URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 32441--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryanism.net gone?
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: April 4, 2026, 3:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Answer Part 3
       --- Quote ---
       > “I have learned a great deal from Marxism, and I do not
       hesitate to admit it,” “I do not mean their boring social
       doctrine or their materialist conception of history, or their
       absurd theories of ‘marginal utility’ and so on. But I have
       learned from their methods. The difference between them and me
       is that I have actually put into practice what these hucksters
       and writers have so timidly begun. The whole of National
       Socialism is based on it. Look at the workers’ sports clubs, the
       industrial cells, the mass demonstrations, the propaganda
       leaflets written specifically for the understanding of the
       masses; all these new methods of political struggle are
       essentially derived from Marxism. All I have to do is to take
       over these methods and adapt them to our aims. I have only to
       develop logically what Social Democracy has repeatedly failed to
       do because of its attempt to carry out its evolution within a
       democratic framework. National Socialism is what Marxism might
       have become if it had been able to break its absurd and
       artificial ties with the democratic order.”– Adolf Hitler
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       Hitler Speaks: A Series of Political Conversations with Adolf
       Hitler on His Real Aims by Hermann Rauschning Page 185
  HTML https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.505385/page/n185/mode/2up?q=the+whole+of+National+Socialism
       --- Quote ---
       > The totalitarian dictatorship will become more ruthless in its
       attitude toward businessmen as well as toward the workers and
       middle classes. The so-called radicals among the Party
       bureaucrats will claim that their program has been fulfilled
       after the expropriation of most private property holders, while
       simultaneously the ruin of the middle classes will be completed
       and the workers will be exploited on an unprecedented scale.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Employers have been badly shocked by their new legal  status,
       especially the "conservatives" who have held their property for
       generations and to whom the sanctity of private property has
       been a part of their religion. They might have excused previous
       violations of property rights as exceptional emergency measures,
       but they hoped that the buttressing of the State power through
       fascism would also bring about a strengthening of the sanctity
       of private property. They were independent and individualistic
       businessmen, not only economically, but politically and
       psychologically. For this very reason they are the most
       disappointed and unhappy over the new state of affairs and are
       likely to get into trouble with a Party secretary or the Gestapo
       (the Secret State Police) for having grumbled incautiously or
       for not having shown enough devotion to the Fuehrer.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > This state of affairs must lead to the final collapse of
       business morale, and sound the death knell of the self-respect
       and self-reliance which marked the independent businessman under
       liberal capitalism.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       Vampire Economy: Doing Business Under Fascism oleh Günter
       Reimann Page xii and 20
       --- Quote ---
       > Herr Goebbels ended it in his May Day radio address this year,
       with his flat assertion that the anti-capitalist offensive "will
       be resumed on the first day of peace!"
       >
       > The people in the democracies would do well not to mistake the
       Nazis' anti-capitalism for mere hostility to big business. It is
       more than a war against free enterprise. It is a war against the
       democratic way of life. Capitalism, in the Nazi mind, means the
       free way, the individual's way. The Nazis are out to smash it.
       And they have gone a long way toward doing just that in Europe.
       Their special victim is the middle class. On the continent they
       have all but liquidated this class which the backbone of the
       democratic world.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       1. The Nazi War Against Capitalism by Nevin Gussack, page 79
       2. The American Mercury 1944-08: Vol 59 Iss 248. “German Plans
       for the Next War” Page 181 (Page 55 in pdf format)
       --- Quote ---
       > There was also evidence that the SS wanted to dismantle what
       they termed the “private economy” in Germany itself after the
       war ended
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       1. The Nazi War Against Capitalism by Nevin Gussack, Page 80
       2. The German Economy at War by Alan S. Milward Page 160 (Page
       174 in pdf format)
       --- Quote ---
       > Himmler’s physician reported that the SS leader told him that
       “There will be no more princes. Hitler gave me the order to
       finish off all the German princes and to do so immediately. He
       suggested that the most important of them should be charged with
       espionage and high treason, others with committing sexual
       perversions. The People’s Court will thereby sentence them to
       death. Goebbels wants the hangings to take place in Berlin
       before the Imperial Palace. The princes should be herded on foot
       down Unter den Linden. The German Work Front will provide the
       necessary personnel who will spit on them and in this way give
       expression to the anger of the nation…The property of the
       princes will be divided between party members and Old Fighters.”
       (After 20th July Plot 1944)
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       Royals and the Reich: The Princes Von Hessen in Nazi Germany by
       Jonathan Petropoulos Page 287
  HTML https://archive.org/details/royalsreichprinc0000petr/page/286/mode/2up?q=Hitler+gave+me+the+order+to+finish+off+all+the+German+princes
       #Post#: 32442--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryanism.net gone?
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: April 4, 2026, 3:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Answer Part 4
       --- Quote ---
       > On 28 June 1930 Hitler wrote in the Illustrierte Beobachter
       that the bourgeois parties and their men ‘were capable of any
       nastiness’, that everything ‘the bourgeois parties put their
       hands on’ goes under. ‘Were Bolshevism not out to destroy the
       best racial élite, but only to clean out the bourgeois party
       vermin, one would almost be tempted to bless it.’ [1] [Page 228]
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Many a bourgeois who condemns the worker’s striving for an
       improvement in his economic situation with an outrage that is as
       unwise as it is unjust would possibly suddenly think completely
       differently if for only three weeks he would have had laid on
       his shoulders the burden of the work demanded of the others.
       Even today there are still countless bourgeois elements who most
       indignantly reject a demand for a wage of ten marks a month, and
       especially any sharp support of this, as a ‘Marxist crime’, but
       display complete incomprehension when faced with a demand to
       also limit the excessive profits of certain individuals. - Adolf
       Hitler, 1 November 1930 [2][3][Page 206]
       >
       > On 24 February 1940 Hitler declared that the
       bourgeois-capitalist world had already collapsed, its age
       already long outdated: This collapse must take place everywhere
       in some form or other and it will not fail to materialize
       anywhere.’ [6] The German nation could not, said Hitler, ‘live
       with the bourgeois social order at all’. [4] In a conversation
       with the Hungarian ‘Leader of the Nation’ Szálasi, Hitler
       declared on 4 December 1944 that the ‘bourgeois European world’
       would break down ever further and all that was left was the
       alternative ‘that either a sensible social order were created on
       a national level, or that Bolshevism would take over’. [5] [Page
       230]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       1. IB (Illustrierter Beobachter), 5th year set, issue 26 of 28
       June 1930, p. 405
       2. IB (Illustrierter Beobachter), 5th year set, issue 44 of 1
       November 1930, p. 765
       3. Hitler's National Socialism by Rainer Zitelmann Page 228, 206
       and 230
  HTML https://ia801207.us.archive.org/13/items/adolf-hitler-archive/Hitler%27s%20National%20Socialism%202022.pdf
       4. Bouhler I/II, p. 162, speech on 24 February 1940
       5. Ibid., p. 164
       #Post#: 32505--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryanism.net gone?
   DIR By: nignog
       Date: April 15, 2026, 9:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       so I guess we're just going to ignore that Aryanism.net has
       become some botsite now, ok cool got it. It was fun while it
       lasted friends
       #Post#: 32541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: April 24, 2026, 11:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Why Socialism and Marxism can be the basis for a non-economic
       explanation for the "True Left Breakthrough" ?
       Hitler considered Leninism and Stalinism more intelligent than
       the Christian religious movement.
       --- Quote ---
       > Furthermore, thanks to the Marxist religion, they have
       everything required to make them patient. They have been
       promised happiness on earth (a feature which distinguishes
       Marxism from the Christian religion) but in the future. The Jew,
       Mardochee Marx, like the good Jew that he was, was awaiting the
       coming of the Messiah. He has placed the Messiah conception in a
       setting of historic materialism by asserting that terrestial
       happiness is a factor in an almost endless process of evolution.
       'Happiness is within your reach,' he says, 'that I promise you.
       But you must let evolution take its course and not try to hurry
       matters.' Mankind always falls for a specious trick of that
       sort. . .
       >
       > Lenin did not have the time, but Stalin will carry on the good
       work, and so on and so on . . . Marxism is a very powerful
       force. But how shall we assess Christianity, that other child of
       Judaism, which will not commit itself further than to promise
       the faithful happiness in another world? Believe me, it is
       incomparably stronger!
       --- End Quote ---
       - Adolf Hitler, 25th February 1945
       Source :
       1. Political Testament of Adolf Hitler Page 48
  HTML https://archive.org/details/PoliticalTestamentOfAdolfHitler/page/n47/mode/2up?q=christianity
       2. Hitlers politisches Testament : die Bormann Diktate vom
       Februar und April 1945 Page 109 until 110
  HTML https://archive.org/details/hitlerspolitisch0000hitl/page/108/mode/2up
       From writings :
       Sie haben als weiteres durch die marxistische Doktrin die
       Mittel, das Volk im Zaume zu halten. Dafür verspre- chen sie das
       Paradies auf Erden - allerdings erst in wei- ter Ferne - und
       unterscheiden sich dadurch wesentlich vom christlichen Dogma.
       Der Jude Mardochai-Mary ein guter Hebräer, wartete auch auf
       seinen Messias. Er ver- wandelte ihn kurzerhand in den
       historischen Materialis- mus und setzte einer Hoffnung aufs
       Unendliche das Himmelreich auf Erden, die irdische
       Glückseligkeit ent- gegen. Dies Glück ist greifbar nahe, es ist
       versprochen, aber man muß abwarten, ohne dem Glück gewaltsam
       nachzuhelfen. Das ist der richtige Dreh, mit dem fängt man die
       Dummen. Was Lenin nicht fertiggebracht hat, wird Stalin
       vollenden, ... und so weiter die Reihe kom- munistischer
       Diktatoren ... Das ist raffiniert! Was soll man aber erst von
       dem, ebenfalls jüdischem Hirn ent- sprossenen Christentum
       halten, das es sich leisten kann, seinen Gläubigen das Paradies
       erst im Jenseits zu ver- sprechen? Es ist doch unvergleichlich
       stärker!
       Ich hingegen stehe unter dem Schicksalsgebot, alles innerhalb
       eines einzigen kurzen Menschenlebens zu voll- enden. Mir steht
       nur eine nüchterne Weltanschauung zur Seite, auf Realitäten
       begründet, deren Versprechen greif- bare Form annehmen müssen,
       und die mir verbietet, den Mond zu versprechen. Wofür die
       anderen die Ewigkeit haben, dafür bleiben mir nur ein paar
       armselige Jahre. Sie verlassen sich auf ihre Nachfolger, die an
       der glei- chen Stelle beginnen, wo der Vorgänger aufgehört hat;
       Ersatzmänner, die mit dem gleichen Pflug die gleiche Furche
       weiterziehen. Ich frage mich unaufhörlich, wo sich unter meinen
       unmittelbaren Mitarbeitern der Fähige findet, um die Fackel
       weiter voranzutragen, die meinen Händen einmal entgleiten wird.
       Hitler considered the bourgeoisie to be "morally corrupt"
       --- Quote ---
       > When he spoke about ‘the bourgeoisie’ he meant – as can be
       seen from the context of his statements – both the
       property-owning as well as the traditionally educated
       bourgeoisie; in other words, for him these terms include both
       the entrepreneurs as well as the intellectuals, even though from
       their socio-economic position the latter would normally more
       properly belong to the middle class. When Hitler spoke about the
       ‘working class’ he normally meant ‘manual labourers’, in other
       words primarily the industrial workers.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > One of Hitler’s most frequently raised accusations against the
       bourgeoisie and the bourgeois parties was that they rejected the
       justified claims of the working class, had no social feelings,
       were greedy for profits and were completely ignoring the
       importance of the social issue. When the bourgeoisie was
       compelled to make social concessions, then it defined these as
       ‘charity’ and not as the natural rights of the working
       class.Social reforms, said Hitler on 30 November 1920, had been
       given to the people ‘as a present, as a favour, instead of as a
       natural right’:
       >
       > "It is one of the deeper causes of the hatred of millions of
       national comrades against these ‘upper classes’ – who in our
       opinion, however, are mostly the lowest of the low, because we
       do not intend to define the level of a human being according to
       his money bags but according to his character – that rights
       which they as national comrades, and at least in times of war as
       recognized, because needed fellow citizens, are entitled to
       demand, are being presented to them as ‘favours’. It
       demonstrates the whole moral decay of our society today, that it
       does not even begin to comprehend how corrupting such a form of
       ‘welfare’ must act upon the truly innocently poor."
       >
       > ...
       >
       > The right-wing parties, Hitler asserted on 21 November 1922,
       had sometimes ‘not had the slightest appreciation for the
       worker’, they had not been able ‘to allow for the social
       currents of the times’. On 26 February 1923 he declared that it
       was ‘a heavy guilt of the bourgeoisie not to treat the manual
       workers as equal fellow citizens, in particular to stem itself
       against any reduction of the excessively long working hours’.
       >
       > On 24 April 1923 he again sharply attacked the bourgeoisie
       because it had ignored the justified demands of the workers:
       >
       > "And then the bourgeoisie, which was also already Jewified,
       stemmed itself against the rapping of the masses for an
       improvement of their living conditions ... Without the boundless
       stupidity of our bourgeoisie, the Jew would never have become
       the leader of the German workers. Stupidity was accompanied by
       pride, in other words, the ‘better people’ considered it beneath
       their dignity to climb down to the ‘common herd’. The millions
       of German national comrades would not have become estranged from
       their nation if the leading classes had taken care of them."
       >
       > In Mein Kampf Hitler also accused the bourgeoisie of having
       ‘taken a position uncountable times against even the most
       generally accepted human demands in a manner that was both most
       awkward but also immoral’, and thereby themselves having become
       guilty of politicizing the union movement. The bourgeoisie had
       driven the workers into the arms of Social Democracy by having
       rejected every socially justified demand. Hitler wrote of the
       >
       > "... insane manner in which the bourgeois parties oppose any
       sort of a social demand. The simply narrow-minded rejection of
       any attempt to improve working conditions, safety devices on
       machines, the abolition of child labour, as well as the
       protection of a woman during the months she is carrying a future
       national comrade under her heart, all contributed to drive the
       masses into the nets of Social Democracy, which gladly seized
       upon each case of such a despicable cast of mind. Never can our
       ‘political bourgeoisie’ make up for these sins."
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       Hitler's National Socialism by Rainer Zitelmann Page 202, 203,
       and 204
  HTML https://ia801207.us.archive.org/13/items/adolf-hitler-archive/Hitler%27s%20National%20Socialism%202022.pdf
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 4
   DIR Previous Page