URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Ancient World
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 12221--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: rp Date: March 23, 2022, 12:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=912.msg10080#msg10080
       date=1639284460]
       I see what you are saying, but a consistent humanist society
       which sincerely viewed "non-whites" as "non-human" would use
       "non-whites" as food. This has not been the case in reality.
       [/quote]
       So what is the reason behind Eurocentrism among Gentiles then,
       if not anthropocentrism? Aggressiveness towards those perceived
       as "weaker" (i.e. non hunters)? In other words, stereotyping of
       "non-Whites" as non-hunters, and thus inferior?
       #Post#: 12226--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 23, 2022, 2:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "So what is the reason behind Eurocentrism among Gentiles then,
       if not anthropocentrism?"
       My guess is preference for high sexual dimorphism.
       "On a different note, I consider humanism/progressive Yahwism
       much more frightening and dangerous to destroy than Turanism,
       the latter being less technologically advanced. What do you
       think?"
       Why do you seem to imply that progressive Yahwism is distinct
       from Turanism? Have you forgotten that Judaism exists?! (Judaism
       is humanist too, by the way, and plenty of its followers are
       excellent machinists also.)
       #Post#: 12227--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: rp Date: March 23, 2022, 8:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok. I agree. One could also point to perhaps the deadliest
       humanist/progressive Yahwist ideology of our time, communism
       (which proliferated mainly in Turandom), to substantiate your
       point. Additionally, the Soviet Union also produced the biggest
       technological innovations of our time (for which it is praised
       by False Leftists).
       #Post#: 12348--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: rp Date: March 29, 2022, 1:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Now that I think of it, could this mean that it is possible for
       those "non-Whites" with Turanian blood to be progressive
       humanists/Yahwists? What do you think? For example,
       non-Eurocentric Westerners (particularly in non-Western
       countries) who promote a Judeophillic/progressivist/secularist
       ideology.
       #Post#: 12349--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 29, 2022, 2:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think they even need to have Turanian blood in order to
       be progressives. Movements the draw heavily on memory of the
       past (and hence ultimately blood memory) are those which are
       likely to sort adherents racially. Progressivism can appeal to
       anyone at all precisely because it de-emphasizes the past.
       Secularism is a different idea. Secularists merely want faith
       kept out of political argumentation. Progressivism is actually
       anti-secular, as progressives have no problem with arguing their
       political views by referring to their own faith (that the future
       will be better than the past) as a starting point. The problem
       is that not enough secularists currently recognize that
       progressivism is a form of faith, instead presuming that it is
       the truth (ie. they themselves are implicit progressives), thus
       fail to notice that progressives are not secularists.
       #Post#: 12350--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: rp Date: March 29, 2022, 2:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I don't think they even need to have Turanian blood in order to
       be progressives."
       I meant to ask, do you think their Turanian blood would draw
       them toward progressivism? But I think you answered my question,
       as you pointed out that progressivism does not necessarily sort
       its adherents racially. I now recall we had this discussion
       before, wherein you pointed out that it is also possible for
       Aryanists to be progressives, since they would not disagree with
       our aims, but would merely believe that the best way to achieve
       our aims would be through progressivism
       "The problem is that not enough secularists currently recognize
       that progressivism is a form of faith, instead presuming that it
       is the truth (ie. they themselves are implicit progressives),
       thus fail to notice that progressives are not secularists."
       I agree. For example non-Western secular nationalist movements
       in the Arab countries, as well as fascist independence movements
       which sought to deemphasize religion as means toward unity, such
       as the Indian National Army headed by SC Bose.
       Among the secularists, however, I was referring to those in
       non-Western countries who explicitly evaluate the "superiority"
       of non-Western cultures using Western standards (while
       selectively bashing other non-Western cultures (e.g. Islam) for
       not meeting these standards), but I think these would be
       classified as progressives rather than secularists as they do
       invoke their faith from time to time. What really made me think
       it was Turanian blood that was driving their ideology was that
       they seemed to be non-Eurocentric, but nevertheless
       Zionist/Western, unlike Gentiles who display Eurocentrism time
       after time. Recall that we previously also distinguished between
       Eurocentrism and Westernization, establishing that it was
       possible to be Westernized but not Eurocentric.
       For example, one who does not necessarily think "Whites" are
       better, and who does not even classify himself according to
       Eurocentric ethnic categories, but who nevertheless worships the
       creations of Western civilization and merely wishes his
       ancestral culture invented those things, even trying to take
       credit for inventing those things.
       #Post#: 12393--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: rp Date: March 31, 2022, 4:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Now that I think of it, the non-racist Eurocentrists in
       "Jew-aware" circles also probably have Gentile blood memory, if
       your theory is correct. To make matters more complicated is that
       some of these Eurocentrists also follow a vegan diet*, so it is
       hard to accuse them of being humanists. But then again, so do
       some Jews/False Leftists.
       Add to the fact that many of those in the non-racist Eurocentric
       "jew-aware" crowd who have had "non-White" sexual partners in
       the past are both male and female, whereas those in the racist
       crowd who have had "non-White" sexual partners are mostly male,
       in accordance with our theory that it is only Turanian males who
       mate with non-Turanians.
       *Strictly speaking, can a Eurocentrist Gentile really be an
       ethical vegan, given that they are not universalist? Some of
       them adamantly claim that they are, all the while proudly
       exuding Paleolithic Ice Age blood memory.
       #Post#: 12535--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: rp Date: April 6, 2022, 6:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Also, are we supposed to try and win over these Eurocentrist
       "non-White" Gentiles and False Leftist "White" Gentiles to our
       side through persuasion, in the hopes that they will
       de-Westernize? After all, their Eurocentrism/humanism is
       genetic, so I don't see any point in converting them to a
       non-Eurocentric, anti-humanist ideology.
       In other words, I am saying that their Gentile blood memory
       inevitably draws them towards Western ideology, and unless they
       can extricate themselves of it, they cannot de-Westernize.
       #Post#: 16799--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: rp Date: December 2, 2022, 3:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So if Gentile blood is not heritably ethnotribalist, then
       wouldn't it follow that those irredeemable False Leftists and
       non racist rightists who identify as "White" are also not
       ethnotribalists?
       #Post#: 16801--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marathon: The Battle that Gave Birth to Western Civilization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 2, 2022, 3:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Heritable ethnotribalism could come from the Turanian blood that
       they have.
       But as I said elsewhere, due to messy leftist messaging, there
       exist some sincere anti-racists who mistakenly think they have a
       social duty to identify as "white" in order to "acknowledge
       their privilege". Those who identify as "white" for this reason
       are not to be prematurely assumed to be "white" on account of
       their self-identification alone.
       The most reliable way to tell whether or not apparent
       anti-racists who say they are "white" are actually "white", as
       always, is whether or not they voluntarily refrain from
       reproducing.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page