DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 4498--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism's hostility towards Russia and Eastern European
people
DIR By: guest30
Date: February 27, 2021, 9:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"This is already changing. As Counterculture-influenced people
see that Jews are oppressors, not victims, they stop supporting
Jews and Israel. The fastest way we could screw things up now is
by listening to you.
The countries which really support Israel are those which were
not influenced by the Counterculture:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/hungary-v4/"
In current reality, the Western countries actually strongly
support and give much aid to Israel, for example United States,
country which ever influenced by the 1960's counterculture
Source :
HTML https://southfront.org/israeli-lover-is-ousted-long-live-the-israeli-lover-tel-aviv-to-receive-9bn-in-arms-from-biden-administration/
ISRAELI LOVER IS OUSTED – LONG LIVE THE ISRAELI LOVER: TEL AVIV
TO RECEIVE $9BN IN ARMS FROM BIDEN ADMINISTRATION
By the way, Biden is presidential candidate from left wing
party Democrat which mostly attracts voters who support leftist
ideology that contain counterculture idea
The US-Israeli ‘partnership’ never changes.
The Biden administration, which is formally less supportive
towards Tel Aviv than the previous one, is going to provide
Israel with $9bn in weapons.
On January 8, the Israeli ministerial committee a $9bn arms deal
with the United States under which Tel Aviv will receive F-35
and F-16 fighters, new troop-carrying helicopters, thousands of
bombs and munitions as well as four Boeing KC-46 aerial
refueling tankers.
The Israeli approval of the deal was delayed for a notable tame
as there is a minor problem. While the funding for all these
weapons will come from the $3.8 billion of military aid that the
United States gives to Israel each year, the payment will have
to come up front. Thus, at least formally, Tel Aviv will have to
spend some money of this efforts. This situation is for sure
unacceptable for the ‘only democracy in the Middle East’.
Nonetheless, it seems that the contradictions have been solved
and Israeli media reported that US banks will provide major
loans to Israel if it’s need some to use US-donated money to
obtain US weapons.
In fact, Western European countries is give more support to
Israel than the Eastern European country, United States is
considered as Western European because its build from the zero
in the past to advanced in current time mostly by the the
Western European immigrants particularly from British, German,
France, and Spanish
So, if we want to seek a country that give less support to
Israel, or even country which against Israel is not to the West,
but to the East
#Post#: 4512--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism's hostility towards Russia and Eastern European
people
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 27, 2021, 9:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
You don't think I know where Israel has been getting most of its
free money from? But what we want is willingness to militarily
invade Israel. Logically, a country which Israel has swindled
heavily is much more likely to resent Israel enough to be
willing to invade it than a country which Israel has not
swindled so heavily. Thus our strategy to get the US to admit it
has been horribly swindled by Israel for many decades, and hence
seek revenge, at least makes psychopolitical sense.
In contrast, Israel-Russia relations are mutually beneficial:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Russia_relations
Therefore I cannot see how Russia could be convinced to invade
Israel in the foreseeable future. The same applies to V4 etc.
(which are too weak to invade Israel successfully anyway).
#Post#: 5193--------------------------------------------------
Johann Von Leers Political Doctrine
DIR By: guest30
Date: March 31, 2021, 10:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Source :
HTML https://jcpa.org/article/the-postwar-career-of-nazi-ideologue-johann-von-leers-aka-omar-amin-the-first-ranking-german-in-nassers-egypt/
Johann von Leers, aka Omar Amin(1902-1965), was one of the
foremost antisemitic propagandists of the Third Reich. Beyond
hating Jews, Judaism, and Christianity, he possessed distinctive
geopolitical views. He advocated cooperation between Germany and
the Muslim world and, like members of the Junker class and
military elite, he viewed Russia as Germany’s natural ally.
Accordingly, he considered the Nazi invasion of the USSR a
blunder. As a young man, Leers wrote propaganda against Zionist
settlement in Mandatory Palestine and, even before the Second
World War, had reached out to Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand
Mufti of Jerusalem. In 1929, he joined the NSDAP. From
1930-1931, Leers was a member of the SA reserves and, in 1935,
he joined the Allgemeine (general) SS where he received the
honorary rank of SS-Sturmbannführer (Major).1
.....
Leers shared Haushofer’s outlook and the traditional
conservative view that Russia was Germany’s natural ally.30 Many
German ultra-conservatives considered that Russia was Germany’s
natural ally. Following this tradition, by signing of the Treaty
of Rapallo (1922), the leaders of Weimar Germany removed
Bolshevik Russia from diplomatic isolation, and General Hans von
Seeckt initiated a secret agreement of military cooperation
which enabled Germany to evade the terms of Versailles.
Trevor-Roper explained that members of the Junker class that
formed the elite of the German general staff “were consistently
opposed to war with Russia. Russia was the traditional ally of
the German Junkers, whose prejudices … still dominated the
General Staff. The Bolshevik Revolution did not alter this
alliance, for they were practical men, above mere ideological
conceptions; and in fact it was through an agreement with
Bolshevik Russia that they contrived to keep a shadow army in
existence during the dark days after Versailles ….”31
Even during the mid-1930s, Leers opposed the Nazi propaganda
campaign against Bolshevik Russia. He wrote that because of his
views he was unceremoniously fired from his teaching job (at the
Deutsche Hochschule für Politik).32 After the war, Leers again
went on record as being favorably-disposed toward Russia and its
Communist regime. For thinkers and activists of the German
nationalist right, Russia held the keys to the reunification of
Germany. For example, a CIA report of March 1959 indicated that
“he [Leers] is constantly pressing for the West German
nationalist opposition to come to an agreement with the Soviet
Union, on the theory that the Soviets should be brought in to
clean up the West.” The report added that “after such a clean-up
the Soviets should be removed by anti-colonial pressure and the
Reich restored (sic!).”33
Leers told William Stevenson of the Toronto Star that after the
war he was held in Russian and East German camps. Stevenson
reported that “he [Leers] was sent into West Germany with
Communist help, and, ironically, moved immediately into the
Vatican Line…. His propaganda themes were curious because, on
close examination, they promoted ideas that were far more
helpful to Communism than anything else: ‘The Germans will unite
again. Their natural friends are the Arabs. The Arabs must unite
under Nasser….The Egyptian song is a modest song until Father
Khrushchev joins in with his Russian balalaika.’”34 The fact
that Leers was freed from Russian and East German prison camps
also raises a basic question, namely, did he agree to work for
his captors? This is a fair question, because he consistently
demonstrated his support for the Soviet Union.
I still stand with his political doctrine, even you consider me
as "traitor", his political worldview is proper in recent
situation. Now, many anti-Zionist states like Syria, Iraq, and
Iran which still war with United States and Western European
countries-backed terrorist is supported by Mother Russia through
military and economic aid, and from the short documentary video
on my website post about interview with Vladimir Putin,
president of Russia, he consider muslim people, include muslims
in his country, is his ally and have the same fate like Russian
people, they get attacked by the Western European countries
(Including Anglo countries like United States, Canada,
Australia, and New Zealand) through economic sanction and they
also get bad image to the world because of Western media
propaganda throughout the world which portray Russians and
muslims is an enemy to the world
And is Western countries who give more aid to Israel and give
more support to Israel and Jewish people than Russia, Russia
indeed beside ally with anti-Zionist muslim states, also work
with Israel, but it just pragmatic action to keep Russia seens
as neutral in international world forum, remembering that
international political forum is dominated by the Western
countries which have more military power than Russia, if Russia
get spotted that she is openly side with anti-Western and
anti-Israel states, then the consequence is Russia get more
sanction and economic embargo from not only the Western
countries which have powerful economic strenght too beside they
also have more strong military power, but also from non-Western
countries which many of them is ally with the West too, and it
makes Russia ruined economically and because of it, Russia
easily has political and economical turmoil and she easily
destroyed, so, beside Russia try to make a good relations with
anti-Zionist states, she also pretending to be Israel allies too
for the sake of Russia's own survival, and Russia is more good
to us rather than evil Anglo and Western European countries
#Post#: 5195--------------------------------------------------
Re: Johann Von Leers Political Doctrine
DIR By: guest5
Date: April 1, 2021, 12:19 am
---------------------------------------------------------
World War II justified by former German soldiers
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PJkNZ30WV0
--- Quote ---
> Historians have written about sexual violence committed by the
armies of the Western Allies and the Red Army as these forces
fought their way into the Third Reich and during the period of
occupation.[10] On the territory of Nazi Germany, it began on 21
October 1944 when troops of the Red Army crossed the bridge over
the Angerapp creek (marking the border) and committed the
Nemmersdorf massacre before they were beaten back a few hours
later.
>
> The majority of the assaults were committed in the Soviet
occupation zone; estimates of the numbers of German women raped
by Soviet soldiers have ranged up to 2 million.[11][12][13][14]
According to historian William Hitchcock, in many cases women
were the victims of repeated rapes, some as many as 60 to 70
times.[15] At least 100,000 women are believed to have been
raped in Berlin, based on surging abortion rates in the
following months and contemporary hospital reports,[13] with an
estimated 10,000 women dying in the aftermath.[16] Female deaths
in connection with the rapes in Germany, overall, are estimated
at 240,000.[2][17] Antony Beevor describes it as the "greatest
phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has concluded that at
least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania
and Silesia alone.[18] According to Soviet war correspondent
Natalya Gesse, Soviet soldiers raped German females from eight
to eighty years old. Soviet and Polish women were not spared
either.[19][20][21] When General Tsygankov, head of the
political department of the First Ukrainian Front, reported to
Moscow the mass rape of Soviet women deported to Germany for
forced labour, he recommended that the women be prevented from
describing their ordeal on their return to Russia.[22]
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_occupation_of_Germany
--- Quote ---
> The controversy surrounding the origins of the Nazi-Soviet War
in 1941, namely over the issue of whether or not Stalin intended
to launch an offensive against Nazi Germany that year, has
produced a contentious debate between revisionist (i.e. those
who believe that Stalin was preparing for an offensive) and
orthodox historians (i.e. those who reject the notion of a
soviet offensive in 1941). First popularized by Victor Suvorov,
the ensuing debate between orthodox and revisionist historians
over Stalin’s intentions in 1941 has produced an abundance of
scholarly literature, and it is the purpose of this paper to
survey the historiography of this controversy.
--- End Quote ---
HTML http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1278/did-stalin-plan-to-attack-hitler-in-1941-the-historiographical-controversy-surrounding-the-origins-of-the-nazi-soviet-war
I believe Stalin was indeed going to attack Germany and had
amassed much of his military on the Soviet-European border and
this is why Hitler was able to get to Stalingrad as quickly as
he did, because he blew right past most of the Russian military
that was located near Europe at that time preparing for an
invasion.
#Post#: 5203--------------------------------------------------
Re: Johann Von Leers Political Doctrine
DIR By: guest30
Date: April 1, 2021, 1:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> "I believe Stalin was indeed going to attack Germany and had
amassed much of his military on the Soviet-European border..."
--- End Quote ---
Source :
HTML https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/who-were-joseph-stalin-biggest-allies-what-was-his-298994
Stalin, then, had the personal goal of achieving and keeping
power for himself, and the broader aim of modernizing his
country as fast as possible. In this last aim, he was certainly
motivated by the urgency of keeping pace with the Western powers
in an uncertain time of economic crises and world wars. However,
contrary to what pohnpei suggests, he did not necessarily
envision the spreading of Communism across the globe. This was
certainly what the likes of Lenin and Trotsky had wanted
earlier, but Stalin came to see that it was not a realistic aim
and settled on the principle of 'Socialism in One Country'. If
the Soviet Union was going to be isolated as a Communist
country, he would make sure it was strong enough to take its
place as a world power and defend itself against other nations.
So, this is Stalin policy, contrary to many historian
revisionist claim that Stalin "try to invade Germany and all of
Western Europe", Stalin just want to make Russia have balance
power with the Western Europe, so it can defend itself if any
attack or invasion from the West come.
--- Quote ---
> [b]The majority of the assaults were committed in the Soviet
occupation zone...[/b]
--- End Quote ---
That is retaliatory violence by Russian people over what
atrocities Hitler soldiers did on Russian's civilians during his
invasion to Russian soil, resulting in mass killing and
starvation which resulting around 20.000.000 deaths, so that is
fair action
--- Quote ---
> World War II justified by former German soldiers
>
>
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PJkNZ30WV0
--- End Quote ---
They just know about world political view from Hitler side, not
from all side include Stalin political worldview, had they know
what Stalin really want about his foreign's policies was, they
will be have the same thinking like Johann von Leers
Stop being Anglophile
#Post#: 5248--------------------------------------------------
Re: Johann Von Leers Political Doctrine
DIR By: Dazhbog
Date: April 3, 2021, 4:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: kameradbaren link ---
> That is retaliatory violence by Russian people over what
atrocities Hitler soldiers did on Russian's civilians during his
invasion to Russian soil, resulting in mass killing and
starvation which resulting around 20.000.000 deaths, so that is
fair action
--- End Quote ---
No, Germany's actions against Russia were retaliatory violence
for the atrocities committed by the Bolsheviks with the
complicity of the bulk of its population.
From your blog:
HTML https://kameradbaren.wpcomstaging.com/en/2021/03/30/brother-muslim-we-in-russia/
--- Quote ---
> Russia seen from the historical record always helps the
struggle of Muslims to fight the attacks of Western countries by
providing weapons and economic assistance , especially when
there was a war between arab Muslim countries and the kuffar
state of Israel from 1948
--- End Quote ---
Russia actually opposed the attack of the Arab states on Israel:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_War#Importing_arms
--- Quote ---
> Although the Arab invasion was denounced by [...] the Soviet
Union [...], it found support from the Republic of China and
other UN member states.
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote from: kameradbaren link ---
> Russia indeed beside ally with anti-Zionist muslim states,
also work with Israel, but it just pragmatic action to keep
Russia seens as neutral in international world forum,
remembering that international political forum is dominated by
the Western countries which have more military power than
Russia, if Russia get spotted that she is openly side with
anti-Western and anti-Israel states, then the consequence is
Russia get more sanction and economic embargo from not only the
Western countries which have powerful economic strenght too
beside they also have more strong military power, but also from
non-Western countries which many of them is ally with the West
too, and it makes Russia ruined economically and because of it,
Russia easily has political and economical turmoil and she
easily destroyed
--- End Quote ---
Iran is much weaker economically and militarily than Russia, yet
Iran takes a principled anti-Zionist position.
--- Quote from: kameradbaren link ---
> [...] Russia is more good to us [...]
--- End Quote ---
You must have a very warped perception of good and evil:
HTML https://informnapalm.org/en/neo-nazi-ideology-amongst-russian-mercenaries/
--- Quote ---
> Lastly, numerous photographic evidence can be found online
from conflict zones, where Russian mercenaries desecrate houses
and mosques with such symbols. Below are examples from the
Libyan conflict, where Wagner mercenaries have left [...] hate
symbols in the territories taken under their control. The
writing on the wall says in Russian: “I see mosques in Russia,
but it’s better to see them burn in hell”.
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 5249--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism's hostility towards Russia and Eastern European
people
DIR By: guest30
Date: April 3, 2021, 5:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> No, Germany's actions against Russia were retaliatory violence
for the atrocities committed by the Bolsheviks with the
complicity of the bulk of its population.
--- End Quote ---
Tell that to Russian World War 2 veterans and Russian people, if
you not got beaten to wound, I agree with your opinion
--- Quote ---
> Russia actually opposed the attack of the Arab states on
Israel:
--- End Quote ---
In later period Arab-Israeli war, Soviet Union (Russia) support
Arab muslims
Source :
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War#Weapons
Weapons
With the exception of Jordan, the Arabs relied principally on
Soviet weaponry. Jordan's army was equipped with American
weaponry, and its air force was composed of British aircraft.
Egypt had by far the largest and the most modern of all the Arab
air forces, consisting of about 420 combat aircraft,[69] all of
them Soviet-built and with a heavy quota of top-of-the-line
MiG-21s. Of particular concern to the Israelis were the 30 Tu-16
"Badger" medium bombers, capable of inflicting heavy damage on
Israeli military and civilian centers.[70]
Israeli weapons were mainly of Western origin. Its air force was
composed principally of French aircraft, while its armoured
units were mostly of British and American design and
manufacture. Some light infantry weapons, including the
ubiquitous Uzi, were of Israeli origin.
Source :
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yom_Kippur_War
You can see the "Belligerents" column and see Soviet Union
support muslim countries
Your Anglophile atittude does not make the "True Left" forum
look like serious anti-Western movement, I'm glad this forum
still not yet have any contribution real political action, so I
will step over you all with go to real political world more
early than you, and expose your movement as a secretly or
implicitly pro-Western
--- Quote ---
> Iran is much weaker economically and militarily than Russia,
yet Iran takes a principled anti-Zionist position.
--- End Quote ---
If Russia show herself as anti-Zionist country, there will be
mass economic boycott, even large scale invasion to Russian soil
and even big battle from evil NATO with its allies United
States, so that is not good political move for Russia
--- Quote ---
> You must have a very warped perception of good and evil:
>
>
HTML https://informnapalm.org/en/neo-nazi-ideology-amongst-russian-mercenaries/
--- End Quote ---
Watch my video in my website about US journalist interview with
the leader of Russia, Vladimir Putin, in reality, Russia
government not making discrimination against "muslims" as their
official policy, so the behaviour of some Russian mercenary in
Libyan conflict is just personal matter
This is my post about that, see that video once again until you
understand, international language subtitle (English) available
:
HTML https://kameradbaren.wpcomstaging.com/en/2021/03/30/brother-muslim-we-in-russia/
#Post#: 5252--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism's hostility towards Russia and Eastern European
people
DIR By: Dazhbog
Date: April 3, 2021, 5:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: kameradbaren link ---
> Tell that to Russian World War 2 veterans and Russian people,
if you not got beaten to wound, I agree with your opinion
--- End Quote ---
My opinion on anything related to Jews and Israel would get me
beaten to a pulp in any area with a heavily Zionist population
as well. That doesn't make it wrong either.
--- Quote from: kameradbaren link ---
> In later period Arab-Israeli war, Soviet Union (Russia)
support Arab muslims
--- End Quote ---
So did America and Britain regarding arms delieveries. From your
own post:
--- Quote from: kameradbaren link ---
> Jordan's army was equipped with American weaponry, and its air
force was composed of British aircraft.
--- End Quote ---
This implies that America and Britain at the very least had no
interest in seeing Israel winning or going unopposed.
--- Quote from: kameradbaren link ---
> If Russia show herself as anti-Zionist country, there will be
mass economic boycott, even large scale invasion to Russian soil
and even big battle from evil NATO with its allies United
States, so that is not good political move for Russia
--- End Quote ---
Again, Iran faces the same risks and it is a lot more vulnerable
than Russia, both economically and militarily. Yet, ever since
the Islamic revolution, Iran has never been afraid to publicly
advocate anti-Zionism.
Being a serious anti-Zionist means taking whatever risks
necessary in order to hurt Israel (and Jewry in general). Even
if your claim about Russia being secretly hostile to Israel were
true, the fact that it doesn't dare to oppose Israel openly for
the concerns you listed still indicates that Russia prioritizes
its own standing on the global stage over isolating Israel.
By the same token, the fact that you endorse Russia's behavior
shows that you aren't a serious anti-Zionist either. It is more
important for you to see Russia winning, not Israel losing.
--- Quote from: kameradbaren link ---
> Russia government not making discrimination against "muslims"
as their official policy
--- End Quote ---
Are you fucking kidding me?
HTML http://euromaidanpress.com/2020/10/01/crimean-tatars-caught-in-the-crosshairs-of-russias-war-on-muslims/
--- Quote ---
> 69 of the 99 Ukrainian political prisoners of the Kremlin are
accused of Islamic terrorism without any evidence of terrorism.
76 of them are Crimean Tatars.
>
> ...
>
> One of the reasons these cases get so little traction in the
West is because the defendants are accused of the emotive and
confusing crime of Islamic terrorism. The very word elicits
conflicted reactions in the democratic world, and Russia
exploits this masterfully.
>
> True, Russia has a real problem with Islamic terrorism.
However, according to Russian social anthropologist Denis
Sokolov, it was mainly precipitated by Russia’s own actions,
namely – the two wars against the independence-seeking Chechens
and a political terror campaign against the religious awakening
of the job-seeking migrants from Islamic village regions of the
former Soviet Union who flowed en masse into Russian cities.
>
> ...
>
> Having received a decent Islamic education and reading the
Koran in the original Arabic, they came into contrariety with
the unlettered Soviet-era “official imams” penetrated by state
security services. Part of the state “corporate” power
structure, these official religious leaders have lost their
positions and authority due to participating in financial
schemes and do not shy away from using law enforcement to
protect their religious interests.
>
> This is why in Russia Muslims are divided into the “right” and
“wrong” kind and the “wrong” ones are constantly under pressure,
Sokolov stresses.
>
> Perceiving these devout “New Muslims” as prone to separatism
and radicalism, and therefore a threat to state power, the
Russian authorities, with the abetment of the “official imams”
wanting to retain their influence, took to intimidating and
persecuting their leaders and labeling this growing community of
believers as terrorists.
>
> ...
>
> To this end, the Kremlin propagandists have constructed,
according to researcher Denis Sokolov, “a believable narrative
of war with the heroic Russian armed forces and special services
in a battle against the forces of radical Islam.”
>
> ...
>
> “Any Muslim who confesses the ‘wrong’ Islam, according to the
law enforcement or official clerics, becomes a target for the
special services. These people have drugs, cartridges, grenades
planted on them, with arrests following. A huge amount of
Muslims was forced out of Russian territory,” says Sokolov.
--- End Quote ---
Let's have a look at which organization catches the ire of the
Russian authorities in particular:
--- Quote ---
> Central to Russia’s persecution of Crimean Tatars is the
criminalization of the Hizb ut-Tahrir organization, to which
they are accused of belonging, as terrorist.
--- End Quote ---
What is Hizb ut-Tahrir all about?
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hizb_ut-Tahrir#Zionism
--- Quote ---
> Hizb ut-Tahrir (which was founded in Palestine by
Palestinians) strongly opposes Zionism and existence of the
state of Israel, or any compromise or peaceful relations with
that state. According to scholar David Commins, the "liberation
of Palestine" from Israel was the original "primary concern" of
Hizb ut-Tahrir, with the project of setting up a unitary
"Islamic state that would revive the "true" Islamic order
throughout the Muslim world coming later."
>
> ...
>
> In the 1990s, Ata Abu Rashta, (HT's current global leader and
former spokesman), proclaimed that "peaceful relations with the
Jews" or settling "for only part of Palestine" (such as the post
1967 territory of the West Bank and Gaza) is "prohibited by
Islamic Law". "None of the Jews in Palestine who arrived after
the destruction of the Ottoman Empire have the right to remain
there. The Islamic legal rule requires that those of whom are
capable of fighting be killed until none survive". Later
statements by HT spokespersons also emphasize the importance of
Islamic control of every bit of Palestine (Taji Mustafa in 2008)
and rejecting negotiation in favor of military Jihad (Imran
Wahid, January 2009).
>
> ...
>
> Hizb ut-Tahrir has used the term "one state solution" for the
Israel/Palestine dispute ("Palestine – why only a one state
solution will work"). This refers not to a Binational solution
(usually thought of in that context), where the "one state" is a
united Palestinian state with no official/state religion and
equal rights for all religions, but rather to the proposed HT
Islamic state/caliphate which would include Palestine and where
everyone, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, would follow statutory
shariah Islamic law.
--- End Quote ---
The ban on Hizb ut-Tahrir alone shows that Russia isn't
anti-Zionist.
#Post#: 5257--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism's hostility towards Russia and Eastern European
people
DIR By: guest5
Date: April 3, 2021, 7:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Russia is SO anti-Zionist that when Israeli news media stated
that Russia backs Israel vs. the ICC Russians immediately called
for Israel to remove the headline! Oh wait, that never actually
happened!
IAF strikes in Syria to persist if Iran remains; Russia backs
Israel vs ICC
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJQ_KWj1peg
Not only did that not happen, but Lavrov just publicly admitted
that Russia IS a Western country!
--- Quote ---
> Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Thursday warned that
anti-white racism might be building in the United States
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://twitter.com/MoscowTimes/status/1377837946888409092
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/duginism/
#Post#: 5259--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism's hostility towards Russia and Eastern European
people
DIR By: guest30
Date: April 3, 2021, 8:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> ... It is more important for you to see Russia winning, not
Israel losing.
--- End Quote ---
What concerning me is destroying Jews without destroying
Russians too, there is no reason about why we must destroying
Russia
--- Quote ---
> Jordan's army was equipped with American weaponry, and its air
force was composed of British aircraft.
>
> This implies that America and Britain at the very least had no
interest in seeing Israel winning or going unopposed.
--- End Quote ---
But, the quote of information which I give from Wikipedia about
Arab-Israel war in 1967 also say if many of Israel weapon is
still heavily Western origin, even until now, so that is imply
that Western countries implicitly did not want Israel to lose
--- Quote ---
> Being a serious anti-Zionist means taking whatever risks
necessary in order to hurt Israel (and Jewry in general). Even
if your claim about Russia being secretly hostile to Israel were
true, the fact that it doesn't dare to oppose Israel openly for
the concerns you listed still indicates that Russia prioritizes
its own standing on the global stage over isolating Israel.
--- End Quote ---
I not consider Russia as anti-Zionist country, but she
politically less pro-Western and Israel rather than the Western
European and Anglo countries which still holding their
oppressive global hegemony, including invading and attacking
anti-Western and Jews muslim people until now both militarily
and economically, so she (Russia) still worth to be invited to
work together for my country, remembering that my country and
many muslim states like Iran and Syria who get attacked by
Western-backed terrorist organization have mutual relation with
Russia, from Russia we get good weaponry and economic benefit
From the blog post which you quote
--- Quote ---
>
HTML http://euromaidanpress.com/2020/10/01/crimean-tatars-caught-in-the-crosshairs-of-russias-war-on-muslims/
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> ...
>
> Perceiving these devout “New Muslims” as prone to separatism
and radicalism, and therefore a threat to state power, the
Russian authorities, with the abetment of the “official imams”
wanting to retain their influence, took to intimidating and
persecuting their leaders and labeling this growing community of
believers as terrorists.
>
> ...
--- End Quote ---
Russia only oppress muslim community which tend to make
separatist movement which want to split Russian territory, not
all muslims in general, like what Anglo-Western countries did to
muslim people and muslim countries, they attack all of them,
look in historical records, many of invasion of muslim countries
and people performed by United States and its Western European
allies (Include Australia, Canada, and New Zealand)
--- Quote ---
> Central to Russia’s persecution of Crimean Tatars is the
criminalization of the Hizb ut-Tahrir organization, to which
they are accused of belonging, as terrorist.
--- End Quote ---
Hizbut Tahrir is Islamic movement who support Western-backed
Islamic military organization ISIS too, so not surprise if they
got banned in Russia, for the sake of her own safety from
terrorism, not only Russia who ban Hizbut Tahrir, but many
countries too including majority muslim countries like my
country Indonesia, Arab country Syria, Libya, Saudi Arabia,
Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Kirigistan,
Jordan, Turkey, and Malaysia, even Western European countries
who enemy to Islam also ban that organization, for example,
Germany, France, and Spain
What is Hizb ut-Tahrir all about?
--- Quote ---
>
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hizb_ut-Tahrir#Zionism
>
> Quote
> Hizb ut-Tahrir (which was founded in Palestine by
Palestinians) strongly opposes Zionism and existence of the
state of Israel, or any compromise or peaceful relations with
that state. According to scholar David Commins, the "liberation
of Palestine" from Israel was the original "primary concern" of
Hizb ut-Tahrir, with the project of setting up a unitary
"Islamic state that would revive the "true" Islamic order
throughout the Muslim world coming later."
>
> ...
>
> In the 1990s, Ata Abu Rashta, (HT's current global leader and
former spokesman), proclaimed that "peaceful relations with the
Jews" or settling "for only part of Palestine" (such as the post
1967 territory of the West Bank and Gaza) is "prohibited by
Islamic Law". "None of the Jews in Palestine who arrived after
the destruction of the Ottoman Empire have the right to remain
there. The Islamic legal rule requires that those of whom are
capable of fighting be killed until none survive". Later
statements by HT spokespersons also emphasize the importance of
Islamic control of every bit of Palestine (Taji Mustafa in 2008)
and rejecting negotiation in favor of military Jihad (Imran
Wahid, January 2009).
>
> ...
>
> Hizb ut-Tahrir has used the term "one state solution" for the
Israel/Palestine dispute ("Palestine – why only a one state
solution will work"). This refers not to a Binational solution
(usually thought of in that context), where the "one state" is a
united Palestinian state with no official/state religion and
equal rights for all religions, but rather to the proposed HT
Islamic state/caliphate which would include Palestine and where
everyone, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, would follow statutory
shariah Islamic law.
--- End Quote ---
Had Hizbut Tahrir not support ISIS, they will not got banned, I
hope Hizbut Tahrir will realize that they got dupped by
mainstream media narrative about ISIS muslim paramilitary
organization, and they will against them and show that they are
real muslim organization which have goal to defeat Western
people and Jews
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 15
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page