DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs Right
*****************************************************
#Post#: 4038--------------------------------------------------
Farming vs Ranching
By: rp Date: February 8, 2021, 7:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Real Life "Farming" (lol. The discrepancy between the title and
the video thumbnail couldn't be more apparent, to the point of
it almost being a parody):
HTML https://youtu.be/KnNxglCKmiE
This demonstrates the extent to which Westerners have corrupted
our vocabulary. As an exercise, try searching "farming" on
YouTube and you'll see that the top results all involve
livestock.
#Post#: 4170--------------------------------------------------
Re: Farming vs Ranching
By: guest5 Date: February 12, 2021, 10:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://i.pinimg.com/originals/99/7e/c1/997ec12928986e43f895fc819dd3fab7.jpg
"All Lives Matter" yells the "white" Westerner in response to
Black Lives Matter.
All lives matter except non-human lives, those we get to maim
and destroy at will and whenever we want without a care in the
world, right? See the general hypocrisy of humans and the evil
nature of humanism and humanitarianism? How do we ever find
justice in hypocrisy?
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/ancient-world/antropocentricism-the-most-dangerous-ideology-in-the-world/
#Post#: 5627--------------------------------------------------
Re: Farming vs Ranching
By: rp Date: April 17, 2021, 2:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Time for some map posting to highlight the inferiority of
Western "Civilization":
HTML https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/bEVtHGLYXitHjHk7WKl84TtLvDM=/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/665482/map_food_vs_fuel.0.jpg
#Post#: 5930--------------------------------------------------
Re: Farming vs Ranching
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 27, 2021, 10:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2021/4/26/22403599/biden-red-meat-ban-burger-kudlow
[quote]The grain of truth in the Republican claims (agri-pun
intended) is that any serious climate change plan needs to do
something about meat production. A recent paper in Science, a
leading academic journal, found that food-related emissions
alone put the Paris climate agreement’s warming target of 1.5
degrees Celsius out of reach. The most effective way to address
these emissions, according to the paper’s authors, is a global
shift away from meat consumption.
...
Increasingly, America’s meat-eating ways are being subsumed into
our culture wars. It’s yet another sign of how polarized our
country is and how hard this polarization makes tackling a
catastrophic threat like climate change.
...
Here’s the problem, though: If Biden’s climate plan doesn’t do
something about meat, it’s probably going to fail.
Globally speaking, livestock production represents a significant
portion of overall greenhouse gas emissions. The reasons for
this are intrinsic to meat production itself; there is no way
for humans to consume meat in the way we do without abetting
catastrophic warming.
Ruminant animals like cows, kept in numbers much larger due to
meat and dairy demand, emit methane gas through their bodily
functions — a pollutant more potent than carbon dioxide. Raising
allegedly more climate-friendly meats, like chicken, also emits
significantly more greenhouse gases than plant-based protein
productions. Animal [s]agriculture[/s] necessitates clearing
huge amounts of land, a significant cause of deforestation in
places like Brazil’s Amazon. Concentrated animal feeding
operations (CAFOs), factory [s]farms[/s] where animals are
crowded into tiny cages and kept in horrific conditions, create
massive feces lagoons that intensify the methane problem.
There is, in short, no way around the problem: If we want to
keep climate change at a manageable level, we need to change the
way we produce and consume animal products.
The Biden administration may or may not eventually take steps to
deal with this problem. But the hysterical reaction to a
falsehood that it is going to be doing so suggests just how
explosive the reaction will be if Biden actually moves in this
direction.
...
meat is linked with masculinity and ideals about the virtuous
traditional [s]American farmer[/s] — central concepts in a
Republican Party dominated by culturally conservative rural
whites.
...
The unstoppable force of climate change advocacy on the left is
about to hit the immovable object of attachment to meat on the
right. The resulting fight will implicate issues at the very
core of American identity, a country where animal
[s]agriculture[/s] is a major part of our mythologized cowboy
past and economic present.
With the stakes so high, there’s every reason to believe that
meat could be the next big fight in our all-consuming culture
war. “Biden bans burgers” isn’t a one-off lie; we may look back
on it as the meat wars’ Fort Sumter.[/quote]
Yet so many journalists still call ranching
"farming"/"agriculture".....
#Post#: 5931--------------------------------------------------
Re: Farming vs Ranching
By: rp Date: April 27, 2021, 10:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The author (Zack Beauchamp) is a Jew
#Post#: 10628--------------------------------------------------
Re: Farming vs Ranching
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 17, 2022, 11:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Our enemies now actively produce focused anti-vegan propaganda:
HTML https://www.eurocanadians.ca/2022/01/is-egetarianism-the-future-of-humanity.html
[quote]Our friends from the Globalist community would like to
abolish animal-based diets for health and environmental reasons.
[/quote]
Given that animal-based diets waste farmland on producing feed
for slaughter animals instead of using the same farmland for
producing food for humans, autarky would in fact be far easier
to achieve with plant-based diets. Thus globalists (ie.
anti-autarkists) are the ones who in reality have an incentive
to maintain the popularity of animal-based diets, in order to
keep food supply dependent on trade. But don't expect our
enemies to understand this.
[quote]we are omnivores with a strong carnivorous tendency. We
are wonderfully well adapted anatomically and physiologically to
eat meat. Meat consumption has also played a key role in
increasing our brain size. Instinctively, meat and its
derivatives are the most sought-after human foods all over the
world [8]. And it is not a culturally rooted need that can be
easily overcome but an anthropological need rooted in our
genes.[/quote]
You are describing yourselves only, not us. That is why we must
eliminate your bloodlines.
[quote]Six Truths About Vegetarians
(Table adapted from science journalist Rolf Degen’s book, Seven
unflattering truths about vegetarians) [9].
1. Most vegetarians are not really vegetarians: 66% of
“vegetarians” have indeed eaten animal products in the last 24
hours [10].
2. People lie about their meat consumption: Women who were
told by researchers that they were going to watch a movie about
a slaughterhouse lied about (or as the study put it,
“under-strategically declared”) the amount of meat they ate
[11].
3. 84% of people who stop eating meat eventually change
their mind and return to a diet that includes animal products
[12].
4. British researchers found that only 25% of people who
said they reduced their meat consumption did so [13].[/quote]
Most people suck. Should we therefore choose to suck too?
[quote] 5. Vegetarians, a majority of whom are women, often
suffer from depression and eating disorders – according to some
scientists, vegetarianism is an occult eating disorder [14]. Why
are women attracted to vegetarianism ? “Meat is masculine. And
eating it proves you’re one tough dude. At least that’s what the
American media tells us. And that message’s pervasiveness might
be one reason the vast majority of vegans in the U.S. are women,
say Emilie Aries and Bridget Todd, the co-hosts of the podcast
Stuff Mom Never Told You” [15].[/quote]
Yes, it depresses me every time I think about how many new
slaughter animals are born into their prisons just in the time
it takes for me to type this. And it depresses me more to
realize that desire for high sexual dimorphism is considered
more important in Western civilization than the duty to not
initiate violence.
[quote] 6. It was not always the case[16], but vegetarianism
is above all an ideology of the left, and this is undoubtedly
the main truth to be remembered from this table: “vegetarianism
is a lie of liberal thought” [17].[/quote]
I am happy that our enemies are making this an explicit left vs
right issue.
[quote]Because of the disproportionate importance given to
carbohydrates and grains, scientists have linked the famous
Harvard University food guide focusing on vegetarian diets to
the source of the epidemic of morbid obesity and of diabetes
that is currently rampant in the United States [19].[/quote]
Yes, this is due to non-Aryan blood:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-metabolism/
Back to enemy article:
[quote]
HTML https://www.eurocanadians.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/3ff24e4d659e490c66c6cde39e0490ba-1.jpg[/quote]
Yes, humans who look like the stereotypical colonial-era
Westerner in the drawing probably are designed to eat meat. That
is why their bloodlines must be eliminated.
[quote]If she were a herbivorous animal, says Temple Grandin,
“she would ‘rather die in a slaughterhouse’ with a system she
designed to make the operation painless, rather than in the
wild, starving or in awareness of a predator attack: early in
her career, she saw a still living calf in Arizona on a ranch,
partially eaten by coyotes, and concluded that “Nature can be
very rough” [37].[/quote]
If not for humans such as Grandin breeding them for food, the
calf on the Arizona ranch she describes would never have needed
to be born in the first place and thus would have avoided the
coyotes (as well as the slaughterhouse, of course).
[quote]There is no connection between a person’s kindness and
being a vegetarian. The Dalai Lama, for example, who is
certainly not devoid of kindness and compassion is a meat eater
[39].[/quote]
Tenzin Gyatso is one of the most evil people currently alive:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/tenzin-gyatso/
Back to enemy article:
[quote]Livestock has no negative impact on the climate.[/quote]
And Trump won the 2020 election.
[quote]Eating meat doesn’t make you a bloodthirsty monster or a
human suprematist villain.[/quote]
And wanting "white" ethnostates doesn't make you racist.
It gets even funnier in the comments:
[quote][img]
HTML https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e9c9aca598ffdbf06ba633c87f5ab082e55ecba19e98028a22ee2c1f0430875c.png?w=800&h=457[/img][/quote]
Yes, notice the contrast in face shapes.
We also cover Lawson here:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/linguistic-decolonization/msg7238/#msg7238
[quote]
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigella_Lawson
[quote]Taking part in the third series of the BBC
family-history documentary series, Who Do You Think You Are?,
Lawson sought to uncover some of her family's ancestry. She
traced her ancestors to Ashkenazi Jews who originate from
eastern Europe and Germany[/quote][/quote]
I rest my case.
#Post#: 10673--------------------------------------------------
Re: Farming vs Ranching
By: guest55 Date: January 19, 2022, 12:28 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Average Westerners subconscious: "If murder and rape keep me
looking young then what other choice do we have except murder
and rape?"
#Post#: 13609--------------------------------------------------
Re: Farming vs Ranching
By: guest55 Date: May 24, 2022, 1:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Chinese [s]farmer[/s] rancher and his 70,000 chickens become
online celebrities
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWjYLYulALs
Rachel Wilson: an Australian free-range egg [s]farmer[/s]
rancher
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLvNaljgwdE
#Post#: 13996--------------------------------------------------
When Ants Domesticated Fungi
By: guest78 Date: June 11, 2022, 1:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]While we’ve been farming for around 10,000 to 12,000
years, the ancestors of ants have been doing it for around 60
million years. So when, and how, and why did ants start …
farming?[/quote]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XuPtW8lBCM
It's debatable whether or not humans have been farming 10k to
20k years too:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/farming-vs-ranching/
Etc.
#Post#: 14139--------------------------------------------------
Re: Farming vs Ranching
By: Zea_mays Date: June 16, 2022, 10:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Land used for ranching:
[quote]The cattle sector of the Brazilian Amazon, incentivized
by the international beef and leather trades,[1] has been
responsible for about 80% of all deforestation in the
region,[2][3] or about 14% of the world's total annual
deforestation, making it the world's largest single driver of
deforestation.[4] The vast majority of agricultural activity
resulting in deforestation was subsidized by government tax
revenue.[5] By 1995, 70% of formerly forested land in the
Amazon, and 91% of land deforested since 1970 had been converted
to cattle ranching.[6][7][/quote]
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation_of_the_Amazon_rainforest
vs farming:
[quote]Half of the world’s habitable land is used for
agriculture, with most of this used to raise livestock for dairy
and meat. Livestock are fed from two sources – lands on which
the animals graze and land on which feeding crops, such as soy
and cereals, are grown. How much would our agricultural land use
decline if the world adopted a plant-based diet?
Research suggests that if everyone shifted to a plant-based diet
we would reduce global land use for agriculture by 75%. This
large reduction of agricultural land use would be possible
thanks to a reduction in land used for grazing and a smaller
need for land to grow crops.
[...]
The land use of livestock is so large because it takes around
100 times as much land to produce a kilocalorie of beef or lamb
versus plant-based alternatives. This is shown in the chart.1
The same is also true for protein – it takes almost 100 times as
much land to produce a gram of protein from beef or lamb, versus
peas or tofu.
Of course the type of land used to raise cows or sheep is not
the same as cropland for cereals, potatoes or beans. Livestock
can be raised on pasture grasslands, or on steep hills where it
is not possible to grow crops. Two-thirds of pastures are
unsuitable for growing crops.2
[...]
Less than half of the world’s cereals are fed directly to humans
[...]
Less than half – only 48% – of the world’s cereals are eaten by
humans. 41% is used for animal feed, and 11% for biofuels.
[...]
In many countries, the share that is for human consumption is
even smaller. We see this in the map. In most countries across
Europe it’s less than one-third of cereal production is used for
human consumption, and in the US only 10% is.7[/quote]
HTML https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
Be sure to check the article to see the additional maps, which
give plenty of evidence of how inferior Western civilization is.
[img width=1280
height=787]
HTML https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2021/03/Land-use-of-different-diets-Poore-Nemecek.png[/img]
(And think of how much _less_ land farming would use, if the
population was at a sane level.)
Some recommendations in the article are problematic though. As
it currently stands, the number of individual chickens
slaughtered far, far exceeds cows. "Substituting" chickens for
cows would add exponentially more cruelty to the world.
[quote]This is an important insight from this research: cutting
out beef and dairy (by substituting chicken, eggs, fish or
plant-based food) has a much larger impact than eliminating
chicken or fish.[/quote]
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page