DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 26940--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: July 4, 2024, 12:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"a good beating would suffice"
It would not.
"This would also deter the child from initiating further
violence, as they would fear another beating."
This is what we are trying to prevent! If they learn to suppress
their evil tendencies, they could potentially be mistaken for
someone without such tendencies, which will lead to the eventual
failure of Aryanization. We already covered this here:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/childcare-issues/msg26905/#msg26905
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/childcare-issues/msg26906/#msg26906
--- Quote ---
> this will lead to violence-initiating blood having this trait
suppressed via rearing and being mistaken for Aryan blood if we
are not careful.
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 26941--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: July 4, 2024, 1:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I see. Aryanization will prevent more future violence than
temporary suppression.
#Post#: 26942--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: July 4, 2024, 10:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Since identifying as "White" is initiation of violence against
"non Whites", would it be okay for adult "non Whites" to kill
"White" children?
"White" juveniles (most of whom are likely school bullies) are
the worst. "Non White" adults mistakenly attribute this to bad
parenting and say that they should have been beaten as a child.
I can inherently sense the arrogance in "White" juveniles, as I
am familiar with them since my school days.
#Post#: 26945--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: July 4, 2024, 5:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Again, due to confusing False Left messaging, there currently
exist well-meaning individuals with "white" parents who think
self-identifying as "whte" in order to check their privilege is
part of anti-racist allyship. These individuals do not deserve
retaliatory violence unless they intend to reproduce (thereby
exposing the insincerity of their supposed allyship).
Those who self-identify as "white" with a sense of pride in
historical "white" behaviour definitely deserve retaliatory
violence no less than those whom they idolize.
#Post#: 27211--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: DisgustingAttacks
Date: July 28, 2024, 11:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Jordan Peterson + Elon Musk...
Elon Musk's Daughter Debunks His DISGUSTING Attacks Against Her
--- Quote ---
> Vivian Jenna Wilson, Elon Musk's transgender daughter, stated
in her first interview on Thursday that he was an absent father
who was cruel to her during childhood for being queer and
feminine. John Iadarola and Wosny Lambre break it down on The
Damage Report.
> "Vivian Jenna Wilson, the transgender daughter of Elon Musk,
said Thursday in her first interview that he was an absent
father who was cruel to her as a child for being queer and
feminine.
>
> Wilson, 20, in an exclusive interview with NBC News, responded
to comments Musk made Monday about her and her transgender
identity. On social media and in an interview posted online,
Musk said she was “not a girl” and was figuratively “dead,” and
he alleged that he had been “tricked” into authorizing
trans-related medical treatment for her when she was 16.
>
> Wilson said that Musk hadn’t been tricked and that, after
initially having hesitated, he knew what he was doing when he
agreed to her treatment, which required consent from her
parents.
>
> Musk’s recent statements crossed a line, she said.
>
> “I think he was under the assumption that I wasn’t going to
say anything and I would just let this go unchallenged,” Wilson
said in a phone interview. “Which I’m not going to do, because
if you’re going to lie about me, like, blatantly to an audience
of millions, I’m not just gonna let that slide.
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7gX_BiVcSc
Comments:
--- Quote ---
> So he’s a terrible father, not exactly a shocker. Musk is one
of those people who view his (many) children as an extension of
himself, rather than as individuals with their own lives, imo.
His mind is too corrupted by his egocentric view of the world.
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> He doesn't care about his kids once they are born. Does that
sound a lot like the republican party?
--- End Quote ---
Great point by Ladarola: Once rightists get their talking points
they feel they no-longer need to learn and think for themselves.
They have their talking point and that's it for them, they just
stick to that. This is the definition of lazy-brained in my
book. Rightists love the easy way out, regardless of how much
damage it causes to the individual, their community, and society
at large. They hate thinking. Perhaps why so many of them are so
terrible at business as well?
#Post#: 27217--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: July 28, 2024, 5:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Great point by Ladarola:"
No, this is False Leftism.
"Once rightists get their talking points they feel they
no-longer need to learn and think for themselves. They have
their talking point and that's it for them, they just stick to
that. This is the definition of lazy-brained in my book."
This is actually true of most people on both sides. This is why
most leftists (including Iadarola) still hold onto False Left
talking points (e.g. race denialism) which have proven to fail
in argument against rightists who know what they are doing.
The notion that not thinking leads to rightism and thinking
leads to leftism is part of the same False Left progressive
worldview which considers it accurate to compare rightists with
children and leftists with adults (and hence justifies
compulsory schooling of children to train them to not be
"lazy-brained", as if this would ensure rightism never returns,
when in fact it has already returned among precisely those who
went through this system). We who reject the latter comparison
must also reject the former notion.
#Post#: 27774--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: September 8, 2024, 5:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Child rearing is especially common these days among Indian
families, mainly to get children to do well in school. The
excuse given is that "how will the children fend for themselves
in the future" (they wouldn't have to if they weren't born in
the first place).
My mother remarked how her father never cared about what her
grades were in school. He also was very religious, and was very
insistent on things like not killing insects. Coincidence?
#Post#: 27777--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: September 8, 2024, 6:20 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Child rearing is especially common these days"
My impression is that those who were born shortly after WWII had
relatively less violent childhoods, as their parents having
experienced WWII were more likely to be content just with seeing
children getting to live in peaceful conditions, and hence
mostly let the children do what they wanted. These children grew
up to be the generation which gave us the Counterculture. The
qualitative top tier among this generation never reproduced. A
middle tier did reproduce but, understanding that the
Counterculture came precisely from the relaxed way they were
raised, at least tried to raise their offspring the same way.
The lowest tier, however, not only reproduced but decided to do
child rearing to make their offspring competitive. The worst
part is that it worked: the lowest tier offspring easily
outcompeted the middle tier offspring, causing the lowest tier
parents to feel validated and the lowest tier offspring (after
maturing, of course) to feel grateful to their parents and
become determined to do even harder child rearing to their own
offspring, despite diminishing returns in competitive advantage
due to more and more parents using the same strategy. Meanwhile,
the Counterculture was already dying precisely as a consequence
of this behaviour.
Once again, the inferior but hence more competitive dominates
the superior but hence less competitive. The only remedy to this
is state intervention in favour of the most superior but hence
least competitive:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/national-socialism-is-revolutionary-not-reactionary/msg10981/#msg10981
--- Quote ---
> True Leftism still believes in superiority and inferiority;
the difference is that we believe the superior can be (and in
reality are more often than not) defeated by the inferior in
worldly competition (the colonial era being one example). In
other words, True Leftism is divergence of the moral hierarchy
from the natural hierarchy.
>
> Socialism is then the attempt, given awareness of the above,
to set things up in practice so as to help the superior (but
less competitive) defeat the inferior (but more competitive).
National Socialism furthermore believes that any such setup will
not last long, therefore the superior must use its brief
interval in power to destroy the inferior, or else the inferior
- being more competitive - will eventually find a way around the
setup to come back and win.
--- End Quote ---
"The excuse given is that "how will the children fend for
themselves in the future""
In the future, they won't be children any more. This is what I
mean when I say parents sacrifice children to benefit the future
adults who will take over the shells where the children were
killed.
#Post#: 27778--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: September 8, 2024, 6:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"My impression is that those who were born shortly after WWII
had relatively less violent childhoods, as their parents having
experienced WWII were more likely to be content just with seeing
children getting to live in peaceful conditions, and hence
mostly let the children do what they wanted."
How do you define "shortly after"? Gen X? Boomer? Or both? For
example, my parents were both born in mid to late 60s. Both has
relatively less violent childhoods. My father didn't get a
professional job until his mid 20s, as he fell behind in his
education during his teen years, and ended up pursuing a non
technical degree, making him ineligible in the eyes of
prospective employers. My mother wasn't able to get married
until her late 20s because her suitors all asked for educational
qualifications and economic standing, and my grandfather, being
a conservative, wasn't intent on sending girls for further
education/employment (of course, my mother wasn't interested in
those things either,so it worked out fine, as she was glad to be
at home. She also did a lot of volunteer work for the elderly in
her free time).
#Post#: 27779--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
DIR By: rp
Date: September 8, 2024, 7:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
How would you describe the conditions today? I would consider it
nothing short of hellish. I expect those who grew up in the post
2000s climate to be more competitive due to wretched nature of
the world.
*****************************************************
Page 14 of 20
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page