DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Issues
*****************************************************
#Post#: 199--------------------------------------------------
Psychological decolonization
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 9, 2020, 3:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT
Really, all other aspects of decolonization would follow
spontaneously if we thoroughly decolonized (ie. eliminate
Eurocentrism from) how people perceive the world. But this is
the hardest one. I have even encountered people who on the
conscious level sincerely want to stop being Eurocentric, but
are unable to do so on the subconscious level.
In any society, there will be more self-confident people and
less self-confident people as a matter of statistical
distribution. This on its own would be, and has been throughout
history, tolerable. The problem from the colonial era onwards is
that, due to Eurocentrism, the lack of self-confidence goes all
one-way, whether the parameter be pigmentation, sexual
dimorphism, height or any other. For example, where are the
insecure light-skinned people who try to darken their skin? They
virtually don't exist. (Guess why not.)
And parents (as always) make things even worse:
[quote]colourism often starts from birth, where parents favour
the children with lighter skin.[/quote]
Old but important (and depressing to watch), the famous Doll
Tests:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkpUyB2xgTM
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRZPw-9sJtQ
---
That is freaking heartbreaking.
---
At least people are pointing it out:
www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7086059/Miss-India-pageant-co
mes-fire-lack-diversity.html
[quote]'This is so white!' Miss India pageant comes under fire
for having 'no dark skin' beauty queens among the 'identically'
pale finalists
...
The organisation came under fire after a newspaper published
headshots of all 30 women competing to take home the crown.
Twitter user LeBrown James shared a photo of the collage,
asking: 'What's wrong with this picture?'
The question sparked dozens of responses from social media users
who pointed out that all the women have 'fair skin', with one
saying simply: 'This is so white!'[/quote]
---
For sure. I think it is primarily because I have somewhat
internalized the Eurocentric notion that self confidence is
"arrogance" when exuded from a "non-white" person.
Some non-Westerners I have encountered also struggle with this,
as they find it difficult to rebut the argument (from rightists)
that colonialism is just a "part of history", and should
therefore be accepted.
---
www.buzzfeednews.com/article/susiearmitage/how-mexican-magazines
-reflect-racial-discrminiation
[quote]Mexican Magazines Are Way Whiter Than The Actual Mexican
Population
...
Dark-skinned individuals make up — at maximum — 20 percent of
the people shown in these 15 magazines.
...
Quién, a society magazine, was the whitest in our analysis: only
2 percent of the people in its pages were brown or black.
...
None of the people on the covers of the magazines we looked at
have dark skin.
...
When dark-skinned Mexicans do appear on magazine pages, they
tend to be in stories about philanthropy, charity events or
travel.
In Esquire, the only two dark-skinned Mexicans in the issue
appeared in content about an entrepreneurship program.
In Vanity Fair México, we found only one indigenous child in
content about an educational charity, and three other
dark-skinned Mexican people at an event with the president and
first lady of Mexico.
In Quién, Indigenous activist Eufrosina Cruz is one of the few
dark-skinned people in the magazine and appears dressed in
traditional Zapotec clothing.
In Vanidades, the only dark-skinned people in the issue are
three Indigenous people in a story on the celebration of Day of
the Dead in Spain.
In Marie Claire México, the majority of the dark-skinned people
appear in a photo feature about Havana, Cuba.
The rest of the brown and black people appearing in the
magazines are non-Mexican celebrities or political figures, like
Beyoncé and Barack Obama.[/quote]
[img]
HTML https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2016-12/9/12/asset/buzzfeed-prod-web09/sub-buzz-22465-1481304984-1.jpg?downsize=800:*&output-format=auto&output-quality=auto[/img]
The article tries to blame the magazine editors, but I would say
that editors are just pragmatically doing whatever helps to sell
their magazines. Supply follows demand. The real problem lies
with the consumers, who are still traumatically mindfucked from
the colonial era. Change how the consumers view the world, and
the magazine photos will change by themselves as a consequence
of market forces.
---
Same results as the Doll Tests:
www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/05/24/726129132/how-disne
y-princesses-influence-girls-around-the-world
[quote]Uppal has been studying the effects of Disney princesses
on girls internationally since 2009. In a world where Disney's
TV channels are broadcast in 133 countries, and its films and
merchandise pervade even more, she wanted to see how girls of
different nationalities perceived the idea of a princess.
Between 2009 and 2018, she asked nearly 140 girls to draw a
princess. They were ages 8 to 15 and lived in five countries —
the U.S., China, Fiji, India and Sweden. She then conducted
private, 10-to-15-minute interviews with each girl, with
questions like, "Who is a princess?" and "What age did you start
watching Disney princess films?" and "Do you think you could be
a princess?" Most girls said they had been watching Disney films
since before they could remember.
Her latest study, published in March in the journal Social
Sciences, analyzed 63 princess drawings from girls in Fiji,
India and Sweden. In this sample, nearly every drawing — 61 out
of 63 — depicted a light-skinned princess, many of those
resembling Disney characters. Fijian girls drew multiple Ariels;
Indian girls drew Belles and Sleeping Beauties. Not one girl
drew a princess in her country's traditional garb.
"We didn't say, 'Draw a Disney princess.' We said, 'Draw a
princess,' " Uppal says. "In India, they didn't draw a single
girl in a sari, or in Fiji a sulu chamba [traditional Fijian
garb]."
Additionally, some girls from non-Western nations — India, Fiji
and China — said in their interviews with Uppal that they could
not be a princess because their skin was too dark and they were
not beautiful enough.
...
Since the introduction of Jasmine in 1992, four young women of
color have been added to the company's official princess lineup:
Pocahontas, Moana, Tiana and Mulan.
"The newer princesses of color have definitely expanded the
vision of what constitutes a princess," Hains says.
But Uppal says her report would indicate that this new wave of
diverse princesses "has not replaced images of popular white
princesses in Disney that have a much older and global
presence." Most girls surveyed preferred the "classic," white
princesses to Mulan and Jasmine.
...
Of course, Disney is not solely responsible for white and
Western notions of beauty: Both Fiji and India were colonized
for many decades, ingraining the concept of whiteness-as-beauty
before Disney products ever reached their shores. But Uppal's
findings show that Disney may bolster these notions, Hains says.
"It's another data point that reinforces these stereotypes and
harmful beliefs about who's good enough and who can be
considered beautiful."[/quote]
One reason why the girls prefer the "classic" princesses is
because Disney itself added the "diverse" princesses purely for
the sake of "diversity", not because it genuinely felt inspired
by them. And the girls can sense this:
[quote]Asked by Uppal about the origins of princesses like
Jasmine and Mulan, a number of girls in India and Fiji
maintained these princesses were "American," not from the Middle
East or China as the movies portray.[/quote]
They can tell the difference between authentic characters and PC
quota characters, and will understandably feel uncomfortable
with the latter. The very need for Disney to quota-insert
precisely one princess of each "non-white" ethnicity, amidst a
conspicuous supermajority of "white" princesses, sends an
obvious signal that the "non-white" princesses have nothing to
offer beyond ethnic tokenism, whereas the "white" princesses are
the ones that - PC aside - Disney actually wants to feature. The
girls interviewed are merely picking up on this patronization.
What Disney - an American company - should have is 0% of its
princesses from Old World fairytales, and 100% of its princesses
from New World fairytales. We do not care about "diversity". We
care about rejecting Eurocentrism.
---
Found this account on Instagram, that exposes modern-day
psychological and social colonisation that are still committed
these days by Westerners, particularly in my motherland
Indonesia :
instagram.com/bulerasis?igshid=ph9yflvprbla
---
Here is an example of the kind of behaviour that "whites" can
get away with in a psychologically colonized country:
nypost.com/video/shocking-video-shows-daycare-worker-smacking-ki
ds/
[quote]A teacher at an English-language daycare in Kitakyushu,
Japan, was filmed allegedly hitting, grabbing, throwing and
abusing small children. A co-worker secretly filmed the Canadian
teacher appearing to mistreat the students on several occasions.
The teacher was suspended for misconduct, but no charges have
been filed yet.[/quote]
Also, WTF does "filmed allegedly hitting..." mean? It's already
on film FFS!
---
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEeGLzGgRm4
The irony at the end when they talk about how they have now
learned to be proud of how they look, even though most of them
have dyed hair.....
And let's be honest: by absolute standards, they are ugly. What
makes them psychologically colonized is that they think it's
their "non-whiteness" making them ugly, when in reality it is
their bad genes. The solution is not to tell them they are
beautiful (as many False Left commenters attempt to) because
that is just untrue. The True Left solution is to teach them to
start noticing the obvious: that most "whites" are just as ugly
(if not more so).
The following is what goes on inside Eurocentric minds. When you
tell them to imagine a generic "white" person, they
automatically imagine an aesthetically idealized "white" person.
Whereas when you tell them to imagine a generic [insert
"non-white" ethnicity here] person, they automatically imagine
an aesthetically mediocre [insert "non-white" ethnicity here]
person. In other words, they let an idealized stereotype
represent their image of "whites" in general, and mediocre
stereotypes represent their image of "non-whites" in general.
Once this double-standard is in place, then when they see
average/below-average "white" people in real-life, they perceive
merely flawed versions of the idealized "white" stereotype
(therefore still fundamentally beautiful in their minds).
Whereas when they see above-average "non-white" people in
real-life, they perceive either merely upgrades of the mediocre
[insert "non-white" ethnicity here] stereotype (therefore still
fundamentally ugly in their minds), or - worse - partial
resemblance to the idealized "white" stereotype (therefore
beautiful in their minds, but only because they "look
white"(!!!), instead of realizing that the beauty comes from
resemblance to the ideal, not resemblance to the "whiteness",
and it is Eurocentrism which spuriously superposed the
"whiteness" over the ideal inside their own minds).
They often are not consciously aware of this. What we are here
to do is help people first become conscious of this, and then
get rid of this conditioned perception.
---
This is how bad the Eurocentrism is:
www.rt.com/news/467369-unidentified-leader-reporter-tweet-uproar
/
[quote]The AP’s six-year veteran White House reporter Darlene
Superville has triggered a backlash in Africa and drawn the ire
of many on Twitter after referring to South Africa President
Cyril Ramaphosa as an “unidentified leader.”
...
“Compounding the blooper, she's a black woman who recognizes
white men from their backs, not black men's faces…”
...
Superville then tweeted the same pictures again some 18 hours
after the tweetstorm began, without apology, leaving countless
irate South Africans fuming.[/quote]
Does the reverse ever happen? Why not? (We all know why
not.....)
---
www.reddit.com/r/JustBeWhite/comments/d4jzey/the_privilege_of_be
ing_blonde_in_mexico/
[quote]In Mexico there are many begger children, kids who beg on
the streets for money. Everyone is aware of them, and no one
does anything, they just pass by them on their car. One day a
blonde haired girl was photographed on the streets begging for
change, a guy took a photo of her, and the Mexican media went
into a frenzy trying to "rescue" her. After everything was
settled she was given donations.[/quote]
I'm not saying this particular girl should not have received
charity, of course. But should not all the other beggar children
also receive charity from those willing to help this girl? What
the fuck is going on inside people's heads? (Answer:
Eurocentrism.)
This reminds me of an older story:
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2476772/DNA-test-confirms-Bulga
rian-woman-IS-natural-mother-blonde-haired-Maria.html
Again, a "white"-looking child in poverty was caught on camera
and the media instantly freaked out. As if "non-white" children
in poverty is no big deal, but a "white" child in poverty is an
emergency that requires instant investigation (including DNA
testing!).
---
www.yahoo.com/news/why-black-puerto-ricans-choose-130945476.html
[quote]More than three-quarters of Puerto Ricans identified as
white on the last census, even though much of the population on
the island has roots in Africa. That number is down from 80% 20
years ago, but activists and demographers say it is still
inaccurate and they are working to get more Puerto Ricans of
African descent to identify as black on the next census in an
effort to draw attention to the island’s racial disparities.
All residents of Puerto Rico can select “Yes, Puerto Rican” on
the census to indicate their Hispanic origin. But when it comes
to race, residents must choose among “white,” “black,” “American
Indian,” multiple options for Asian heritage, or they can write
something in. Most Puerto Ricans choose “white.”
...
Bárbara I. Abadía-Rexach, a sociology professor at the
University of Puerto Rico and a member of Colectivo Ilé, was
shocked when she learned how many Puerto Ricans identified as
white on the last census.
...
“There are people that don’t want to use the word black because
they think it’s an insult, and there is still that idea that we
need to ‘better the race,’” Abadía-Rexach said, referring to
mejorar la raza, a popular saying in Latin American countries
that suggests light skin is more desirable than dark
skin.[/quote]
And the punchline:
[quote]Centuries ago, a policy known as gracias al sacar allowed
black Puerto Ricans with mixed racial heritage to petition Spain
to be reclassified as white for a fee.[/quote]
---
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKvleI4Uj10
Does this work the other way round? No. Why not? Eurocentrism.
"Whites" in formerly colonized countries get all kinds of
special favours for being fluent in the local language (on top
of the favours they already get just for being "white"), whereas
"non-whites" in former colonial powers are expected to be fluent
in the local language just to be barely tolerated.
The underlying message is that the colonized feels flattered
that the colonizer deigned to learn the local language, which is
a self-declaration of subservience, which is why it only happens
one way round. This subservient mentality is what we are here to
end.
---
incels.co/threads/chinese-ai-rates-a-white-woman-93-100-placing-
her-above-all-asian-women.171652/
The woman:
incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2F
dam%2Fassets%2F170817010758-elle-reeve-vice-news-thumb.jpg&hash=
2befe9a18b1865822c40236b71f9ee05
Anyone still disbelieve how bad the Eurocentrism is?
#Post#: 200--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 9, 2020, 4:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT contd.
Beardneck foreigner (likely sexpat) shoves "asian" youtuber in
Korea in a failed attempt to impress girls:
www.reddit.com/r/hapas/comments/6gn77c/beardneck_foreigner_in_ko
rea_shoves_hapa_terrytv/
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT21ISjZ9QA
Why do the local police tolerate such behavior?
I recall another video (although I can't seem to find it now)
where there was a similar foreigner in Japan who was playing his
music loudly in a bar, and when the police arrived and told him
to stop he proceeded to tell off the police. The police just
stood idly by and did nothing.
---
"Why do the local police tolerate such behavior?"
They are psychologically colonized, therefore still behave as if
all "whites" are colonialists who are above the law.
---
Here is an old enemy article that elucidates what is going on
inside the colonized mind of the author (David Yeagley,
"non-white" Eurocentrist):
vdare.com/articles/what-s-up-with-white-women-and-white-men
[quote]This article came about as the result of a simple
exchange between myself and a white female student, back when I
was teaching at Oklahoma State University (Oklahoma City
campus).
...
"Look at your culture," she said to me. "Look at American Indian
tradition. Now I think that's really great. You have something
to be proud of. My culture is nothing."
...
Her words disturbed and offended me in a way that I could not
quite enunciate.
I could hardly concentrate the rest of the day. I lay awake that
night thinking about what she had said.
...
On the one hand, I was proud to say that it took the greatest
culture in the world to defeat the Indians. But, on the other
hand, if this young heiress of America considered her own
culture to be “nothing”, then what did that say of mine[/quote]
In other words, all possibility that his own culture is superior
to the colonizers' culture has already been eliminated inside
Yeagley's mind. Therefore the only way he can cope is to imagine
his colonizers' culture to be so great that even inferiority to
it is not shameful. Thus, when someone looks down on the
colonizers, even though that same person admires his culture,
his mind is incapable of processing this information to reach
the correct conclusion (that the colonizers are the inferior
ones). Instead, he is compelled to defend the narrative of the
colonizers' superiority in order to preserve his own slavish
"pride".
[quote]I believe in my Comanche people. I know that someday
we'll stand as equals before the white man, strong, prosperous
and self-sufficient. But we won't get there by listening to
empty praise from guilty white women. We'll get there by
studying the white man's ways and learning to be strong as he
is."[/quote]
The absolute best he is capable of envisioning is being equal to
"whites". Have you ever seen a more pathetic creature than
Yeagley? (And worse, you can tell that he thinks what he wrote
sounds cool.)
---
Sad! You have proven to me things are much, much worse, than I
had ever imagined. Holy cow! Yeagley has clearly never taken the
time to imagine what a world without western colonialism may
have looked like, or a better world for that matter. That is
also sad, especially for a teacher. To fall in love with a
barbarian, talk about Stockholm syndrome! What do you think the
things Yeagley would list as to why western culture is superior
to American Indian culture if he were asked?
---
At least more people want to turn things around now!
HTML https://www.instagram.com/p/CA0jSaRhQ1O/?utm_source=ig_embed
---
"I have seen a lot of these “I used to be Eurocentric” type
tweets. What do you make of them? Is it a case of the subject
actually gaining self esteem, or are they merely attempting to
convince themselves of this?"
In this particular case there is no clear indication from her
words that she is no longer Eurocentric. She could have merely
personally given up trying to look "whiter", but this does not
imply that her tastes have changed (in the same way that many
incels who have personally given up lifting weights still
believe that a heavily muscular physique is superior). The way I
interpret her words, it appears she claims to have been bullied
for her skin colour and hence at one stage tried to lighten her
skin colour, though that has ended. This is a sign of low
self-esteem to begin with. (Whereas if she had said something
like: "Being bullied for my skin color made me give up trying to
lighten it as I was doing before the bullying started", I would
be more optimistic.) Furthermore, if she truly regrets trying to
lighten her skin previously (as she would if she were ashamed of
her former Eurocentrism), why isn't she now tanning with the
other girls in order to cancel out her previous efforts?
---
1010wins.radio.com/articles/johnson-johnson-to-stop-selling-skin
-whitening-creams
[quote]According to a spokeswoman, it will stop selling Clean &
Clear Fairness line of products sold in India, and earlier in
the month, it was reported it would also pull its Neutrogena
Fine Fairness line, available in Asia and the Middle East.
"Conversations over the past few weeks highlighted that some
product names or claims on our dark spot reducer products
represent fairness or white as better than your own unique skin
tone," Johnson & Johnson said. "This was never our intention –
healthy skin is beautiful skin."[/quote]
As I always say, withdrawing supply only leads to the vaccuum
being filled by someone else willing to provide supply. Removing
demand is the only true solution.
---
HTML https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/fashion-beauty/article/3090015/asia-reacts-skin-whitening-creams-withdrawal-pure-racism
[quote]Johnson & Johnson has decided to stop selling
skin-whitening creams popular in Asia and the Middle East, after
such products have come under renewed social pressure in recent
weeks amid a global debate about racial inequality. The company
will stop selling its Clean & Clear fairness line of products,
sold in India, a spokeswoman told Reuters. It was reported
earlier this month that it would drop its Neutrogena Fine
Fairness line, available in Asia and the Middle East. Reactions
to Johnson & Johnson’s decision on social media ranged from the
incredulous to the supportive. “Pure racism and sexism towards
Asian women. Our rights as [an] ethnic minority are being
infringed [upon],” wrote a commenter based in Hong Kong. “Her
body her choice,” wrote a social media user on Twitter, while
another said: “A disgrace. If people want to buy them, they have
a right to do it.”[/quote]
---
So businesses cannot decide what products to sell?! This is how
Eurocentrism fucks up people's thinking.
---
"This really isn't specific to the thread's main idea, but
whenever I'm near those who appear to be "Asian" (East Asian,
from my guesses), I can feel how terrified they are of me. It
could just be my paranoia, but especially in supermarkets. In
the area I live in, they aren't common civilians, but I just
remember strictly an incident where I was at a supermarket in
the aisle, and this Asian woman looked very wary and kept her
child super close to her when she was near me. I also remember
visiting a considerably wealthy area near the coast that had a
beach. We went on to beach and I could literally sense that we
were being stared at or watched, like we weren't supposed to be
there. Surprisingly, I never really endure much ethnic profiling
from whites because the part of the state I live in has a high
density of minorities, which warrants more tension between these
groups. Actually, I experience more racism from other minorities
(online) than white people. It's super strange."
Firstly, please use "" around "Asian". "Asia" only exists in
Western minds.
Secondly, her behaviour is almost certainly an example of
Eurocentrism at work, which is what we are here to end. You
should ask her whether it was your co-ethnics who colonized her
co-ethnics in the past. And yet the actual colonizing
ethnicities are probably the ones she ironically has no wariness
towards at all. That is what is so fucked up about this whole
situation.
#Post#: 201--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 9, 2020, 4:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Earlier we had already seen signs of Uncle Tom behaviour from
Christian Cooper:
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/christian-cooper-amy-cooper-cnn-200302542.html
[quote]Christian Cooper told CNN’s Don Lemon on Tuesday that he
didn’t want to make a situation worse and said as offensive as
the woman’s actions, people should remain civil.
“I am told there has been death threats and that is wholly
inappropriate and abhorrent and should stop immediately,” he
said. “I find it strange that people who were upset that ...
that she tried to bring death by cop down on my head, would then
turn around and try to put death threats on her head. Where is
the logic in that?[/quote]
(The logic is simple: retribution. You "find it strange" only
because you are psychologically colonized. It is because of
people like you that racists get away with as much as they do.
By defending your own tormentor, you not only betray yourself,
but become culpable for all her subsequent victims. Thus you are
part of the problem. If you do not shape up soon, any true
anti-racist will be only too happy to shoot through you to hit
the one you are protecting.)
Well, he's still doing it! And this time he's against not just
vigilante justice, but also state justice!
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/case-against-amy-cooper-lacks-120946692.html
[quote]The Manhattan district attorney’s decision to charge a
white woman with filing a false police report against a Black
man in Central Park does not have the support of one key person:
the victim himself.
The man, Christian Cooper, has not cooperated with the
prosecution’s investigation. The woman, Amy Cooper, lost her job
and was publicly shamed after a video Christian Cooper made on
May 25 was posted online; it showed her calling 911 to claim an
“African American man” was threatening her. Those consequences
alone, Christian Cooper said at the time, were in his view
perhaps too much punishment.
“On the one hand, she’s already paid a steep price,” Christian
Cooper said in a statement on Tuesday. “That’s not enough of a
deterrent to others? Bringing her more misery just seems like
piling on.” But he added that he understood there was a greater
principle at stake and that this should be defended. “So if the
DA feels the need to pursue charges, he should pursue charges.
But he can do that without me.”[/quote]
This is how you recognize total psychological colonization. This
is identical to the above-noted behaviour of "non-white" police
officers in formerly colonized countries letting "white" (and
only "white") tourists/foreign workers/etc. break the law with
impunity.
And Cooper isn't the only Uncle Tom around either:
[quote]City Councilman Donovan J. Richards, D-Queens, who chairs
the public safety committee, said that he was not overjoyed to
hear that charges had been brought against Amy Cooper. For him,
the matter was complicated.
“I don’t think any of us are celebrating the fact that she was
arrested,” said Richards, who is Black. “I’m hoping at the end
of the day she learned her lesson and that this is a teachable
moment for folks — that they can’t just call 911 and put
people’s lives in danger just because their privilege is being
checked.”[/quote]
For Eurocentrists like Cooper and Richards, their motivation for
anti-racism is itself Eurocentric: they want these "whites" to
one day learn to stop seeing "non-whites" as inferior, whereupon
they themselves can then at last enjoy the validation as equals
coming from these same "whites", which they have longed for.
This validation, and nothing else, is what really matters to
them. This is why they are so obsessed with teaching "white"
racists to not be racist (which is impossible, by the way),
instead of simply wanting to exterminate racists as we do. Being
told by other "non-whites" that "non-whites" are not inferior is
not satisfying to them. It has to be "whites" unanimously
telling them that "non-whites" are not inferior in order for
them to feel non-inferior, so low is their self-esteem.
Which in itself proves their inferiority (not necessarily
compared to "whites", but compared to non-Eurocentrists).
#Post#: 438--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: rp Date: July 22, 2020, 11:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
More Eurocentric denial from an account I mentioned previously
on Pro-Boards
HTML https://twitter.com/yuktaxkulkarni/status/1285767897676222465?s=20
[quote]
yukta
HTML https://twitter.com/yuktaxkulkarni?s=20
@yuktaxkulkarni 13h
HTML https://twitter.com/yuktaxkulkarni/status/1285767897676222465?s=20
my children will not grow up hating themselves or who they are
like i did.[/quote]
Yeah, sure fam. Your children will magically be immune from the
Eurocentrism they inherit from you. Fuck you.
#Post#: 446--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 23, 2020, 12:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Another aspect of Eurocentrism is that multiethnic Eurocentrists
always try to emphasize their "white" side and downplay their
"non-white" side:
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/hispanic-activist-upset-monuments-removal-143802170.html
[quote]RIO RANCHO, N.M. — A New Mexico Hispanic leader upset
about the removal of Spanish conquistador monuments is pushing
for New Mexico to end its support for Chicano and Native
American Studies.
In a letter to University of New Mexico President Garnett
Stokes, New Mexico League of United Latin American Citizens
executive director Ralph Arellanes wrote that the state’s
largest university should dismantle both programs because they
teach Latino students “self-hate” about their Spanish
heritage.[/quote]
Should children conceived from rape not hate their rapist
parent's bloodline?
[quote]The demand comes as Albuquerque and the small community
of Alcalde removed statues of Spanish conquistadors following
racial injustice protests. Some Native Americans in New Mexico
have long objected to the public glorification of Spanish
conquistadors like Don Juan de Oñate, who they blamed for
violence and enslavement of some Indigenous populations during
the region’s Spanish colonial period.
But some Hispanic activists, like Arellanes, who trace their
family linage to early Spanish settlers, regularly celebrate
Oñate and other similar figures.[/quote]
We should treat Arellanes the same way we would treat the
conquistadors themselves.
#Post#: 447--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: rp Date: July 23, 2020, 12:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
“Emphasize their ‘white’ side”
Yes. And when non-Eurocentric POC (I.e. “blacks”) justifiably
accuse them of being Eurocentric, these POC in turn accuse them
of “dividing the movement”. It is no coincidence that these
types are also reproductive Eurocentrists.
This is why I am sympathetic to, for example, “blacks” who
criticize “mixed” race POC for being Eurocentric, as well as
other POC (such as “Asians” and “Latinos) who try to “act
white”, which is what their criticism is primarily directed at,
rather than those ethnicities themselves. Remember the Ice Cube
song “Black Korea” you were talking about earlier? The same
dynamic applies here. It will also help weed out the
reproductive Eurocentrists who will inevitably show their true
colors.
#Post#: 448--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: rp Date: July 23, 2020, 12:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
“Should children conceived from rape not hate their rapist
parent's bloodline?”
Those that do not should not reproduce. It is worth noting that
Jewish owned “black” online magazines like “The Root” have
published slave/master “fantasy fiction” that actively
encourages female “blacks” to sexually eroticize slave masters.
Yet these same publications shame “black” men as being
“misogynistic” for wanting relationships with other “black”
women. I intend to elaborate on this in the “reproductive
decolonization thread” once you have posted the old content.
#Post#: 451--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 23, 2020, 5:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"these POC in turn accuse them of “dividing the movement”."
In the case of "Latin" Eurocentrists, some think of "the
movement" in the US as merely being about replacing the "white"
Anglo elite (including Anglo Jews) with a similarly "white"
Hispanic elite (including Hispanic Jews).....
"It is no coincidence that these types are also reproductive
Eurocentrists."
Exactly. Except here they don't even care about Anglo vs
Hispanic anymore..... If anything they might even prefer Anglo,
because Hispanic (regardless of how blond) is assumed to carry a
fraction of New World blood (which is what they want to get rid
of whether or not they admit it).....
"“mixed” race POC"
Do you mean multiethnic, or are you really talking about mixed
Aryan/non-Aryan POC?
(I actually have a racial theory of Eurocentrism (in addition to
colonialism causing Eurocentrism). I currently suspect that,
among prehistoric Gentiles, Giants would have been considered
superior (e.g. on account of physical size, sexual dimorphism,
etc.). On the other hand, among prehistoric Aryans, there would
have been no particular reason to consider Aesir etc. superior,
since their Golden Age was not better than the Golden Age
elsewhere. So when present-day "non-whites" worship "whites", it
would be a function of their Gentile blood memory. Based on my
anecdotal observations of individuals, Eurocentrism does seem
less frequent (or weaker in manifestation) among "non-whites"
with noticeable Aryan traits, though as always there are
exceptions.)
#Post#: 455--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: rp Date: July 23, 2020, 9:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Do you mean multiethnic, or are you really talking about mixed
Aryan/non-Aryan POC?"
I meant multiethnic, hence why I put "mixed" in quotes.
Specifically those with one "white" and "non-white" parent who
try to downplay their "non-white" ancestry.
"So when present-day "non-whites" worship "whites", it would be
a function of their Gentile blood memory."
Yes. This is why some women were sexually attracted to the
conquistadors, because they saw them as "worthy conquerors"
(LOL). In Gentile culture, "worthy conquest" seems to be
synonymous with rape, pillage, and plunder.
#Post#: 493--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: rp Date: July 25, 2020, 11:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Also, regarding the term POC, I have no issue with the term
itself, but I can understand why some "black" nationalists might
have an issue with it. This is because Jews have introduced many
categories within "POC" such as latino, asian, etc. that
effectively creates a hierarchy within this category in which
"white" adjacent groups, such as "white" latinos, "model
minority" asians, and "mixed" ethnicity "blacks" are given
precedence over "blacks", who are placed at the bottom of the
hierarchy. They do this because they recognize the former group
is more easily manipulable toward Zionist interests than the
latter group, as they will do anything to gain brownie points
from "whites".
What do you think? Should the POC term be discarded in favor of
something like "non-whites", or should we simply take aim at the
extra categories and attempt to get rid of them? I recommend
both approaches.
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page