DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 2189--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: November 13, 2020, 11:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Nixon reveals his inferiority (preference for high sexual
dimorphism):
HTML https://www.news18.com/news/world/pathetic-most-unattractive-richard-nixons-hostility-for-india-revealed-in-new-tapes-2851699.html
--- Quote ---
> New Delhi: A set of newly declassified tapes from the White
House reveal the stark hostility former US President Richard
Nixon had towards India and Indians. Nixon referred to Indians
as the “most sexless” and “pathetic”, and called Indian women
the “most unattractive women in the world” during a meeting with
senior officials at the Oval Office on June 17, 1971, reports
say.
> ...
> Nixon's antipathy towards Indians was also fanned by Henry
Kissinger, the National Security Adviser during that time, who
also determined US policy towards New Delhi in the early 1970s,
Indian Express reported. Richard Nixon, a Republican, was the
37th President of the United States, serving from 1969 until
1974.
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 2372--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: November 19, 2020, 10:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Evidence that (as I have asserted for years) Francis is nothing
but False Left genetic trash:
HTML https://us.yahoo.com/news/vatican-launches-inquiry-pope-francis-162323501.html
--- Quote ---
> A Brazilian bikini model has joked that she is “going to
heaven” after a photograph of her in a skimpy schoolgirl outfit
was ‘liked’ by the official Instagram account of Pope Francis.
--- End Quote ---
The model:
[img]
HTML https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/q0xBjxlZ5xCREs054PGjJw--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTQ0MDtjZj13ZWJw/https://media.zenfs.com/en-GB/the_telegraph_258/2260594255568806099ec400303e1305[/img]
#Post#: 2424--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: November 22, 2020, 12:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I was laughing at the sheer inferior taste over here:
HTML https://incels.co/threads/sexual-dimorphism-is-bullshit.259950/
--- Quote ---
> Looking good = being dimorphic. How can you not understand
this?
>
> Foids want a man whose arms are as thick as her torso, who can
kill other men with his bare hands, not some chinky fag who
produces as much testosterone as a **** chihuahua.
> ...
> This is a top-tier white Chad. His SMV is basically infinite.
He can point at a foid and she’ll be sucking his dick within
seconds.
>
> [img width=1038
height=1280]
HTML https://incels.co/attachments/be5fd588-e203-4bae-8c3e-9fae83fd76f9-jpeg.375531/[/img]
> ...
> show me their K-pop equivalents and tell me that dimorphism
doesn’t matter
--- End Quote ---
Everyone here knows I hate K-pop. Alan Tam, on the other hand, I
am a fan of (thank you Counterculture!):
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0gneecOhU4
Dimorphism does matter: low sexual dimorphism is superior. Note
how much more gracilized Tam is compared to the ugly female
model (2:23-2:27), who on the other hand would look about
facially matched if paired with "top-tier white Chad" above
instead - that is how ugly "top-tier white Chad" actually is.
Tam's facial match, on the other hand (repost):
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMJ1juwb8TM
#Post#: 2426--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: Prite
Date: November 22, 2020, 7:01 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.8days.sg/sceneandheard/entertainment/alan-tam-s-love-life-likened-to-a-palace-drama-cos-of-his-13159954
How about his 2 wives, Sally Yeung Kit-mei and Wendy Chu
Wing-ting?
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/KKjr5xgC/at1.jpg
HTML https://postimg.cc/KKjr5xgC
#Post#: 2435--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: November 22, 2020, 10:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
They do not appear in his music videos, so it doesn't really
matter what they look like. It is only when someone is chosen to
represent supposed "beauty" that I worry about their whether or
not their looks justify it.
#Post#: 2974--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: December 20, 2020, 12:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.psypost.org/2020/12/women-overestimate-mens-attraction-to-thin-female-fashion-models-study-finds-58831
--- Quote ---
> The researchers found that while men and women gave similar
ratings to the models, neither gender was accurate at guessing
how the other would evaluate the models. Both men and women felt
that the other sex would be less likely to rate the models as
too thin and more likely to find the models attractive than they
actually were. The researchers call this a “parallel
misconception”, explaining that men overestimated the extent
that women would idealize the models’ bodies, and women
similarly overestimated the extent that men would admire the
models’ bodies.
--- End Quote ---
In other words, both men and women overestimate our influence in
society.
(For the record, most fashion models are facially ugly despite
having thin bodies. Here is the picture that goes with the
article:
HTML https://eadn-wc03-196922.nxedge.io/cdn/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/thin-skinny-runway-fashion-models.jpg
Note the robust jaw of the model nearest the camera.)
#Post#: 3095--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: January 4, 2021, 3:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Tanya Roberts just died:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DNmARLBPLI
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanya_Roberts
--- Quote ---
> Roberts was born in 1955 in the Bronx, New York City, the
second child of a father of Irish descent and a Jewish
mother.[2]
--- End Quote ---
But wait!
--- Quote ---
> Roberts was married to Barry Roberts from 1974 until his death
in 2006. They had no children.[11]
--- End Quote ---
Heritage matters when it is passed down, not when it is
terminated. Therefore Roberts is not a Jew.
(If everyone with Jewish parents followed Roberts' example, the
Jewish problem would be solved in one generational cycle.)
#Post#: 3413--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: guest5
Date: January 16, 2021, 8:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Trump Goon: He's The MOST Masculine President EVER
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAyOyTPeRWE
Surprised again!!! Never thought I'd agree with a Trump goon on
anything.
Does anyone anticipate Musk putting a massive bust of himself in
the entrance of his Mars colony with a plaque on it that reads,
"Welcome to Mars, and don't forget, I'm yo daddy!!!"? Musk is
literally a mini-Martian-Yahweh! ;D
#Post#: 4300--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 17, 2021, 11:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.livescience.com/21172-men-sexist-attitudes-muscles.html
--- Quote ---
> Men obsessed with building muscles are significantly more
likely to objectify women, be hostile toward women, and have
sexist attitudes, new research finds.
--- End Quote ---
As we expected.
--- Quote ---
> "We have previously found that men who hold stronger
oppressive beliefs are more likely to think that thinner women
are attractive," study researcher Viren Swarmi, of the
University of Westminster in the United Kingdom, told
LiveScience in an email.
--- End Quote ---
This fails to distinguish between those (True Leftists) who also
prefer men to be thin and those (rightists) who prefer men to
not be thin. The problem is not (as False Leftists think)
preferring women to be thin, but having gender-based
double-standards.
--- Quote ---
> "but we're also arguing that those oppressive beliefs directed
at women also have an impact on men's own body images,
specifically their drive for muscularity," Swarmi said.
--- End Quote ---
In other words, this does not apply to us. We want both men and
women to be thin, thus reducing sexual dimorphism, whereas
rightists want muscular men and thin women, thus increasing
sexual dimorphism.
--- Quote ---
> Those men who showed more interest in being muscular were also
more likely than others to score higher on sexist beliefs,
hostility toward and objectification of women.
>
> "We think men who hold oppressive beliefs about women and
gender equality are also more likely to endorse traditional
stereotypes of masculinity, which includes the muscular
physique," Swarmi said.
>
> "In addition, in societies where patriarchal structures are
being challenged, some men may seek to reassert their
masculinity by enhancing their physiques." For example, they
might react to having a female boss by beefing up at the gym.
--- End Quote ---
Again, not us. Our enemies, on the other hand, are perfect
examples:
HTML https://incels.co/threads/if-allah-appeared-before-you-and-told-you-he-would-change-your-looks-as-you-wished-what-would-you-do.274425/
--- Quote ---
> This is how i imagine myself in my dreams.
>
>
HTML https://incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fimg-comment-fun.9cache.com%2Fmedia%2Fa6N2rnN%2Fa5jPb5LB_700w_0.jpg&hash=a1ffe7d8a8e32f326e8f22ac5f596640
>
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://incels.co/threads/how-do-you-rate-foids.269687/
--- Quote ---
> There are 100/10 giga stacies that I don't even get a crush on
because they're light years out of my league like top models and
top actresses. Barbara Palvin for example:
>
>
HTML https://incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hawtcelebs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2Fbarbara-palvin-for-aimer-spring-summer-2019-14.jpg&hash=8c74584fc4ebcea668d4a41ad2015ba2
--- End Quote ---
And no, it's not just the low camera angle; her face really is
that short:
HTML https://photo1.allfamous.org/public/people/headshots/barbara-palvin-19931008-allfamous.org-7.jpg
A short face and a thin body is actually a horrible combination.
#Post#: 4434--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 24, 2021, 12:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
No wonder I have always found makeup disgusting:
HTML https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p6331
--- Quote ---
> female faces were shown to have greater luminance contrast
between the eyes, lips, and the surrounding skin than did male
faces. This sex difference in facial contrast was found to
influence the perception of facial gender. An androgynous face
can be made to appear female by increasing the facial contrast,
or to appear male by decreasing the facial contrast. Application
of cosmetics was found to consistently increase facial contrast.
Female faces wearing cosmetics had greater facial contrast than
the same faces not wearing cosmetics. Female facial beauty is
known to be closely linked to sex differences, with femininity
considered attractive. These results suggest that cosmetics may
function in part by exaggerating a sexually dimorphic
attribute—facial contrast—to make the face appear more feminine
and hence attractive.
--- End Quote ---
No. Femininity in female faces is considered attractive only by
inferior* people. Superior people have the exact opposite tastes
(by which I mean we prefer low sexual dimorphism, not that we
prefer masculinity (Westerners perpetually struggle with this
conceptual distinction)). The superior may be the minority, but
it is sloppy academic writing to make it sound like the superior
minority does not exist.
(* The subhumans who like makeup on females almost always
dislike makeup on males, a double-standard. This gender-based
double-standard is what makes them inferior. While I would
disagree with someone who likes makeup on both males and
females, I would not consider such a person aesthetically
inferior as they at least have no gender-based double-standard.
(I would consider still them ecologically/economically inferior,
but that is a separate discussion.))
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 14
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page