DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Wayside Alabaster
HTML https://waysidealabaster.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussions
*****************************************************
#Post#: 185--------------------------------------------------
Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: Victoreno
Date: April 5, 2013, 6:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Pretty self-explenatory.
You can vote to wether stay on gm_atomic or switch to
rp_apocalpyse.
Please discuss the pro and contra arguments of every map in the
comment section below, if you got something to say, please do
it.
gm_atomic:
+Designed with Fallout designs and visuals
+Fits the style of New Vegas
+Great faction bases for NCR, CL and BoS
+Places for new roleplay opportunities (such as the empty place
where Calamty is, the place where Paradise is or at the Legion
outpost.
-Map seems empty, rather boring
rp_apocalypse:
+Alot more different places (such as caves, the lake and swamp)
+Alot more houses/ bigger town
+More interesting map design (dark, fog)
-No real NCR base, the bunker is rather BoSish and not easy
enough to access for a main faction.
-No real CL base, the only place would be in the small fort or
at the shore which both are very close to other roleplay-places.
-No BoS base as the bunker is at the spawn, which should be NCR
town, and the BoS would rather choose a lonelier place.
-Unfitting map design (dark, fog)
-Requires Half-Life 2: Episode One
-Lags/ breaks for some players
If you gather more arguments speaking for or against a certain
map in the comment section, I will add it above.
#Post#: 186--------------------------------------------------
Re: Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: A Hiding Hobo
Date: April 5, 2013, 6:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hmm, hard to decide. Wish we could take all the good things
from them both! :P But I think we should stick with atomic. The
other map doesn't have any bases, and for me, that seems like a
vital part, personally.
#Post#: 187--------------------------------------------------
Re: Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: Altairp
Date: April 5, 2013, 6:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The NCR has a base, the town and te bunker is the base, and it
isn't too much BoSish since the NCR actually control an entire
vault back in California.
#Post#: 188--------------------------------------------------
Re: Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: Victoreno
Date: April 5, 2013, 7:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
1. The town is hardly a base.
2. It is hidden and only accessable with a lift/ leader which
implies that it is rarely used, AKA only BoS, no way it would be
owned by the NCR.
3. The bunker on the Washington* map, gm_atomic, is not a vault
at all but rather designed for military/ NCR use.
Therefore, for NCR: gm_atomic = kickass; rp_apocalpyse =
asskick.
#Post#: 189--------------------------------------------------
Re: Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: James Williams
Date: April 5, 2013, 7:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Atomic is to stale in my opinion. We'll do better off in the
other one.
#Post#: 190--------------------------------------------------
Re: Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: Chase :D
Date: April 5, 2013, 8:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
OH GOD YES!
Rp_Apocalpyse For the win!
#Post#: 191--------------------------------------------------
Re: Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: SantaDog
Date: April 6, 2013, 3:21 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm a bit iffy about both really, they're both good, Gm_Atomic
has that fallout style and all, but the thing is, It's too
bland, boring to go out and such. Has good bases for NCR and CL,
but since when in Fallout New Vegas have the NCR really been in
a bunker? They had an airport, a farm, a camp but I'm not sure
about anything else. Definitely not a bunker. Rp_Apocalypse
doesn't however have that fallout theme, unless it would be
night but still wouldn't, it has that destroyed city, which is
pretty cool, but like Victoreno said, finding places for bases
would be awkward. I wouldn't really vote for any, personally I
think both maps are overused.
#Post#: 192--------------------------------------------------
Re: Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: Victoreno
Date: April 6, 2013, 4:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Well, on apoc NCR would not have a base (except that tiny gas
station maybe), BoS would not have a base and the CL would
actually have the best one in the middle of the map at a small
shore part...
Darkness is okay, it still is the nuclear fallout apocalpyse and
that brighter Fallout: New Vegas looked like disney land.
#Post#: 195--------------------------------------------------
Re: Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: Altairp
Date: April 6, 2013, 6:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
For the Vault back in California I was talking about Vault City,
the NCR annexed the place and took the Vault, so, nothing is too
Bosish for them :P
Anyway, I think that the only real problem here is for the
Brotherhood, they don't have a place to stay at all.
#Post#: 196--------------------------------------------------
Re: Map change for Fallout Roleplay
DIR By: Jankon
Date: April 6, 2013, 9:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I prefer gm_atomic- it's made for Fallout, unlike rp_apocalypse.
Atomic is also smaller, sunnier and overally looks better to me.
RP_apocalypse gives a feel of zombie apocalypse, not Fallout New
Vegas...
We should keep the gm_atomic and maybe put down some more
props... perhaps new areas, idk.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 3
DIR Next Page