URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Ancient World
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 30108--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 7, 2025, 1:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "What’s the difference between equality and universalism?"
       I assume you mean the difference between egalitarianism and
       universalism? Egalitarianism is the belief that everyone is
       equal. Universalism is the belief that we should not have an
       in-group/out-group double-standard in our scope of ethical
       concern. Not only does a universalist need not be an
       egalitarian, but indeed an egalitarian would suck at being a
       universalist, since an egalitarian universalist would consider
       tribalists equal to universalists (at the same as agreeing that
       tribalism is wrong!).
       "what did Aristotle and Moses stand for?"
       You can read up on them yourself, and come back if you have
       specific questions.
       "What can a Westernized individual overcome to prevent anymore
       Westernization?"
       Progressivism, Eurocentrism, Achilleanism, Faustianism, etc..
       #Post#: 30112--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: HikariDude Date: May 7, 2025, 10:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       “Not only does a universalist need not be an egalitarian, but
       indeed an egalitarian would suck at being a universalist, since
       an egalitarian universalist would consider tribalists equal to
       universalists”
       Hence the new but faithful saying “love for all who have love
       for all” (which the egalitarian does not understand). Were
       sayings like that in ancient times?
       “You can read up on them yourself,”
       In the main site’s ‘Western Civilization Must Die’ page, for
       example?
       “Achilleanism, Faustianism,”
       What is the difference between Achilleanism and Faustianism? I
       know Faustianism is one’s desire for material gain at the
       expense of their soul. But to be sure, is Achilleanism (as I
       read in the page mentioned above) about fame being a long term
       motivator?
       #Post#: 30113--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 7, 2025, 4:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "“love for all who have love for all”"
       This implies we should love those who love tribalists (who would
       be included in the second "all"). WTF?!
       "In the main site’s ‘Western Civilization Must Die’ page, for
       example?"
       Anywhere you wish.
       "What is the difference between Achilleanism and Faustianism?"
       Achilleanism is the desire for glory. Faustianism is the desire
       to be the first to do what has never been done before. In
       practice, being the first to do what has never been done before
       frequently leads to obtaining glory, therefore the two often go
       together. On the other hand, there are other ways to obtain
       glory than being the first to do what has never been done
       before, therefore Achilleanism is broader.
       #Post#: 30117--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: HikariDude Date: May 7, 2025, 7:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       “This implies we should love those who love tribalists”
       Weren’t you praising the quote here:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/jews-have-nothing-in-common-with-us!/msg418/#msg418
       [quote]This slogan succinctly captures the true spirit of
       universalism. Jews do not have love for all, therefore hating
       Jews does not in any way discredit our universalism;[/quote]
       ? Of course some in the second (or third, fourth, etc) “all”
       might actually not love all. This is why I believe we should be
       radical about it and judge the root of their “love”. For
       example, not only would some in the second “all” not love all,
       but some in the first “all” that do not “love all” might
       actually “love all who have love for all” radically. Don’t you
       think so?
       “there are other ways to obtain glory than being the first to do
       what has never been done before, therefore Achilleanism is
       broader”
       So to be sure, all Faustians are Achilleans but not all
       Achilleans are Faustians?
       Also, Faustianism might also go hand in hand with Progressivism
       as progress would make the inventor the first.
       But how does Eurocentrism (and others like high sexual
       dimorphism) correlate with the other three?
       #Post#: 30119--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 7, 2025, 7:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]Jews do not have love for all, therefore hating Jews does
       not in any way discredit our universalism;[/quote]
       This statement is true. But taking this approach further, the
       next question is: should we love those who love both Jews and
       non-Jews? I am saying we should not.
       Thus I admit I should not have said:
       [quote]This slogan succinctly captures the true spirit of
       universalism.[/quote]
       I have edited the original post such that the statement at that
       position now instead reads:
       [quote]This slogan demonstrates that Jackson is closer to the
       true spirit of universalism than Barkley is.[/quote]
       Thanks!
       "So to be sure, all Faustians are Achilleans but not all
       Achilleans are Faustians?"
       In theory, I suppose you could be a non-Achillean Faustian if
       you want to be the first to do something that has never been
       done before but deliberately keep this a secret from the rest of
       the world. But I doubt this is significant in reality.
       "But how does Eurocentrism (and others like high sexual
       dimorphism) correlate with the other three?"
       From where has most of the progress been coming from?
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/ancient-world/gnosticism/msg24878/#msg24878
       [quote][img]
  HTML https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-889f85686fb00293dc1511e0ef5dadcf-pjlq[/img][/quote]
       As for high sexual dimorphism:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg10146/#msg10146
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg12447/#msg12447
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg21872/#msg21872
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg22158/#msg22158
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg24370/#msg24370
       (and many other posts in that topic)
       High sexual dimorphism also implies low neoteny:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg16234/#msg16234
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg13173/#msg13173
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg28314/#msg28314
       #Post#: 30126--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: HikariDude Date: May 7, 2025, 10:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       “Thus I admit I should not have said:”
       I will also admit seeing the root at which number “all” could
       also be time consuming. For example, love for all (who have love
       for all)x might mean it would take forever to see where x lands.
       “I suppose you could be a non-Achillean Faustian if you want to
       be the first to do something that has never been done before but
       deliberately keep this a secret from the rest of the world. But
       I doubt this is significant in reality.”
       Those non-Achillean Faustians either might be anonymously
       earning glory, might be contributing to something they would
       feel embarrassed about, or might simply see it as a confidence
       booster.
       Also, I am not that much familiar with the story about Faust,
       but from what I know of Faust, he was basically an Achillean by
       your definition. He sold to the devil his soul for glory. Though
       I am not sure what he was first to do.
       “From where has most of the progress been coming from?”
       Good point.
       #Post#: 30128--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 7, 2025, 11:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I am not sure what he was first to do."
       He was supposed to have excelled in various fields to an
       unprecedented degree. Anyway, here are more posts about
       Faustianism:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg20084/?topicseen#msg20084
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg17277/?topicseen#msg17277
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg16871/?topicseen#msg16871
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg14867/?topicseen#msg14867
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg14444/?topicseen#msg14444
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg13094/?topicseen#msg13094
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg10670/?topicseen#msg10670
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg10474/?topicseen#msg10474
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg9344/?topicseen#msg9344
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg9151/?topicseen#msg9151
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg5055/?topicseen#msg5055
       #Post#: 30147--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: HikariDude Date: May 8, 2025, 11:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       “He was supposed to have excelled in various fields to an
       unprecedented degree.”
       Okok.
       I think we had a good talk. Put another end to discussion? I
       might need a break. If I have questions or other things to share
       (maybe sooner, maybe later), I would let you know.
       #Post#: 30176--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: TheRock Date: May 12, 2025, 12:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=890.msg30128#msg30128
       date=1746678798]
       "I am not sure what he was first to do."
       He was supposed to have excelled in various fields to an
       unprecedented degree. Anyway, here are more posts about
       Faustianism:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg20084/?topicseen#msg20084
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg17277/?topicseen#msg17277
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg16871/?topicseen#msg16871
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg14867/?topicseen#msg14867
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg14444/?topicseen#msg14444
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg13094/?topicseen#msg13094
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg10670/?topicseen#msg10670
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg10474/?topicseen#msg10474
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg9344/?topicseen#msg9344
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg9151/?topicseen#msg9151
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/homo-hubris/msg5055/?topicseen#msg5055
       [/quote]
       I overheard my uncle yesterday speaking on how much harder it is
       to get parents to volunteer for things parents in California
       used to love to volunteer for. No one wants to participate
       anymore in the U.S., apparently?
       #Post#: 31165--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gnosticism
       By: FakeJesus Date: October 9, 2025, 6:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       More people acknowledging and looking into Gnosticism:
       The Fake Jesus You Were Taught About | Prof Jiang
       Explains[quote]
       Jesus Christ — the most famous man to ever live.
       But who was he, really? A divine Son of God, a revolutionary
       social reformer, or a misunderstood human who challenged empire
       and religion alike?
       In this lecture, Prof. Jiang separates the historical Jesus from
       the biblical Jesus, tracing how one humble Galilean teacher
       became the central figure of Western civilization.
       You’ll discover how Jesus’ teachings on forgiveness, rebellion,
       and redemption reshaped moral philosophy — and how his story was
       later transformed by politics, myth, and power.
       This is not a sermon. It’s history, philosophy, and religion —
       explained through evidence, logic, and humanity.[/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzzNQOmEZ1Y
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page