URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: News
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 4390--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 21, 2021, 10:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Biden does not know how to pack the court:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrats-start-lobbying-first-black-171216926.html
       [quote]Mr Biden promised to appoint a black woman to the bench
       just before last year's South Carolina primary which rescued his
       then faltering campaign for the Democratic nomination.
       Although there is no current vacancy, the jostling has already
       started on Capitol Hill in anticipation of a seat becoming
       vacant.
       Stephen Breyer, one of three liberal justices left on the
       nine-strong Supreme Court, is 82 and should he step down Mr
       Biden will be able to make a nomination at a time when, thanks
       to vice president Kamala Harris's casting vote, the Democrats
       has a majority in the Senate.
       ...
       According to the New York Times, Jim Clyburn, the
       highest-ranking African-American in Congress, is pushing the
       case of Michelle Childs, a judge in South Carolina.[/quote]
       Replacing a leftist with another leftist results in zero
       arithmetic improvement. Biden should be trying to get Childs
       onto the bench before Breyer steps down, so that when Breyer
       does step down he can appoint another leftist. Only then does he
       get one seat back. Either he should pursue removal of
       Kavanaugh/Barrett, or else he should expand the bench.
       #Post#: 4448--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 24, 2021, 9:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Meanwhile, Trump's court packing continues working for him:
  HTML https://us.yahoo.com/news/trump-appointed-federal-judge-indefinitely-163317871.html
       [quote]Trump-appointed federal judge indefinitely blocks the
       Biden administration's 100-day deportation freeze[/quote]
       #Post#: 4607--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 4, 2021, 9:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       All the while, the Supreme Court continues pushing the US
       rightwards:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/court-raises-bar-immigrants-avoid-163942501.html
       [quote]Court raises bar for some immigrants to avoid deportation
       ...
       Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion for a 5-3 conservative
       majority that ruled against a Mexican citizen who entered the
       U.S. illegally and has lived in the country for 25 years.
       ...
       Gorsuch wrote for the court that Pereida failed to prove he was
       not convicted of a serious crime.
       Under immigration law, “certain nonpermanent aliens seeking to
       cancel a lawful removal order must prove that they have not been
       convicted of a disqualifying crime,” Gorsuch wrote.[/quote]
       Guilty until proven innocent (for "non-whites" only, of
       course).....
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/barrett-authors-first-u-supreme-164133186.html
       [quote]Barrett authors first U.S. Supreme Court ruling, a loss
       for environmentalists
       ...
       In the 7-2 ruling, the justices sided with the U.S. Fish and
       Wildlife Service, thwarting the Sierra Club's bid to obtain
       documents concerning a regulation finalized in 2014 relating to
       power plants. Barrett and the court's other five conservative
       justices were joined by liberal Justice Elena Kagan in the
       majority, with liberals Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia
       Sotomayor in dissent.
       The Senate approved Barrett for a lifetime job on the top U.S.
       judicial body on Oct. 26 after a contentious and accelerated
       confirmation process in the weeks before the Nov. 3 presidential
       election.[/quote]
       By the way, I told you Kagan was no good:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan
       [quote]Kagan was born on April 28, 1960, in Manhattan, the
       second of three children[6][7] of Robert Kagan, an attorney who
       represented tenants trying to remain in their homes, and Gloria
       (Gittelman) Kagan, who taught at Hunter College Elementary
       School.[8][9] Both her parents were the children of Russian
       Jewish immigrants.[9] [/quote]
       #Post#: 5022--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 21, 2021, 10:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It is not over:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z76QLcvOp-I
       #Post#: 5788--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 23, 2021, 3:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/ted-cruz-supreme-court-packing-070435678.html
       [quote]‘Gaslighting 101’: Sen. Ted Cruz Ripped For One Of His
       Biggest, Boldest Lies Yet
       ...
       "You didn't see Republicans when we had control of the Senate
       try to rig the game. You didn't see us try to pack the
       court."[/quote]
       #Post#: 5870--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 25, 2021, 4:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IoK3shtP7c
       #Post#: 5937--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 28, 2021, 10:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ihnC7kK5Eo
       #Post#: 6822--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 31, 2021, 2:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-WD3okWnOw
       #Post#: 6844--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 1, 2021, 10:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Trumpism continues in the Supreme Court:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-overturns-9th-circuits-204105520.html
       [quote]The Supreme Court on Tuesday set aside a rule used by the
       9th Circuit Court in California that presumed immigrants seeking
       asylum were telling the truth unless an immigration judge had
       made an "explicit" finding that they were not credible.
       ...
       "For many years, and over many dissents, the 9th Circuit has
       proceeded on the view that, “[i]n the absence of an explicit
       adverse credibility finding [by the agency], we must assume that
       [the immigrant's] factual contentions are true' or at least
       credible," wrote Justice Neil M. Gorsuch in Garland vs. Dai. He
       said this rule was not justified and gave immigrants the benefit
       of the doubt in close cases.[/quote]
       Gorsuch thinks refugees are guilty until proven innocent. They
       assumed Kavanaugh was innocent until proven guilty, so that the
       Supreme Court can now apply the opposite principle to refugees.
       #Post#: 7273--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court packing
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 23, 2021, 10:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-conservatives-just-undid-172856258.html
       [quote]Supreme Court conservatives just 'undid one of César
       Chávez's greatest accomplishments'
       In a 6-3 ruling along ideological lines, the Supreme Court
       struck down a California law that gave union organizers access
       to farm sites. The decision means people seeking out farm
       workers for unionization purposes going forward will be
       violating the property rights of agricultural landowners and
       food processors, who can now legally keep them off their land.
       Critics lamented the result. Niko Bowie, a professor at Harvard
       Law, wrote that the regulation "was the product of a years-long
       campaign by César Chávez" and the United Farm Workers "to force
       agribusiness to respect the dignity and workplace rights of
       agricultural workers." Slate's Mark Joseph Stern agreed,
       tweeting that the high court's "conservative supermajority just
       undid one of César Chávez's greatest accomplishments." He called
       it "a complete and total blowout against unions" that marks "an
       incredibly dark day for organized labor."[/quote]
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page