DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 19035--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 26, 2023, 11:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Dunn's face shape doesn't really fit our standards:
[img width=853
height=1280]
HTML https://media.vogue.co.uk/photos/639cd4c985fb4af05936c04d/2:3/w_2560%2Cc_limit/RICHES%2520006.JPG[/img]
Many shots make her face look outright short:
[img width=972
height=1280]
HTML https://hips.hearstapps.com/cosmopolitan-uk/15/09/nrm_1424857566-gettyimages_464331660.jpg[/img]
[img width=1280
height=720]
HTML https://www.maybelline-me.com/~/media/mny/mena%20hub/fit%20me%20makers/1600x900_jourdan.jpg?h=900&w=1600&la=en-GCC&hash=51207139563E2C6D66F5138C037D55D29F3BE39B[/img]
[img]
HTML https://akns-images.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/201991/rs_600x600-191001071626-600-Jourdan-Dunn-LT-100119-shutterstock_editorial_10424686bj.jpg?fit=around%7C660:372&output-quality=90&crop=660:372;center,top[/img]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOWthiHcVZk
I would go as far as to say she better belongs in:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-turanism/
#Post#: 19043--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: April 27, 2023, 5:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I guess it depends on the angle. Although I certainly agree now
that her face is rather short and that she has sharp cheekbones,
she does have a somewhat oval face as well as a high forehead in
the image I posted. I at least find her better than the visibly
robust Giant types (come to think of it, Turanian women seem to
be less robust than Giant women. Why?). Perhaps it is due to
Aryans' evolutionary history of allying with Turanians that
causes me to feel this way?
Coming back to the point, I certainly agree now that Dunn's face
does not measure up to our standards. However, I disagree that
she is much worse than Holt. But if you must choose between the
two, you can boot Dunn until we find a better face, at which
point we can boot Holt.
#Post#: 19045--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 27, 2023, 5:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Turanian women seem to be less robust than Giant women. Why?"
Many Turanian women have compounded matrilineal ancestry from
victims of kidnapping by Turanian raiders over millennia. Overly
robust women would have tended to be more ergonomically
inconvenient to transport by horse all the way back to the
steppe. They would probably instead have been raped and then
left behind.
This is also why Turanian sexual dimorphism is so high: the men
keep becoming more masculine (the best raiders in each
generation reproduce with the largest number of kidnapping
victims) while the women keep becoming more feminine
(accumulating ancestry generation after generation from
kidnapping victims who did not commit suicide).
#Post#: 19046--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: April 27, 2023, 6:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Many Turanian women have compounded matrilineal ancestry from
victims of kidnapping by Turanian raiders over millennia."
But why is it that only the women inherit this skeletal
structure matrilineally, and not men? Also, since the victims
also did not commit suicide, would these victims be
Gentile-Aryan hybrid types, since they were non-Aryan enough to
find their rapists attractive, but nevertheless had Aryan
skeletal structure?
#Post#: 19047--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 27, 2023, 6:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"But why is it that only the women inherit this skeletal
structure matrilineally, and not men?"
Some men probably did inherit it, but then consequently tended
to reproduce less than the other men who did not inherit it. In
order for a trait to become established, not only does it have
to be inherited, but it has to be inherited by those who then
reproduced more than (or at least not less than) average.
"Also, since the victims also did not commit suicide, would
these victims be Gentile-Aryan hybrid types, since they were
non-Aryan enough to find their rapists attractive, but
nevertheless had Aryan skeletal structure?"
Find their rapists attractive is not the only explanation for
not committing suicide. In some cases it could have been merely
choosing to stay alive even if they did not like the lifestyle.
Some perhaps hoped to be ransomed/swapped back home one day.
Some could even have been spies.
#Post#: 19048--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: April 27, 2023, 7:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Some men probably did inherit it, but then consequently tended
to reproduce less than the other men who did not inherit it. In
order for a trait to become established, not only does it have
to be inherited, but it has to be inherited by those who then
reproduced more than (or at least not less than) average."
But by the same token, how did gracility for women become
established? Since the female offspring also have the potential
of patrilineally inheriting their skeletal type, wouldn't there
have been a sizeable proportion of robust women as well? And
wouldn't these women have reproduced as much as the gracile
women, since gracility does not afford any ergonomic advantages
after the women have been transported back to the steppe?
#Post#: 19049--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 27, 2023, 7:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Since the female offspring also have the potential of
patrilineally inheriting their skeletal type, wouldn't there
have been a sizeable proportion of robust women as well?"
This is how we eventually reach the pentagon shape.
"And wouldn't these women have reproduced as much as the gracile
women"
Perhaps not, if the Turanian men involved preferred high sexual
dimorphism and (being robust themselves) perceived less robust
women as more feminine and thus preferable. (I of course am
totally disgusted by this, since I think gracile women should
only be paired with similarly gracile men.)
#Post#: 19050--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: April 27, 2023, 8:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"This is how we eventually reach the pentagon shape."
I see. So what we end up getting is a gracialized Turanian face?
"I of course am totally disgusted by this, since I think gracile
women should only be paired with similarly gracile men"
So what we have is Aryans being cuckolded by Tuanian "Chads"...
Perhaps some Aryans today sense this and end up turning to
inceldom because of this?
#Post#: 19051--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Turanism
By: rp Date: April 27, 2023, 8:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ana de Armas, Cuban-Spanish actress:
[img width=960
height=1280]
HTML https://flxt.tmsimg.com/assets/587180_v9_bb.jpg[/img]
#Post#: 19052--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 27, 2023, 9:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"So what we have is Aryans being cuckolded by Tuanian "Chads"...
Perhaps some Aryans today sense this and end up turning to
inceldom because of this?"
I disagree with your description. Incels constantly wish they
looked like Chads and are frustrated that they do not, whereas I
have never for an instant wished to look like anyone robust.
When a robust man expresses preference for gracile women, the
first thought in my mind is: "Please look in the mirror and
figure out you do not deserve anyone so much more highly evolved
than yourself, you subhuman!" This is the opposite of
incel-style thinking.
If anything, incels should be compared to the steppe losers:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-aryanism/msg19047/#msg19047
[quote]Some men probably did inherit it, but then consequently
tended to reproduce less than the other men who did not inherit
it. [/quote]
who wished they were the steppe winners but were not.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page