DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 466--------------------------------------------------
Non-Aryan infidelity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 24, 2020, 1:55 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT
www.theguardian.com/science/2019/apr/17/cheating-men-can-be-spot
ted-by-their-face-type-study-suggests
[quote]Experts found men with more “masculine” faces were more
likely to be thought to be unfaithful, and such men also
self-reported more cheating or “poaching” of other men’s
partners
...
The team said being suspicious of men with masculine features –
such as a strong browridge, strong jaw and thinner lips – might
have offered an evolutionary advantage, allowing heterosexual
women to spot a flaky partner and men to recognise a potential
rival who might seduce their partner or leave them raising
someone else’s child.
Previous research has suggested women are able to spot
unfaithful men from their mugshot, with the masculinity of the
man’s face a key factor in the judgment, while weaker effects
have been found for men weighing up images of women.[/quote]
Therefore aesthetic standards (e.g. Western) that prefer
non-Aryan (ie. low neoteny, high sexual dimorphism) facial
features are inferior. Which is what we already knew.
---
www.bbc.com/future/story/20190619-how-your-looks-shape-your-pers
onality
[quote]One study out of Germany’s University of Göttingen
recently reported that of more than 200 men, those who were
physically stronger and who had more “macho” bodies – including
larger chests and biceps – also tended to be more extroverted,
especially in the sense of being more assertive and physically
active. The same strength-extroversion association was not found
among the women in the study.
...
Other research has suggested that your approach to hooking up
with relationship partners may also be a strategic adaptation
influenced by your bodily and facial features, especially if you
are male. For instance, in their research involving hundreds of
undergrads, Aaron Lukaszewsk at Loyola Marymount University and
colleagues, including Christina Larson and Kelly Gildersleeve at
the University of California, found that the men (but not the
women) who were stronger – based on a weight-training test – and
more attractive were more likely to say that sex without love is
okay, and that they could happily have sex with someone without
being close to them.
This pattern of findings is consistent with the idea that among
our male ancestors, those in better physical shape had more
reproductive success by engaging in lots of casual sex and that
such a sexual strategy has since evolved as a response to being
physically capable. “The current findings support the hypothesis
that stronger and more attractive men have more sex partners in
part because these men are calibrated toward the pursuit of
uncommitted mating opportunities,” the researchers
wrote.[/quote]
This fits our characterization of mesomorphy and robustness as
non-Aryan.
Of course, what I take issue with is the article taking for
granted that such features as "more attractive" or "better
physical shape". By Western standards these features may be
considered such, but what we are here to do is to toss out
Western standards and establish different standards.
I myself have always aesthetically despised heavy builds.
Besides being obviously non-neotenous, heavy builds also waste
energy in two ways: 1) the extra mass demands extra nutrition
just to maintain in equilibrium; 2) during physical activity,
the extra mass requires extra energy to move. The most
energy-efficient build for a farming lifestyle is a light build
that combines gracility with ectomorphy (which I also expect to
positively correlate with the most romantic (including
non-promiscuous) personality), which is what Aryan women should
prefer in men. In other words, women who prefer robustness
and/or mesomorphy in men are non-Aryan.
(Ironically, many women appreciate gracility and ectomorphy in
women, yet not in men. In general, I can't stand people with
gender-based aesthetic double-standards.)
---
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/fb-5636031/ARE-MEN-SHORT-WIDE-FA
CES-LIKELY-CHEAT.html
[quote]
The results showed that men and women with a high FWHR – square
and wide faces – reported a greater sex drive than others.
Men with a larger FWHR were also more easy-going when it comes
to casual sex and would consider being unfaithful to their
partners.
The researchers hope the findings will shed light on the role
that facial features play in sexual relationships and mate
selection.
Their research builds upon previous studies that have shown that
certain psychological and behavioural traits are associated with
particular facial width-to-height ratios (FWHR).
Square-faced men tend to be perceived as more aggressive, more
dominant, more unethical, and more attractive as short-term
sexual partners than men with thinner and longer faces.[/quote]
This shows that FWHR and the traits listed in the earlier posts
such as heavy brow ridge, chest, etc. are all part of a
consistent archetype - which was what I predicted from the
beginning.
---
The archetype continues to be fleshed out:
medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-low-voiced-men-em-women.html
[quote]Men with low-pitched voices have an advantage in
attracting women, even though women know they're not likely to
stick around for long.
...
"Until now, it's been unclear why women would like the voices of
men who might cheat. But we found that the more women thought
these men would cheat, the more they were attracted to them for
a brief relationship when they are less worried about
fidelity."[/quote]
Another job for state control over reproduction!
---
www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7902663/cheaters-have-longer-index-fin
gers/
[quote]Contrary to previously held beliefs, women who have more
"feminine" traits are less likely to remain faithful[/quote]
I told you so.
[quote]Eiluned Pearce measured the fingers of 275 female
volunteers and also sampled their DNA, before getting them to
complete psychological tests about their relationships.
She found that "women with higher (more feminine) left-hand
digit ratios are more impulsive and rate their romantic
relationships less favourably" -which she said was "intriguing,
because the opposite might be expected".[/quote]
Not by me. Only worshippers of high sexual dimorphism would
think that:
[quote]Scientists previously believed that they'd been exposed
to higher levels of female sex hormones in the womb and
therefore were "more feminised" and were more likely to be
satisfied with romantic relationships.[/quote]
Wrong, wrong, wrong! Femininity is evil, just as masculinity is
evil!
Combined with the above posts about male infidelity, we now have
a complete picture. The best men are the least masculine men,
and the best women are the least feminine women, exactly as I
had predicted from the beginning using no empirical data but
only our (now validated) theory of Original Nobility.
---
[quote]Porn the new weapon of choice
Ramallah, West Bank - Porn movies and programmes in Hebrew are
being broadcast by Israeli troops who have taken over three
Palestinian television stations of Ramallah, irate residents of
the besieged West Bank town said on Saturday.
The offices of three local television and radio stations were
occupied by soldiers on Friday morning, a few hours after tanks
and hundreds of troops stormed the town in Israel's biggest
offensive against the Palestinian Authority and its leader
Yasser Arafat.
The soldiers started broadcasting the porn clips - considered
extremely offensive by most Muslims - intermittently on Saturday
afternoon from the Al-Watan, Ammwaj, and Al-Sharaq channels, the
residents said.
"The pornographic movies started on Al-Watan television at
around 03:30," one 34-year-old Palestinian mother named Reema
said.
"I have six children at home, they have nowhere to go with what
is going on here and can't even watch TV," she said angrily.
"It's not healthy really. I think the Israelis want to mess with
our young men's heads," she said.[/quote]
www.news24.com/xArchive/Archive/Porn-the-new-weapon-of-choice-20
020330
---
Purely aesthetically speaking, I have never liked porn. Remember
that time I tried to explain the difference between porn and
gravure on the old blog?
aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/colohoax-confirmed/comment-pag
e-2/#comment-170360
We should consider promoting gravure as a clean alternative to
porn. Whereas porn demeans the performers, gravure pedestalizes
them. Thus in terms of psychological impact on the viewer,
whereas porn leads to desensitization (and consequently the need
for increasingly hardcore performances just for the same
effect), gravure leads to sensitization (and consequently the
demand for increasingly subtle performances). A gravure fan
looking at porn will find it so unsubtle as to evoke only
disgust. This is what we should aim at: not people refusing porn
out of fear of being aroused by it, but people refusing porn
because they find it too aesthetically crude to be arousing.
---
I recall reading somewhere that Aryans are able to much more
easily control their naturalistic tendencies when younger, as
opposed to non-Aryans. This is why celibacy is valued in youth
in Aryan culture, in contrast to non-Aryan culture which
promotes asceticism/celibacy in old age.
For example, this guy:
www.rooshv.com/5-layers-of-sexual-temptation
[quote]If you’re a fornicator, you may find the above examples
silly, but if you’re chaste, you understand how hard it is to
remain so in a secular world that has elevated masturbation and
sex to virtues. You will be tempted nearly every which way you
turn, not just from pornography and real-life women, but also
advertisements, movies, and music videos. It’s almost as if
those in power want you to think of sex constantly. The average
woman in her prime is more than eager to play along with this
agenda.
I know that my biggest weakness is the female flesh. I have very
little willpower to defend against an attractive woman, so I’ve
had to identify and block the main areas where they tempt me
while praying to God for help. If there’s no temptation, there’s
no lust, and if there’s no lust, the desire to fornicate
diminishes. I’m still a hot-blooded man, but thanks to these
efforts, I’m much more in control of my passions than
before.[/quote]
So while non-Aryans such as Roosh V (Gentile?) may indeed be
sincere when he says he wants to control his sexual impulses,
the fact is at this late an age (40), it is of little to no
consequence, especially when he was at the center of promoting
Eurocentrism at the height of PUA. Perhaps the good thing that
has come out of all this is that Roosh V's adventures in PUA
have destroyed his ability to bond so much that he will not
enter a long term relationship in the foreseeable future and
thus will not reproduce.
---
"Aryans are able to much more easily control their naturalistic
tendencies when younger, as opposed to non-Aryans."
If referring to sex drive only, this should be a straightforward
function of our lower sexual dimorphism.
Roosh V looks like this FFS:
You can tell he is a sex maniac from his primitive appearance
(esp. facial hair area (but note also the upper arm hair))
alone.
---
"You can tell he is a sex maniac from his primitive appearance"
But according to the False Left he is just a basement-dwelling
virgin! LMAO (rofl)
Are the False Left really that stupid, or are they simply too
cowardly to confront the truth that sex maniacs do indeed exist?
The False Left's tendency to gravely underestimate their enemies
will get us all killed tbh
---
"If referring to sex drive only"
Yes
In terms of fornication, I recall that we were discussing that
contraception will no doubt do some good in preventing births by
sex maniacs, but (as you have mentioned) what good is it when
the sex maniacs can simply now reproduce at their own volition?
The only solution is state control over reproduction, which
Roosh, being a traditionalist*, will not accept. While the
general cultural shift to lower sexual dimorphism itself will
somewhat select against these types of men, which is why he
laments over the inability to find a partner, only state control
over reproduction will definitively phase people like him out.
* I recall in one of his blogs he mentioned that the
Enlightenment "rationalist" (i.e. empiricist) of trying to
accumulate as many partners as possible because it is in
accordance with one's Darwinist biological imperatives was
wrong, but only because that type of sex was "sterile", and so
the solution he proposed was to encourage sex that actually
resulted in reproduction, because the latter was what was truly
in accordance with one's biological imperatives. Roosh V is a
primalist, plain and simple.
---
"Perhaps the good thing that has come out of all this is that
Roosh V's adventures in PUA have destroyed his ability to bond
so much that he will not enter a long term relationship in the
foreseeable future and thus will not reproduce."
The women who find Roosh V attractive enough to be willing to
have sex with him are the ones who should be prohibited from
reproducing.
In the grand scheme of things, it won't make much difference if
Roosh V doesn't reproduce, since the same women willing to
reproduce with him will just reproduce with some other similarly
primitive man instead, since that is what they find sexually
stimulating. But if the National Socialist state manages through
state control over reproduction to eliminate from the gene pool
all the matrilineal bloodlines attracted to non-neotenous
traits, then all the Roosh V types in the world will be unable
to get sex even if they want it (unless they resort to rape).
That is what we are here to do.
---
"since the same women willing to reproduce with him will just
reproduce with some other similarly primitive man instead, since
that is what they find sexually stimulating."
A common trope I have heard is that Jewish women cheat on their
partners for more masculine and aggressive Gentile men, hence
why wee see feminists such as Laurie Penny (Jew) promoting PUAs.
This would lead to selection in favor of offspring that carry
both Jewish cunning and Gentile aggression in their blood, as
manifest in present day Israelis.
---
Although not strictly infidelity, non-monogamy is a driving
force of sexual dimorphism:
[quote]Sexual dimorphism is often caused through evolution in
response to male male competition and female choice.[15] In
polygamous species there is a noted sexual dimorphism. The
sexual dimorphism is seen typically in sexual signaling aspects
of morphology. Males typically exhibit these dimorphic traits
and they are typically traits which help in signaling to females
or male male competition.[17][26] In monogamous species sexual
conflict is thought to be lessened, and typically little to no
sexual dimorphism is noted as there is less ornamentation and
armor. This is because there is a relaxation of sexual
selection.[17][/quote]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monogamy_in_animals#Sexual_dimorphism
[quote]So while non-Aryans such as Roosh V (Gentile?) may indeed
be sincere when he says he wants to control his sexual impulses,
the fact is at this late an age (40), it is of little to no
consequence, especially when he was at the center of promoting
Eurocentrism at the height of PUA. Perhaps the good thing that
has come out of all this is that Roosh V's adventures in PUA
have destroyed his ability to bond so much that he will not
enter a long term relationship in the foreseeable future and
thus will not reproduce. [/quote]
I mean, he still has 35+ years where he could reproduce.
---
"Although not strictly infidelity, non-monogamy is a driving
force of sexual dimorphism"
I wish our enemies understood that legislative monogamy =/=
fidelity in practice:
#Post#: 1529--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan infidelity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 14, 2020, 1:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Time to laugh at our enemy Sailer's bad taste again:
HTML https://vdare.com/posts/sen-hirono-to-acb-since-you-became-a-legal-adult-have-you-ever-made-unwanted-requests-for-sexual-favors
[quote]Granted, Ms. Barrett’s requests for sexual favors have
probably not very often turned out to be unwanted[/quote]
You are talking about someone who looks like this:
HTML https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/RW1QCOSTuimEbHSsRALzscip7ug=/0x0:4000x2667/1200x800/filters:focal(1680x1014:2320x1654)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/67555079/Supreme_Court_Barrett.0.jpg
So how racially inferior does that make Sailer himself for
finding Barrett arousing?
[quote]If acted upon universally in the manner of Kant’s
categorical imperative, Senator Mazie Hirono’s definition of
sexual harassment –“since you became a legal adult, have you
ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors?” — would lead to
the eventual extinction of the human race.[/quote]
That is Gnosticism for you.
#Post#: 2611--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan infidelity
By: guest27 Date: December 2, 2020, 2:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]The most energy-efficient build for a farming lifestyle
is a light build that combines gracility with ectomorphy (which
I also expect to positively correlate with the most romantic
(including non-promiscuous) personality), which is what Aryan
women should prefer in men. In other words, women who prefer
robustness and/or mesomorphy in men are non-Aryan.[/quote]
I always preferred gracility/ectomorphy in men. My ideal man, my
imaginary boyfriend, is hardly a 'man' in a conventional sense.
He's boyish, in looks and personality. Same height as me.
Neither particularly dominant nor submissive. Infinitely sweet
and sensitive. He strikes me as a mythical creature, like he
doesn't even make sense in the context of reality.
[quote]Although not strictly infidelity, non-monogamy is a
driving force of sexual dimorphism[/quote]
[s]Non-monogamy[/s] Sexual competition. Reproduction has
degenerated love into possessiveness, jealousy, exclusivity, and
conditionality. We don't find the same danger in
'non-monogamous' friendship, childcare, comradery, or heroism;
inclusive and no less (perhaps more) beautiful forms of love.
#Post#: 3455--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan infidelity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 17, 2021, 10:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/4340871/want-to-know-if-your-partner-will-cheat-men-over-this-height-are-more-likely-to-be-unfaithful/
[quote]the study included in a report by online affairs website
Ashley Madison found that taller men were twice as likely to
cheat when compared to those under five foot 10.[/quote]
Giant (hence Gentile) blood, duh!
[quote]Meanwhile another factor on whether your man will cheat
is intelligence, with Ashley Madison revealing that three per
cent of its members have a PhD - compared to just 0.7 per cent
of the global population.[/quote]
As I keep saying, intelligence and education have nothing to do
with ethical behaviour.
See also:
HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/other/racial-jewishness-archive-from-true-left-forum/
#Post#: 4084--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan infidelity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 10, 2021, 1:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Extreme sexists get more sex:
HTML https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC4842162&blobtype=pdf
[quote]The third latent class group, a relatively small
proportion of the sample (8 %), had high endorsement of rigidly
traditional notions of masculinity and high hostility toward
women. They also reported committing far more physical IPV,
control IPV, and sexual assault than any other group and, for
these reasons, we characterized this group’s masculinity as
Misogynistic. Sexual sensation seeking levels were high in this
group. Misogynistic men reported the highest support for a
traditionally masculine sexual script and the lowest support for
the monogamy and emotion script of any men in the sample. These
men’s mean numbers of both lifetime sexual partners and lifetime
one-night stands were higher than those of men in the two
Normative groups, and they were more likely than men in any
other group to have paid for sexual services. Many of them were
also daily pornography users (although frequent use of
pornography was common across this sample). Regarding male group
involvement, Misogynistic men participated in organized sports
teams, informal sports, and computer or gaming groups at higher
levels than men in most other groups, and their fraternity
membership proportion (58 %) was the highest of any
group.[/quote]
Famous example:
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/stormy-daniels-claims-donald-trump-204719618.html
[quote]Stormy Daniels Claims Donald Trump Made This Disgusting
Comment Before They First Had Sex
...
“I went to sidestep and he stood up off the bed and was like
‘This is your chance.’ And I was like, ‘What?’ and he was like,
‘You need to show me how bad you want it or do you just want to
go back to the trailer park,'”
...
“I didn’t know what to say. He had stripped down to his
underwear and was perched on the bed doing his best yet
horrifyingly disturbing impression of Burt Reynolds.”[/quote]
Back to the research paper:
[quote]Men in the Misogynistic group were more likely than men
in the two Normative groups to have caused a pregnancy[/quote]
And this is why we need state control over reproduction.
Otherwise every new generation will be more sexist than the
previous!
#Post#: 4339--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan infidelity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 19, 2021, 9:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513802001496?via%3Dihub
[quote]We investigated sex differences in shoulder to hip ratios
(SHR) and waist to hip ratios (WHR), and their relationships to
different features of sexual behavior. Males with high SHR and
females with low WHR reported sexual intercourse at an earlier
age, more sexual partners, more extra-pair copulations (EPC),
and having engaged in more instances of intercourse with people
who were involved in another relationship (i.e., having
themselves been EPC partners). The predictive value of these
morphological features was highly sex-specific.[/quote]
To avoid confusion, high SHR means shoulders wider than hips,
whereas low WHR means waist narrower than hips. In other words,
masculine men and feminine women are more promiscuous. Which is
what we predicted.
Why can't people just admit that low sexual dimorphism is
superior? (Hint: it has something to do with Eurocentrism.)
#Post#: 5148--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan infidelity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 29, 2021, 12:56 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://us.yahoo.com/news/american-businesswoman-jennifer-arcuri-said-103139343.html
[quote]The American businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri has given
intimate details of a passionate four-year affair with UK Prime
Minister Boris Johnson when he was London's mayor.
Arcuri, 35, a tech entrepreneur who now lives in the United
States, told the Sunday Mirror she had the relationship with
Johnson, 56, who was married at the time, between 2012 and 2016.
She said the pair met at an event where he spoke in 2011 while
she was a student and again the next year when she volunteered
to campaign for him in his 2012 election bid.
They first had sex before he had to rush off to sit with his
then-wife, Marina, and Princess Anne at the Paralympics opening
ceremony in 2012.
The pair subsequently met regularly at her central London
apartment to have sex and exchanged sexual messages, Arcuri
said, before the relationship ended in 2016.[/quote]
Arcuri's face:
[img width=1280
height=640]
HTML https://i.insider.com/606047098e71b300185192cb?width=1300&format=jpeg&auto=webp[/img]
And of course Johnson's face:
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1331215386633756675/NodbPVQv_400x400.jpg
#Post#: 5219--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan infidelity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 1, 2021, 10:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/01/politics/matt-gaetz-photos-women/index.html
[quote](CNN)Rep. Matt Gaetz, the Florida Republican being
investigated by the Justice Department over sex trafficking
allegations, made a name for himself when he arrived on Capitol
Hill as a conservative firebrand on TV and staunch defender of
then-President Donald Trump. Behind the scenes, Gaetz gained a
reputation in Congress over his relationships with women and
bragging about his sexual escapades to his colleagues, multiple
sources told CNN.
Gaetz allegedly showed off to other lawmakers photos and videos
of **** women he said he had slept with, the sources told CNN,
including while on the House floor. The sources, including two
people directly shown the material, said Gaetz displayed the
images of women on his phone and talked about having sex with
them. One of the videos showed a naked woman with a hula hoop,
according to one source.
"It was a point of pride," one of the sources said of
Gaetz.[/quote]
Gaetz's face:
HTML https://www.advocate.com/sites/default/files/clown_0.jpg
#Post#: 5220--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan infidelity
By: guest5 Date: April 2, 2021, 12:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps if Gaetz had spent less time feeding off of his
instincts and chasing women and studying how best to serve his
country instead, which should be important to him considering
the work he chose, he may have actually reached a level of
smartness over time? :)
#Post#: 5326--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan infidelity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 4, 2021, 11:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
While we're at it:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Miller_(communications_strategist)
[quote]Miller began co-hosting, with Steve Bannon, War Room:
Impeachment, a daily radio show and podcast intended to advise
the Trump White House and its allies into how to fight the
impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump.[41] The podcast was
removed from YouTube in January 2021, following the 2021
storming of the United States Capitol. [42][43]
The Trump 2020 campaign hired Miller as a senior adviser in June
2020.[44] The Trump campaign routed his $35,000 monthly salary
through his former firm, making it harder for the mother of
Miller’s son to prove his income in court, and aiding him in
dodging approximately $3,000 per month in child support.[45]
In October 2020, shortly after the FBI announced that it had
thwarted an attempt by a right-wing militia group to kidnap
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Miller said it was
"shameful" for Whitmer to call out President Trump's divisive
rhetoric. Trump had tweeted, "LIBERATE MICHIGAN!" in April 2020,
which was seen as a rallying cry for opponents of Whitmer.
Miller said, "If we want to talk about hatred, then Gov.
Whitmer, go look in the mirror."[46]
In the days before the 2020 election, Miller mendaciously
claimed that counting of ballots after election day amounted to
Democrats stealing the election.[47]
...
On March 18, 2021 it was announced that Miller had joined
Newsmax as a contributor.[48][/quote]
The relevant part:
[quote]Miller lives near Washington, D.C. with his wife and
their two daughters.[49] He also fathered a child with A. J.
Delgado during a brief extra-marital affair, born six months
after his second child.[50]
In 2018, Miller was accused of drugging his mistress with an
abortifacient drug, by blending a pill into a fruit smoothie.
The ensuing controversy caused him to leave his position as a
political commentator on CNN.[51]
In 2019, Miller admitted in court that he had a history of
visiting prostitutes and patronizing "Asian-themed" massage
parlors.[52][/quote]
Miller's face:
HTML https://s.yimg.com/hd/cp-video-transcode/prod/2020-08/02/5f26c83742c7cb439766405f/5f26c83742c7cb4397664060_o_U_v2.jpg
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page