URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Human Evolution
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 25082--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 17, 2024, 7:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The more neotenous men produce less sperm, therefore would be
       more inclined to save it up. The absence of a corresponding
       mechanism in women leaves the picture much less clear.
       I would imagine that the less neotenous women are more likely to
       view the man as a reproductive partner. But if so, then one
       possible reason why they would be more likely to wait for him
       without cheating is in order to protect their eggs from telegony
       by other men:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/telegony/
       Such women would be willing to wait for the man they have in
       mind without cheating even though they know the man is cheating
       on them!
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/mate-choice-copying/
       In contrast, I expect that the more neotenous women would only
       be willing to wait for a man without cheating so long as they
       are sure the man is also not cheating. These are the women who
       are thinking purely in romantic (as opposed to reproductive)
       terms.
       But for the purpose of this model we are starting off (see
       original tweet) with the assumption that most men (95% according
       to the original tweet) would cheat. Thus the women who would
       continue to wait without cheating themselves could well mostly
       belong to the former (less neotenous) group, since the latter
       (more neotenous) group probably already gave up waiting as soon
       as they started suspecting the men of cheating. Do you see what
       I mean?
       #Post#: 25083--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: rp Date: February 17, 2024, 8:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This makes sense. This is the explanation behind less neotenous
       women trying to get Chad to commit to them.
       #Post#: 25146--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 20, 2024, 4:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       LOL:
  HTML https://www.reddit.com/r/WomensHealth/comments/1ae8p80/husband_bruised_my_cervix_and_uterus_now_i_have/
       #Post#: 25232--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 26, 2024, 9:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can't make this **** up:
  HTML https://www.reddit.com/r/shortguys/comments/1aywq7w/ai_has_trouble_generating_images_of_short_men/
       (Also notice that only "whites" are pictured.....)
       #Post#: 25336--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: rp Date: March 5, 2024, 5:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://twitter.com/CarmineSabia/status/1764422104483602470?t=H8coiEcrInqE64JFNrEJVg&s=19
       [quote]
       You can have the fat women, transgenders and circus freaks you
       want in all the ads and magazines you want.
       But Sydney Sweeney just proved that for 200,000 years in a row
       men still prefer blondes with racks.
       [/Quote]
       *Eurocentrist men
       #Post#: 25338--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 5, 2024, 3:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Note tweeter:
       [quote]Carmine Sabia
       @CarmineSabia
       🇺🇸 🇮🇱 Christian, conservative,
       Journalist / Editor, Radio, TV, Pundit, Yankees fan, NRA member,
       Israel supporter.[/quote]
       He also looks like what we would expect:
  HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1761446260572106752/MBx6rUho_400x400.jpg
       #Post#: 25340--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: rp Date: March 5, 2024, 5:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Did someone say Oedipus complex?:
  HTML https://twitter.com/ShitpostGate/status/1764721989057417459?t=I3fPJERYykp5d5nZT_hOSw&s=19
       [Quote]
       [img width=1036
       height=1280]
  HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GH2NS16XsAAWqPu?format=jpg&name=large[/img]
       [/Quote]
       I theorize that preference for high sexual dimorphism itself is
       a product of the Oedipus complex.
       #Post#: 25343--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 5, 2024, 6:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I theorize that preference for high sexual dimorphism itself is
       a product of the Oedipus complex."
       I disagree. Men who like feminine women are seeking maximum
       fertility, whereas MILFs are already declining in fertility.
       Also, accusing our enemies of having Oedipus complex as a way to
       attack them is not recommended, since it would imply that
       Oedipus complex is a sign of inferiority, when in fact it is
       Original Nobility operating on incomplete information. Those
       who, given the same incomplete information, nevertheless do not
       have Oedipus complex are the inferior ones by our standards.
       Oedipus is a stepping stone to Kronos:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cronus
       [quote]In an ancient myth recorded by Hesiod's Theogony, Cronus
       envied the power of his father, Uranus, the ruler of the
       universe. Uranus drew the enmity of Cronus's mother, Gaia, when
       he hid the gigantic youngest children of Gaia, the
       hundred-handed Hecatoncheires and one-eyed Cyclopes, in
       Tartarus, so that they would not see the light. Gaia created a
       great stone sickle and gathered together Cronus and his brothers
       to persuade them to castrate Uranus.[4]
       Only Cronus was willing to do the deed, so Gaia gave him the
       sickle and placed him in ambush.[5] When Uranus met with Gaia,
       Cronus attacked him with the sickle, castrating him and casting
       his testicles into the sea.
       ...
       The period in which Cronus ruled was called the Golden Age, as
       the people of the time had no need for laws or rules; everyone
       did the right thing, and immorality was absent.[/quote]
       #Post#: 25346--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: SirGalahad Date: March 5, 2024, 8:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can you elaborate on what you mean? Attraction towards your
       mother (or more commonly, people who remind you of your mother),
       seems counterintuitive to original nobility. Even if we remove
       the attraction aspect and treat it as simply someone who prefers
       their mother to their father. Wouldn’t someone with sufficient
       original nobility dislike their father AND mother equally,
       unless their mother was forced to conceive against her will?
       Even the mythological Kronos narrative seems more like Kronos
       went soft by sparing and even fighting on behalf of his mother
       #Post#: 25347--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 5, 2024, 11:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Attraction towards your mother (or more commonly, people who
       remind you of your mother), seems counterintuitive to original
       nobility."
       Prior to learning language and getting the facts, we honestly
       did not know that our mother chose to conceive us. Therefore it
       is expected that we at that stage confuse pre-birth conditions
       (inside womb) with pre-material conditions, and thus confuse our
       mother with God, and confuse leaving the womb with becoming
       trapped in the material world. Original Nobility then causes us
       to want to return to pre-birth conditions, which in practice
       manifests as idealizing a life in which no one exists except
       oneself and our mother (as an approximation to the first-person
       perspective from inside the womb). It is the inferior who, being
       more interested in exploring the outside world, who lack this
       idealization.
       "wouldn’t someone with sufficient original nobility dislike
       their father AND mother equally"
       Yes, after we get the facts.
       "unless their mother was forced to conceive against her will?"
       Well spotted. In such cases she is genuinely a fellow victim.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page