URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       
  HTML https://unitedindiversity.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Members' Corners and forum updates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2535--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: KerryD Date: October 23, 2025, 4:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Mike Waters link=topic=34.msg2533#msg2533
       date=1761163596]
       I've got another puzzler.
       I'm too tired to look things up in a proper study so this is all
       from previous thoughts and memory.
       When the 12 apostles were chosen I think the criteria was that
       they had to have physically walked with Christ during his
       ministry and been witnesses to his resurrection.
       Intellectual calibre seems not to have been a factor and many
       came from lowly walks of life (maybe they were of limited
       ability to write) and few seem to have contributed to the New
       Testament canon of scripture.
       Why were they not all endowed with spiritual prowess to overcome
       their limitations?
       After all those that did contribute seem to have been given
       extra prowess and are we not told that scripture came from 'Holy
       men' who spoke as they were moved by God.
       Maybe much more scripture (the origin of which we assume to have
       be inspired) was in fact written by scribes who relied on verbal
       accounts from those who couldn't write (and probably were also
       somewhat short on 'memory').
       I personally know of no 'Scribes' who were converts away from
       their lifelong dedication to keeping records of Jewish past and
       present history.
       So were they really likely to have reliably recorded factors of
       a ministry that placed absolute necessity on those who were so
       indoctrinated by the expectation of the ultimate restoration of
       an 'Earthly Jerusalem', that they had to be told that they
       needed to be 'Born again' into the real expectation of the
       restoration being to a 'New Heavenly Jerusalem'. (sorry that's
       so long and convoluted).
       Perhaps I should say no more.
       [/quote]
       Looking that passage up, I see Peter wrote it; and I doubt he
       was thinking of any New Testament books since it contains the
       word "old."
       2 Peter 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the
       scripture is of any private interpretation.
       21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but
       holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
       I would think he meant the Pentateuch and the books Jews called
       "The Prophets."  The others were called Scriptures since they
       contained some useful information; but they were not considered
       highly inspired; and some even had errors.
       It struck me as odd that I and II Chronicles and I and II Kings
       are considered prophetic while I and II  Chronicles are more
       historic than inspired.  Think of this difference:  Kings
       mentions some unflattering things about Solomon; but I doubt
       you'd find one unkind word about him in Chronicles -- unless you
       count the reference to 666 in 2 Chronicles 9:13.  Was Chronicles
       affected by politics?
       Most of the books of the New Testament don't even purport to be
       prophetic.  I find the Gospels valuable since they contain the
       words of Jesus; but I think the authors writing things they had
       heard.  Luke tells us his Gospel is historical in nature.  I
       don't think he was inspired by the Holy Ghost.  He was relating
       facts as he had heard them.  I trust the Gospel of John more
       however since John was present when Jesus said those things; and
       I trust his account of the Crucifixion more since he was
       present.
       #Post#: 2536--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: Dave Date: October 23, 2025, 10:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As I was slurping my coffee as I'm wont to do as Helen would
       confirm, I had this thought, why did no one of the 12 say, 'call
       me tomorrow', was it a case of many are called but few are
       chosen?
       As in some church scenario's people leave over who are the
       'chosen' and there appears in the 12, three were chosen from the
       chosen, and what merited their choosing above the others?
       #Post#: 2537--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: KerryD Date: October 23, 2025, 11:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Dave link=topic=34.msg2536#msg2536
       date=1761234253]
       As I was slurping my coffee as I'm wont to do as Helen would
       confirm, I had this thought, why did no one of the 12 say, 'call
       me tomorrow', was it a case of many are called but few are
       chosen?
       As in some church scenario's people leave over who are the
       'chosen' and there appears in the 12, three were chosen from the
       chosen, and what merited their choosing above the others?
       [/quote]
       Here's another question to ponder.  Why were the Apostles afraid
       to meet Paul?    Why did Barnabas have to go tell them that Paul
       was okay?  Why didn't the Holy Spirit tell them he had become a
       Christian?  Then shortly after telling us how the Apostles were
       afraid, we read twice about how bold Paul was.
       #Post#: 2538--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: Rita Date: October 24, 2025, 2:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=KerryD link=topic=34.msg2537#msg2537
       date=1761280644]
       Here's another question to ponder.  Why were the Apostles afraid
       to meet Paul?    Why did Barnabas have to go tell them that Paul
       was okay?  Why didn't the Holy Spirit tell them he had become a
       Christian?  Then shortly after telling us how the Apostles were
       afraid, we read twice about how bold Paul was.
       [/quote]
       It wasn’t the Apostles that were afraid, it was the disciples.
       So Barnabas then took Paul to the Apostles. I presume this was
       to reassure the disciples that Paul could be trusted.
       As far as the Holy Spirit telling people not to be afraid,
       becoming a Christian doesn’t eliminate mistrust or fear as we
       are all human. If someone has had a dodgy past and does a
       complete turnaround it is more difficult to actually believe
       they can be trusted and not feared. We may hear the Holy Spirit
       within giving reassurance, but our own human responses are also
       within us. The disciples trusted the Apostles, so reassurance
       from them was needed.
       #Post#: 2539--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: Mike Waters Date: October 24, 2025, 3:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I awoke this morning after the most restless night you could
       imagine. Paul and the other 'Apostles' couldn't be further from
       my mind.
       I'm 90 years old and had got led through every conceivable
       moment of my past life.
       When I awoke I just had to get out of bed, make coffee and tea
       for Christine and myself (a couple of hours earlier than usual)
       in the hope that it would switch my mind out of its chaos.
       So, where does it leave me?
       I consider the fact that I was virtually 'born into
       'Churchianity'.
       At the tender age of 10, I changed from CoE Sunday School to
       join that of the 'Chapel', a stones throw from my parent's home,
       simply because I learned that to be the SS attended by my one
       and only childhood sweetheart.
       I morphed up the SS ladder until I was in the final 'young men's
       class'.
       I further morphed along until The Chapel became the cornerstone
       of my life.
       Those around me professed to have experienced a 'distinct moment
       of conversion' and, so as not to be left out, I decided that CoE
       to Chapel had to be my 'moment of conversion'.
       Right up until now nothing has changed with me always having
       adapted to my 'chameleon like' life style, running parallel with
       my OCD compulsion to be 'leader' of everything that crossed my
       path.
       Last night my mind became captivated by the impossible task of
       pulling  into chronological order every minute aspect of a life
       (0utside of Religion) that it was driving me crazy.
       I just had to get out of bed to clear my head, and here I am, a
       man 'broken' by the remorse of all my 'wrong doings'.
       If only I had heeded the wishes of my wife (my aforesaid
       childhood sweetheart) and stayed in my steady Local Government
       job.
       But I didn't and I am left with my epitaph "If only ~ but too
       late now".
       #Post#: 2540--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: Helen Date: October 24, 2025, 7:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sad reading this Mike.  Does nothing in your Christian life
       bring you peace? I’m sure you wouldn’t say no. ( ? )
       Could you not have just had a bad night ? Even a horrid
       night of the enemy of our souls who attacks  our minds ? He
       comes to rob, steal and destroy , bringing misery. That’s his
       job.
       It’s his job because he is the ‘tester of the saints’.
       Over the years I’ve seen you ‘contending for the faith ‘ too
       much , for it to have all just been a “change of mind, or change
       of church.
       I think you have to learn how to mentally climb onto Fathers
       lap, snuggle and just ‘be’.
       Ofter we get ourselves beyond prayer to a place of - “ Be
       STILL , and just know, that I Am God.”
       xx
       #Post#: 2541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: Dave Date: October 24, 2025, 9:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Looking back Mike is not always the best move, all the seeming
       past mistakes seemed right at the time.
       I wonder if Peter woke up in the night with the accuser of the
       brethren saying, “how’s denying the Lord working for you these
       days”
       I read this just yesterday, hot off the press, “ Forgiveness
       doesn't excuse what happens,
       It’s not about
       changing the past
       - it’s about
       freeing the future.
       Edith Eger from her book “ The Choice”
       #Post#: 2542--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: Mike Waters Date: October 24, 2025, 9:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Helen link=topic=34.msg2540#msg2540
       date=1761310293]
       Often we get ourselves beyond prayer to a place of - “ Be STILL
       , and just know, that I Am God.”
       xx
       [/quote]
       And that's exactly where I am.
       But with a lot of caveats.
       But I'm too tired to more fully enlarge upon right now with a
       discourse of what I have constantly referred to as the 'bigger
       picture'.
       'Briefly' (lol) it's about God being GOD of the entire universe
       and for the eternity of 'Timeless Time', as distinct from being
       limited to the origination of the Mediterranean based religion
       of the Jews.
       If God created the entire universe I just have to believe that
       'He' has always been equally interested in the earliest
       inhabitants of the far eastern antipathy of 'Mount Ararat'.
       And when we say that there is no way to God other through Christ
       I have to believe that far eastern different 'religions' still
       do exactly that....but In different forms simply because of them
       not having the background of Mediterranean influence.
       Hence my old uncompleted 'blog', which I think still exists
       under the URL of
  HTML https://myuniversalgod.blogspot.com/
       Looking it up I see that its lost most of its 'Title' and that
       modifacation all carry the misleading modifications dates of
       December 2024.
       #Post#: 2543--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: Mike Waters Date: October 24, 2025, 10:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Dave link=topic=34.msg2541#msg2541
       date=1761316150]
       Looking back Mike is not always the best move, all the seeming
       past mistakes seemed right at the time.
       I wonder if Peter woke up in the night with the accuser of the
       brethren saying, “how’s denying the Lord working for you these
       days”
       I read this just yesterday, hot off the press, “ Forgiveness
       doesn't excuse what happens,
       It’s not about
       changing the past
       - it’s about
       freeing the future.
       Edith Eger from her book “ The Choice”
       [/quote]
       You're a wise old 'Bird' Dave.
       #Post#: 2544--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Paul 
       By: Rita Date: October 24, 2025, 10:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Mike Waters link=topic=34.msg2539#msg2539
       date=1761293376]
       I awoke this morning after the most restless night you could
       imagine. Paul and the other 'Apostles' couldn't be further from
       my mind.
       I'm 90 years old and had got led through every conceivable
       moment of my past life.
       When I awoke I just had to get out of bed, make coffee and tea
       for Christine and myself (a couple of hours earlier than usual)
       in the hope that it would switch my mind out of its chaos.
       So, where does it leave me?
       I consider the fact that I was virtually 'born into
       'Churchianity'.
       At the tender age of 10, I changed from CoE Sunday School to
       join that of the 'Chapel', a stones throw from my parent's home,
       simply because I learned that to be the SS attended by my one
       and only childhood sweetheart.
       I morphed up the SS ladder until I was in the final 'young men's
       class'.
       I further morphed along until The Chapel became the cornerstone
       of my life.
       Those around me professed to have experienced a 'distinct moment
       of conversion' and, so as not to be left out, I decided that CoE
       to Chapel had to be my 'moment of conversion'.
       Right up until now nothing has changed with me always having
       adapted to my 'chameleon like' life style, running parallel with
       my OCD compulsion to be 'leader' of everything that crossed my
       path.
       Last night my mind became captivated by the impossible task of
       pulling  into chronological order every minute aspect of a life
       (0utside of Religion) that it was driving me crazy.
       I just had to get out of bed to clear my head, and here I am, a
       man 'broken' by the remorse of all my 'wrong doings'.
       If only I had heeded the wishes of my wife (my aforesaid
       childhood sweetheart) and stayed in my steady Local Government
       job.
       But I didn't and I am left with my epitaph "If only ~ but too
       late now".
       [/quote]
       So sorry you feel this way Mike, you know I think The Lord may
       have a completely different prospective on your life. We all
       impact in ways that we can never grasp from where we are , Gods
       view is so much better. The Lord can do way more with our
       brokenness than we realise , may He reassured you in some very
       clear way x
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page