DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 28496--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: rp
Date: November 6, 2024, 12:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Now that I think about it, it wasn't even "attraction" per se,
it just felt like that the conditioning was such that the
"right" thing to do was pair up with her, more of a
vacancy-filling mindset than anything. Compulsory schooling
cultivates masculinity from an early age by forcing **** like
gender-segregated bathrooms, color coding (blue is for boys pink
is for girls). So boys are shown as different from girls, and
any interaction is a potential sexual relationship. There is
also the fact that many "children's toys" advertisements are
male coded (esp Mattel advertisements for mechanical toys which
have the archetypal deep-voiced man as a narrator), and most TV
shows feature heterosexual relationships
As for primitive emotion being switched on, it was mostly one of
a girl interacting with me (blood rush). I wasn't attracted to
the blond hair in and of itself, but I knew something was
"reptillian" (for the lack of a better word) about being
attracted to a blonde-haired girl.
"I do not find this too convincing, given that only recently you
told us about being attracted to someone else with a terrible
face shape."
I didn't really notice the face shape, I just liked that a girl
was giving me attention, and I assumed she was "kind" because
she was doing so. After interacting with her again after a few
years later in middle school I learned her personality was very
different from mine (as were most girls') so all attraction went
out the window. But now looking back at her face shape, I would
say there was a correlation.
As for the other girl, I really wanted to be non prejudicial and
give her the benefit of the doubt. It was definitely her other
features (low sexual dimorphism, ectomorph, gracility), that
attracted me the most. And definitely her having an upbringing
with Aryanist values made me want to believe that she truly was
noble.
"Unless you mean this one is even worse than that one."
I would say so. The second one at least had some potential in
her body physiognomy, which caused me to jump the gun and assume
it correlated with her personality. I similarly assumed the same
of some other gracile ectomorphs when in school, but upon
learning that they eat meat, my attraction went out the window.
#Post#: 28524--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: November 7, 2024, 1:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"it just felt like that the conditioning was such that the
"right" thing to do was pair up with her, more of a
vacancy-filling mindset than anything. Compulsory schooling
cultivates masculinity from an early age"
OK, but why with her and not with some other girl? (I assume she
wasn't the only girl in the class?)
"it was mostly one of a girl interacting with me (blood rush). I
wasn't attracted to the blond hair in and of itself"
So you would have had a similar blood rush if a non-blond girl
was interacting with you? Or not?
"I knew something was "reptillian" (for the lack of a better
word) about being attracted to a blonde-haired girl."
What about celebrities? Is there a similar feeling towards your
favourite blond celebrity that is absent towards to your
favourite non-blong celebrity? (This is actually probably a
better test, as other factors of appearance can be maxed out.)
#Post#: 28534--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: rp
Date: November 7, 2024, 11:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"OK, but why with her and not with some other girl? (I assume
she wasn't the only girl in the class?)"
We were placed together for some activity. There was also a
redhead with her, but due to Eurocentric conditioning from
Barbie dolls and television shows, you could say I had a
Eurocentric bias.
"So you would have had a similar blood rush if a non-blond girl
was interacting with you? Or not?"
Yes. I had a similar rush with a brown-skinned Hispanic girl,
and also the redhead.
#Post#: 29046--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: December 31, 2024, 12:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrglGbINv5A
Anyone who likes to sniff panties should be prohibited from
reproducing. (Also, the narrator should be prohibited from
reproducing.)
#Post#: 29266--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: rp
Date: January 28, 2025, 11:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824001053#:~:text=On%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20facial,Marcinkowska%20et%20al.%2C%202019%3B
#Post#: 31815--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: December 28, 2025, 3:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Continuing from:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg14610/#msg14610
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg25735/#msg25735
How inferior is Western eroticism? Answer:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aDD70n886s
To generalize, focusing on sexually dimorphic areas is inferior,
whereas focusing on areas that are sexually non-dimorphic is
superior. (This is another reason why porn is inferior to
gravure.)
#Post#: 32616--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: May 12, 2026, 6:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Purely for entertainment:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVlGcGssCeg
--- Quote ---
> RFK Jr. starts babbling about how teen boys these days don't
have enough [ __ ]
> 2:272 minutes, 27 secondsHe started talking about when I was a
young whippersnapper, we had [ __ ] for days. We had an endless
amount of sperm. The sperm count was through the roof.
--- End Quote ---
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg24370/?topicseen#msg24370
#Post#: 32722--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: June 9, 2026, 6:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgoIajELUds
For reference:
HTML https://drjarryd.medium.com/height-preferences-111e27af3bfc
--- Quote ---
> Bisexual women/ lesbians prefer lovers of similar heights
whereas heterosexuals prefer hypergamous height patterns
(Valentova et al., 2016). Bisexual men/ gays also prefer lovers
of similar heights (Valentova et al., 2014, Valentova et al.,
2016).
> ...
> When women commit infidelity it’s usually with someone taller
than her current boyfriend (Gangestad & Thornhill, 1997).
> ...
> Kirchengast (2000) found that shorter women had more offspring
& taller men had a higher number of surviving offspring.
> ...
> According to both the scientific literature and popular media,
all one needs to win a US presidential election is to be taller
than one’s opponent.
> ...
> Women who chose taller men as mates could directly pass this
propensity for taller height to offspring, and, therefore, women
prefer taller men as mates.
> ...
> The crucial factor was not that tall men had more fecund
wives, but that tall men more often had a second family.
Selection worked strongly in favor of very tall men, not just
against short men. Since there were no hints of any evolutionary
check on this selection, these findings suggest unconstrained
directional selection for tallness in men.
--- End Quote ---
So, which civilization is the most racially inferior?
--- Quote ---
> A preference for males being taller than their female partners
is widespread in Western populations (e.g., Fink, B., et al.,
2007, Pawlowski, B., 2003). Male height is associated with
intra-sexual dominance, which leads to a higher resource
acquisition (Stulp & Barrett, 2014). Thus, female preferences
for taller men are suggested to be adaptive, because they direct
them to better resource providers.
--- End Quote ---
By coincidence, the same civilization is also the most
patriachist:
--- Quote ---
> The social norm that instructs men should be taller than women
perpetuates gender stereotypes, which in turn supports and
somehow describes a patriarchal society. These stereotypical
perceptions manifest in what may seem to be overlooked aspects
of the everyday, such as height preferences in romantic
relationships, yet insidiously enforce sexual inequality. This
was noted by Ocay (2019) who posited that gender norms that
constitute the construction of tall men as masculine may be
reflected in stereotypical height preferences.
--- End Quote ---
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/colonialism-and-sexism/
Informative comment:
--- Quote ---
> Friedrich Wilhem I, King of Prussia, also had a fascination
with really big dudes. He assembled an army of absolute units
from across Europe as a personal regiment that he paid
handsomely primarily just to march around and pose for
paintings. It was a massive, stupid waste of resources, but also
really funny to read about if you’re into history.
>
> From Wikipedia:
> “The king trained and drilled his own regiment every day. He
liked to paint their portraits from memory. He tried to show
them to foreign visitors and dignitaries to impress them. At
times he would try to cheer himself up by ordering them to march
before him, even if he was in his sickbed. This procession,
which included the entire regiment, was led by their mascot, a
bear. He once confided to the French ambassador that ‘The most
beautiful girl or woman in the world would be a matter of
indifference to me, but tall soldiers—they are my weakness’”
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 32739--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: June 16, 2026, 5:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-Hqb1vYSNU
For reference:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast_torture#Nipple_torture
--- Quote ---
> There are some health risks associated with nipple torture.
Nipple clamps that are positioned wrongly can cause small
cuts.[26] Nipple bondage can result in damage to the nipples[29]
and tearing the skin of the nipples can cause scarring.[23]
Regular heavy nipple play that produces scabbing and bruising
can cause internal scar tissue and de-sensitization, resulting
in permanent nerve and tissue damage.[30]
--- End Quote ---
This is how racially inferior Trump is.
Bonus video:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tO0hBEB3_mA
#Post#: 33224--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 31, 2026, 8:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
You can't make this **** up:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2wr2cj2mys
As usual, the False Leftist narrator gets it wrong:
--- Quote ---
> people pushing a distorted version of masculinity onto them.
--- End Quote ---
It is not distorted. It is accurate.
--- Quote ---
> moral courage, taking accountability, emotional
> 8:338 minutes, 33 secondsintelligence, having the courage to
be vulnerable, acting with integrity, being a supportive
partner, showing empathy,
> 8:408 minutes, 40 secondslifting up others if you're able to
do so. These are all examples of strength and masculinity
--- End Quote ---
They are not. If they were, why are women who exhibit these
characteristics not viewed as masculine?
In contrast, why have we never heard about women wanting
cauliflower ears? (Answer: because cauliflower ears are
accurately masculine.)
--- Quote ---
> A lot of men
> 9:069 minutes, 6 secondsseem to have lost sight of what
masculinity really means
--- End Quote ---
No, they are rediscovering what False Leftism has tried to bury
because False Leftists just can't bring themselves to say
masculinity is evil (unlike True Leftists who say this with no
difficulty).
Cue relativist comment:
--- Quote ---
> I wish as a species we could just learn to accept each other
how we are instead of setting ridiculous standards for what’s
attractive.
--- End Quote ---
Indeed everyone should accept their born phenotype instead of
trying to disguise it using cosmetic procedures. But that does
not mean we should not set standards. Setting standards and then
accepting that most people are born failing to meet those
standards is true acceptance, whereas avoiding standards is
avoiding the above acceptance.
In other words, leave beauty to those few who possess it
effortlessly, rather than attempt to acquire it for oneself
through effort.
So, from best to worst:
1) admire low sexual dimorphism, possess low sexual dimorphism;
2) admire low sexual dimorphism, possess high sexual dimorphism,
do not pursue low sexual dimorphism;
3) admire low sexual dimorphism, possess high sexual dimorphism,
pursue low sexual dimorphism;
4) refuse to set standards;
5) admire high sexual dimorphism, possess high sexual
dimorphism;
6) admire high sexual dimorphism, possess low sexual dimorphism,
do not pursue high sexual dimorphism;
7) admire high sexual dimorphism, possess low sexual dimorphism,
pursue high sexual dimorphism;
I expect 2) to feel a duty to voluntarily refrain from
reproducing. 3) and below should be prohibited from reproducing.
1) are most likely to voluntarily refrain from reproducing in
reality.
*****************************************************
Page 14 of 14
DIR Previous Page