DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 370--------------------------------------------------
Aryan Hearts
By: guest5 Date: July 17, 2020, 8:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Human Hearts Streamlined for Stamina by Neolithic Revolution
[size=10pt][quote]Farming caused the human heart to evolve less
“ape-like” and be better for endurance and stamina.
New research suggests human hearts significantly changed when we
dropped hunting and began leading more consistent lives as
farmers, and now they are longer, thinner, and more
flexible-walled hearts than chimpanzees.
The research, published in the journal Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, was led by Dr. Aaron Baggish,
director of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cardiovascular
Performance Program. Analyzing the differences between our
hearts, and those of apes, they found the human heart has
evolved over thousands of years to better suit modern life.
The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly
Dr. Baggish and his team investigated, measured, and compared
the functionality of hearts in 40 semi-wild chimpanzees and five
gorillas with the hearts of over 160 people. Assembled in four
test groups the heart structures of American football players,
elite runners, and indigenous Mexican subsistence farmers were
studied alongside those from people who rarely leave their
armchairs.
The researchers found that human hearts appear to have evolved
to be better at handling endurance type activity as opposed to
short intense bouts and if a heart is “particularly good” at one
function it’s “conversely poor” at the opposite. The new
findings suggest that while the human heart was at one time
designed for short bursts to assist the demands of hunting and
gathering, it became steadily more efficient at sustaining
endurance tasks over increasingly longer periods of time.
[/quote]
HTML https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/human-heart-0012596
Conclusion: Aryan genetics are superior genetics especially when
it comes to human hearts.
#Post#: 374--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan Hearts
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 18, 2020, 12:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT
I have been saying this about stamina long before the research
was done. The "longer and thinner" cardial geometry is new to
me, but it fits the familiar pattern of Aryan physique. I would
furthermore venture that the elongated heart would be coherent
with evolution of a narrower ribcage that is also familiar to
us.
---
www.mitchmedical.us/sexual-selection/human-physique-and-sexual-a
ttractiveness.html
[quote]Examples of pronounced mesomorphic, ectomorphic, and
endo-morphic somatotypes are shown in Figure 7.6, along with an
intermediate, or average, type of physique. Images of this kind,
back-posed to avoid the distraction of facial cues and
standardized for height and posture, have been used in
cross-cultural studies to measure female preferences for
masculine physique
...
mesomorphic and average somatotypes received the highest ratings
for sexual attractiveness, whilst the endomorphic physique was
least preferred. The ectomorph did not receive the highest
ratings in any of the populations studied, but this image did
receive proportionately higher scores in China (Figure 7.7) and
in Sri Lanka than in some other countries. Thus, some cultural
variations probably exist in female preferences. As a second
example of such differences, a mesomorphic somatotype was rated
as significantly more attractive than an average male physique
in UK, whereas the reverse was true in China.[/quote]
Slightly more Aryan blood memory in China and Sri Lanka (though
still nowhere near enough)?
---
"What I would really like to know is what the correlation looks
like between the somatotype that women prefer in men and the
respective women's own somatotype. I would idealistically hope,
of course, that ectomorphic women are more likely to prefer
ectomorphic men, but my anecdotal observation over the years
leads me to suspect otherwise....."
Perhaps there is hope:
[quote]Assortative mating is a mating pattern and form of sexual
selection in which individuals with similar phenotypes mate with
one another more frequently than would be expected under a
random mating pattern.
...
Genetic assortative mating is well studied and documented. In
1903 Pearson and colleagues reported strong correlations in
height, span of arms, and the length of the left forearm between
husband and wife in 1000 couples.[11] Assortative mating with
regards to appearance does not end there. Males prefer female
faces that resemble their own when provided images of three
women, with one image modified to resemble their own. However,
the same result does not apply to females selecting male
faces.[12][/quote]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assortative_mating#In_humans
(As to why it says females do not prefer similar faces in males,
perhaps that is only because it is citing a single study? If we
replicated this experiment perhaps results would differ?)
*****************************************************