DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 5331--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 5, 2021, 1:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Our enemies exhibit their gender-based double-standards:
HTML https://www.amren.com/blog/2021/04/even-those-who-would-be-trad-wives-may-miss-their-chances/
[quote]White trad wives are the most desired creatures on the
planet, but many white women still manage to blow it because
they have never been told the rules that were invented by our
female ancestors to protect their daughters. Even when men have
fewer choices, they will still be men, even those who have the
vision to create a family and build their own white clan.
...
The white woman should be reactive, which is the opposite of the
sexually aggressive, dominant, promiscuous, vulgar, emotionally
empty woman that modern media have taught us to be: “Just be
yourself, throw yourself over him, and it will magically work
out”. It won’t. Men appreciate women with standards and values
they want transmitted to their children even if they themselves
are not 100 percent up to these standards.[/quote]
In other words, according to rightists, men can be promiscuous,
but women cannot. Men should reject promiscuous women but women
should accept promiscuous men.
And of course some Gentile blood memory:
[quote]I wish our men could help us become better versions of
ourselves by explaining what makes us attractive. Unfortunately,
reality is different. We must discover who we are, and whom we
want to attract. Men must do the same. Fish do not tell
fishermen how or when to cast their lines. Fishermen must figure
this out for themselves.[/quote]
The comments are even worse:
[quote]One of the things I like about President Trump is that he
has made more like himself/ourselves. Failed marriages? So what.
That's not important. The important thing to do is reproduce and
reproduce White.[/quote]
#Post#: 5439--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: April 9, 2021, 10:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://lookism.net/threads/elon-musk-is-a-slayer.364418/
[quote]He said that went to college partly just to meet girls
lmao, he chose Queen's University because of its high
female-male ratio. Meanwhile an incel wouldn't even dream of
meeting girls. What a **** jock tbh, he's had three divorces, is
6'2'', is a multi billionaire, very high IQ and has a big robust
skull.
[/quote]
HTML https://i.imgur.com/2QHrstc.jpg
Giants are usually less intelligent than their Turanian
counterparts. Musk seems to be an exception.
#Post#: 5448--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 9, 2021, 11:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Giants are usually less intelligent than their Turanian
counterparts."
I wouldn't make such a claim. They may be less adept at social
manipulation, but there is no reason why they would not have
been selected for high technical intelligence, which is what IQ
test score measures.
[quote]What a **** jock tbh, he's had three divorces[/quote]
Citing number of divorces as an achievement is a good example of
our enemies' value system.
[quote]big robust skull.[/quote]
It's a consistent Musk family trait:
[img width=1280
height=959]
HTML https://cdn.5280.com/2020/04/Musk_family_Courtesy_Chris_Ruth_Photography.jpg[/img]
#Post#: 5452--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: April 10, 2021, 12:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
" may be less adept at social manipulation"
Perhaps this could account for Musk's unpolished social
interactions.
#Post#: 5711--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: April 21, 2021, 12:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Even in non-Western countries traits such as agressiveness and
high sexual dimorphism are seen as "attractive" by many. Perhaps
this is simply because non-Aryans are the majority in all
countries, but I do not believe these traits would be extolled
as much as they are now were it not for Western influence.
#Post#: 5715--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 21, 2021, 4:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
At least in pre-colonial-era non-Western countries, those who
like high sexual dimorphism (even if the majority) could be
mocked as having vulgar plebian tastes. In a culturally
non-democratic society, what is considered aesthetically
superior is not necessarily what is popular but what is endorsed
by culture leaders who were trusted to have good taste. Back
then, if an aesthetical preference was popular but not shared by
any of the culture leaders, one would conclude that most people
have not reached the cultural level required to understand the
reason behind the culture leaders' consensus rejection of it.
This is how we explain why, despite (as you say) the majority in
non-Western countries liking high sexual dimorphism, we do not
see this preference reflected in non-Western clothing styles
etc. anywhere near as much as in their Western counterparts,
because clothing styles were determined not by the majority but
by artisans.
What happened during colonialism was that, in the minds of the
colonized majorities, the colonialists replaced the local
artisans as those trusted to have good taste. Worse, even some*
of the less self-confident artisans themselves started trusting
the colonialists over their own senses, and hence deliberately
Westernized their own tastes in order to 'keep up'! What we are
here to do is to gather the incorruptible remnants who never
stopped despising Western aesthetics, and restore these
individuals to their deserving roles as culture leaders.
This is why it is so important for us not just to state our
preference, but to explicitly claim that our preference is
superior. This is why I don't just say: "Porizkova is not my
type," instead I say outright: "Porizkova is UGLY, and if you
disagree you have inferior blood, and if you are physically able
to have sex with her, you should be prohibited from
reproducing!" I am putting the vulgar plebs back in their place.
And similarly here:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/
#Post#: 5722--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: April 21, 2021, 7:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"vulgar plebian tastes"
Vulgarity also seems to have become fashionable in non-Western
countries. Western Civilization seems to be effective in
societally elevating non-Aryan traits and by extension
non-Aryans, effectively ensuring Aryan blood becomes rarer than
it is already.
#Post#: 6420--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: May 16, 2021, 12:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Our enemies ridicule us using the incel "Virgin vs Chad" meme:
[img width=1280
height=520]
HTML https://i.redd.it/zujtn0gb9ui51.png[/img]
All of their descriptors are accurate (save for the labelling of
inferior traits as "superior) except for one: the complexion.
Neolithic people had darker skin due to their exposure to the
sun, unlike the subhuman Ice Age Giants.
FYI "Stacy" is an archetypal high sexually dimorphic female, the
counterpart to a "Chad"
Anyway, it is good to see our enemies making it clear how they
view themselves (and us). Now it is our turn to make it clear
how we view ourselves (and them). In other words, the good guys
have always been the good guys, and the bad guys have always
been the bad guys.
#Post#: 6425--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 16, 2021, 1:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Neolithic people had darker skin due to their exposure to the
sun, unlike the subhuman Ice Age Giants."
I think they are citing:
HTML https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/07/first-modern-britons-dark-black-skin-cheddar-man-dna-analysis-reveals
[quote]Scientists believe that populations living in Europe
became lighter-skinned over time because pale skin absorbs more
sunlight, which is required to produce enough vitamin D. The
latest findings suggest pale skin may have emerged later,
possibly when the advent of farming meant people were obtaining
less vitamin D though dietary sources like oily fish.[/quote]
""Stacy" is an archetypal high sexually dimorphic female,"
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/gentilism/msg2646/#msg2646
In any case, their points contradict one another. If we are
"harvesting grain all day", how can we also be living a
"sedentary life"? So which is it?
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-labour/
Similarly, if we live next to rivers, why would we need
rainwater?
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-hydraulic-empire/
#Post#: 6426--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: May 16, 2021, 1:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
If they mean "sedentary" in the sense of "settling down in one
place", they would be correct. But if by "sedentary" they mean
"sitting around", then they would be wrong.
I would agree though that a farmer would be "weaker" in terms of
brute physical strength than a hunter.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page