DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
UCC (UMMA) Managers Forum
HTML https://umma.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Stable Wars
*****************************************************
#Post#: 3701--------------------------------------------------
Round 2
By: umma-manager Date: July 27, 2017, 3:34 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
World of Fight versus Pyes Gorgeous Grapplers
The Vixens versus Fighting Academy
Managers of the above stables must reply to this message and
list:
[list]
[li]The Stable they are challenging[/li]
[li]Their five fighters (can't use fighters that have already
fought)[/li]
[li]The five opposition fighters they will meet in the cage[/li]
[li]Optional: Who they want to referee each fight[/li]
[li]Optional: A quote/taunt/comment from each fighter[/li]
[/list]
Managers of the stables being challenged can reply to this
message and list:
[list]
[li]Optional: A quote/taunt/comment from each fighter[/li]
[/list]
Remaining stables before we reset:
Amped
Awesome Aries
Bad Ass Bunnies
Codino
Danger Dolls
Death by Bikini
Fighting Academy
Haydens Powergirls
Hellfire Girls Club
[s]In Yo Face Bitches[/s]
Indian Fight Club
International Lingerie Federation
Lass Kickers
Lionesses
Lost Wildcats
Project Kitty Clutch
Pyes Gorgeous Grapplers
Raccoon
[s]Strikeforce[/s]
Tango Ring Rumble
The Centerfold Angels
[s]The Vixens[/s]
[s]World of Fight[/s]
[sub](Please follow the rules)[/sub]
#Post#: 3702--------------------------------------------------
Re: Round 2
By: The Vixens Date: July 28, 2017, 8:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The Vixens now challenge the Stale known as Fighting Academy.
The Fights:
Natalya vs Ellen Page (Referee: Suzuka Ishikawa)
Victoria Pendleton vs Paige Vanzant (Referee: Kate Nash)
Alicia Fox vs Dianna Dahlgren (Referee: Katie Price)
Carmella vs Brittany Tacy (Referee: Utada Hikaru)
Dana Linn Bailey vs Lena Ovchynnikova (Referee: Kelsey Chow)
Quotes:
Natalya: Ellen, you have the body of a Goddess. Too bad that
once I'm through grinding you into mincemeat no one will ever
see it again.
Victoria: Paige, you left the UFC after Waterson choked you out.
When I'm finished with you, you're going to wish you could leave
UMMA.
Alicia: Dianna, just who are you again? Oh wait I don't care.
Once you've been knocked out I'm watch Dana knock out your
Leader. See you in the cage, bitch.
Carmella: Damn... Tacy's got some muscle on her. Too bad it
won't help you. Muscle slows you down. The moment the fight
starts I'll be running circles around you. You don't stand a
chance.
Dana: Lena is an impressive fighter... outside of UMMA. Here,
she's a joke. So Lena, after your beat-down go and find
somewhere else to fight because you will never achieve anything
here.
#Post#: 3703--------------------------------------------------
Re: Round 2
By: Pyewacket Date: July 28, 2017, 12:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Having observed round 1 I have a suggestion for a change in the
rules. The current rules has one stable challenging another.
Then the challenging stable gets to select what fighter
challenges which fighter on the challenged team. This seems
unfair and gives the impression that the challenging team can
stack the deck. Is it a coincidence that the challenging team
won both group 1 stable wars?
I think it would be better for Team A to challenge Team B. Then
Team B's fighters get to challenge the fighters in Team A. This
is the accepted rule for duels in which the challenged party
gets to choose the weapons. Helps to even out the selection
process.
#Post#: 3704--------------------------------------------------
Re: Round 2
By: umma-manager Date: July 28, 2017, 3:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
That's a good idea. Unless anyone is opposed, let's switch to
that for round 3 :)
The one thing I wanted to avoid was having both sides able to
pick their fighters. I wanted an Open Night feel to things. If
both parties could pick their fighters I figured that would slow
the process down and there would be failure to follow the
selection rules.
#Post#: 3705--------------------------------------------------
Re: Round 2
By: Pyewacket Date: July 28, 2017, 3:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=umma-manager link=topic=646.msg3704#msg3704
date=1501272269]
That's a good idea. Unless anyone is opposed, let's switch to
that for round 3 :)
The one thing I wanted to avoid was having both sides able to
pick their fighters. I wanted an Open Night feel to things. If
both parties could pick their fighters I figured that would slow
the process down and there would be failure to follow the
selection rules.
[/quote]
I have an improved suggestion. The challenging stable gets to
name two fights and the challenged team three fights. To speed
up the process the challenging team could name their fights when
they do the challenge. The challenged team should be given a
limited time in which to chose the other three fights. That way
one team isn't controlling all five fights but the challenged
team gets to name a majority of the fights.
#Post#: 3706--------------------------------------------------
Re: Round 2
By: umma-manager Date: July 28, 2017, 5:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This probably isn't the right thread for this discussion :)
I have thought about this a bit more. One of the issues I had
was that the stable being challenged wouldn't respond in time.
It's yet to be seen if that is a problem.
I think the controlling stable is OK to issue the challenges and
pick their opponents. Yes, they my try to be strategic - but
that would be the point. They are the controlling stable. And,
they only have a limited number of fighters. They will quickly
get to a point where they will have to put their weaker fighters
into the cage. Remember, once a fighter has fought - she can't
fight again.
The other point is that the controlling stable would be choosing
an opponent stable and the fights for a reason (grudge, rivals,
whatever). If we take away from them that power to choose a
theme or whatever, it lessens the challenge.
So, I am flip-flopping on my decisions here. Sorry.
Let's stick with the existing format for at least the first
go-around of stables. Then we can reconsider.
#Post#: 3707--------------------------------------------------
Re: Round 2
By: Pyewacket Date: July 28, 2017, 9:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=umma-manager link=topic=646.msg3706#msg3706
date=1501279294]
This probably isn't the right thread for this discussion :)
I have thought about this a bit more. One of the issues I had
was that the stable being challenged wouldn't respond in time.
It's yet to be seen if that is a problem.
I think the controlling stable is OK to issue the challenges and
pick their opponents. Yes, they my try to be strategic - but
that would be the point. They are the controlling stable. And,
they only have a limited number of fighters. They will quickly
get to a point where they will have to put their weaker fighters
into the cage. Remember, once a fighter has fought - she can't
fight again.
The other point is that the controlling stable would be choosing
an opponent stable and the fights for a reason (grudge, rivals,
whatever). If we take away from them that power to choose a
theme or whatever, it lessens the challenge.
So, I am flip-flopping on my decisions here. Sorry.
Let's stick with the existing format for at least the first
go-around of stables. Then we can reconsider.
[/quote]
Fine. I posted in this thread because I could not post in the
thread that specifies the rules.
#Post#: 3708--------------------------------------------------
Re: Round 2
By: umma-manager Date: July 28, 2017, 9:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Good point! I locked that one down. I'll start something
separate for rule adjustments. :D
#Post#: 3709--------------------------------------------------
Re: Round 2
By: WorldofFight Date: July 30, 2017, 7:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
World of Fight has challenged Pyes Gorgeous Grapplers in the 2nd
round of the Stable Wars. In a bold effort to keep the fights
entertaining and fair I have decided to challenge all 5 of Pye's
'Top 5 Fighters.
Fight #1 (MW-Prime) Nathalie Kelley vs. Jennifer Aniston (Drew
Barrymore)
Fight #2 (HW-WW Prime) Kylie Bax vs. Christina Applegate
(Katie Price)
Fight #3 (LHW Veteran) Monica Hansen vs. Kristinna Lokken
(Drew Barrymore)
Fight #4 (HW Veteran) Petra Cubanova vs. Jenny McCarthy (Fearne
Cotton)
Fight #5 (SHW Veteran) Torrie Wilson vs. Pamela Anderson
(Autumn Resser)
Nathalie - Jennifer can act and is in good shape for her age but
unfortunately for Jenn, none of that make a difference when the
cage doors are locked.
Kylie - For some unknown reason, Pye put Christina in charge of
his stable. The doesn't say very much for the rest of his girls
now does it. Just thinking of Kelly Bundy running a stable makes
me laugh. Maybe Bud could help out.
Monica - I kept bothering Bertrand for better competition and I
guess I got what I asked for. Kristinna may be a former champion
but the key word here is former. I haven't seen much from
Kristinna lately and don't expect her to bring anything I can't
handle.
Petra - This league is being over-run by a bunch of Playboy
models and it's time to start culling them out. I'll start by
beating Jenny senseless.
Torrie - I fully agree with Petra, they are extremely annoying.
Pamela is the queen of the fake Playmates and has zero substance
and has lost what was left of her appeal. I feel it is my duty
to beat her into retirement. It's time to face reality and hang
it up for good.
Bertrand Laroque
Owner and CEO, World of Fight
#Post#: 3711--------------------------------------------------
Re: Round 2
By: Pyewacket Date: July 31, 2017, 12:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
World of Fight has challenged Pyes Gorgeous Grapplers in the 2nd
round of the Stable Wars. In a bold effort to keep the fights
entertaining and fair I have decided to challenge all 5 of Pye's
'Top 5 Fighters.
Thanks, Bertrand, for being honorable and selecting my 'Top 5
fighters'. Of course the unintended consequences are that these
fighters will be unavailable after this win or lose. But don't
fret, these are not necessarily my most winning fighters, just
my '5 favorites' with the highest attribute points.
Respectfully,
Pye
Fight #1 (MW-Prime) Nathalie Kelley vs. Jennifer Aniston (Drew
Barrymore)
Fight #2 (HW-WW Prime) Kylie Bax vs. Christina Applegate
(Katie Price)
Fight #3 (LHW Veteran) Monica Hansen vs. Kristinna Lokken
(Drew Barrymore)
Fight #4 (HW Veteran) Petra Cubanova vs. Jenny McCarthy (Fearne
Cotton)
Fight #5 (SHW Veteran) Torrie Wilson vs. Pamela Anderson
(Autumn Resser)
Nathalie - Jennifer can act and is in good shape for her age but
unfortunately for Jenn, none of that make a difference when the
cage doors are locked.
Jennifer - Thanks for the compliments, Nathalie. You're a class
person who can also act and is in good shape even if you are a
bit young and brash. I agree these don't make a difference when
the cage doors are locked. However, my muscles do!
[table]
[tr]
[td]
HTML https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4293/35483612063_0c8be298ee_c.jpg[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td][center]Do you think my hands are the right size for
your boobies?[/center][/td][/tr]
[/table]
[table]
[tr]
[td]
HTML https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4321/35483592393_e28eacca70_z.jpg[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td][center]A close up of my bicep and my ferocious attitude
just in case your are nearsighted.[/center][/td][/tr][/table]
Kylie - For some unknown reason, Pye put Christina in charge of
his stable. The doesn't say very much for the rest of his girls
now does it. Just thinking of Kelly Bundy running a stable makes
me laugh. Maybe Bud could help out.
Christina = Sorry, Kylie, but Kelly doesn't need or want any
help from Bud. In case you have forgotten Kelly was always the
most successful until she got help from Bud or Al.
[table]
[tr]
[td]
HTML https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4311/35896348000_35cbde9a07_o.gif[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td][center]And we all know how well Kelly could fight! My
fists are lethal.[/center][/td][/tr][/table]
[table]
[tr]
[td]
HTML https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4299/35896346790_ea9a927973_o.gif[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td][center]As for your height, I can reach up and punch
taller babes also.[/center][/td][/tr]
[/table]
Monica - I kept bothering Bertrand for better competition and I
guess I got what I asked for. Kristinna may be a former champion
but the key word here is former. I haven't seen much from
Kristinna lately and don't expect her to bring anything I can't
handle.
Kristanna - Monica, too bad you don't have as much class as
Nathalie or Bertrand. At least you could get the spelling of one
of my names correct. It's Kristanna and Loken, not Kristinna
and Lokken.
[table]
[tr]
[td]
HTML https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4327/36123430592_837b0926f7_c.jpg[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td][center]Do you think you can handle this apple after I
stuff it down your throat?[/center][/td][/tr][/table]
Petra - This league is being over-run by a bunch of Playboy
models and it's time to start culling them out. I'll start by
beating Jenny senseless.
And I am tired of this league being overrun by loudmouthed
models who don't have what it takes to be a Playboy model, let
alone a Playmate. You're not even the best from Brno, CZ.
peaking of being already senseless, you can't even spell your
name right. I was looking for your profile page and couldn't
find it. Turns out your are Cubonova, not Cubanova.
[table]
[tr]
[td]
HTML https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4317/35897169730_d2ae00e05c_o.gif[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td][center]This is how worried I am about your beating me
senseless.[/center][/td][/tr][/table]
Torrie - I fully agree with Petra, they are extremely annoying.
Pamela is the queen of the fake Playmates and has zero substance
and has lost what was left of her appeal. I feel it is my duty
to beat her into retirement. It's time to face reality and hang
it up for good.
Pamela - Funny thing for you to say. Last time I checked I was a
real Playmate, not a fake wrestler like you were. Don't forget I
started by career out as a bodybuilder/fitness instructor. I
remained fit and strong throughout my career.
[table]
[tr]
[td]
HTML https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/453/19057169526_952f315d92_b.jpg[/td]
[/tr]
[tr][td][center]I lift serious weights, not those mickey mouse
things used by other women. Want a curl
contest?[/center][/td][/tr][/table]
Bertrand Laroque
Owner and CEO, World of Fight
Proud to have the intelligence and multi-faceted talented
Christina Applegate as my Stable leader! :-* :-* :-*
Pye
Owner and CEO, Pye's Gorgeous Grapplers
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page