URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Ancient World
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 26534--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: antihellenistic Date: May 22, 2024, 10:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Another Description of Western Civilization
       [quote]Western Civilisation textbooks always include a full
       chapter on the Hellenistic era to describe a period of about
       three centuries, roughly from 323 BC to 30 BC. During this time
       Greek culture, after the conquests of Alexander the Great, was
       spread over a remarkably large area, including Egypt and far
       into the Iranian plateau. The significance of the Hellenistic
       era, however, does not consist in the vast areas and diverse
       peoples it covered, but in the high cultural accomplishments
       this period saw in literature, art, science, medicine, and
       philosophy led by ethnic Greek individuals, particularly in the
       cities of Alexandria and Pergamum.[45] The new schools of
       philosophy (Epicureanism and Stoicism) were actually centred in
       Athens, including the characteristics of Hellenistic sculpture
       and literature, were all Greek. Moreover, it should be
       emphasised that this epoch produced the first true scientists in
       human history, as argued by Lucio Russo in The Forgotten
       Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 BC and Why it Had to Be
       Reborn.[46] What Russo argues in great detail has long been
       known by Classicists. For example, Marshall Clagett, in Greek
       Science in Antiquity (1955), calls the Hellenistic period ‘the
       great period of Greek science’, correctly identifying the
       Presocratics as philosophers rather than scientists, and
       offering an overview of the original writings of Strato,
       Aristarchus, Eudoxos, Erastosthenes, Hipparchus, and
       Archimedes.[47] This Hellenistic accomplishment in science
       should actually be extended beyond 31 BC to cover the ideas of
       Euclid, Ptolemy, and Galen in the first two centuries AD in
       mathematics, solid and fluid mechanics, optics, astronomy, and
       anatomy.[/quote]
       Source :
       Faustian Man in a Multicultural Age by Ricardo Duchesne page 91
       #Post#: 26772--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: antihellenistic Date: June 14, 2024, 9:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ethno-nationalism and Debating was part of Greek Culture, the
       Culture which Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       [quote]Moreover, like the free-market military cultures based on
       voluntarily chosen leaders, the Western urban cultures of
       antiquity retained a free-market approach to other areas of
       culture, in particular with regard to belief systems
       (ideologies) and science. Thus in classical Greece (i.e., after
       the Homeric period),
       the ultimate basis of Greek civic and cultural life was the
       aristocratic ethos of individualism and competitive conflict
       which pervaded [Indo- European] culture. Ionian literature was
       far from the world of berserkers but it was nonetheless just as
       intensively competitive. New works of drama, philosophy, and
       music were expounded in the firstperson form as an adversarial
       or athletic contest in the pursuit of truth... . There were no
       Possessors of the Way in aristocratic Greece; no Chinese Sages
       decorously deferential to their superiors and expecting
       appropriate deference from their inferiors. The search for the
       truth was a free-for-all with each philosopher competing for
       intellectual prestige in a polemical tone that sought to
       discredit the theories of others while promoting one’s own.*?
       This underlines the individualistic nature of scientific
       endeavor. Scientific movements are highly permeable groups whose
       members are prone to defection if they find a better theory or
       if new data are uncovered—a free-market system of ideas. On the
       other hand, The Culture of Critique contrasts the Western
       individualist tradition of science with several
       twentieth-century intellectual movements composed of slavish
       followers centered around charismatic leaders who expounded
       dogmas that were not open to empirical disconfirmation.©
       Individuals convinced by their own judgments to adopt different
       theories or reject fundamental dogmas (e.g.,. the Freudian
       Oedipal complex) were simply expelled, typically in a torrent of
       invective; dissent was not tolerated. Such movements far more
       resembled authoritarian ingroups centered around a despot rather
       than individualist truth-seeking.
       But despite the individualism of the ancient Greeks, they also
       displayed a greater tendency toward exclusionary (ethnocentric)
       attitudes than the Romans®! or the Germanic groups that came to
       dominate Europe after the fall of the Western Empire (see
       below). In addition to a sense of belonging to the wider Greek
       culture, the Greeks had a strong sense of belonging to a
       particular city-state, and this belonging was rooted in a sense
       of common ethnicity deeply entwined with religious attitudes.
       The Greeks, unlike the Romans and despite their common language
       and culture, “never overcame the exclusionary nature of their
       institutions to form a lasting union.” °
       The polis was thus both exclusionary (serving only citizens,
       typically defined by blood) and communitarian (subscribing to a
       citizen-soldier ideal under which all were expected to sacrifice
       for the whole). The city-state meant for the Greeks the actual
       people (they always called themselves “the Athenians,” “the
       Spartans’), their ancestors, and their gods: “this explains the
       patriotism of the ancients, a vigorous sentiment which was for
       them the supreme virtue and that which all the others culminated
       in’; “The piety of the ancients was love of country.” Guillaume
       Durocher:
       From fairly early on, Athenian democracy became tinged with what
       Susan Lape calls a “racial ideology.”®> Whereas Herodotus had
       argued that the Athenian population was the product of a mixing
       between Hellenic settlers and Pelasgian natives, the Athenians
       claimed to be racially pure in contrast with the other Greeks,
       having supposedly sprung from the Attic soil as true
       autochtones.®®
       Similarly, Sparta was essentially an ethnostate, with the highly
       xenophobic Spartans ruling over and enslaving a conquered
       people, the Helots, from whom they remained separate, with no
       intermarriage, for hundreds of years.®” Thus, Greek patriotism
       based on religious beliefs and a sense of blood kinship was in
       practice very much focused on the individual city, making those
       interests absolutely supreme, with little consideration for
       imperial subjects, allies, or fellow Greeks in general[/quote]
       Source :
       Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary
       Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future by Kevin
       MacDonald page 47 - 49
       I think our debate dialogue to the enemy is how we using one of
       western culture on linguistic communication, correct me if I'm
       wrong
       #Post#: 26910--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 1, 2024, 6:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "correct me if I'm wrong"
       You are wrong. Debating was part of ancient statism all over the
       world. The monarch would invite courtiers/guests with opposing
       views to debate each other in order to arrive at a decision on
       an issue. (Don't you watch any palace dramas?)
       
       #Post#: 28949--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: rp Date: December 13, 2024, 3:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=912.msg10080#msg10080
       date=1639284460]
       I see what you are saying, but a consistent humanist society
       which sincerely viewed "non-whites" as "non-human" would use
       "non-whites" as food. This has not been the case in reality.
       [/quote]
       Then perhaps this is true of Turanian blood. Jews, for example,
       have been historically accused of ritually murdering children
       and drinking their blood.
       #Post#: 28951--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 13, 2024, 5:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Jews who do that are not relying on that blood as their main
       source of nutrition. As you yourself say, it is more about
       ritual.
       A better comparison with such Jews would be big game hunters who
       do not eat their victims but turn them into trophies.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page