DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
WebWar
HTML https://webwar.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Αντιφασι	...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 8862--------------------------------------------------
Re: ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΙΑΚ
Η ΚΑΠΙΤΑΛΙΣ	
32;ΙΚΗ ΠΟΥΤΣΑ Σ
;Ε ΦΑΣΙΣΤΕΣ
By: Libertarian Date: January 22, 2014, 6:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]I am an anticommunist libertarian, but currently a member
of Golden Dawn in Greece, so I can say I know and have done more
for this ideology than most of you and I’d like to express my
sorrow for this site which although is dedicated to the cause of
empowering the White Race (so to speak) is not at all dedicated
to learning anything during the process.
This narrative is bosh if there isn’t a firm ideology to back it
up. So talking about a narrative is talking about nothing. And
even referring the word narrative sounds foolish.
The first thing we do when talking to others (even though some
of us just want to fight them and kill them for there is
something Jewish in them) is to know their political positions.
The first thing there is to learn in this case, just by googling
and having some knowledge, is that this blackadiclizzard boy is
a mutualist and a racialist. His youtube channel by the same
name and his gibberish here proves it. This means he (says he)
is as pro-white as you (racially aware people have no big
differences on the aspect of race) but his economic approach is
different, and I shall say, weird.
You, Andrew, seem 1) not to care to find and learn who are you
talking to 2) not to know what mutualism even means. This is a
recipe for failure. And so your economic arguments are not good.
The nazi regime was not a socialist regime, it was basically
keynesian. In theory there was an ideological fraction that was
full socialist but politically it took the form of strasserism.
(Do you know that ideology? I suggest to you not to go into this
path). Hitler was not a strasserite, in fact he killed there
faggots.
Now, if you want to defend that fiat money is good, you have to
have some (keynesian) arguments about it. This position though,
i think, is blatantly wrong. GD current position is that money
has to have some guarantee, not meaning metals, but a
revitalized national production. So Golden Dawn is against
dropping the euro and issuing a fiat money right now. In other
words production first. The Austrian School and the Chicago
school (i don’t like the second) have plenty of argument of what
would the unintended consequences be if you artificially boost
demand. This problem cannot be solved by anathematizing them all
as Jews. You said that fiat money is good. What is this
economically? It is keynesianism. Who is the best proponent of
this school now? Krugman, a Jew. Who was Keynes who first though
it? An antinazi with many Jewish friends. See…
And there’s another one argument which is overly stupid. You say
that “the individual caring first for his own needs above all
others” is an alien idea with no analog in the natural world.
Wtf?! 99% of the people on the Earth would say that you’re crazy
or stupid. And putting it that way shows how not well-read you
are. Indeed nationalism and socialism espouse the idea that one
should not care first for himself, but no one would dare to say
that thing you wrote. EVERYWHERE we see, as nationalists, this
phenomenon, and your “narrative” should urge people to overcome
this phenomenon which penetrates our lives. But arguing that it
doesn’t exist. If we’re living in a world where everyone is
putting the others before himself then why are you striving to
accomplish what? It seems you don’t know well what nationalism
and socialism really means.
(I’m not saying that I agree to this idea “caring first for
others”, I am saying how this idea is related to socialism and
nationalism)
And coming to a third argument that I saw and I think it is
wrong. About this concentration thing you write. It is true that
concentrated big wealth is better than wealth in tiny pieces,
but how is this bad if each and every person concentrates the
wealth that he and his ancestor created? Jews create wealth and
concentrate it in a big factory. They have the factory. You and
your ancestors do the same. Where in the fuck do you see any
theft, injustice, or something to be fixed? Let’s imagine your
ancestors were boors and I have a factory and you don’t. Is
there anything to be fixed? I personally don’t see it this way.
And asking people to see it this way is asking them to think
like parasites.
To my opinion redistribution is theft. And now we come to a
final point I want to make. You, as many other nationalists
think that libertarianism and free trade is an ideology which
comes with niggers pissing at your porch. I don’t see anything
like that. People can be denied entrance in a country or even
deported, while goods can come in or go out. What is your
problem with me trading a good which I made with another good
that a nigger or a Jew made in their countries? Transportation
of a good is not immigration of an individual.
Anyways, this site cannot convert any significant number of
people to anything and its narrative is not good. The fusion of
white nationalism and libertarianism is to me a good think and
can be a consistent ideology. Every time in history that fascism
rose as a movement this was partly due to a reaction of the
middle class (traditionally pro-free market class) to some event
or threat. Without the middle class you’re doomed. And
rethinking such things as natural and as age-old and as well
sounding as free trade is something that will help your movement
influence politics.
My channel on youtube is marmiteman6 (not 4) , twitter:
PlaceInTheSun2 , so please don’t make articles on how you
responded to comments, it’s too amateurish, and if you want to
talk about narrative don’t do it in public cause people will
think you’re about to fool them with pretty words. Narrative,
propaganda, spamming, do them but never admit you did
them.[/quote]
Το παραπάνω
είναι
γραπτό του Fringe
(marmiteman6), αρκετά
ενδιαφέρον.
#Post#: 8866--------------------------------------------------
Re: ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΙΑΚ
Η ΚΑΠΙΤΑΛΙΣ	
32;ΙΚΗ ΠΟΥΤΣΑ Σ
;Ε ΦΑΣΙΣΤΕΣ
By: TotalFringe Date: January 22, 2014, 11:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Είτε
αφήνεις
τους
κομμουνιστ^
1;ς
να παίζουν
μπάλα είτε
παίζεις εσύ
μπάλα.
Οι
κομμουνιστ^
1;ς
χρησιμοποι_
9;ύν
και τη λέξη
καπιταλιστ^
2;ς
συνέχεια.
Κανείς
φιλελεύθερ_
9;ς
σήμερα δεν
τολμάει να
πει ότι
είναι
καπιταλιστ^
2;ς.
Όποιος
υποστηρίζε_
3;
τον
σοσιαλισμό
μπορεί να
λέγεται
σοσιαλιστή`
2;.
Αλλά αν δεν
υπάρχει
λέξη που να
περιγράφει
αυτόν που
υποστηρίζε_
3;
τον
καπιταλισμa
2;,
τότε το
παιχνίδι το
έχουν πάρει
οι κόκκινοι.
Είναι
δειλία να
εγκαταλείπ^
9;ις
μια λέξη
μόνο και
μόνο επειδή
οι
κομμουνιστ^
1;ς
θέλουν να
ορίσουν το
νόημά της.
Είναι δειλό
να μην
τολμάς να
πεις ότι
είσαι
καπιταλιστ^
2;ς,
όταν αυτό
περιγράφει
καλύτερα
τις απόψεις
σου, μόνο και
μόνο επειδή
οι
κομμουνιστ^
1;ς
έχουν
μονοπωλήσε_
3;
την λέξη.
Αυτό το
οποίο
υποδηλώνει
η έκφραση
μισθωτή
σκλαβιά
είναι ότι
κάποιοι
άνθρωποι
δεν έχουν
άλλη
επιλογή από
το να
αρνηθούν
μια
κατάσταση
εργασίας.
Κάποιοι
άνθρωποι
περιορίζον`
4;αι
από κάτι, και
εξαναγκάζο_
7;ται
τρόπον τινά
να δεχθούν
κάποιες
εργασιακές
συνθήκες
που άλλοι
άνθρωποι
δεν θα
δεχόντουσα_
7;.
Αυτό το κάτι
είναι η
έλλειψη
ιδιοκτησία`
2;
εκ μέρους
τους. Είσαι
υπέρ ενός
συστήματος
στο οποίο
υπάρχουν
φτωχοί και
εξαναγκάζο_
7;ται
να
εργαστούν
ενδεχομένω`
2;
και με
άθλιες
συνθήκες ή
είσαι κατά, ή,
δηλαδή,
πιστεύεις
ότι ο κάθε
λεχρίτης,
γόνος
τεμπέληδων,
πρέπει να
έχει ίσο
δικαίωμα
στον πλούτο
και να
ικανοποιού_
7;ται
οι ανάγκες
του από τον
πλούτο που
άλλοι
παρήγαγαν;
Διότι αν δεν
είσαι υπέρ
της κλοπής,
είσαι υπέρ
του κάποιος
φτωχός να
είναι
εξαναγκασμ^
1;νος
να δεχτεί
την σκλαβιά
και τη
φεουδαρχία
και την
τυραννία
και όπως
θέλεις πες
την, του
μεγάλου
κεφαλαίου.
Αν δεν είσαι
υπέρ της
κλοπής
είσαι υπέρ
της
μισθωτής
σκλαβιάς.
Είσαι υπέρ
ενός κόσμου
αξιοκρατία`
2;;
Τότε είσαι
υπέρ ενός
κόσμου
δούλων και
αφεντάδων.
Γιατί αν δεν
είσαι υπέρ
ενός κόσμου
δούλων και
αφεντάδων
είσαι υπέρ
της
ισότητας
και κατά
εκείνων των
λαμπρών
αστεριών
που
ξεχωρίζουν
και κάνουν
την
ανθρωπότητ^
5;
να
προοδεύει.
Είσαι υπέρ
της
ατομικής
ιδιοκτησία`
2;;
Τότε, δειλέ,
σταμάτα να
λες ότι
είσαι
"φιλελεύθερ	
59;ς",
αντίκρισε
τους
κομμουνιστ^
1;ς
και πες, ναι,
είμαι
ακραίος
κα-πι-τα-λι-στ
ής!
Και αν είσαι
καπιταλιστ^
2;ς
δεν πρέπει
να σε
φοβίζουν οι
λέξεις.
Όταν
αναφέρθηκα
στη σκλαβιά,
δεν το έκανα
για να
διαφημίσω
την
ιδεολογία
μου σε
κομμουνιστ^
1;ς,
αλλά
περισσότερ_
9;
για να
περιγράψω
πως θα ήθελα
να είναι οι
εργασιακές
σχέσεις σε
έναν
ιδανικό
κόσμο.
Σήμερα
ζούμε σε μια
χώρα όπου
κανένας
κυριολεκτι_
4;ά
δεν
εργάζεται.
Αυτό είναι
δυστοπικό. Η
ουτοπία θα
ήταν να
εργάζονται
όλοι, να
είναι
σκλάβοι του
ανταγωνισμ_
9;ύ
και
παράλληλα
άλλων
(ανώτερων)
ανθρώπων.
Μόνο έτσι θα
επικρατήσε_
3;
ο
Υπεράνθρωπ_
9;ς!
#Post#: 8867--------------------------------------------------
Re: ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΙΑΚ
Η ΚΑΠΙΤΑΛΙΣ	
32;ΙΚΗ ΠΟΥΤΣΑ Σ
;Ε ΦΑΣΙΣΤΕΣ
By: Fringe_Elements Date: January 22, 2014, 11:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=TotalFringe link=topic=1297.msg8866#msg8866
date=1390411806]
Αυτό το
οποίο
υποδηλώνει
η έκφραση
μισθωτή
σκλαβιά
είναι ότι
κάποιοι
άνθρωποι
δεν έχουν
άλλη
επιλογή από
το να
αρνηθούν
μια
κατάσταση
εργασίας.
[/quote]
Αυτό το
οποίο
υποδηλώνει
η έκφραση
μισθωτή
σκλαβιά
είναι ότι
κάποιοι
άνθρωποι
δεν έχουν
άλλη
επιλογή από
το να
δεχθούν μια
κατάσταση
εργασίας.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page