DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 25742--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 2, 2024, 10:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"But do you agree that preference for boobs over ass is a sign
of possible neoteny"
Not generally, because this presumes that the above is the only
mechanism that produces this preference. In reality, there are
likely to be multiple mechanisms leading to the same preference.
Besides, female infants also breastfeed. Should not the above
model therefore apply to them also?
"I myself can't stand extremely large breasted women (who more
often than not have non Aryan faces). On the other hand, women
with a somewhat "curvy" (endomorphic) somatotype, and hence a
somewhat large posterior, I am attracted to provided they have
an Aryan face."
Please post pictures.
#Post#: 25744--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
By: rp Date: April 3, 2024, 7:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Simrat Kaur from facial Aryanism is somewhat curvy body, but her
breasts are not too big.
#Post#: 25746--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 3, 2024, 2:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Now I remember:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/misinformation-about-racial-origins/msg22040/#msg22040
But whereas in the meme you posted the alpha views this shape as
a sign of fertility, in our earlier discussion you said:
[quote]In my case, it was a certain matriarchal impulse that
made me attracted to them, the feeling that a woman like Kaur
would be able to provide me with "love" and "warmth" of a
"caring mother/older sister".[/quote]
So you seem to be seeking closer to what the beta in the meme is
seeking, but find it in the alpha's preference? But if so, then
why dislike large breasts?
Even more confusingly, you later say:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/misinformation-about-racial-origins/msg22043/#msg22043
[quote]With an ectomorph it is different. In particular, if they
are shorter than me, although I feel sexually attracted to them,
the feeling of attraction (while certainly surpassing my
feelings of attraction toward skinny-fat women with Aryan faces
of similar stature, to the point of manifesting in reproductive
desire) is not the same. I recognize that the height difference
between genders is simply a biological fact, but one cannot deny
the sexual dynamics at play. It is not necessarily a negative
thing, as I view them to be more neotenous (perhaps even more so
than myself), and I am drawn toward their childlike innocence. I
feel this way with shorter skinny-fat women with Aryan faces as
well, but with them, this attraction manifests in a somewhat
patriarchal impulse of a "caring father/older brother".
On the other hand, an ectomorphic woman who is as facially
beautiful as Kaur but taller than me would certainly illicit a
greater feeling of attraction (even reproductive desire) than
both ectomorphic women of smaller stature with Aryan faces and
non-ectomorphic women with Aryan faces of similar stature (i.e.
Kaur herself).[/quote]
This would suggest you also seek what the alpha seeks, but find
it in the ectomorph? And if so, is it the case that you were
attracted only to curvy bodies when you were younger, and only
developed an attraction for thin bodies as you grew up (as
depicted in the alpha pathway of the meme, but substituting your
preferences)?
(In contrast, I want to emphasize that my preference for
ectomorphs is precisely because they appear less fertile.)
#Post#: 26088--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 23, 2024, 8:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Previously:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-bones/msg10572/#msg10572
Our enemies are still doing it, this time with kids:
HTML https://vdare.com/public_upload/publication/featured_image/61846/vdareseen.jpeg
(Is rp paying attention? This is an Oval.)
Contrast with, for example:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-ahimsa/msg7870/#msg7870
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-ahimsa/msg19139/#msg19139
Who looks more dangerous? (Hint: ask the fish!)
#Post#: 26094--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Aryan bones
By: rp Date: April 24, 2024, 1:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Is rp paying attention? This is an Oval."
I see. I have been using the egg shape as a benchmark ever since
you mentioned it in the other thread.
#Post#: 26131--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Aryan bones
By: rp Date: April 26, 2024, 1:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Wait, weren't rightists like Duchesne saying that "Whites" are
superior to "non Whites" because "Whites" are more mature? I
guess it's ok for "Whites" to be mature.
#Post#: 26611--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
By: rp Date: May 31, 2024, 9:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Example of non-Aryan reproductive maturity
HTML https://people.com/texas-dad-to-be-dead-electrocuted-while-trimming-tree-8655820
[quote]
A 20-year-old man, who was expecting his first child, died by
electrocution while trimming a tree on May 25.
[/quote]
Face:
HTML https://people.com/thmb/MXjXaZUfmgwC4GBJxU57EoBqo9c=/750x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(758x236:760x238):format(webp)/Carl-David-Blaylock-053024-e9025bdbc89140dab1b30923746a4b6d.jpg
#Post#: 26612--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 31, 2024, 3:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
At least he won't be reproducing again! ;D Seriously, though,
20 by ancient standards was not a young age for reproducing, so
I'm not sure if this is the best example. Even with present-day
cases, we could go a lot younger, such as:
HTML https://au.news.yahoo.com/australias-youngest-parents-teen-couple-with-two-kids-under-two-38824189.html
[quote]16-year-old couple Mollie Syrigos and her boyfriend Oscar
Wilks, labelled Australia's youngest parents ... The couple met
when they were both 12 and became pregnant with their first
child Theodore just over a year later[/quote]
[img]
HTML https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/9KdkOznsg4cEiRO6c_El_A--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtjZj13ZWJw/https://s.yimg.com/os/en-AU/homerun/y7.yahoo7news/d557ed0b13e650d06697e79fd467dc48[/img]
In any case, I remain ambivalent about using this as an
indicator of maturity, as it's not like reproducing requires
exceptional skill.... I still think genuine prodigal talent
(which is also much statistically rarer) is likely to be a
better indicator.
#Post#: 26667--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
By: rp Date: June 4, 2024, 2:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"20 by ancient standards was not a young age for reproducing"
But I recall another post of yours where you, referring to a
paedomorphic Chinese women who had reproduced before 25, said,
"Aryans do not reproduce so early".
"In any case, I remain ambivalent about using this as an
indicator of maturity, as it's not like reproducing requires
exceptional skill.."
But you have previously stated that neotenous people reproduce
late due to late sexual maturation.
#Post#: 26668--------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 4, 2024, 5:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I presume you are referring to:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg7737/#msg7737
[quote]The truly neotenous do not reproduce so early, as (by
definition of the term) our youth is extended. Many of us never
reproduce at all. Padeomorphs, on the other hand, tend to be
highly fertile (and possessing high sex drive). This confirms
what I explained a long time ago: paedomorphy is a mere
superficial effect not caused by neoteny[/quote]
This is referring to someone who facially appears immature,
whereupon their having reproduced is a way to debunk the claim
that they are immature in actuality.
In contrast, the face you posted looks fully mature, thus it
would not be visually surprising to see a face like that with
offspring. Therefore to cite such a face having offspring is not
particularly useful.
"But you have previously stated that neotenous people reproduce
late due to late sexual maturation."
Yes, but other people who reproduce late are non-neotenous
people who would have preferred to reproduce early but who
needed a long time to become economically ready or to find a
reproductive partner, whereas other people who reproduce early
are people (including neotenous) who were not given a choice.
The point is that age of reproduction involves too many
overlapping variables to be useful as a measure of maturity.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page