DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 462--------------------------------------------------
Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 24, 2020, 1:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT
www.viewzone.com/wideface.html
[quote]Facial width-to-height ratio (WHR) is determined by
measuring the distance between the right and left cheeks and the
distance from the upper lip to the mid-brow. A high WHR means
the width of the face is greater that the height -- in other
words, a wide face.
During childhood, boys and girls have similar facial structures,
but during puberty, males develop a greater WHR than females.
Previous research has suggested that males with a larger WHR act
more aggressively than those with a smaller WHR.
...
volunteer subjects estimated a higher aggression assessment to
photographed faces with higher WHR ratios -- the greater the
WHR, the higher the aggressive rating, suggesting that we may
use this aspect of facial structure to judge potential
aggression in others.[/quote]
Another thing we already know. Furthermore:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23389425
[quote]We present three studies examining whether male facial
width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is correlated with racial prejudice
and whether observers are sensitive to fWHR when assessing
prejudice in other people. Our results indicate that males with
a greater fWHR are more likely to explicitly endorse racially
prejudicial beliefs, though fWHR was unrelated to implicit bias.
Participants evaluated targets with a greater fWHR as more
likely to be prejudiced and accurately evaluated the degree to
which targets reported prejudicial attitudes. Finally, compared
with majority-group members, racial-minority participants
reported greater motivation to accurately evaluate prejudice.
This motivation mediated the relationship between minority- or
majority-group membership and the accuracy of evaluations of
prejudice, which indicates that motivation augments sensitivity
to fWHR. Together, the results of these three studies
demonstrate that fWHR is a reliable indicator of explicitly
endorsed racial prejudice and that observers can use fWHR to
accurately assess another person's explicit prejudice.[/quote]
I told you so.
Quick example:
HTML https://s.hdnux.com/photos/72/56/51/15395411/75/gallery_large.jpg
---
The problem:
www.livescience.com/1785-study-chick-magnets-today-cavemen.html
[quote]Guys with bulldog-like faces have been chick magnets
throughout human evolutionary history.
A recent study of the skulls of human ancestors and modern
humans finds that women, and thereby, evolution, selected for
males with relatively short upper faces. The region between the
brow and the upper-lip is scrunched proportionately to the
overall size of their heads.
...
Men with "mini mugs" might have been most attractive to the
opposite sex and thus most likely to attract mates for
reproduction, passing along the striking features to the next
generation and so forth, said lead study author Eleanor Weston,
a paleontologist at the Natural History Museum in
London.[/quote]
medicalxpress.com/news/2014-02-wider-faced-dates-short-term.html
[quote]"Our study shows that within three minutes of meeting in
real life, women find more dominant, wider-faced men attractive
for short-term relationships, and want to go on another date
with them," says psychological scientist and lead researcher
Katherine Valentine of Singapore Management University.
...
"High male fWHR has previously been associated with surviving in
hand-to-hand combat, aggressiveness, self-perceived power, and
CEO's financial success," says Valentine. "Our study shows it's
also a reasonably good indicator of perceived dominance – not
only that, it piques women's interest in a face-to-face
speed-dating setting."
...
"The fact that women wanted to see these men again suggests that
our findings are robust – women aren't just saying they are
interested, they're actually willing to be contacted by these
men," says Valentine.[/quote]
Thus, under natural selection, non-Aryans will have greater
reproductive success.
This can be solved with state control over reproduction. If only
the minority fraction of women in each generation who
spontaneously prefer men with low FWHR are allowed to reproduce,
bloodlines which sexually select for high FWHR (and hence for
aggressiveness) could be phased out, following which bloodlines
for high FWHR (and hence for aggressiveness itself) will phase
out automatically as they fail to be selected by Aryanized
women, thus Aryanizing the men too.
---
HTML https://www.economist.com/img/b/1280/682/90/sites/default/files/20180224_WOC323.png
www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/02/20/are-alpha-males-wors
e-investors
[quote]A paper recently published by researchers at the
University of Central Florida and Singapore Management
University looks at the relationship between testosterone (a
hormone associated with competitiveness and risk-taking) and
investment performance. Using over twenty years of data on
hedge-fund returns and thousands of images collected from
Google, the authors find that fund managers with wider faces, a
proxy for testosterone levels, tend to trade more frequently,
invest in riskier securities and hold onto losing bets longer.
As a result, between 1994 and 2015, high-testosterone fund
managers (with an average facial width-to-height ratio of 2.10)
underperformed low-testosterone ones (with an average ratio of
1.57) by 5.8% per year.
Is there anything investors can do to avoid testosterone-fuelled
traders? One approach might be to seek out fund managers with
long, thin faces.[/quote]
Take one guess where the term hedge (verb) comes from in the
first place:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedge_(finance)
[quote]The market values of wheat and other crops fluctuate
constantly as supply and demand for them vary, with occasional
large moves in either direction. Based on current prices and
forecast levels at harvest time, the farmer might decide that
planting wheat is a good idea one season, but the price of wheat
might change over time. Once the farmer plants wheat, he is
committed to it for an entire growing season. If the actual
price of wheat rises greatly between planting and harvest, the
farmer stands to make a lot of unexpected money, but if the
actual price drops by harvest time, he is going to lose the
invested money.[/quote]
---
Huh? Then why are the wealthiest hedge fund managers Jewish?
---
Official answer:
Jews have undergone millenia of selective pressure for financial
skills, which would probably include selection for ability to
control their aggression when making financial decisions, thus a
high fWHR Jew would probably outperform a similarly high fWHR
non-Jew. Nevertheless, we should still expect among Jews the low
fWHR ones outperforming the high fWHR ones, albeit perhaps by a
smaller margin.
Real answer:
Tribal insider trading, duh!
---
Turns out their ability to do this isn't so good after all:
Jim Cramer (Jew):
[quote]en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Cramer#Other_media_appearances
On November 13, 2005, Dan Rather interviewed Cramer on 60
Minutes. Among the topics of discussion were Cramer's past at
his hedge fund; including his violent temper.[/quote]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Cramer#Performance_of_Cramer's_investm
ents
[quote]On the March 11, 2008, episode of Cramer's show Mad
Money, a viewer named Peter submitted the question "Should I be
worried about Bear Stearns in terms of liquidity and get my
money out of there?" Cramer responded "No! No! No! Bear Stearns
is not in trouble. If anything, they're more likely to be taken
over. Don't move your money from Bear." On March 14, 2008, the
stock lost more than half of its value on news of a Fed bailout
and $2/share takeover by JPMorgan Chase.[/quote]
"Real answer: Tribal insider trading, duh!"
Yep:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Cramer#Admission_of_market_manipulatio
n
[quote]Admission of market manipulation
In a December 2006 interview, Cramer described activities used
by hedge fund managers to manipulate stock prices—some of
debatable legality and others illegal. He described how he could
push stocks higher or lower with as little as $5 million in
capital when he was running his hedge fund.[/quote]
Amazing how Cramer (Jew) is almost a caricature of what you
described in your analysis, everything from his behavior down to
his phenotype!:
Yet despite having zero data on Cramer, you were able to paint
an accurate picture of his archetype. Proof that rationalism >
empiricism.
---
www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2013/01/002.html
[quote]BUFFALO, N.Y. – Research on the communication trait of
verbal aggressiveness, which includes behavior like name
calling, ridicule, insults, racial epithets and threats, has
tended to focus on its social causes.
However, a new study by a team of researchers led by Allison Z.
Shaw, PhD, assistant professor of communication at the
University at Buffalo, has found that verbal aggression may have
biological causes that can be identified by the ratio of length
of a person’s ring finger (second digit) to the length of the
index finger (fourth digit).
It is the first study to use the 2D:4D ratio – considered a
measure of prenatal testosterone exposure – as a determinant of
verbal aggression.
...
The team found that men and women with smaller 2D:4D ratio
reported themselves to be more verbally aggressive.[/quote]
---
As requested, here are some papers from the BlackPillScience
subreddit:
Women who espouse feminist beliefs are just as likely to have
fantasies of forced sex as are other women (Shulman & Horne,
2006)
www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/eaq16u/women_who_espo
use_feminist_beliefs_are_just_as/
Hence why we see feminists promoting PUAs
The paper (access is restricted but here is the abstract):
www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490609552336
[quote]This study estimated a path model of women's forceful
sexual fantasies. Constructs examined were childhood sexual
abuse, feminist beliefs, sexual guilt, erotophilia, and sexual
experience. The study clarifies how these factors mediate one
another in relationship to forceful sexual fantasies and is
first to examine the effects of feminist beliefs on forceful
sexual fantasy. Adult women (N = 261) participated by completing
an online survey. A path from sex guilt to forceful sexual
fantasy, mediated by erotophilia, was found, wherein low levels
of sex guilt and high levels of erotophilia were found to
predict forceful sexual fantasy. A direct path between childhood
sexual abuse and forceful sexual fantasy was also found. The
resulting model is discussed in relation to
previously‐proposed theories on the role of force in
women's sexual fantasies.[/quote]
The second phrase in bold says it all: the tormented child grows
up to worship her tormenter. This is traditionalism. This is
slavery.
---
"This is slavery."
A related study:
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165178117303815?
via%3Dihub
[quote]Revictimized women with histories of intimate partner
violence (IPV) rated men with larger fWHRs and higher values of
actual aggression to be more attractive than did revictimized
women without IPV histories. A reduced appraisal of threat
signals as threatening and an attraction to wider-faced and more
aggressive men might increase the risk for
revictimization.[/quote]
---
incels.co/threads/thugpill-being-nice-is-detrimental-to-life-qua
lity-of-men-including-sex-life.49952/
[quote]The desire to expel unselfish members from the group.
Parks, Craig D.,Stone, Asako B.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 99(2), Aug
2010, 303-310
"An initial study investigating tolerance of group members who
abuse a public good surprisingly showed that unselfish members
(those who gave much toward the provision of the good but then
used little of the good) were also targets for expulsion from
the group...A fourth study suggested that the target is seen by
some as establishing an undesirable behavior standard and by
others as a rule breaker. Individuals who formed either
perception expressed a desire for the unselfish person to be
removed from the group."
To put it in simpler terms, being altruistic and friendly is
just as likely to cause people to reject you as those who are
completely selfish and purely look out for their needs only. The
study found no significant difference. This contradicts the
mainstream advice that having a "good personality" will cause
people, including women, to like you. They will hate you just as
much as someone who practically steals from them. This is also
reflected in the workplace, as "agreeable" men (peaceful and
friendly) are paid significantly less than their disagreeable
counterparts.
"Overall, across the first three studies, men who are one
standard deviation below the mean on agreeableness earn an
average of 18.31% ($9,772) more than men one standard deviation
above the mean on agreeableness. Meanwhile, the
“disagreeableness premium” for women was only 5.47% ($1,828).
Thus, the income premium for disagreeableness is more than three
times stronger for men than for women."
So as we could see, the price of being nice when you are a man
is a staggering 18% of your income throughout life. It is also
far stronger in males than females. So this means that nice men
in the first study would have been rejected even more often than
the nice women. This suggests that nice men are rejected more
often than men who are completely selfish and practically steal
off of everyone. Now, let us focus more on the effects of being
"mean" or "evil" on attracting a woman. "A Billion Wicked
Thoughts: What the World's Largest Experiment Reveals about
Human Desire" is a book by two neuroscientists that combines
countless research by Alfred Kinsey and experiments found on the
internet that has a data on over half a billion people to see
what are the raw sexual desires of humanity. The book quotes
quite a few unnerving conclusions of the sexuality of women
based on many individual experiments:
“It turns out that killing people is an effective way to elicit
the attention of many women: virtually every serial killer,
including Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, and David Berkowitz, have
received love letters from large numbers of female fans” (p.
98).
“[Their] inner cavewoman knows Doormat Man would become
Sabertooth Tiger Lunch in short order” (p .97).
Psychology Today had an article that confirmed and analyzed how
women desire men who are violent, mean, and show criminal
behavior, with much thanks to the book mentioned above.
"women demonstrate a strong erotic preference for dominant men.
Or toward what’s now commonly referred to as alpha males—in the
authors’ words, men who are 'strong, confident, [and] swaggering
[as in 'cocky,' and the pun is intended].' Unfortunately, what
these descriptors often imply is behavior sufficiently bearish,
self-centered, and insensitive as to often cross the line into a
physical, mental, and emotional abuse that can be downright
brutal."
"there’s something in their native wiring that makes a great
many of them susceptible to 'bad boys.'"
"many women (at least secretly, or subliminally) can’t help but
be drawn toward cold-blooded, controlling, 'bad boys' whose
dominance symbolizes quite the opposite of what in relationships
they’re consciously seeking."
"many women experience as enticing the idea of surrendering to a
powerful male figure because of its very riskiness. Curiously,
such an acutely felt threat can actually be eroticized by
women’s minds into exceptional sexual excitement so compelling
that (at least on a fantasy level) it’s almost irresistible."
Sources:
www.amazon.com/Billion-Wicked-Thoughts-Largest-Experiment/dp/052
5952098
www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-news/Documents/Nice--JPSPInPress.p
df
psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/a0018403
www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evolution-the-self/201204/why-do
-women-fall-serial-killers[/quote]
Perhaps in the incel forums we could find some Aryanists?
Then again as with anti-PUAers, it appears many of those who
post these types of studies actually only envy these types of
men.
---
"Perhaps in the incel forums we could find some Aryanists?"
Their main complaint seems to be that too many women are only
willing to give a chance to good-looking men. I have no problem
with this. My problem is that too many women use the wrong
definition of "good-looking" (Eurocentrism being one aspect of
this). If women could be corrected to use our definition
instead, I would want them to be even more idealistic about whom
to date than they currently are. Incels, in contrast, want women
to lower their standards, which means abandoning their idealism.
Incels are fundamentally anti-idealistic, in this sense.
"it appears many of those who post these types of studies
actually only envy these types of men."
Yes. Worse, they think any man who doesn't look hyper-masculine
and who claims not to want to is being dishonest. It is
impossible to communicate meaningfully with people like that.
And for the record:
incels.co/threads/i-hope-trump-wins-again-just-to-see-the-femoid
-cuck-and-sjw-rage-and-pain.204639/
---
"if they (women) are Eurocentrists, they are not idealists, no?"
A woman who thinks, "I will not date anyone who does not look
like my dream guy!" is an idealist (with respect to dating).
The same woman who additionally thinks, "My dream guy must be
white!" is a Eurocentrist.
So it is theoretically possible for an idealistic woman to be a
Eurocentrist.
"When you say "corrected to use our definition instead" what do
you mean?"
"My dream guy must be a reincarnated Golden Age Aryan prince!"
"Demographically engineered?"
Unless we discover it can be done with pop culture influence
alone!
---
"I this applicable to those who prefer high sexual dimorphism
also?"
Which is why I said:
[quote]My problem is that too many women use the wrong
definition of "good-looking"[/quote]
I, unlike incels, want women to refuse to settle for anyone
other than their dream guy. I just want their concept of what
constitutes their dream guy to be drastically different than the
currently popular concept.
"Only insofar as what she considers "white" features are
congruent with Aryan features, such that she only perceives
"white" men as having those features."
No. Idealism (in dating) simply means refusing to settle for
less. This position contains no information about the content of
the ideal. You are the one presuming that she prefers Aryan
features, which may or may not be the case.
---
"But does this not mean that idealism,minus the Aryan ideal,
when pursued on its own is bad?"
Yes:
aryanism.net/politics/white-nationalists/why-race-matters/
[quote]Jews too can be considered a product of racial idealism
in this sense, though their selection process is much more
complex, being steered by how Judaism has directed Jews to
interact, always with Jewish tribal interests in mind, both with
other Jews and with non-Jews.
From the above examples, it is evident that the term “racial
idealism” on its own nowhere implies that the ideal itself is
automatically a good one.[/quote]
#Post#: 463--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 24, 2020, 1:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT contd.
www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/beards-facial-hair-men-protection-101615
926.html
[quote]Beards have been described as a sign of masculinity and
“social dominance”, suggesting they play a role in “male contest
competition” for a partner.
Some experts have claimed beards may play a similar role to a
lion’s mane, which is thought to protect its jaw and throat from
attacks.
...
As with other great apes, most fights occur between men, with
the face usually being the target.
...
“The results of this study indicate that hair is indeed capable
of significantly reducing the force of impact from a blunt
strike and absorbing energy,” wrote the scientists.
“If the same is true for human facial hair, then having a full
beard may help protect vulnerable regions of the facial skeleton
from damaging strikes, such as the jaw.”
Beards may equally protect against cuts and other injuries, they
added.
The “protective nature” of beards may give men a competitive
edge, which could explain why facial hair is linked to “high
masculinity, social dominance and behavioural
aggressiveness”.[/quote]
#Post#: 910--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 27, 2020, 3:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
In connection with the above article on predicting verbal
aggressiveness from faces, I was just reading this news article
about rightists deliberately mispronouncing Harris' name:
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/not-hidden-racism-behind-mispronouncing-184407322.html
and it included this picture:
[img]
HTML https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/JIFfySs3vSEnokaECPdbew--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTM5Ni41NjI1/https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/Edz1vDokBHfRHfYis_brhQ--~B/aD01NzY7dz0xMDI0O3NtPTE7YXBwaWQ9eXRhY2h5b24-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/thegrio_yahoo_articles_946/c9859586c331a0c09edaf5fb4953d8d5[/img]
#Post#: 911--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: rp Date: August 27, 2020, 5:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I have seen some False Leftists who don't like her do this as
well. Harris is married to a Jew BTW. This seems to contradict
the personality archetype of her phenotype. Perhaps it could
have something to do with her slave-owning ancestors on her
Jamaican father's side?
#Post#: 919--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 28, 2020, 12:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Harris is married to a Jew but did not reproduce with him.
(Though this also could be her husband's decision due to her not
wanting "non-white" blood in his Jewish bloodline. Or it could
simply be her age by the time they married.) Her absence of
biological offspring fits her phenotype, at least (especially
compared to Palin's spawn). Her sister has one child; compare
their faces:
HTML https://img1.thelist.com/img/gallery/the-truth-about-kamala-harris-sister-maya-harris/intro-1597341192.jpg
I repeat: I am in no way recommending that we assume Harris is
any better than she is just because of her face. But if her face
can help her win the election, great!
While we are at it:
HTML https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200709094609-trump-biden-split-large-16-9.jpg
#Post#: 1020--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: rp Date: September 4, 2020, 11:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The people who would most find Harris's demeanor and phenotype
appealing would be True Leftists, as she is at least (outwardly)
conveying the message that she is sincere/honest/etc. Whether or
not it is true and to what extent we will know only after we win
the election. She has not reproduced (and probably never will)
so IMO she is still redeemable. What do you think?
#Post#: 1068--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: rp Date: September 7, 2020, 9:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Also, one thing I noticed about Maya (Kamala's sister) is that
her big jaw is very distinct from individuals who simply have
pointy chins. I say this because it is easy to conflate a heavy
jawline with a pointy chin, and thus classify the latter as
non-Aryan also, when it is in fact possible for an Aryan
individual to have a pointy chin.
#Post#: 1071--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 7, 2020, 11:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"it is easy to conflate a heavy jawline with a pointy chin"
I'm not sure I understand. Isn't Kamala's chin more pointy than
Maya's? I would have thought a small jaw correlates positively
with a pointy chin, since the smaller the angle leading into the
chin. Palin's jaw is even bigger and her chin is almost being
consumed by her jaw!
#Post#: 1072--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: rp Date: September 7, 2020, 11:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I would have thought a small jaw correlates positively with a
pointy chin, since the smaller the angle leading into the chin."
Yes! This was what I was trying to say. I was merely saying that
people often mischaracterize pointy-chinned individuals as
"heavy jawed" while giving actually heavy jawed people a pass.
#Post#: 1089--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan aggressiveness
By: guest5 Date: September 9, 2020, 9:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Palin needs that wide ass jaw to get through the grit and
cartilage : (You know I couldn't resist, sorry not sorry...)
HTML https://partsinthesum.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/corndog-tea-party-bachmann.jpg
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page