URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       
  HTML https://unitedindiversity.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Our Latest Secular Posts
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2604--------------------------------------------------
       Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: KerryD
       Date: November 6, 2025, 2:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am no fan of Donald Trump by any means; but neither can I
       claim to be a fan of Pope Leo.  His latest criticism of Trump
       seems far-fetched to me.
       Pope Leo offers his strongest criticism of Trump yet
  HTML https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1lq751964mo
       Pope Leo has called for "deep reflection" on how migrants are
       treated in the United States, where he said many people were
       deeply affected by the controversial policy of mass deportation.
       I strongly agree  with that part.  I have a problem with what
       follows.
       Emerging to address a bank of TV cameras outside his papal
       retreat at Castel Gandolfo and offering to answer "one or two
       questions", Pope Leo XIV said there were people who have lived
       in the US "for years and years never causing problems, who have
       been deeply affected" by Trump's hardline policy on migration.
       Speaking in English, and reaching a US audience directly, he
       reiterated the Catholic belief that every Christian will
       ultimately be judged on how they welcomed "the foreigner".
       It is not a question of whether American Christians welcome
       every foreigner to the US.  There is also a matter of law which
       govern immigration. When Israel took refuge in Egypt,  Joseph
       and the Pharoah knew who they were and even granted them land of
       their own.
       Genesis 45:8 So now it was not you that sent me hither, but God:
       and he hath made me a father to Pharaoh, and lord of all his
       house, and a ruler throughout all the land of Egypt.
       9 Haste ye, and go up to my father, and say unto him, Thus saith
       thy son Joseph, God hath made me lord of all Egypt: come down
       unto me, tarry not:
       10 And thou shalt dwell in the land of Goshen, and thou shalt be
       near unto me, thou, and thy children, and thy children's
       children, and thy flocks, and thy herds, and all that thou hast:
       11 And there will I nourish thee; for yet there are five years
       of famine; lest thou, and thy household, and all that thou hast,
       come to poverty.
       We might call this chain-migration today. Joseph did well in
       Egypt and everyone knew who he was.  Israel was not sneaking
       into Egypt or breaking any laws.
       Now let us look at the Scripture Pope Leo seems to be using to
       validate the position of the Catholic Church.
       Numbers 15:28 And the priest shall make an atonement for the
       soul that sinneth ignorantly, when he sinneth by ignorance
       before the Lord, to make an atonement for him; and it shall be
       forgiven him.
       29 Ye shall have one law for him that sinneth through ignorance,
       both for him that is born among the children of Israel, and for
       the stranger that sojourneth among them.
       30 But the soul that doeth ought presumptuously, whether he be
       born in the land, or a stranger, the same reproacheth the Lord;
       and that soul shall be cut off from among his people.
       We don't have Jewish priests to make atonement for us today; but
       updating this to apply the principle to today's situation, we
       could say that if an immigrant goes to a country without knowing
       his journey is unlawful, he should tell authorities who probably
       can help make him a lawful immigrant if he has no other crimes
       on his record.  I cannot discuss what every other country should
       do; but the USA needs to be able to identify people, especially
       those who cross the borders to make sure they're not smuggling
       drugs or engaging in human smuggling which can reduce some women
       and children into unwilling prostitutes or actors in  porn.  We
       also need to be able to assess whether they might be acting as
       spies for our enemies.
       Leo obeyed the immigration laws of Peru when he went there. Pope
       Leo XIV updates his Peruvian citizen registration with his new
       Vatican address
  HTML https://apnews.com/article/pope-leo-peru-national-registration-vatican-address-0a3ce71dab08746fba97592caf266e30<br
       />
       Leo was granted Peruvian citizenship in August 2015, the month
       before Pope Francis, his predecessor, appointed him bishop of
       Chiclayo, a city in the country’s north. To qualify, he had to
       live in Peru for at least two years and pass a civics test.
       I guess he passed the civics test and Peru knew who he was.
       #Post#: 2605--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: Helen
       Date: November 6, 2025, 9:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good post Kerry …agree.
       My son in law sat on a plane next to a priest …the priest said
       he wouldn’t trust the Pope at all.
       He also said he was very worried about who the Pope has around
       him as friends , as they were a bad lot.
       Not sure quite what he was talking about…but it didn’t sound
       good . The priest inferred that the Pope wasn’t what he
       pretended to be.
       #Post#: 2607--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: KerryD
       Date: November 6, 2025, 5:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Helen link ---
       >
       > Good post Kerry …agree.
       > My son in law sat on a plane next to a priest …the priest said
       he wouldn’t trust the Pope at all.
       > He also said he was very worried about who the Pope has around
       him as friends , as they were a bad lot.
       > Not sure quite what he was talking about…but it didn’t sound
       good . The priest inferred that the Pope wasn’t what he
       pretended to be.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'd love to know what was really on that priest's mind; but my
       impression, sad to say, is that this Pope is a publicity hound
       and also goes for stunts to increase his popularity.  I did not
       know what to think when he met King Charles and Queen Camilla.
       Sky News noted (below) how both of them are plagued by sex
       scandals.  I heard that it was Prince William who put the
       pressure on Charles to take action about "Prince" Andrew who
       seems to have gotten away with much for a long time.  I wish
       myself that Charles had been more active sooner.  If you ask me,
       he's responsible for upholding the reputation of the royal
       family, so Andrew should have been chastened more and sooner.
       "To whom much is given, much is required."
       This leaves me wandering if Charles was trying to polish his own
       image a bit and getting help from the Pope -- who was using him
       the same way.
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FvfqlqOPVw
       Of course, while I can see the reason for some public praying, I
       do not see the justification for famous people using prayer to
       try to polish their own reputations.
       Matthew 6:5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the
       hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues
       and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men.
       Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
       6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when
       thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret;
       and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
       #Post#: 2608--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: Helen
       Date: November 7, 2025, 9:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For myself I believe everything ended with the real Queen dying.
       I don’t give a fig for Charles and Camilla…..they don’t have
       the peoples respect or following.
       Charles will never shake the ghost of Princes Diana who had more
       Royal English blood ( even if from the wrong side of the blanket
       ) in her little finger than Charles did in his whole body…..
       while Charles was not “English” , but German and Greek.
       But Rita knows more about the “Royal family “ than I do, I’ve
       been out of it for 59 years now.
       I don’t like Charles , he’s a prime Globalist , ‘The Great Reset
       ‘ was his brain child.  He works for the enemy. He has no
       Christian values other than those attached to his position.
       He and the new Pope have lots in common I’m sure.
       As for Camilla, pfft …..she’s just a wannabe…
       I loved Queen Elizabeth and her love and dedication for England
       .
       I’d like to hear what Rita has to say about. Even though I know
       she is an anti-royalist .  :)
       #Post#: 2609--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: KerryD
       Date: November 7, 2025, 12:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Helen link ---
       >
       > For myself I believe everything ended with the real Queen
       dying.
       > I don’t give a fig for Charles and Camilla…..they don’t have
       the peoples respect or following.
       > Charles will never shake the ghost of Princes Diana who had
       more Royal English blood ( even if from the wrong side of the
       blanket ) in her little finger than Charles did in his whole
       body….. while Charles was not “English” , but German and Greek.
       > But Rita knows more about the “Royal family “ than I do, I’ve
       been out of it for 59 years now.
       > I don’t like Charles , he’s a prime Globalist , ‘The Great
       Reset ‘ was his brain child.  He works for the enemy. He has no
       Christian values other than those attached to his position.
       > He and the new Pope have lots in common I’m sure.
       > As for Camilla, pfft …..she’s just a wannabe…
       >
       > I loved Queen Elizabeth and her love and dedication for
       England .
       >
       > I’d like to hear what Rita has to say about. Even though I
       know she is an anti-royalist .  :)
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I think maybe Charles is really a shy person.  Diana wasn't.
       I see Prince Harry and Meghan are also still making news when
       they wore LA Dodgers caps during the World Series.  To his
       credit, he did apologize for it; but why would they do that in
       the first place?  Because the owner of the Dodgers invited them
       to it?
  HTML https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/800/cpsprodpb/6823/live/bb41cb40-bba3-11f0-b2a1-6f537f66f9aa.jpg.webp
       Story at BBC.
  HTML https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9kgpvzlndo
       #Post#: 2612--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: Helen
       Date: November 7, 2025, 4:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think they should be stripped of any titles and the money that
       supports them ( unless Charles uses his own money ) they are a
       disgrace along with Andrew.  The gravy train should end.
       I so wish Rita would jump in here! Haha!
       #Post#: 2613--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: Rita
       Date: November 7, 2025, 5:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Oh okay , I see why you wanted my input Helen -  oh our
       wonderful Royal family ( being sarcastic )
       I must admit I did like the Queen, didn’t agree with everything
       she did with Andrew as I felt he should have faced the music. I
       kind of respected the Queen on one level but once she passed an
       era was over and I just see most of them enjoying a comfortable
       life style and not really in the real world.
       Andrew now deserves what he gets , should never have got away
       with things this long. He is an arrogant royal, and a bit of a
       child. He has rows of teddies on his bed and the ‘ servants ‘
       have to put them back in a certain order other wise he gets
       angry and throws a tantrum ( that’s come out in many
       documentaries ) He is no longer protected, I think there was
       just no other choice than to do something as public pressure was
       growing and in many respects the Royal Family need the public.
       I never agreed with what Charles did to Diana, but having dealt
       personally with ‘ other women ‘ in a marriage I had a lot of
       empathy for her. I realise she wasn’t innocent later on, but not
       sure I blamed her in the end. Not sure how I feel about Charles,
       he certainly isn’t worthy of being the head of the church - not
       in a biblical way as his life should have reflected a better
       moral standard.
       Princess Anne and Prince Edward and their families work hard,
       but are never in the press these days with any scandal.
       Harry and Megan , they wanted out but also seem to crave
       publicity. They want reconciliation , but then do things that
       make the rift wider. They want their cake and eat it. I use to
       quite like him and Harry when they were younger because they
       seems more like their mum.
       I am not a royalist - I think the way they live is behind the
       times, a recent documentary stated that they are living in a
       different era to the rest of us - I think that is very true of
       many of them, but not all.
       #Post#: 2614--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: Rita
       Date: November 7, 2025, 5:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Helen,
       I would not say I was anti Royalist while the Queen was alive,
       she dedicated her life to the role and she was well respected (
       well most of the time )
       I think with all the issue we face it’s a bit of a kick in the
       teeth when they spend so much money on pomp and ceremony, and
       all the expensive outfits they wear not to mention the expensive
       food they eat. They just live in a different world to us common
       folk.
       William and Kate are moving into a new home, surrounding the
       house are public walk ways and parks that are used for dog
       walkers. Well those areas are now going to be blocked, that has
       not gone down to well.
       I don’t know what to believe with the globalist thing, I keep an
       open mind on that but not sure where I sit with it all.
       #Post#: 2615--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: Rita
       Date: November 7, 2025, 5:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Kerry
       I think Charles got a really hard deal when he was younger. He
       went to a horrible boarding school and was bullied but his
       father wouldn’t let him change schools. Also they did block his
       original romance with Camilla, she was his first real love - he
       was sent away to the Navy to stop it progressing. Those things
       would have impacted him. It was the same with Princess Margaret
       , they denied her as well.
       I can relate to that with my own dad , his first love was the
       lady he eventually had endless affairs with and once my mum died
       they became a couple. Even I could see how much he loved her and
       the relationship was so different to my mum and dads.
       #Post#: 2616--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Pope Leo and President Trump
   DIR By: KerryD
       Date: November 8, 2025, 6:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Rita link ---
       >
       > Kerry
       > I think Charles got a really hard deal when he was younger. He
       went to a horrible boarding school and was bullied but his
       father wouldn’t let him change schools. Also they did block his
       original romance with Camilla, she was his first real love - he
       was sent away to the Navy to stop it progressing. Those things
       would have impacted him. It was the same with Princess Margaret
       , they denied her as well.
       >
       > I can relate to that with my own dad , his first love was the
       lady he eventually had endless affairs with and once my mum died
       they became a couple. Even I could see how much he loved her and
       the relationship was so different to my mum and dads.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       What's amazing is that while he was miserable when going there,
       later he said he was glad to have been sent there.  My guess is
       he learned that the bullying was silly; and today as king, he's
       almost immune to it.  I think he also learned how to get by
       without taking advantage of royal privilege.  Andrew also went
       there, but I'd say he never learned that, he was always willing
       to use the royal position to his own advantage.
  HTML https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/may/24/king-charles-to-become-patron-of-gordonstoun-association
       I had no clue he and Camilla went back that far. I thought they
       met much later, so thanks for that info.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page