URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Issues
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 6047--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 2, 2021, 3:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I believe there is hope for the third tweeter."
       Then invite him here! (Your previous invitee never showed up
       after registering.)
       "Contrast this to the Turanists who are happy to claim steppe
       ancestry (and to add insult to injury claim this makes them
       "Aryan"), and are proud of the nomadic barbarism of Vedism."
       These can never be ideologically converted, but at least you
       should persuade them to use the correct vocabulary ie. call
       themselves Turanian instead of "Aryan". This will make things
       clearer for future newcomers to the subject.
       #Post#: 6048--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: rp Date: May 2, 2021, 3:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "your previous invitee never showed up after registering"
       I just sent him a welcome message through the forum. His
       activism seems to be mainly in the Twittersphere, where he is
       bodying False Leftists left right and centre using many of our
       ideological talking points. Here is his latest tweet that he
       posted just yesterday:
  HTML https://twitter.com/taiyogakure/status/1388192270982156291?s=20
       [quote]Cancel culture should be genetic, and it should prevent
       subhumans like Glenn Danzig from producing offspring
       [/quote]
       He seems to share all our views, but I feel he could be more
       effective if his talent were put to use in more effective ways.
       In any case, given that I am pretty active on Twitter myself, it
       is good to see another person who shares my views on the
       platform. I am still in contact with him via Twitter DM, so I
       will keep you posted on his status.
       "These can never be ideologically converted, but at least you
       should persuade them to use the correct vocabulary ie. call
       themselves Turanian instead of "Aryan"."
       I will elaborate on this more in a future post ASAP.
       #Post#: 6066--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: rp Date: May 2, 2021, 2:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Strictly speaking, Eurocentric Turanists would believe that the
       Turanians who migrated west degraded less from mixing than the
       Turanians who migrated south did."
       The casteist, racist subreddit "Bakchodi" is a good example of
       this. It is essentially a circle jerk of racist Indian HBDers
       arguing about which "race" is more "Aryan" (Turanian). Here is a
       post from a non-Eurocentric Turanian:
  HTML https://www.reddit.com/r/bakchodi/comments/98f0j1/comment/e4firxr?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=comment_timestamp
       [quote]
       the yamnaya people ([s]aryans[/s] Turanians - RP) were  browner
       than these fag niggers .
       they were genetically tall (phenotypic height is determined by
       both genetics and environmental factors), overwhelmingly
       dark-eyed (brown), dark-haired and had a skin colour that was
       moderately light, though  somewhat darker than that of the
       average modern European .
  HTML https://vgy.me/QLgU0t.jpg
       (face of
       yamnaya) [s]Aryans[/s] Turanians- RP were mostly swarthy, dark
       haired and dark eyed individuals. **** lol at mayo larpers.
       [/quote]
       For the last **** time, THEY. ARE. NOT. ARYAN!!!
       "I have encountered some Turanist Hindus who believe the
       opposite, which is their rationale for supposedly looking down
       on "whites": they think brahmins are purer Turanians than
       "whites", and won't shut up about brahmin average IQ test score
       (~120 ie. even higher than Jews (their emphasis)). These cannot
       be described as Eurocentric."
       Here is a tweet from another racist Indian Turanist in which he
       disparages South Indians, exuding his steppe blood memory:
  HTML https://twitter.com/therajaputra/status/1386298358386417668?s=20
       [quote]Because they deserve it.
       Also, you're wrong. Subnarmadans with their Subsaharan blood
       have lower Average IQ. The civilised parts of Maharashtra are
       full of non-Marathis.[/quote]
       "Subnarmadans" apparently refers to those Indians who are
       located geographically south of the Narmada-Tapti basin.
       More on this:
  HTML https://twitter.com/therajaputra/status/1388428930403602432?s=20
       [quote]Narmada traditionally formed the boundary between
       Āryāvarta and Dakṣiṇapatha. Except for a
       few instances, South of Narmada has always been a different
       civilisational entity from the North and more often than not a
       hostile one. Languages to ethnicity they are a different
       people.[/quote]
       The Turanian definition of "Aryavarta" (meaning abode of the
       Aryans) was appropriated from the actual Aryans who used it to
       refer to their homeland and was subsequently used by the
       Turanians to refer to the Steppes. I will go into more detail on
       this in another post
       #Post#: 6093--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 2, 2021, 11:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ""Subnarmadans" apparently refers to those Indians who are
       located geographically south of the Narmada-Tapti basin."
       In other words, the less Turanized ones.
  HTML https://www.draliceevans.com/post/why-are-southern-north-eastern-indian-states-more-gender-equal
       [quote]Southern and North-eastern women are more likely to
       survive infancy
       be educated
       marry later
       choose their own husbands
       interact more closely with their husbands
       bear fewer children
       own more assets
       exercise more control over their dowry
       socialise with friends
       move more freely in their communities and
       work alongside men.
       In North/North-west India, women are much more constrained, and
       sex ratios are far higher.
       Education, paid work, and age are all associated with greater
       economic and physical autonomy. But even if a woman completes
       secondary school, she is less likely to choose her husband if
       she lives in the North.
       Region is a strong predictor of female survival, literacy,
       autonomy, employment, and independent mobility. A woman with the
       exact same household wealth/ caste/ religion will likely have
       more autonomy if she lives in the South.[/quote]
       See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/turanian-sexism/
       The evidence is especially strong because Northeast India (which
       as we know is also less Turanized) behaves more like South
       India.
       Continuing:
       [quote]pastoralism was historically pervasive across North-west
       India, and this entrenched patriarchal norms. Pastoral societies
       tend to be gender segregated. Men take the herd to pasture,
       while women stay at home, tending newborn animals and processing
       milk into ghee. Men may leave for a few days, searching for new
       pasture. If men cannot observe women's whereabouts, they may
       worry about paternity, and try to control female sexuality.
       Analysing societies across the world, Anke Becker finds that
       pre-industrial societies that were more dependent on pastoralism
       had stronger son preference and are more likely to believe in
       male superiority. These effects persist today. Women whose
       ancestors subsisted on pastoralism report less control over
       their sexuality and greater preference for sons, which is
       reflected in uneven sex ratios. Pastoral groups are also
       disproportionately patrilineal and patrilocal.
       ...
       exogamous patrilineality is pervasive across North India. As
       Anke Becker shows, it is strongly associated with ancestral
       pastoralism.
       Pastoralism may have also influenced India's caste-system.
       Brahmins dominate business, public service, politics, the
       judiciary, and universities. Upper caste purity and prestige has
       been preserved through female seclusion, prohibiting polluting
       sexual access. These patriarchal norms may be rooted in ancient
       livelihoods. Genetic data suggests that Brahmins have some
       contributions from steppe pastoralists.[/quote]
       Which is what we have been saying all along.
       #Post#: 6097--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: rp Date: May 3, 2021, 12:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "The evidence is especially strong because Northeast India
       (which as we know is also less Turanized) behaves more like
       South India."
       The theory goes that the Turanian incursion forced some of the
       IVC inhabitants down south, where they were able to escape
       having their blood polluted.
       The similarity of Dravidian (South Indian) languages with the
       Semitic languages seems to substantiate this, as it suggests
       that some of the original IVC inhabitants also spoke these
       languages since the IVC, being a trading partner of Sumer, would
       have had some linguistic similarities with the Sumerian
       civilization.
       This map also seems to support your hypothesis:
       [img width=1280
       height=502]
  HTML http://thewire.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Untitled-design.jpg[/img]
       Once again you are right on the money!
       #Post#: 6197--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: guest5 Date: May 7, 2021, 12:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Indian politician accused of targeting Muslim Covid-19
       volunteers
       [quote]This Indian politician is being accused of singling out
       Muslim volunteers working at a Covid-19 war room in Bangalore
       and communalising the "bed allotment scam."
       #TejaswiSurya​[/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7Q8xbnhs48
       #Post#: 6574--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: guest5 Date: May 21, 2021, 12:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Why are India’s Hindutva supporters backing Israel?
       [quote]India’s “unwavering” support of the “just” Palestinian
       cause at the UN Security Council has irked the country’s Hindu
       nationalists. Here is why. #GazaUnderAttack
       #IndiaStandsWithIsrael #IndiaBacksPalestine[/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSMu4HEiOws
       [quote]Hindutva (transl. Hinduness) is the predominant
       form of Hindu Nationalism in India.[1] As a political ideology,
       Hindutva was articulated by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in 1923.[2]
       It is championed by the Hindu Nationalist volunteer organisation
       Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the Vishva Hindu Parishad
       (VHP), the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)[3][4] and other
       organisations, collectively called the Sangh Parivar. The
       Hindutva movement has been described as a variant of "right-wing
       extremism"[5] and as "almost fascist in the classical sense",
       adhering to a concept of homogenised majority and cultural
       hegemony.[6][7] Some analysts dispute the "fascist" label, and
       suggest Hindutva is an extreme form of "conservatism" or "ethnic
       absolutism".[8]
       Hindutva was mainstreamed into Indian politics with Narendra
       Modi's election as Prime Minister in 2014.[5][/quote]
       [quote]According to Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World
       Religions, Hindutva is a concept of "Indian cultural, national,
       and religious identity".[11] The term "conflates a
       geographically based religious, cultural, and national identity:
       a true 'Indian' is one who partakes of this 'Hindu-ness'. Some
       Indians insist, however, that Hindutva is primarily a cultural
       term to refer to the traditional and indigenous heritage of the
       Indian nation-state, and they compare the relationship between
       Hindutva and India to that of Zionism and Israel."[11] This
       view, as summarised by Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World
       Religions, holds that "even those who are not religiously Hindu
       but whose religions originated in India — Jains, Buddhists,
       Sikhs, and others — share in this historical, cultural, and
       national essence. Those whose religions were imported to India,
       meaning primarily the country’s Muslim and Christian
       communities, may fall within the boundaries of Hindutva only if
       they subsume themselves into the majority culture".[11][/quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindutva
       #Post#: 6575--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: rp Date: May 21, 2021, 1:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "majority culture"
       In other words, democracy. Unsurprising, considering that the
       founder of Hindutva, Veer Savarkar, was a colonialist
       bootlicker:
       How Did Savarkar, a Staunch Supporter of British Colonialism,
       Come to Be Known as 'Veer'?
  HTML https://thewire.in/history/veer-savarkar-the-staunchest-advocate-of-loyalty-to-the-english-government
       [quote]At the time when Subhas Chandra Bose was raising his
       Indian National Army to confront the British in India, Savarkar
       helped the colonial government recruit lakhs of Indians into its
       armed forces. He further destabilised the freedom movement by
       pushing his Hindutva ideology, which deepened the communal
       divide at a time when a united front against colonial rule was
       needed. Post independence, Savarkar was also implicated in
       Mahatma Gandhi’s murder.
       [/quote]
       There was a blog called "WideAwakeGentile" (now defunct) that
       theorized on Savarkar's possible Jewish ancestry.
       In any case, the above paragraph alone should disqualify him
       from speaking on Indian nationalist issues.
       #Post#: 6715--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: rp Date: May 25, 2021, 11:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Getting back to this post:
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=676.msg5906#msg5906
       date=1619428379]
       "Turanians must be thought of as anti-Indian."
       To promote this first requires cultivating pride in pre-Vedic
       India.
       [/quote]
       I support this. But unfortunately, due to False Leftists honing
       in on only the negative aspects of this era (see:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/uneducable-gentiles/?message=6550<br
       />), those with Aryan blood memory are being drawn away from it.
       This is why it is important to establish the fact that
       agriculture (i.e. actual Aryans) developed independently in
       India, as opposed to merely being brought over by "Iranian
       agriculturalists" (i.e. accultruated/mixed Zarzians who are now
       correctly being referred to as "Zagrosian agriculturalists").
       This would lead to the logical conclusion that the prehistoric
       Indians did indeed follow a vegan diet, thereby leading those
       who have Aryan blood memory to take pride in the era.
       Recently, a paper was published that revealed the findings
       obtained by scientists who conducted a study on DNA extracted
       from a pre-Harappan Neolithic site. I will elaborate on this in
       the "Aryan Diffusion Part 3 Confirmed" thread.
       #Post#: 6975--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Indian Attitudes
       By: guest5 Date: June 7, 2021, 8:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Muslims pressured to vacate homes near Hindu temple in India
       [quote]Muslim families living near a famous #Hindu temple in
       India’s Uttar Pradesh state said they were forced to sign a
       "consent letter" to give up their homes and lands for the
       “safety of the temple."[/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5duWNgiPg8s
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page