DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 24767--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 10, 2024, 2:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The Hellenist otherwise likes high sexual dimorphism:
HTML https://twitter.com/The_Hellenist/status/1585798506324774912
HTML https://twitter.com/The_Hellenist/status/1697051577180131474
and dislikes neoteny:
HTML https://twitter.com/The_Hellenist/status/1714627388577927666
In any case, he is our enemy:
HTML https://twitter.com/The_Hellenist/status/1674221144801681408
HTML https://twitter.com/The_Hellenist/status/1713359032449437842
HTML https://twitter.com/The_Hellenist/status/1681468904630018051
HTML https://twitter.com/The_Hellenist/status/1657188916246585347
HTML https://twitter.com/The_Hellenist/status/1572390154194526208
#Post#: 24768--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: January 10, 2024, 8:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I don't understand how such contradictory views on sexual
dimorphism are possible. Any theories?
#Post#: 24769--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 10, 2024, 12:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
He believes sex is for reproduction, and small penises can
impregnate just as effectively as large ones, but consume less
energy, thus leaving more energy for sperm production. I would
agree that a man with a smaller penis who produces more sperm is
more masculine than a man with a larger penis who produces less
sperm*. I would also definitely expect the former to be more
likely to have Homo Hubris traits. I would without question try
to eliminate the former's bloodline first.
Thus his views are not contradictory, but an optimization of his
Homo Hubris values.
#Post#: 24816--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: January 13, 2024, 10:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It is worth noting that all the "great" conquerors in history
that Homo Hubris types like to gloat about were "manlets".
Genghis Khan was 5'6", Alexander was 5'5", Napoleon was 5'7",
Stalin was 5'5", Putin is 5'7", etc. I would theorize that this
height obsession (much like d!ck size obsession) is primarily a
product of Giant blood memory.
Extra height = extra energy, which is not necessarily an
advantage in the age of agriculture, which allows formations of
large divisions of infantrymen. Even if one argues that those
infantrymen would benefit from size and strength, their
commanders would purely be selected on intelligence, in which
case diverting energy for extra bone/muscle mass or your d!ck is
much less useful than using it for your brain.
I guess this is a "whitepill" for "manlets" like me, but on the
other hand, we have seen the consequences of selecting for
intelligence, which produces ruthless Homo Hubris machinists
that can create the deadliest weapons known to mankind. In this
case, even high intelligence won't save Aryans as we do not have
the capacity to gain an advantage by building superior machinery
to defeat our enemies. The only solution is for the
high-intelligence Aryans to use the low-intelligence non-Aryans
as cannon fodder against the Homo Hubris.
The downside is that Aryanists will have to take a temporary hit
in their spiritual level to collaborate with these non-Aryans.
#Post#: 24818--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 13, 2024, 11:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
""manlets""
I dislike this term as it implies that men should dislike being
short but women need not dislike being short. Our view is that
to whatever extent being short is bad (or good), it should be
considered bad (or good) for both men and women.
""whitepill""
I wish you wouldn't use incel-speak unnecessarily.
"I would theorize that this height obsession (much like d!ck
size obsession) is primarily a product of Giant blood memory."
I'm not sure about this. Those most obsessed with height seem to
be mostly those who are short themselves!
#Post#: 24819--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: January 13, 2024, 11:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Our view is that to whatever extent being short is bad (or
good), it should be considered bad (or good) for both men and
women."
I agree with this view, but I think those who use "manlet" would
not disagree either. "Manlet" merely implies that short men are
not "full" men (hence the "-let" suffix). I have seen "womanlet"
used similarly for women.
#Post#: 24822--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 14, 2024, 1:01 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"I have seen "womanlet" used similarly for women."
But much more rarely. In particular, I have not seen women
describe themselves as "womanlets", whereas men who describe
themselves as "manlets" are everywhere these days. That gendered
terms are used in the first place is what enables this
disparity. If a single non-gendered term were used to refer to
short people irrespective of gender, there would not be this
problem.
#Post#: 25076--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: February 17, 2024, 1:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://twitter.com/growing_india1/status/1647141435123159040?t=0lUS0G-5lftOdCSEt2xPnw&s=19
[Quote]
Women are more selfless than men in love ❤️
A woman can love a man for years without having sex with
him⭐️
Tell a man to love a women for 5 years
and be committed to her
(without having sex or any physical intimacy)
⭐️He will either cheat or breakup with her in 95 %
cases⭐️
[/Quote]
If we consider that women on average are more neotenous than
men, this is likely true.
#Post#: 25078--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 17, 2024, 5:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Supposing it is neoteny that is causing this, then we should
expect the fraction of men who can love a woman for years
without sex to be the more neotenous fraction. This sounds
plausible enough.
But are the women who can love a man for years without sex the
more neotenous fraction of women?
#Post#: 25081--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: February 17, 2024, 6:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I would assume. Would you disagree?
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page