URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 3964--------------------------------------------------
       Inbreeding
       By: rp Date: February 4, 2021, 2:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What is your opinion on "inbreeding" (i.e. cousin marriage)?  On
       the one hand, it can be seen as an attempt to preserve Jewish
       nepotism, but on the other hand, it could be seen as a
       last-ditch attempt by Aryans to prevent their blood from further
       corruption. Thoughts?
       #Post#: 3966--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Inbreeding
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 4, 2021, 4:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "it could be seen as a last-ditch attempt by Aryans to prevent
       their blood from further corruption"
       Given that present day Aryan individuals frequently are the only
       one in their entire known family, I don't see how reproducing
       with cousins helps us. Aryan blood is so mixed that for it to
       create just one of us in the same lineage every several
       generations is rare enough, let alone two of us in the same
       generation.
       Hypothetically, if the only other Aryan individual you know
       happens to be your cousin, then of course it is better to
       reproduce (if at all) with your cousin rather than with someone
       inferior. But in such a situation you are not reproducing with
       your cousin because that person is your cousin, but because that
       person is a high quality individual. But (and this is the real
       point) even then do not necessarily expect Aryan offspring! Both
       you and your cousin will be carrying non-Aryan blood which could
       well end up being the predominant blood inherited by your
       hypothetical offspring.
       Nothing but total state control over reproduction (under highly
       competent supervision) is going to sort it out properly, and
       even then it will take many generations.
       #Post#: 3968--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Inbreeding
       By: rp Date: February 4, 2021, 7:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Given that present day Aryan individuals frequently are the
       only one in their entire known family"
       I was referring to situations where one would be more likely to
       find Aryan blood in their extended family, for example if one
       belonged to a vegetarian clan, one could expect to find Aryan
       blood as the descendants would at the very least be adhering to
       a noble lifestyle.
       However, even here the inferior descendants would be able to
       mask their ignobility as it is possible they are merely adopting
       vegetarianism out of social pressure. In this case, it is better
       for such individuals to not reproduce. One of my cousins, for
       example, despite belonging to the same vegetarian clan as
       myself, regularly consumes meat and has even taken up hunting!
       However, it is only because he is unmarried that he pursues
       these activities openly, whereas if he were married, his ignoble
       blood would stealthily be passed on as he could pretend to be
       noble merely for social purposes.
       Hence, with the removal of the social pressure to reproduce in
       order to "save the clan", my ignoble cousin has effectively been
       weeded out from the gene pool.
       "Hypothetically, if the only other Aryan individual you know
       happens to be your cousin, then of course it is better to
       reproduce (if at all) with your cousin rather than with someone
       inferior. "
       Ok, but what about the possibility of genetic defects? Do you
       agree with the Western medical analysis that reproducing with a
       cousin is more likely to cause genetic defects in the offspring?
       #Post#: 3970--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Inbreeding
       By: Ganbaru Date: February 4, 2021, 9:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @rp
       I think the scenario you posted could be viable if there were
       absolutely no other alternatives in a rapidly coarsening
       population, but direct consanguinity should be avoided in case
       the western theories hold any truth (and out of compassion for
       the children who might end up physically deformed like some of
       these "royal inbreeding" pictures, etc.)
       What western science suggests is that inbreeding might lead to
       identical chromosomes, which increase the manifestation of the
       bloodline's most destructive hereditary diseases (possibly
       earlier in the life cycle and in a stronger amplitude). In a
       Darwinian perspective, this scenario is undesirable in the short
       term but it could also purge the unfit genes through "purifying
       selection" and lead to increased lifespan for the surviving
       individuals and generations to come.
       Jews have been inbreeding for a while (I recall that nearly half
       of the Ashkenazi population have had their lineage traced back
       to 4 matrilineal bloodlines) but they (mostly the Ashkenazim)
       seem to live longer than average according to statistics.
       Western science attributes this to mutations which inhibit
       growth hormone secretion and a very active social life
       (especially in orthodox communities), but I suspect that
       inbreeding might also have contributed in lengthening their
       lifespan (Ashkenazi Jews are genetically predisposed to many
       diseases but quite a few of them are beneficial for the tribe,
       as they might increase IQ and contribute to DNA auto-repairing,
       GH deficiency, etc.)
       #Post#: 14519--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reproductive decolonization
       By: rp Date: July 5, 2022, 10:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=291.msg12468#msg12468
       date=1649035919]
       To be fair, Thomas has not reproduced with Lamp. But I agree
       Thomas is clearly a Eurocentrist based on his other behaviour.
       Perhaps his intention was to reproduce with Lamp but he merely
       did not succeed.
       [/quote]
       Wait, so does this mean Aryanists would be approving of
       non-reproductive relationships with non-Aryans?  (**cough
       **cough JAM ***cough (allegedly)).
       #Post#: 14521--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Inbreeding
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 5, 2022, 11:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "does this mean Aryanists would be approving of non-reproductive
       relationships with non-Aryans?"
       If I had a non-reproductive but exclusive relationship with
       someone of reproductive age whom I believe should be prohibited
       from reproducing, I would at least be preventing them from
       reproducing with someone else during this time and could
       hopefully run out the clock on their reproductive potential. So
       purely in theory, I would be assisting the cause by doing so.
       With that said, the impact on demographics would be negligible
       in practice, therefore I would definitely not recommend it as a
       strategy. As a romantic, this would also be something I could
       not bring myself to do personally.
       #Post#: 22623--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Inbreeding
       By: rp Date: October 7, 2023, 10:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Ganbaru link=topic=463.msg3970#msg3970
       date=1612495716]
       @rp
       I think the scenario you posted could be viable if there were
       absolutely no other alternatives in a rapidly coarsening
       population, but direct consanguinity should be avoided in case
       the western theories hold any truth (and out of compassion for
       the children who might end up physically deformed like some of
       these "royal inbreeding" pictures, etc.)
       What western science suggests is that inbreeding might lead to
       identical chromosomes, which increase the manifestation of the
       bloodline's most destructive hereditary diseases (possibly
       earlier in the life cycle and in a stronger amplitude). In a
       Darwinian perspective, this scenario is undesirable in the short
       term but it could also purge the unfit genes through "purifying
       selection" and lead to increased lifespan for the surviving
       individuals and generations to come.
       Jews have been inbreeding for a while (I recall that nearly half
       of the Ashkenazi population have had their lineage traced back
       to 4 matrilineal bloodlines) but they (mostly the Ashkenazim)
       seem to live longer than average according to statistics.
       Western science attributes this to mutations which inhibit
       growth hormone secretion and a very active social life
       (especially in orthodox communities), but I suspect that
       inbreeding might also have contributed in lengthening their
       lifespan (Ashkenazi Jews are genetically predisposed to many
       diseases but quite a few of them are beneficial for the tribe,
       as they might increase IQ and contribute to DNA auto-repairing,
       GH deficiency, etc.)
       [/quote]
       Yeah it seems even pre-modern cultures understood the problems
       of this:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consanguinity#Religious_and_traditional_law
       So, I would not recommend it.
       *****************************************************