DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 32216--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: February 21, 2026, 3:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"What about those who do not want to live under such a state?
They can choose to leave whenever they want, provided their
reproductive potential is surgically removed first. Anyone
concerned about parental tyranny, even those themselves not
intending to reproduce anyway, should agree to this, since they
would be aware that without this others would leave and then
reproduce and then practice parental tyranny."
What about in the future where have an Aryan imperium, when the
entire world is under Aryanist control. I assume euthanasia
would be legal?
#Post#: 32219--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 21, 2026, 4:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Eventually this would lead to a scenario where
capitalists/machinists (mostly "Whites" btw) end up getting away
with parental tyranny while the poor/non-machinists (mostly "non
Whites") do not."
In theory it is surely possible for a machinist to be against
the tyranny of a non-machinist parent and use a machine to get
through the door?
"What about in the future where have an Aryan imperium, when the
entire world is under Aryanist control."
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/re-true-left-breakthrough-anti-whiteness-3248/msg31037/#msg31037
"I assume euthanasia would be legal?"
Yes, except for those in the middle of a task which they have
promised to complete first, whereupon euthanasia would be
desertion.
#Post#: 32221--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: February 21, 2026, 7:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"In theory it is surely possible for a machinist to be against
the tyranny of a non-machinist parent and use a machine to get
through the door?"
Yes. This is what I tried to get at with my post. Did it suggest
otherwise?
#Post#: 32222--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 21, 2026, 8:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I started by assuming you meant non-machinist tyrannical parents
would be stopped by other non-machinists. Nevertheless, you
said:
--- Quote ---
> Eventually this would lead to a scenario where
capitalists/machinists (mostly "Whites" btw) end up getting away
with parental tyranny while the poor/non-machinists (mostly "non
Whites") do not.
--- End Quote ---
The part in bold suggests that a machinist who is also a
tyrannical parent would use a machine to prevent their own door
from being penetrated. But another machinist could penetrate
their door.
So if non-machinist tyrannical parents can be stopped by
machinists and non-machinists, whereas machinist tyrannical
parents can be stopped by machinists, machinist tyrannical
parents can still be stopped provided anti-parental-tyranny
people include some machinists. For the part in bold to be true
would require no machinists to be among anti-parental-tyranny
people. But if so, from where comes the machinist stopping the
non-machinist tyrannical parents (whom you have just clarified
exists)?
Unless you mean a machinist would find parental tyranny by
non-machinist parents intolerable, but parental tyranny by
machinist parents tolerable?
#Post#: 32225--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: February 22, 2026, 9:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unless you mean a machinist would find parental tyranny by
non-machinist parents intolerable, but parental tyranny by
machinist parents tolerable?"
This. Also the fact that machinists would probably classify
consensual activities among non machinists as "tyranny".
#Post#: 32228--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 22, 2026, 5:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"machinists would probably classify consensual activities among
non machinists as "tyranny"."
Please elaborate.
#Post#: 32229--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: February 22, 2026, 11:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Please elaborate"
For example, children sharing rooms is considered to be a
failure of parents' responsibility in Western countries today,
even if children do not object to the set up.
#Post#: 32231--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 23, 2026, 8:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
So you are saying a non-machinist Westerner would find children
sharing rooms unproblematic, but a machinist Westerner would
find it problematic? If so, why?
#Post#: 32374--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: March 18, 2026, 1:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/g1apf4/hierarchies_in_families/
HTML https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/g1apf4/comment/fnefxat/
[Quote]
The word family literally is rooted in the latin word
"famulus", which translates to slave.
The core-family literally is/was a replication of an absolute
states force onto children and women by the dominant male.
A love couple is fine as long as there is no power (physical and
psychiological) is involved. That said, most people will have to
relearn how to live together WITHOUT enforcing power structures.
Edit: spelling
[/Quote]
#Post#: 32375--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: March 18, 2026, 2:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> The core-family literally is/was a replication of an absolute
states force onto children and women by the dominant male.
--- End Quote ---
No, the absolute state is what is required to prevent the
dominant male from exerting force onto children and women (and
women from exerting force onto children also).
--- Quote ---
> most people will have to relearn how to live together WITHOUT
enforcing power structures.
--- End Quote ---
They will not. (If they did learn, they would start by
voluntarily refraining from reproducing.) Which is why the state
is needed.
*****************************************************
Page 19 of 20
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page