. At the first halt,
their captors took the infants from them, tied them to wooden
spits, placed them to die slowly before a fire, and feasted on
them before the eyes of the agonized mothers, whose shrieks,
supplications, and frantic efforts to break the cords that bound
them were met with mockery and laughter . . .
The Iroquois arrived at their village with their prisoners,
whose torture was
designed to cause all possible suffering without touching life.
It consisted in blows with sticks and cudgels, gashing their
limbs with knives, cutting off their fingers with clam-shells,
scorching them with firebrands, and other indescribable
torments. The women were stripped naked, and forced to dance to
the singing of the male prisoners, amid the applause and
laughter of the crowd . . .
On the following morning, they were placed on a large scaffold,
in sight of the whole population. It was a gala-day. Young and
old were gathered from far and near. Some mounted the scaffold,
and scorched them with torches and firebrands; while the
children, standing beneath the bark platform, applied fire to
the feet of the prisoners between the crevices. . . . The
stoicism of one of the warriors enraged his captors beyond
measure . . . they fell upon him with redoubled fury, till their
knives and firebrands left in him no semblance of humanity. He
was defiant to the last, and when death came to his relief, they
tore out his heart and devoured it; then hacked him in pieces,
and made their feast of triumph on his mangled limbs.
All the men and all the old women of the party were put to death
in a similar manner, though but few displayed the same amazing
fortitude. The younger women, of whom there were about thirty,
after passing their ordeal of torture, were permitted to live;
and, disfigured as they were, were distributed among the several
villages, as concubines or slaves to the Iroquois warriors. Of
this number were the narrator and her companion, who . . .
escaped at night into the forest . . .
Of the above account, Parkman writes: “Revolting as it is, it is
necessary to recount it. Suffice it to say, that it is sustained
by the whole body of contemporary evidence in regard to the
practices of the Iroquois and some of the neighboring tribes.”
The “large scaffold” on which the prisoners were placed, is
elsewhere in his narrative referred to by Parkman as the
Indians’ “torture-scaffolds of bark,” the Indian equivalent of
the European theatrical stage, while the tortures performed by
the Indians on their neighbors — and on the odd missionary who
happened to fall their way — were the noble savages’ equivalent
of the European stage play.
If the descendants of the New England tribes now devote their
time to selling tax-free cigarettes, running roulette wheels, or
dealing out black jack hands, rather than to the capture,
torture, and consumption of their neighboring tribesmen, should
we not give thanks to those brave Jesuits who sacrificed all to
redeem these “native Americans”?
Native Africans
What kind of life did the African live in his native land,
before he was brought to America and introduced to Western
civilization? That slavery was widely practiced in Africa before
the coming of the white man is beyond dispute. But what sort of
indigenous civilization did the African enjoy?
In A Slaver’s Log Book, which chronicles the author’s
experiences in Africa during the 1820s and 1830s, Captain
Theophilus Conneau (or Canot) describes a tribal victory
celebration in a town he visited after an attack by a
neighboring tribe:
On invading the town, some of the warriors had found in the
Chief’s house several jars of rum, and now the bottle went round
with astonishing rapidity. The ferocious and savage dance was
then suggested. The war bells and horns had sounded the arrival
of the female warriors, who on the storming of a town generally
make their entry in time to participate in the division of the
human flesh; and as the dead and wounded were ready for the
knife, in they came like furies and in the obscene perfect state
of nakedness, performed the victorious dance which for its
cruelties and barbarities has no parallel.
Some twenty-five in number made their appearance with their
faces and naked bodies besmeared with chalk and red paint. Each
one bore a trophy of their cannibal nature. The matron or leader
. . . bore an infant babe newly torn from its mother’s womb and
which she tossed high in the air, receiving it on the point of
her knife. Other Medeas followed, all bearing some mutilated
member of the human frame.
Rum, powder, and blood, a mixture drunk with avidity by these
Bacchantes, had rendered them drunk, and the brutal dance had
intoxicated them to madness. Each was armed also with some
tormenting instrument, and not content with the butchering
outside of the town of the fugitive women, they now surrounded
the pile of the wounded prisoners, long kept in suspense for the
coup de grâce. A ring was formed by the two-legged tigresses,
and accompanied by hideous yells and encouraging cry of the men,
the round dance began. The velocity of the whirling soon broke
the hideous circle, when each one fell on his victims and the
massacre began. Men and women fell to dispatching the groaning
wounded with the most disgusting cruelties.
I have seen the tiger pounce on the inoffensive gazelle and in
its natural propensity of love of blood, strangle its victim,
satiate its thirst, and often abandon the dead animal. But not
so with these female cannibals. The living and dying had to
endure a tormenting and barbarous mutilation, the women showing
more cannibal nature in the dissection of the dead than the
stronger sex. The coup de grâce was given by the men, but in one
instance the victim survived a few minutes when one of those
female furies tormented the agony of the dying man by
prostrating herself on his body and there acting the beast of
double backs.
The matron, commander of these anthrophagies, with her fifty
years and corpulous body, led the cruelties on by her example.
The unborn babe had been put aside for a bonne bouche, and now
adorned with a string of men’s genital parts, she was collecting
into a gourd the brains of the decapitated bodies. While the
disgusting operating went on, the men carved the solid flesh
from the limbs of the dead, throwing the entrails aside.
About noon the butchering was at an end, and a general
barbecuing took place. The smell of human flesh, so disgusting
to civilized man, was to them the pleasing odor so peculiarly
agreeable to a gastronomer …
The barbecuing over, an anthrophagous repast took place, when
the superabundant preserved flesh was packed up in plantain
leaves to be sent into the Interior for the warriors’ friends. I
am silent on the further cruelties that were practiced this day
on the unfortunate infirm and wounded that the different
scouting parties brought in during the day, supposing the reader
to be sick enough at heart at the above representation.
Vanishing History
This is the history that has been handed down to us by men who
either were present when the recorded events took place — that
is, Diaz and Conneau — or who had access to period documents —
that is, Parkman. But this factual history has suffered greatly
at the hands of politically correct myth-mongers. The books
themselves are disappearing from the shelves: Conneau’s book has
been out of print for nearly a generation; perhaps Diaz’s and
Parkman’s will follow in the next 20 years. In its place, the
most absurd historical fantasies are substituted. As the
seemingly inexorable forces of political correctness grind on,
we may be left with as much knowledge of our true history as
Orwell’s Winston Smith had of his.
Were it not for their subjugation by Europeans, Mexicans would
perhaps have continued to practice the Aztec traditions of
slavery, human sacrifice, and cannibalism; many American Indians
would probably still be living their sad and perilous life of
nomadism, subsistence farming, and warfare; and Africans would
likely be expiring in even greater numbers on the fields of
mayhem and slaughter (as the world has noted to its horror in
Rwanda, Liberia and Congo), when not being bought and sold as
slaves (as still is done in Sudan and Mauritania).
In his 1965 work, The Course of Empire: The Arabs and their
Successors, the sagacious Glubb Pasha wrote in defense of
Western colonialism:
Foreign military conquest has not only enabled backward people
to acquire the skills and the culture of the conquerors, but it
has often administered a salutary shock to the lethargic
mentality of the inhabitants, among whom the desire to rise to
equality with the foreigners has roused a new spirit of energy.
. . . Britain has permeated Asia and Africa with her ideas of
government, of law and of ordered civilization. The men of races
who less than a hundred years ago were naked are now lawyers,
doctors and statesmen on the stage of the world.
But if the present trend of denigrating the West’s mission
civilisatrice continues, the achievements of that great
civilizing venture might well be squandered and lost forever. If
we permit inhumane customs and mores to reassert themselves, the
ultimate dissolution of the West itself is not an impossibility.
In his famous poem “White Man’s Burden,” Rudyard Kipling
eloquently spelled out the fate of a culture that loses faith in
itself and its mission:
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch Sloth and heathen Folly
Turn all your hope to naught.
Journal of Historical Review 17, no. 3 (May–June 1998), 7–11.
Online source:
HTML http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n3p-7_Beary.html
HTML http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/10/life-styles-native-imposed-3/
#Post#: 17015--------------------------------------------------
Re: ΥΠΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΙ
ΕΝΤΕΛΩΣ ΟΙ Μ&
#919; ΛΕΥΚΟΙ
By: mistermax Date: October 12, 2015, 1:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Αρα δεν
ειναι η φυλη
το θεμα, αλλά
το
οικονομικο`
0;ολιτικο
μοντέλο. Οσο
πιο φιλικο
προς την
ελευθερια
ειναι τοσο
καλυτερα τα
αποτελέσμα`
4;α.
Για αυτο και
ο
βιομηχανικ_
9;-χρηματοπισ&
#964;ωτικος
ολοκληρωτι`
3;μός
και τα
γιουσουφάκ_
3;α
τους οι
αναρχοκαπι`
4;άλες
θα
καταρρεύσο`
5;ν.
Μονο ενα
αναρχικο
συστημα
οπου τα μεσα
παραγωγης
πλουτου
είναι
διανεμημέν^
5;
δικαια και
ελευθερα
στον
πληθυσμο
μπορει να
εξασφαλίσε_
3;
τον
Ανθρωπισμο
και την
Ευημερία,
και την
Ελευθερία.
#Post#: 17018--------------------------------------------------
Re: ΥΠΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΙ
ΕΝΤΕΛΩΣ ΟΙ Μ&
#919; ΛΕΥΚΟΙ
By: Αρχιφα
σίστας Dat
e: October 12, 2015, 3:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[img]
HTML https://scontent-mxp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xta1/v/t1.0-9/12109192_780952572026617_1853703878128156440_n.png?oh=c22ab4a36e257ca594596f45d85fb2f5&oe=569D82F8[/img]
Μην ξεχνάμε
επίσης ότι
οι Ατζέκοι
ήταν τόσο
σκατένιοι
κυβερνήτες
που οι
υπόλοιποι
ιθαγενείς
πολέμησαν
στο πλευρό
των Ισπανών
εναντίων
τους. Εδώ
βλέπουμε
ότι το 99% του
στρατού του
Κορτές
αποτελούτα_
7;
από
ιθαγενείς! :D
#Post#: 17020--------------------------------------------------
Re: ΥΠΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΙ
ΕΝΤΕΛΩΣ ΟΙ Μ&
#919; ΛΕΥΚΟΙ
By: mistermax Date: October 12, 2015, 5:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=DER TRÜMPER link=topic=1957.msg17018#msg17018
date=1444681585]
Μην ξεχνάμε
επίσης ότι
οι Ατζέκοι
ήταν τόσο
σκατένιοι
κυβερνήτες
που οι
υπόλοιποι
ιθαγενείς
πολέμησαν
στο πλευρό
των Ισπανών
εναντίων
τους. Εδώ
βλέπουμε
ότι το 99% του
στρατού του
Κορτές
αποτελούτα_
7;
από
ιθαγενείς! :D
[/quote]
Ντεφιντιστ^
9;ς!
Προδρομοι
του Αγι
Στίνα.
Ενδιαφέρον!
;)
#Post#: 17021--------------------------------------------------
Re: ΥΠΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΙ
ΕΝΤΕΛΩΣ ΟΙ Μ&
#919; ΛΕΥΚΟΙ
By: Pinochet88 Date: October 13, 2015, 1:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Η διανομή
των μέσων
παραγωγής
είναι ότι
πιο
ανελεύθερο
και
καταστροφι_
4;ό
υπάρχει,
ταυτόσημο
με το να
επιβάλεις
ένα σύστημα
μέσα στο
οποίο
καθίσταται
καθήκον να
ποδοπατάς
τον κόπο του
άλλου. Στην
"αναρχο"κομμ&#
959;υνιστική
Ισπανία ο
κόσμος ήταν
περισσότερ_
9;
αγανακτισμ^
1;νος
με την
εξουσία
παρά με τους
Ατζέκους
και ο Φράνκο
νίκησε πολύ
πιο εύκολα
από ότι
νίκησαν οι
κονκισταδό`
1;ες!
*****************************************************