DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Mythical World
*****************************************************
#Post#: 28691--------------------------------------------------
Re: Turanian sexism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 16, 2024, 8:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
LOL:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0eqajVIUlE
Internet access would also allow them to look for gravure, but
they aren't doing so. Why not? Answer: because they are racially
inferior.
(Optional homework: guess the ethnicities of the porn stars that
the North Korean soldiers are viewing most.)
#Post#: 30022--------------------------------------------------
Re: Inspired by Muhammad
By: christianbethel Date: April 25, 2025, 12:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://youtu.be/_J5bDhMP9lQ
#Post#: 30379--------------------------------------------------
Re: Turanian sexism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 5, 2025, 4:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Continuing from:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/turanian-sexism/msg13631/#msg13631
For the longest time I did not understand how homophobia fit
into our enemies' evolutionary psychology. But I gradually
observed that our enemies are much more hostile to "gays" than
to "lesbians". Now I think I have finally figured it out: it is
raider mentality.
In non-raiding societies, we would expect a man
straightforwardly pursuing reproductive self-interest to dislike
"lesbians" (who reduce the number of women potentially available
for himself) but like "gays" (who remove the number of male
competitors against himself), while a woman straightforwardly
pursuing reproductive self-interest would like "lesbians" and
dislike "gays" by equivalent reasoning.
For raiders, in contrast, it is overwhelmingly the men of the
tribe who do the raiding, and during raids it is advantageous to
the genetic proliferation of the tribe as a whole for the
raiders to impregnate as many victim women as possible. Thus any
"gays" among the raiders would imply fewer victim women
impregnated and hence a reduction in efficiency of genetic
proliferation of the tribe. In contrast, "lesbians" do not
reduce this efficiency, as "lesbians" among the victim women
would get **** (and hence impregnated) anyway.
As a corollary, this also explains why our enemies are also
against other 'wastages' of ingroup sperm (contraception, ****,
sex with pre-pubescent/post-menopausal females, etc.) Any of
these, if practiced among raiders, would also mean less
impregnation during raids. The raider creed is to maximize the
ingroup sperm entering fertile victim women during raids. It
really is that simple. This also accounts for what I observed
earlier here:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/ancient-world/what-did-the-romans-think-about-race/msg17886/#msg17886
(I am proud that it took me so long to figure out something so
elementary: at least it demonstrates how utterly alien a concept
this is to me, and hence my minimal Turanian blood.)
#Post#: 30382--------------------------------------------------
Re: Turanian sexism
By: WorseThanWeThought Date: June 5, 2025, 11:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I never imagined a day would come were all sexuality would
become repugnant and repulsive to me. That day did come. I hate
it to the fullest!!!
#Post#: 30401--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
By: rp Date: June 8, 2025, 7:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[img width=1024
height=1280]
HTML https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/484690270_1201932744825042_5600474834016351179_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=833d8c&_nc_ohc=j0P0roAGfBAQ7kNvwF0FcC0&_nc_oc=Adl_LTQlOryrIO7c4MLe9RkTR-DQlffPcnLyXk1DfI4QbGJDNFcB20NlVS_zfNrYkAUpvmD88jX35d46MmwsWEuh&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&_nc_gid=cmVbPuMmqOv4KM52FMKNVQ&oh=00_AfOgvA2L9KTxZxieCdSoEGsTrEr777hD60wJdnDmU-NV1w&oe=684B67AB[/img]
For the record, Tomei has not reproduced.
#Post#: 30404--------------------------------------------------
Re: Turanian sexism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 8, 2025, 6:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This is a good example of how barbaric our enemies are, and why
their bloodlines must be actively eliminated.
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg26586/#msg26586
I'm not sure who "all the usual suspects" supposedly refer to,
though. (Non-manosphere people?) In any case, it is also
possible to not be attracted to Tomei from the left. For
example, in the posted picture, her Western shoe choice should
be an instant turn-off:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/dress-decolonization/msg7414/?topicseen#msg7414
#Post#: 30405--------------------------------------------------
Re: Turanian sexism
By: rp Date: June 8, 2025, 6:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I'm not sure who "all the usual suspects" supposedly refer to,
though."
"Soy faced shitlibs" "redditors' etc. Note that this group also
consist of False Leftists.
#Post#: 32154--------------------------------------------------
Re: Turanian sexism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 12, 2026, 12:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Continuing from:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/turanian-sexism/msg255/#msg255
Case study:
HTML https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/feb/11/british-woman-lucy-harrison-unlawfully-killed-by-father-kris-harrison-texas
[quote]A Cheshire woman who was shot dead by her “reckless”
father while visiting him in the US after a row about Donald
Trump was unlawfully killed, a coroner has ruled.
Lucy Harrison, 23, who lived in Warrington and worked as a
fashion buyer for Boohoo, was shot in the chest with a
semi-automatic handgun by Kris Harrison
...
He was never charged by Texas police in relation to her
death[/quote]
Let's think about this in terms of bloodline. Lucy would not
have been passing down Kris' patrilineal bloodline even had she
not died. On the other hand, Trump via MAGA policies (which lead
to elimination of large numbers of "non-white" patrilineal
bloodlines) increases the chance that Kris' patrilineal
bloodline (and those of his tribe) gets passed down in the
long-term by decimating their potential competition. Thus Kris
is making a perfectly rational decision for his own (and his
tribe's) patrilineal bloodline(s) by eliminating a Trump critic
who could, had she lived, contributed to obstruction of MAGA
policies.
[quote]Lucy had asked her father: “How would you feel if I was
the girl in that situation and I’d been sexually assaulted?”
He responded that it would not upset him that much.[/quote]
His response also fits my theory.
#Post#: 32199--------------------------------------------------
Re: Turanian sexism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 18, 2026, 8:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJUYoh1kstU
Raider blood memory:
[quote]3:24
Epstein talked about—and this is in the records in the new
release—how he loved
3:30
the fact that many of the women he brought there from Eastern
Europe spoke no English.
3:35
He said they were his favorites because they didn’t bother him;
they couldn’t speak to him.
...
Epstein laughed about the
5:42
fact that they couldn’t really communicate, saying they were
the easiest girls to get along with.”[/quote]
(Perhaps a milder version of this is "white" Anglosphere men who
are turned on by women speaking English with an "exotic" accent
(they also like to mimic such accents when describing these
women to other men).)
For myself, in contrast, a language barrier is a total turnoff,
and any accent which suggests lack of proficiency in the
language reduces attraction. The only situation in which an
accent increases attraction for me is when the speaker is
already known to be able to speak unaccented but speaks accented
deliberately as a way to express superiority over the
unaccented.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page