URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 10817--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 25, 2022, 3:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       They have the same attitude to religion, assuming all religious
       extremists share a stereotype despite them being extreme about
       religions with different teachings! This never made any sense to
       me. There was also the underlying presumption that all religious
       extremism is bad. Why? If the religion itself is good, the more
       extreme you are about following it, clearly the better you are!
       They just fear extremism for being extreme, without regard for
       the content of the extremism. These are probably the same types
       who lack the ability to tell the difference between initiated
       violence and retaliatory violence, instead considering both
       equally bad. (They have annoyed me since childhood with bullshit
       about how I will only succeed in converting meat-eaters to
       veganism by being nice to them in all circumstances (even when
       they are literally killing animals in front of me) "so that they
       cease to fear veganism as something extreme". WTF?! The reason
       meat-eaters aren't vegan is not because they "consider veganism
       extreme" but because they don't care about the animals! I don't
       want to convert meat-eaters in the first place; I want to kill
       them using the same methods they are OK with being used to kill
       their victims! But when I say this, I am accused of "making
       vegans look extreme".)
       "left-leaning"
       Which means we are the ones constantly having to expend extra
       energy to distinguish ourselves from them and clarify that they
       do not represent serious leftist thinking, thereby putting us at
       an even bigger disadvantage compared to rightists who do not
       have this problem.
       
       #Post#: 10824--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: SirGalahad Date: January 25, 2022, 5:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not to mention that very often, massive problems require extreme
       solutions to solve in the first place. Using "extremist" or
       "radical" as a specifically negative catch-all term is foolish.
       "They have annoyed me since childhood with bullshit about how I
       will only succeed in converting meat-eaters to veganism by being
       nice to them in all circumstances"
       This drives me (quite literally) mad. What irks me the most is
       that 99% of the people saying this are non-vegan themselves. If
       you couldn't convince yourself to be vegan, why the **** would
       anyone take YOUR advice when you claim to know how to convert
       people? You're unintentionally admitting that you shouldn't be
       listened to. They're basically politely telling you to shut up,
       because non-humans are so oppressed that nobody even wants to
       hear about or be bothered with their plight, and on the rare
       occasions that it IS brought up in discussions, people forget
       entirely about the non-human's perspective in all of this. "It's
       all up to dietary choice. I'll respect vegans as long as they
       respect my right to eat meat." "I just don't like the vegans
       that force it on people" (neglecting the fact that carnism is
       forced on non-humans). "We need to eat plant-based for the
       environment." Etc etc. The psychopathic tunnel vision is so
       strong in carnists, that they register merely bringing up and
       vouching for veganism as force, and the exploitation and murder
       of billions of living beings as non-force. Cows, pigs, chickens,
       and really any non-human deemed socially acceptable to imprison,
       exploit and slaughter, are openly and proudly viewed as complete
       non-entities. Now, if only I had the power to snap my fingers
       and put any carnist in the situation they willingly place
       non-humans in
       #Post#: 10917--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: Zea_mays Date: January 30, 2022, 5:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]They just fear extremism for being extreme, without
       regard for the content of the extremism.[/quote]
       As an additional coping mechanism for their fear, they have
       turned to self-aggrandizement! For example, I've seen countless
       people seriously bring up the "horseshoe theory" (which is not
       even a "theory", much less a logically-consistent idea)--which
       is basically a way to say "Anyone who is unideological like me
       is good; anyone who has an ideology is bad."
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory
       And for fun, here is a forum to make fun of these morons who
       make a false equivalency between leftism and rightism:
  HTML https://old.reddit.com/r/ENLIGHTENEDCENTRISM/
       [quote]This drives me (quite literally) mad. What irks me the
       most is that 99% of the people saying this are non-vegan
       themselves.[/quote]
       It reveals their exploitive character in its rawest form.
       They are basically saying "Gratify me first, and if I am
       entertained enough, _maybe_ I will consider your perspective.
       But, if you slip up, I will mock you, because even in defiance I
       can derive gratification from you."
       i.e. "I am going to attempt to exploit you, because I don't
       value you in the first place."
       #Post#: 10968--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: guest55 Date: February 1, 2022, 1:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]It reveals their exploitive character in its rawest form.
       They are basically saying "Gratify me first, and if I am
       entertained enough, _maybe_ I will consider your perspective.
       But, if you slip up, I will mock you, because even in defiance I
       can derive gratification from you."
       i.e. "I am going to attempt to exploit you, because I don't
       value you in the first place."[/quote]
       Alot of this going on out there!
       #Post#: 11163--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 9, 2022, 9:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://archive.is/j9e22
       [quote]Status Anxiety Is Blowing Wind Into Trump’s Sails
       ...
       Over the past six decades, according to Petersen, there has been
       a realignment of the parties in respect to their position as
       pro-establishment or anti-establishment: “In the 1960s and 1970s
       the left was associated with an anti-systemic stance but this
       position is now more aligned with the right-wing.”[/quote]
       Yes, because in the 60s-70s the establishment had been shaped by
       traditional Western civilization. Today's establishment, on the
       other hand, has been significantly shaped by the Counterculture.
       [quote]Instead of focusing on the economic system and its
       elites, Hartwich continued,
       Right-wing populists usually identify what they call liberal
       elites in culture, politics and the media as the “enemies of the
       people.” Combined with the rejection of marginalized groups like
       immigrants, this creates targets to blame for dissatisfaction
       with one’s personal situation or the state of society as a whole
       while leaving a highly unequal economic system intact.
       Right-wing populists’ focus on the so-called culture wars, the
       narrative that one’s culture is under attack from liberal
       elites, is very effective because culture can be an important
       source of identity and self-worth for people. It is also
       effective in organizing political conflicts along cultural,
       rather than economic lines.
       ...
       Diana Mutz, a political scientist at the University of
       Pennsylvania, described the political consequences of white
       status decline in her 2018 paper, “Status threat, not economic
       hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote.”
       ...
       Mutz found that:
       Change in financial well-being had little impact on
       candidate preference. Instead, changing preferences were related
       to changes in the party’s positions on issues related to
       American global dominance and the rise of a majority-minority
       America: issues that threaten white [s]Americans[/s]’ sense of
       dominant group status.
       ...
       Status anxiety has become a driving force, Mitrea and her
       colleagues note: “It is not so much current economic standing,
       but rather anxiety concerning future socioeconomic decline and
       déclassement, that influences electoral behavior.”[/quote]
       Hence offering to improve their financial well-being will not
       placate them. The only thing that will placate them is to give
       them permanent "white" supremacy. This is morally unacceptable.
       Therefore we should not be trying to placate them at all. We
       should be trying to destroy them.
       [quote]Michael Bang Petersen puts it this way:
       We know that humans essentially have two routes to acquire
       status: prestige and dominance. Prestige is earned respect from
       having skills that are useful to others. Dominance is status
       gained from intimidation and fear. Individuals who are high in
       the pursuit of dominance play a central role in political
       destabilization. They are more likely to commit political
       violence, to engage in hateful online interactions and to be
       motivated to share misinformation.
       That this is dangerous does not need repeating.[/quote]
       See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-we-lose/
       #Post#: 11404--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 21, 2022, 11:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1cMn5nR0PM
       #Post#: 11953--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 12, 2022, 8:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhmC26sbGfM
       Related:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/groypers/
       #Post#: 12710--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: rp Date: April 11, 2022, 1:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "But not the majority "white" school! They are Eurocentrists."
       Literally this. I know many Indian immigrant parents who moved
       all the way to another fucking city just to get their children
       into a "good" school. But I do not know if it was because they
       wanted their children to attend a "White" majority school, or if
       it was simply because those schools had shown better academic
       performance among their students.
       They are still Westerners, as they view academic performance in
       the Western education system positively.
       #Post#: 13342--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: Zea_mays Date: May 14, 2022, 2:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]A series of 13 studies with over 10,000 participants
       tested the change in Americans’ prejudice following the
       presidency of Donald Trump. The researchers found that explicit
       racial and religious prejudice increased amongst Trump’s
       supporters, while prejudice decreased among those who opposed
       him. This research was published in Nature Human Behavior.
       [...]
       Across Studies 1-9, Ruisch and Ferguson found that support for
       Donald Trump predicted “a significant increase in prejudice
       towards a range of social, racial and religious minoritized
       groups.” Those who generally opposed Trump, including liberals
       and conservatives, showed decreases in prejudice in the same
       time period. Studies 10-13 provided indirect support for the
       mechanism behind the shift in social norms.
       Trump supporters perceived that expressing prejudice had become
       more acceptable since his election, and this perception
       predicted greater personal prejudice among them. As well,
       “experimentally leading participants to feel that Trump
       supporters approved of his controversial rhetoric significantly
       increased Trump supporters’ personal expressions of prejudice
       .”[/quote]
  HTML https://www.psypost.org/2022/04/donald-trumps-presidency-associated-with-significant-changes-in-the-topography-of-prejudice-in-the-united-states-62880
       I.e., tolerating tribalism makes tribalists more tribalist:
       [quote]Although these correlational studies cannot speak to
       causality, our final four studies provided indirect support for
       our proposed causal mechanism of shifting social norms: Trump
       supporters perceive that it has become more acceptable to
       express prejudice since Trump’s election (study 10), and the
       perception that prejudice is more acceptable predicts greater
       personal prejudice amongst Trump supporters (study 11).
       Providing more decisive causal evidence for this proposed norms
       mechanism, we found (studies 12 and 13) that experimentally
       leading participants to feel that Trump supporters approved of
       his controversial rhetoric significantly increased Trump
       supporters’ personal expressions of prejudice.[/quote]
       #Post#: 13774--------------------------------------------------
       Re: True Left breakthrough: non-economic explanations
       By: Zea_mays Date: May 30, 2022, 12:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]More than 60 percent of Americans who voted for former
       President Trump agree with the core tenet of the “great
       replacement theory,” according to a new Yahoo News-YouGov poll.
       The poll, published on Tuesday, found that 61 percent of Trump
       supporters agree with the statement that “a group of people in
       this country are trying to replace native-born Americans with
       immigrants and people of color who share their political views.”
       Twenty-two percent of Trump supporters surveyed said they
       disagreed with the conspiracy theory.
       Meanwhile, 16 percent of respondents who voted for President
       Biden said they agree with the statement, while 71 percent said
       otherwise.
       Seventy-three percent of Trump supporters agreed with the
       statement that there is discrimination against white people in
       the U.S. and 18 percent disagreed, compared with 20 percent of
       Biden supporters who agreed and 74 percent who disagreed.
       Sixty-nine percent of respondents who voted for Trump said that
       they are concerned U.S.-born citizens are losing​​
       economic, political and cultural influence in the country to
       immigrants, while 30 percent of those who voted for Biden agreed
       with that statement, the poll said.
       The new poll comes a week after the massacre at a Tops Friendly
       Markets location in Buffalo, N.Y., that resulted in the deaths
       of 10 people and injuries to three others.[/quote]
  HTML https://thehill.com/news/state-watch/3499877-6-in-10-trump-voters-agree-with-core-tenet-of-great-replacement-theory-survey/
       Who are those 16% of Biden voters who believe this?
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page