DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 2189--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 13, 2020, 11:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Nixon reveals his inferiority (preference for high sexual
dimorphism):
HTML https://www.news18.com/news/world/pathetic-most-unattractive-richard-nixons-hostility-for-india-revealed-in-new-tapes-2851699.html
[quote]New Delhi: A set of newly declassified tapes from the
White House reveal the stark hostility former US President
Richard Nixon had towards India and Indians. Nixon referred to
Indians as the “most sexless” and “pathetic”, and called Indian
women the “most unattractive women in the world” during a
meeting with senior officials at the Oval Office on June 17,
1971, reports say.
...
Nixon's antipathy towards Indians was also fanned by Henry
Kissinger, the National Security Adviser during that time, who
also determined US policy towards New Delhi in the early 1970s,
Indian Express reported. Richard Nixon, a Republican, was the
37th President of the United States, serving from 1969 until
1974.[/quote]
#Post#: 2372--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 19, 2020, 10:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Evidence that (as I have asserted for years) Francis is nothing
but False Left genetic trash:
HTML https://us.yahoo.com/news/vatican-launches-inquiry-pope-francis-162323501.html
[quote]A Brazilian bikini model has joked that she is “going to
heaven” after a photograph of her in a skimpy schoolgirl outfit
was ‘liked’ by the official Instagram account of Pope
Francis.[/quote]
The model:
[img]
HTML https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/q0xBjxlZ5xCREs054PGjJw--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTQ0MDtjZj13ZWJw/https://media.zenfs.com/en-GB/the_telegraph_258/2260594255568806099ec400303e1305[/img]
#Post#: 2424--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 22, 2020, 12:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I was laughing at the sheer inferior taste over here:
HTML https://incels.co/threads/sexual-dimorphism-is-bullshit.259950/
[quote]Looking good = being dimorphic. How can you not
understand this?
Foids want a man whose arms are as thick as her torso, who can
kill other men with his bare hands, not some chinky fag who
produces as much testosterone as a **** chihuahua.
...
This is a top-tier white Chad. His SMV is basically infinite. He
can point at a foid and she’ll be sucking his dick within
seconds.
[img width=1038
height=1280]
HTML https://incels.co/attachments/be5fd588-e203-4bae-8c3e-9fae83fd76f9-jpeg.375531/[/img]
...
show me their K-pop equivalents and tell me that dimorphism
doesn’t matter[/quote]
Everyone here knows I hate K-pop. Alan Tam, on the other hand, I
am a fan of (thank you Counterculture!):
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0gneecOhU4
Dimorphism does matter: low sexual dimorphism is superior. Note
how much more gracilized Tam is compared to the ugly female
model (2:23-2:27), who on the other hand would look about
facially matched if paired with "top-tier white Chad" above
instead - that is how ugly "top-tier white Chad" actually is.
Tam's facial match, on the other hand (repost):
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMJ1juwb8TM
#Post#: 2426--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: Prite Date: November 22, 2020, 7:01 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.8days.sg/sceneandheard/entertainment/alan-tam-s-love-life-likened-to-a-palace-drama-cos-of-his-13159954
How about his 2 wives, Sally Yeung Kit-mei and Wendy Chu
Wing-ting?
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/KKjr5xgC/at1.jpg
HTML https://postimg.cc/KKjr5xgC
#Post#: 2435--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 22, 2020, 10:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
They do not appear in his music videos, so it doesn't really
matter what they look like. It is only when someone is chosen to
represent supposed "beauty" that I worry about their whether or
not their looks justify it.
#Post#: 2974--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 20, 2020, 12:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.psypost.org/2020/12/women-overestimate-mens-attraction-to-thin-female-fashion-models-study-finds-58831
[quote]The researchers found that while men and women gave
similar ratings to the models, neither gender was accurate at
guessing how the other would evaluate the models. Both men and
women felt that the other sex would be less likely to rate the
models as too thin and more likely to find the models attractive
than they actually were. The researchers call this a “parallel
misconception”, explaining that men overestimated the extent
that women would idealize the models’ bodies, and women
similarly overestimated the extent that men would admire the
models’ bodies.[/quote]
In other words, both men and women overestimate our influence in
society.
(For the record, most fashion models are facially ugly despite
having thin bodies. Here is the picture that goes with the
article:
[img width=1280
height=836]
HTML https://eadn-wc03-196922.nxedge.io/cdn/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/thin-skinny-runway-fashion-models.jpg[/img]
Note the robust jaw of the model nearest the camera.)
#Post#: 3095--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 4, 2021, 3:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Tanya Roberts just died:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DNmARLBPLI
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanya_Roberts
[quote]Roberts was born in 1955 in the Bronx, New York City, the
second child of a father of Irish descent and a Jewish
mother.[2][/quote]
But wait!
[quote]Roberts was married to Barry Roberts from 1974 until his
death in 2006. They had no children.[11][/quote]
Heritage matters when it is passed down, not when it is
terminated. Therefore Roberts is not a Jew.
(If everyone with Jewish parents followed Roberts' example, the
Jewish problem would be solved in one generational cycle.)
#Post#: 3413--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: guest5 Date: January 16, 2021, 8:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Trump Goon: He's The MOST Masculine President EVER
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAyOyTPeRWE
Surprised again!!! Never thought I'd agree with a Trump goon on
anything.
Does anyone anticipate Musk putting a massive bust of himself in
the entrance of his Mars colony with a plaque on it that reads,
"Welcome to Mars, and don't forget, I'm yo daddy!!!"? Musk is
literally a mini-Martian-Yahweh! ;D
#Post#: 4300--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 17, 2021, 11:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.livescience.com/21172-men-sexist-attitudes-muscles.html
[quote]Men obsessed with building muscles are significantly more
likely to objectify women, be hostile toward women, and have
sexist attitudes, new research finds.[/quote]
As we expected.
[quote]"We have previously found that men who hold stronger
oppressive beliefs are more likely to think that thinner women
are attractive," study researcher Viren Swarmi, of the
University of Westminster in the United Kingdom, told
LiveScience in an email.[/quote]
This fails to distinguish between those (True Leftists) who also
prefer men to be thin and those (rightists) who prefer men to
not be thin. The problem is not (as False Leftists think)
preferring women to be thin, but having gender-based
double-standards.
[quote]"but we're also arguing that those oppressive beliefs
directed at women also have an impact on men's own body images,
specifically their drive for muscularity," Swarmi said.[/quote]
In other words, this does not apply to us. We want both men and
women to be thin, thus reducing sexual dimorphism, whereas
rightists want muscular men and thin women, thus increasing
sexual dimorphism.
[quote]Those men who showed more interest in being muscular were
also more likely than others to score higher on sexist beliefs,
hostility toward and objectification of women.
"We think men who hold oppressive beliefs about women and gender
equality are also more likely to endorse traditional stereotypes
of masculinity, which includes the muscular physique," Swarmi
said.
"In addition, in societies where patriarchal structures are
being challenged, some men may seek to reassert their
masculinity by enhancing their physiques." For example, they
might react to having a female boss by beefing up at the
gym.[/quote]
Again, not us. Our enemies, on the other hand, are perfect
examples:
HTML https://incels.co/threads/if-allah-appeared-before-you-and-told-you-he-would-change-your-looks-as-you-wished-what-would-you-do.274425/
[quote]This is how i imagine myself in my dreams.
HTML https://incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fimg-comment-fun.9cache.com%2Fmedia%2Fa6N2rnN%2Fa5jPb5LB_700w_0.jpg&hash=a1ffe7d8a8e32f326e8f22ac5f596640
[/quote]
HTML https://incels.co/threads/how-do-you-rate-foids.269687/
[quote]There are 100/10 giga stacies that I don't even get a
crush on because they're light years out of my league like top
models and top actresses. Barbara Palvin for example:
HTML https://incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hawtcelebs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2Fbarbara-palvin-for-aimer-spring-summer-2019-14.jpg&hash=8c74584fc4ebcea668d4a41ad2015ba2[/quote]
And no, it's not just the low camera angle; her face really is
that short:
HTML https://photo1.allfamous.org/public/people/headshots/barbara-palvin-19931008-allfamous.org-7.jpg
A short face and a thin body is actually a horrible combination.
#Post#: 4434--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 24, 2021, 12:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
No wonder I have always found makeup disgusting:
HTML https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p6331
[quote]female faces were shown to have greater luminance
contrast between the eyes, lips, and the surrounding skin than
did male faces. This sex difference in facial contrast was found
to influence the perception of facial gender. An androgynous
face can be made to appear female by increasing the facial
contrast, or to appear male by decreasing the facial contrast.
Application of cosmetics was found to consistently increase
facial contrast. Female faces wearing cosmetics had greater
facial contrast than the same faces not wearing cosmetics.
Female facial beauty is known to be closely linked to sex
differences, with femininity considered attractive. These
results suggest that cosmetics may function in part by
exaggerating a sexually dimorphic attribute—facial contrast—to
make the face appear more feminine and hence attractive.[/quote]
No. Femininity in female faces is considered attractive only by
inferior* people. Superior people have the exact opposite tastes
(by which I mean we prefer low sexual dimorphism, not that we
prefer masculinity (Westerners perpetually struggle with this
conceptual distinction)). The superior may be the minority, but
it is sloppy academic writing to make it sound like the superior
minority does not exist.
(* The subhumans who like makeup on females almost always
dislike makeup on males, a double-standard. This gender-based
double-standard is what makes them inferior. While I would
disagree with someone who likes makeup on both males and
females, I would not consider such a person aesthetically
inferior as they at least have no gender-based double-standard.
(I would consider still them ecologically/economically inferior,
but that is a separate discussion.))
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page