URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Issues
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 6104--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dietary decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 3, 2021, 2:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "If you mean that Vedic traditionalism exhibits a double
       standard by forbidding non-Brahmins to eat beef but allowing
       Brahmins to consume it"
       This is what I meant.
       "the first step in this process is to reject other meats as
       well"
       Of course! I only mentioned milk because it also comes from
       cows.
       "Lacto Vegetarianism > Ovo Vegetarianism"
       Disagree here. Recall:
  HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/our-enemies-concede-that-judaism-is-rightist/comment-page-1/#comment-180200
       [quote]I would have no problem in principle with eating eggs
       from GENUINELY free hens (not the present-day scam “free-range”
       where there is a so-called “exit” that none of the hens can
       realistically reach). Back in the Neolithic era, it would have
       made perfect sense for hens to congregate voluntarily on Aryan
       subsistence farms (where they would get not only food but also
       refuge from predators (human and non-human)), and the Aryans
       would get their eggs in return. This only became corrupted when
       non-Aryan humans who had learned farming imprisoned the
       congregated hens, and started breeding subsequent generations
       deliberately (for both eggs and meat, as well as cockfighting
       and other sadistic practices), which eventually led to the
       horrors of Western modern poultry factories:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_molting
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick_culling
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debeaking
       Thus, while I would in principle be willing to eat eggs from
       existing hens (in genuinely free living conditions), I would
       never support breeding subsequent generations of hens for the
       sake of maintaining a supply of eggs for humans. This means in
       practice that I don’t eat eggs within the economy at all, as
       doing so would create economic demand for subsequent generations
       of hens to be bred.
       ...
       “Was it noble of them to assume that the chickens coming to them
       for refuge were okay with them eating their eggs? Do you think
       that there somehow was communication/consent between the two
       species?”
       It would only be an assumption if the chickens were not allowed
       to choose to leave. What I was describing involved chickens free
       to weigh the deal they got on Aryan subsistence farms compared
       to deals they could get elsewhere. Indeed, it is entirely
       possible that two Aryan subsistence farms had different tax
       rules, for example one might prefer taxes payable in manure:
  HTML https://www.hgtv.com/outdoors/gardens/animals-and-wildlife/the-straight-poop-on-using-chicken-manure-as-fertilizer
       so it would be up to individual chickens to migrate to whichever
       they prefer. Remember, back then chickens were not yet
       domesticated, so if they didn’t like any available deal, they
       could choose to fend for themselves like they were doing the
       whole time before Aryan subsistence farms came along! (Whereas
       today, dealing with domesticated chickens, the ethical
       calculation is different.)[/quote]
       In contrast, there was no prehistoric ethical pathway for milk
       consumption short of a freak scenario where the calf dies
       accidentally and then the cow turns up at the Aryan subsistence
       farm volunteering to be milked.
       #Post#: 6106--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dietary decolonization
       By: rp Date: May 3, 2021, 2:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "In contrast, there was no prehistoric ethical pathway for milk
       consumption short of a freak scenario where the calf dies
       accidentally and then the cow turns up at the Aryan subsistence
       farm volunteering to be milked."
       I see. But I was using ovo vegetarians to refer to those consume
       eggs but also consume dairy, whereas most lacto vegetarians I
       know avoid the former. I should have used "lacto-ovo
       vegetarianism" to refer to the the former group.
       #Post#: 6162--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Gentilism
       By: Zea_mays Date: May 5, 2021, 10:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It always shocked me that things like "Meatless Monday" are
       supposed to be a challenge for the majority of people. Are these
       people really so addicted to cruelty that they eat meat every
       single meal of every single day? Like, don't they just
       spontaneously have random days with no meat in their meals? They
       are actually going out of their way to meticulously plan each
       meal to ensure they don't accidentally demasculinize themselves
       by forgetting their meat?
       (It's also shocking that environmentalists and vegans who
       promote things like "Meatless Monday" think that's actually
       going to make a dent in violence against non-humans and
       environmental damage...)
       #Post#: 6184--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Re: Gentilism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 6, 2021, 2:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "every single meal"
       I never understood how it is possible to eat meat for breakfast.
       The infamous full English breakfast:
  HTML https://www.ladbible.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1200,quality=70,format=jpeg,fit=cover,dpr=1/https%3A%2F%2Fs3-images.ladbible.com%2Fs3%2Fcontent%2F8389bb7360696b98394622a8f527b983.png
       [img]
  HTML https://www.datocms-assets.com/32685/1613141623-skillet2.jpg?q=80&auto=format&dpr=1&w=800&h=500&fit=crop[/img]
       Worse, hotels etc. in former colonies continue to offer this
       breakfast option! And many local Eurocentrists consider it to be
       "cultured"!
       "They are actually going out of their way to meticulously plan
       each meal to ensure they don't accidentally demasculinize
       themselves by forgetting their meat?"
       It certainly seems that way:
  HTML https://www.ladbible.com/news/uk-sausage-voted-as-the-most-important-part-of-a-full-english-breakfast-20210404
       "(It's also shocking that environmentalists and vegans who
       promote things like "Meatless Monday" think that's actually
       going to make a dent in violence against non-humans and
       environmental damage...)"
       I am convinced that the only way we will ever get a vegan world
       is by prohibiting lots of people from reproducing.
       #Post#: 6185--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dietary decolonization
       By: rp Date: May 6, 2021, 2:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "English breakfast"
  HTML https://youtu.be/WEBy5zrsdPI
       I never understood Westerners' obsession with "breakfast" to
       begin with. In many non-western cultures, for example, a bowl of
       porridge or oats is considered enough. Anything else is reserved
       for special occasions.
       #Post#: 6789--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dietary decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 29, 2021, 10:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Our enemies are voluntarily leaning into our narrative:
  HTML http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2021/05/29/the-food-wars-are-coming-to-america/
       [quote]Alienated metropolitan weirdos are attacking the great
       culinary traditions of Western civilization
       Editor’s Note: By all accounts, Farage loves to drink and
       Salvini is a foodie. Neither of them are faking it. Donald Trump
       also eats like that.
       ...
       The libs don’t even believe in equality or live and let live
       anymore. Today, they have self-righteous moral puritans who
       believe that eating a cheeseburger or a chicken sandwich is a
       moral catastrophe.
       ...
       Is barbeque a rightwing nationalist and populist cause?
       Once again, I never really thought of it that way. Who has a
       problem with barbeque?
       ...
       The idea that you are saving the planet by eating asparagus,
       brussels sprouts or a salad and that this makes you better than
       someone who eats a steak with it is absurd.[/quote]
       Let the cow judge who is better!
       #Post#: 6987--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dietary decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 8, 2021, 12:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just some information that might be useful:
  HTML https://www.lockhart.co.uk/medias/lockhart/blog-feature-images/dairy-environment.jpg
       #Post#: 7468--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dietary decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 9, 2021, 2:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       At least some people are attempting to tackle the subject:
  HTML https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-exotic-food-racism-xenophobia
       [quote]The Washington Post published a piece arguing that food
       should no longer be described as "exotic."
       ...
       Galarza spoke with several professors who similarly oppose the
       term "exotic food," including one who insisted it's "tied to the
       history of colonialism and slavery."[/quote]
       This is correct. Western food is never called "exotic" by locals
       no matter where in the world you are eating it. People from a
       formerly colonized country may call food from a different
       formerly colonized country "exotic" even though it is
       geographically nearer, and not call food from a former colonial
       power (not necessarily even one which colonized the country in
       question) "exotic" even though it is geographically further
       away. Thus what is considered "exotic" is influenced by
       Eurocentrism. This ties back in with what I was saying above
       about hotel breakfasts always offering a Western option etc..
       [quote]"ok but can i still call the dancers that?" Washington
       Examiner commentator T. Becket Adams quipped.[/quote]
       Sure, as long as you start by calling ballroom/ballet/etc.
       dancers that. Those styles come from centuries ago across the
       Atlantic Ocean FFS!
       #Post#: 7591--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dietary decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 18, 2021, 11:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Western scientists belatedly confirm what was always totally
       obvious to any non-Turanian with a functional nose and tongue:
  HTML https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26517348/
       [quote]Interactions between tea polyphenols and milk proteins,
       especially between catechins and caseins, could account for a
       decrease in antioxidant activity,[/quote]
       #Post#: 7707--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dietary decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 24, 2021, 10:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/white-woman-making-improved-congee-apologizes/ar-AAMrFe6
       [quote]White woman making 'improved' congee apologizes
       Breakfast Cure, an Oregon-based company run by a white woman,
       Karen Taylor, has apologized after being accused by Asian
       Americans of culturally appropriating congee, a traditional
       Asian rice porridge.
       The company, which sells pre-packaged meals it had referred to
       as congee, issued the apology in a statement on its website this
       week after it was criticized by many across social media for
       exoticizing the comfort food and trying to reframe the
       already-popular dish. It had previously claimed to have altered
       congee to fit “your modern palate” and “improve” a dish that’s
       been beloved by Asian cultures for centuries.
       ...
       Taylor, an acupuncturist and self-proclaimed “Queen of Congee,”
       had written a now-edited post titled, “How I discovered the
       miracle of congee and improved it.”
       ...
       Congee has long been a dish for commoners that is often eaten in
       times of need because it requires only a few ingredients. By
       contrast, Breakfast Cure’s slow-cook meal packs cost $14.95 per
       pack. Kim said that Taylor's profiting off of congee,
       particularly as a white woman, erases the humble nature of the
       dish.
       “She's essentially making a large amount of money, or could
       potentially make a large amount of money, based on taking common
       people's Asian food,” Kim said. “She is claiming that congee is
       not good on its own, and she as a white woman has found a way to
       make congee much, much better, meaning that it serves a white
       people's palate.”
       Krishnendu Ray, the chair of the Nutrition and Food Studies
       department at New York University, said it’s not surprising that
       non-Asians would be interested in East Asian cuisine. The
       problem comes when white people are the ones who profit from
       this culture and sell a “kind of a white women's version of
       porridge and then naming it congee because they want a cool,
       exotic name.”
       “And when that happens, often outsiders come in, and they, in
       their minds, upgrade the cuisine,” Ray said.[/quote]
       Embellishment is not improvement/upgrading. But Westerners will
       never understand this because Western civilization is
       aesthetically inferior. Don't believe me? Here is Taylor's
       cultural appropriation product:
       [img width=1280
       height=890]
  HTML https://supchina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/breakfast-cure.jpg[/img]
       This is actual congee:
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/White_Congee.jpg/800px-White_Congee.jpg
       Anyone who thinks the first picture is an
       "improvement"/"upgrade" over the second is a Westerner.
       Another article trashing Taylor:
  HTML https://nextshark.com/congee-backlash-breakfast-cure-asian-dish-western-palate/
       [quote]‘Karen, Queen of Congee’ draws backlash over brand
       ‘improving’ ancient Asian dish for the Western palate
       ...
       There are currently 13 flavors of Breakfast Cure’s prepackaged
       “congee.” These include “Apple Cinnamon,” “Coconut Blueberry
       Bliss,” “Golden Spice,” “Karen’s Kitchari,” “Mango and Sticky
       Rice,” “Masala Chai Spice,” “Mega-Omega,” “Om Berry,”
       “Pear-Fection,” “Pineapple Paradise,” “Romano Bean Dream,”
       “Tangled Up in Blueberry” and “Three Treasures.”[/quote]
       You only have to read the names to know that this is not
       "improvement", but Homo Hubris flavouring.
       This goes back to what was being discussed here recently:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/msg7612/#msg7612
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/msg7648/#msg7648
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page